|
|
6/27/08 9:53 AM
|
|
Viewed 213, Replies 8
|
|
|
Good boy, you are the devs ideal customer. |
|
|
|
6/24/08 10:54 AM
|
|
Viewed 1876, Replies 83
|
|
|
All these games together won't have half the amount of subs you write in 2010.
Peoples will be moving to new titles. I for 1 will never play a must-raid/PvP game, and I am not alone...many players have such a strong stance but only against 1 aspect...and many other things to consider. The point is, these titles rinse and repeat the same mistakes, over and over and over again, up to Ad Nauseum. The smallest injury if not treated could lead to severe consequences.
|
|
|
|
6/23/08 7:46 AM
|
|
Viewed 2988, Replies 80
|
|
|
Simple is good.
Complexity for the sake of complexity was never Gary's goal. New rules where added to make the game better, this simplification is well done IMO. |
|
|
|
6/19/08 3:18 PM
|
|
Viewed 972, Replies 51
|
|
|
Fanbois are dangerous for their own game.
Trolls are amusing/boring, nobody really give a damn what they say 99% of the time. When devs listen to their trolls (1% of the time), treat them as fanbois instead, they are just as bad, in these occasions.
Devs need a spine and to ignore fanbois (and trolls) and just analyze/figure out what is best on their own, fanbois and trolls should be read only as part of a brainstorm activity, never as part of a serious opinion/direction for their game. Cause trolls and fanbois have 1 good thing, they usually have tons of ideas...so for a brainstorming, if the devs have the spines, they are actually good. Saddly, when devs lack spines and are desesperate to please their investors, reading these guys is actually extremely dangerous...especially that they have no vision, no long-term goal, only a mine of brainstorm ideas. |
|
|
|
6/13/08 12:39 PM
|
|
Viewed 487, Replies 3
|
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rw8gE3lnpLQ
World of World of Warcraft. They will use the WWW instead of WoWoW apparently for a sigle.
Complementary information directly from Blizzard CEO could be found here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0&feature=related
|
|
|
|
5/26/08 10:21 AM
|
|
Viewed 1284, Replies 90
|
|
|
In no precise order: USA, France, Sweden, Lithuanie, Turkey, Canada except Ontario(french hatred over there, I run out of patience with them "Lindros-syndrom"), Russia, South Korea, Singapoure would mostly be of interest to visit/settle down. I guess it would most likely depend on life opportunities over there.
French Guinea, New Caledonie, New Zeland, Japan, Vietnam, Taiwan, Gabon and most other Europeans countries would also be appealing, even if less than the above countries.
The idea here is to keep your horizons open and wide, you never knows. I would likely frown at the mention of other places, but eh, maybe, why not. I am extremely happy with Quebec city however and I dunno if I would move anytime soon, I guess a job or a girl could make me move! :P |
|
|
|
5/21/08 11:15 AM
|
|
Viewed 1020, Replies 74
|
|
|
LOL
Name me 1 game which deserve that I upgrade my computer.
The best MMO out there is City of Villains (not even a close call, it outmatch each and every other MMO soo easily it is presponderous), it runs fine on a computer which was top-notch in 2003. A computer which is more recent? Why? I hardly see any use for it.
I have 2k on the side ready...for 2 years now. And no game is even remotedly worth that I spent this money. Make a good game and we will talk again. Release crap with high requirements and I will just laugh at your sillyness.
Non-MMO wise...Civ IV: Beyond the Sword/Medieval Total War (the 2nd also runs well, but I don't like it so uninstall it) also run extremely well. I am starving for good games, and there are not just coming. Go ahead, focus on this PvP/FPS/Whatever, I can wait.
LOOKING FOR A GAME...and/or a girl! :P |
|
|
|
5/15/08 8:51 PM
|
|
Viewed 332, Replies 5
|
|
|
I just purchase a pre-paid time card (no CC anymore since I cancel it, thanks to Sony).
Me is in a fool mood however. :P Carefull, interact only with extreme care. Girls are evil! :P |
|
|
|
5/09/08 6:32 AM
|
|
Viewed 7919, Replies 88
|
|
|
Originally posted by YagyuJubei
You put words I never spoke in my mouth.
I want to never be mez by minions/lieutnants/bosses. Not the same. Again, PvP obviously screw PvE, as you main argument is solely about PvP! Which is completely and totally irrelevant for a player as me. I don't care if there is 1 or 50 lieutnants, they are not supposed to mez a dark batman, a dark superman, a dark powered tanking villain. |
|
|
|
5/09/08 6:30 AM
|
|
Viewed 203, Replies 3
|
|
|
I would always recommend /dark cause you can then play and relax.
Force Field for example...it is a constant hassle if you want to buff your pets. |
|
|
|
5/09/08 6:24 AM
|
|
Viewed 1003, Replies 36
|
|
|
LOL.
The worst part of it, I can relate to you!
Let's start the beaten & abused gamers association! :P |
|
|
|
5/08/08 8:23 PM
|
|
Viewed 7919, Replies 88
|
|
|
Originally posted by boognish75
Nah it is not a bug. The way the game work, the stun status is a stacking effect (mag 2+ mag 2 + mag 2 + mag 2 + mag 3 would beat a stun resist of 11, which is what most brutes have...so 5 minions/lieutnants perfectly timed could stun any brute, the mag effect usually last on the target between 1-10 seconds for stacking purpose). Eventually, if you stack enought of the weakest stun, you would stun anything. Which, IMO, isn't acceptable. A level 50 brute shouldn't be stunned by lowly attacks, no matter how many of these. Especially in a game which is supposedly group-oriented.
See, casuals players and soloers won't see this at all. But the ultra-endgame oriented players will see this, I am not even sure the devs themselves understand the issue. The lack of understanding of some devs, if not all of them, still doesn't justify this design orientation. It affect only 1% of the players, it is still a design mistake, shafting 1% or 100% of your players is a mistake regardless. |
|
|
|
5/08/08 8:16 PM
|
|
Viewed 509, Replies 21
|
|
|
Other: Have differents penalties for different server rules. |
|
|
|
5/08/08 8:02 AM
|
|
Viewed 7919, Replies 88
|
|
|
Originally posted by Rhoklaw
Been able to resist stuff like stun from minions/lieutnant/bosses is a BASIC concern. I don't see, why, suddenly, at level 50 when you fight a LOT of stuff, it should suddenly be a new weakness on my character when in a full group. I developp this character a LOT. I enjoy more challenge and all, but I don't enjoy, not even for 1 second, the idea to have to compensate for a weakening vs what I am used to.
The peoples who tanks shouldn't be affected by stun, except maybe on a few very rare occasions, definitely not bosses/lieutnants/minions, no matter how many of them.
The idea is not to have an "I Win" profession, it is to have a logical profession. I never see a tank/warrior/whatevertankingclassname been stunned by weak minions/lieutnants/bosses in any other MMO, and then toasted because they have been stunned. See, someone who fullfill a role, must be given the proper tools to fullfill it. If the casuals don't experience this, it doesn't mean it is properly balance, it means most players won't experience it, but that doesn't make it right. |
|
|
|
5/07/08 9:31 AM
|
|
Viewed 832, Replies 39
|
|
|
CoX for me as well.
See, the first point which make it best grouping game is that you don't absolutely needs a group. So, you didn't find a group(rare but may happen in any game), why don't you solo 1 mish or 2 for 15-30 minutes and recheck later, odds are that you will be invited before you finish your first mission.
The fact ANY group could work (if the players can figure out how to adapt to this new group config) make it extremely group-friendly. You are 7 stalkers and you see an 8th LFG? You CAN group him. A/S will be insanely funny (not for the mobs).
Also, the fact you have a GLOBAL name make it easier for your friends to track you down, and propose you some grouping options for toons which you are not currently playing.
You can also join a group anytime, the mission will scale.
So, quick review: - Can solo, no need to wait boringly and most likely will be invited while soloing. - Can group anyone, every combos could work. - Can track friends on alternates toons with ease. - Easy to jump in and quit at any moment without shafting the group or having it too easy. |
|
|
|
5/06/08 12:08 PM
|
|
Viewed 1094, Replies 17
|
|
|
*shrug*
I did more "endgame content" in this MMO than in ANY other MMO, and I did raid-non-stop for a few months back in EQ (seems like an eternity).
Quality is better than quantity. |
|
|
|
5/05/08 12:32 PM
|
|
Viewed 1379, Replies 44
|
|
|
Indeed.
I never give that game a chance. Core design issue. Best groupers are peoples who do a little of everything, aka not groupers. This is NOT acceptable. I am angry just thinking about the conclusion before even starting the journey, this is definitely bad in entertainment! Losers would try to change me, winners will change! |
|
|
|
5/05/08 11:53 AM
|
|
Viewed 317, Replies 10
|
|
|
They are not xenophobic, they are putting a high priority on trust, friendship, loyalty and a few other such qualities.
I am usually ignored/help from such group of players, but sometimes they invite silly me.
This is about ALL MMOs, not precisely this 1. And it is not only 1 cultural group that does the same, I can tell you the Frenchs does it even more. :P Yet again, paragons of freedom will usually come from cultures which are promiting the group and the well beeing of the many over that of individuals. :P
Even if English is the "norm", it is pretty much the exception. It is the neutral ground where everyone meets everyone. |
|
|
|
5/02/08 9:32 AM
|
|
Viewed 1221, Replies 53
|
|
|
Good luck getting a refund from Sony even if you are lawfull and rightfully deserve it.
That is a clear sign of greed. |
|
|
|
5/02/08 9:28 AM
|
|
Viewed 2146, Replies 80
|
|
|
I like to know what my role is, and what my friend roles are. But I am open-minded to intelligent alternatives.
I can't stand raiding nor EvE nor PvP nor RvR. I simply wants to group. Nothing less, nothing more. From day 1, to the last day where I win/lose and decide to quit. Soloing is also an interesting option for me if for any reason grouping isn't working.
Raid/PvP/RvR all you want...without me or the like of me. PUGs lovers are a key part of a successfull community, no matter if you like to PUG or not...and if they are ghetto (ghetto rewards...), you will have ghetto players there...and a shortage of good ol's groupers. The health of a MMO, for me, it is judged by the quality of it PUGing.
For PUGs, key roles is good. Doesn't have to be as static as EQ, games like CoX advances the setting and more or less change this trinity thingy, up to the point peoples disagree what the trinity is.
Again, no PUGs, no game. :P |
|