| 336 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Seems like the game has peaked on XFire
General Discussion « Star Wars: The Old Republic 12/27/11 1:45:55 PM
What's Xfire? |
|
|
Sub numbers went down, but revenue went WAYYYYY up from the same time last year. Which means they made more money off of less people. At the end of the day, for a business, revenue is all that matters. |
|
Originally posted by Geowash ??? Why in the world would anyone be interested in the starter edition unless they were a new player? It's simply an extended free trial. |
|
Originally posted by tazarconan
DDO was more successful after going F2P than it ever was beforehand. In fact, Turbine was overwhelmed by the success of DDO after it went F2P. So much so that they followed suit with LoTRO, which was far from a "failure". Turbine's switch to F2P was so succeessful for them, that it's encouraging most other AAA MMOs to go F2P, or at least offer an F2P option. That being said, I hate the F2P business model, and won't touch any F2P games. |
|
|
Sounds like a great concept, but Cryptic is making this game. So there you go. |
|
|
The High Priced World that is Warcraft
General Discussion « World of Warcraft 6/03/11 9:49:10 AM
LOL, so go play some crap free to play MMO if you can't afford it. WoW is worth every penny, and Blizzard knows this. Other sub-based MMOs have FTP options or free previous expansions because they are hurting for players, and their game is a stale fart compared to WoW. |
|
Originally posted by Zolgar You don't have to drop it all at once. All you need to start playing is original WoW. The expansions won't be needed until you hit 60, 70, and 80 respectively. Or if you want to roll a Draenei or Blood Elf (need BC), a Worgen or Goblin (need Cata), or use the archeology profession (need Cata). Other than those, pretty much everything else will be available from levels 1-60. |
|
|
WOW's graphics are simply the best...
General Discussion « World of Warcraft 3/24/11 12:36:27 PM
WoW's art direction is simply unmatched. It's absolutely amazing. That being said, the animations, shadows and lighting are excellent as well. On ultra settings, the game looks damn good. The only negative thing I can say about WoW's graphics are that they have mostly low resolution textures and low poly counts on the models. But, IMO, the art direction more than makes up for it, and it's the most beautiful and enchanting fantasy MMO around. |
|
|
You may never become a home owner playing World of Warcraft
General Discussion « World of Warcraft 3/15/11 3:59:38 PM
They ruin one of the main reasons to visit cities in MMOs. When crafting stations were added to housing in games like DAoC and EQ2, the main cities became ghost towns. |
|
|
You may never become a home owner playing World of Warcraft
General Discussion « World of Warcraft 3/15/11 3:33:58 PM
WoW doesn't need housing. There's plenty of other things to do in the game. If you really want housing, there are plenty of other games that offer it. While I did enjoy the housing in the MMOs I've played that have it, I really don't miss it in WoW. I'd rather they work on other things. |
|
|
While I agree that the term "WoW clone" is way overused and mostly undeserved, if there was ever a game deserving of the title "WoW clone" Rift is it. IMO, Rift is the first 'true' WoW clone. There are so many aspects of Rift that are exactly like WoW it's not funny. And I'm not talking about superficial things like they both have quests and character advancement. I'm talking very specific, obvious, blatant, intentional similarites with WoW. Their advertising even says "We're not in Azeroth anymore". Anyone who doesn't think Rift is a clone of WoW either hasn't played Rift, or hasn't played WoW, or is blind. |
|
Originally posted by erictlewis Gamebryo engine FTL. |
|
Originally posted by SaintViktor Millions and millions of them. Newsflash: Rift is already done. |
|
|
I took a Leap of faith and I'm enjoying this game : )
General Discussion « Star Trek Online 3/11/11 3:39:39 PM
Originally posted by Warjin
LOL? I love Star Trek, and I also love good MMOs, which this game is not. Star trek Online sucks ass. Bigtime. |
|
|
"After 1 year, STO worth picking up?" No. |
|
|
99 servers... is Trion making the same mistake as Mythic did with WAR?
General Discussion « Rift 3/02/11 12:22:15 PM
Originally posted by Xzen Considering the fact that Trion consists of some of the WAR team, does this surprise anyone? |
|
Originally posted by psyclum THIS. If the government wants to listen in on your Teamspeak conversation, they are already well capable of doing it. VoIP isn't going anywhere. Please take the tinfoil hat off. |
|
|
Raptr? What ever happened to Xfire? So, are people going to start quoting Raptr statisics now instead of Xfire when they try to argue about a games popularity? |
|
Originally posted by mastersomrat Really? From what source did you hear that from? Not that it matters, but from my understanding, WoW now has more subscribers than it ever did. It is far, far from "done". |
|
Originally posted by rokrow Bullshit. Rift is so much like WoW, it's not even funny. It's blatantly obvious. If you think otherwise, you are either blind, or you have never played WoW. Everything about it screams WoW. Their advertisements even say "We're not in Azeroth anymore". I hate the term "WoW clone", as it is overused, and moslty undeserved. However, if there was ever a game that deseves that title, it's Rift. In fact, I would say Rift is the first "true" WoW clone. As an above poster said, denying the similarities does not make them untrue. |
|