|
|
5/08/08 9:09 AM
|
|
Viewed 6281, Replies 61
|
|
Originally posted by girlgeek Sounds alot like me. I've quit WoW like 3 times and EQ2 twice (not currently playing either one). I'm on the bandwagon for AoC right now, but since I heard of Aion a few months ago, it has peaked my interest and is definitely on my list of watched games. The good things I've read in this thread about it has only reinforced my interest. |
|
|
|
5/08/08 8:24 AM
|
|
Viewed 2659, Replies 51
|
|
Originally posted by nitroxxx You're talking about basic MMORPG game mechanics. You'll find them in every game of the genre. It's tried and true so it isn't going to change. The problem in WoW is that for the vast majority of its players, the game offers only these basics in their most boring forms and throws in a heaping helping of grind 'til you're blind. You can't possibly apply such observations to AoC because you haven't played the game to level cap and you haven't done all there is and will be to do in this game. WoW would be an excellent game if they took out alot of the grinding requirements and added more quest lines that were even a little more involved than killing 10 boars, or 12 birds, or 15 wolves, etc. But as I said, that's the staple of MMORPGs, it just shouldn't be the only thing on the menu. If AoC follows the same formula, then I would agree with you that it's WoW all over again, but at this point, you and I simply do not know that it is. And with the list of promised features, I tend to believe it will offer more of a variety and therefore be more fun to play than WoW ever was. |
|
|
|
5/06/08 12:50 PM
|
|
Viewed 9358, Replies 43
|
|
|
Originally posted by mechrugal
As a subscriber (soon to be a former subscriber), my problem with the game now is I've seen everything there is to see in the game. One can only do Moloch and Wilds runs so many times before boredom sets in. Maybe the Abyss will breathe some new life into it, but that's what they thought about Stonehenge. After a few weeks of its release, Stonehenge was already getting boring. So I guess if you have a T2, you might want to steer clear of this game since it appears it doesn't work right over a T2. |
|
|
|
5/06/08 12:20 PM
|
|
Viewed 623, Replies 13
|
|
Originally posted by miagisan True. Because when you don't, that just makes people assume that you have nothing good to say, that all the flame trolls may actually have a valid point... the game is a mess and will take months to get it into any semblance of something that can yield more fun than frustration. I haven't cancelled my pre-order and plan on giving the game a fair shake at launch, but I'm not kidding myself either. This game is chock full of issues that can't possibly be fixed in two weeks. How can Funcom work on fixing bugs in an old build? Go check the official forums. They clearly state that they are patching the Closed Beta client with code from the OPEN BETA client to try and figure out the problems. Why would they do this for an old build? C'mon people. Use that stuff between your ears. There is no super sexy build that no one has seen. What you are seeing in OB is what it is. That's what you'll be getting when you open your retail box. Sure, there will be patches and some of the issues will be resolved with those patches, but if you expect a night and day difference between the game now and the game at launch, you'll be in for a rude awakening. I'm just hoping for enough of an improvement that I won't be tempted to sling my keyboard through the window in frustration. |
|
|
|
5/06/08 11:53 AM
|
|
Viewed 3726, Replies 85
|
|
Originally posted by daadamo
|
|
|
|
5/06/08 10:44 AM
|
|
Viewed 3773, Replies 101
|
|
Originally posted by Yukkione
|
|
|
|
2/22/08 2:00 PM
|
|
Viewed 1397, Replies 29
|
|
|
As MMOGs have become more mainstream, players' expectations have risen. They have also developed more clear ideas of what is fun to them. If a new game doesn't offer as many play-style options as WoW on the day of its release, it''s viewed as incomplete or "still in beta" or simply a crappy game. WoW has raised the bar as far as choice is concerned. It offers at least little of everything. Now people expect new games to have everything WoW does but do those things better. That's not unreasonable, but much more difficult to realize for a startup game company or really any game company that doesn't have the kind of resources Blizzard has. It will be done eventually, but I don't think it's going to happen anytime in the near future. When it does, believe me, you'll know it. |
|
|
|
2/22/08 1:30 PM
|
|
Viewed 1918, Replies 23
|
|
|
EQ2's graphics engine was designed to scale as video technology improved. I'm not sure technology has yet advanced to the point that any but possibly the highest end graphics cards can run it at max settings. If you leave shadows off, you can probably set everything else to max with a really good video card. Even then, you'd probably have to tune it back down some in high traffic areas like cities and raids. An ATI 2600XT isn't even in the ballpark for doing this. If you have an nVidia 8800 GTX, you can get pretty close to maxed-out. |
|
|
|
2/22/08 10:24 AM
|
|
Viewed 4421, Replies 95
|
|
Originally posted by Mistick
|
|
|
|
2/22/08 9:32 AM
|
|
Viewed 2448, Replies 37
|
|
Originally posted by IceAge Save your review. It's already been done by professionals. Bottom line, the game blows. |
|
|
|
2/22/08 9:21 AM
|
|
Viewed 2087, Replies 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/08/08 8:11 AM
|
|
Viewed 1727, Replies 33
|
|
|
Originally posted by mo0rbid
I like the environments in WoW. I hate the character and armor models. Most of the weapon graphics are decent, but I have to give a huge thumbs down to character/armor graphics in general. In EQ2, there is a lack of diversity in alot of the armor and weapons, but at least what they have doesn't look like clown attire. |
|
|
|
2/08/08 8:02 AM
|
|
Viewed 2218, Replies 51
|
|
|
Originally posted by Pappy13
I was going to say Blizz went with quantity over quality, but really, the quantity isn't all that much compared to some other mainstream MMOs. The quality is definately lacking. For a company pulling in the kind of money they are, they sure do move really slow... I always think of a big juggernaut that can barely move under its own weight. Maybe the success has gotten to them and they don't give a crap about creating fun content anymore. All they seem to be able to do is crank out the boring grind content. I guess there are enough people out there that eat this kind of inferior crap up that that's all they really need to do. /shrug Well, if they continue that way, you can bet there will be a "WoW killer" MMO at some point. And the longer Blizz continues to crank out crap content, the less it will take for another game to steal a huge chunk of their player base. And yes, some people will never be satisfied, thankfully. Better than those people that are easily amused and just take whatever crap content they are sold and think that's the best there is. I'd rather be in the crowd that expects more than a grinding snorefest of a game. |
|
|
|
2/08/08 7:33 AM
|
|
Viewed 1435, Replies 30
|
|
Originally posted by mindw0rk See, I'm the exact opposite. I've played Mythos and didn't care for it. Not that it's bad, just not what I enjoy. |
|
|
|
1/14/08 8:23 AM
|
|
Viewed 414, Replies 10
|
|
|
As you have deduced, I think the games with the "hard-core" playstyle are a thing of the past. I too played EQ 1 for about 4 years and began wandering as the MMO offerings began to expand. My first excursion from EQ was to Dark Age of Camelot. Not a bad game, especially if you like RvR PvP. I also note the absence of WoW on your played list. If you've never played it, I think you need to at least check it out to see what all the hullabaloo is about. It's not a bad game, although it does get boring at end game if you're not in a raiding guild or into alts. If nothing else, it's a great time-killer while waiting for the MMO explosion we'll be seeing later this year. |
|
|
|
1/14/08 8:05 AM
|
|
Viewed 156, Replies 3
|
|
|
ALL free games are good for nothing more than a few hours of amusement. If you want deep, long-term enjoyment, you're going to have to pay for it. I think you might have got the PvE/PvP labels backwards for WoW and GW. 2008 is going to be a great year for MMOs. If you don't want to spend money, then you're going to miss out on the best gaming of all time. |
|
|
|
1/14/08 8:00 AM
|
|
Viewed 3390, Replies 63
|
|
Originally posted by Thecrow12345
|
|
|
|
1/09/08 2:49 PM
|
|
Viewed 770, Replies 13
|
|
|
Not enough to make the game more fun... unless you enjoy grinding endless hours be it for faction or gear. TBC was a big disappointment IMO. |
|
|
|
1/09/08 2:25 PM
|
|
Viewed 3068, Replies 64
|
|
|
Blizzard will have to make some huge, HUGE changes in most of their basic design philosophies in order to make WoW truly FUN to play instead of just a grind for gear in both PvP and PvE. Personally, I don't think they have it in them. WotLK will be just another grindfest with maybe a handful of bright spots in an otherwise boring treadmill just like the rest of the game. I hope I'm wrong here, but I have really lost faith in them. They will have to do something really spectacular for me to even consider buying the next expansion. |
|
|
|
1/09/08 10:57 AM
|
|
Viewed 1303, Replies 10
|
|
Originally posted by dougmysticey Same here. Before the patch I usually couldn't play more than an hour or two with crashing. Since then, I have played several sittings up to 3 or 4 hours with no problems. It is MUCH improved if not completely fixed. The game is coming along nicely and if you haven't played it with the most recent patch in place, then you have nothing to complain about. |
|