Ok, take this for example.  Got it from Ten Ton Hammer

Fighting the Zealot

The best way to deal with a zealot is by disrupting the complex network of interconnected effects and abilities which can make him so powerful. There are several ways to do this, the most obvious being the use of magic which helps protect you from his Harbingers or strips Marks from his allies. Alternatively, you might wish to attack the Zealot as a priority, but he is hardly the soft target that he might appear to be. You must weigh this option against the possibility that his allies will gain a critical edge while you attempt to eliminate the Zealot himself.

I am 100% positive there will be.  Whats my reasons for this assumption?  Don't have one, there just has to be. 

The game of WoW doesn't attract me at all.  The only thing that attracts me about WoW is my friends.  But now, that ins't even strong enough to pull me back to that game. 

All I can say is, the best games aren't MMO's.  I think WoW burned me out on the genre. 

Heh.  Goes to show what kind of morons run our censorship in the US.  Why does it even matter what the ESRB says.  I mean what you just stated ^ "Land of the free"  Oh well I just I can just blame Bush for mistaking the Constitution for toilet paper.  

Censorship is for the weak.  If it says 18+ or M or w/e, then they should be able to put whatever they want in it, even if its Dana Kirkpatrick's beaver.  After all, they did warn us didn't they?  They are supposed to check kiddies ID's aren't they?  Maybe its time I move "elsewhere" in Europe. 

And to think, I wrote all that because I won't get to see nipples.  WHATS THE DEAL?  EVERYONE HAS A PAIR 6-12 INCHES FROM THEIR FACE, DEPENDING ON HOW FAR THEY SAG!

Any word on the type of PvE its going to have?  Are the "dungeons" going to be insteanced (like WoW) or open (like EQ2) or are they even going to have dungeons at all ( crazy I know).  I havent been able to find hardly any literature right now, and if anyone else has please let me know. 

Personally I am hoping they're more like EQ2, because WoW instances are sooo cookie cutter.  By that I mean you have to have 5 people every single time with the same cookie cutter makeups (1 tank 3 dps 1 healer).  In EQ2 you can run with almost any combination, or even with just 2 or 3 players instead of a full 6 in a group every single time.  A lot more flexibility that way. 

Anyway hope this wasn't a hijack.  Thought it was fitting for the whole lot of pve thing. 

RIP STO.  You'll always live in my dreams!

I would hit up Planeshift, its free.  Totally free.  RF Online is another free to play game, although to what extent of free it is,  I am not sure.  Tons of free trials out there and stuff. 

they have dungeons now?  I only played pre-CU and the only thing they had back then was the jedi cave to grind crystals and the Corellian cruiser instance lol.

The bugs didn't bother me.  SWG at launch was the greatest game I had ever seen.  Given it was my first MMO and then I discovered EVE Online, which was equally as good.  It was Star Wars.  No one knew how to get jedi, infact you couldn't until about 6 months later.  But I fear, everyone was playing it for that exact purpose, which was the downside of having a STar Wars game set in that time.  It would have been a lot better to have it set in the KOTOR world, and hopefully Bioware comes out with their game. 

Long live the OP.

Pre-Cu, it was my favorite thing in the world, well, it was my first MMO ever so of course I thought it was great.

I would give a go again with little reservation.  Well, as long as I could have 3 rancors out at the same time again, that was so cheap

If it's as enjoyable as KOTOR, then it will work, until the main quest line, or story, ends.  But, I am sure, while somethings might make you use some NPC's for grouping, if they have instances or anything they will be all player groups.  Or at least I am hoping they are because I saw absolutely no point for me even to be connected to the Internet when playing Guild Wars. 

I don't want the next game to be as "easy".  Yes, how else could they get 7 or 8 million subscribers?  I guess Im just too tired of shitheads and people who haven't hit puberty yet. 

I guess what I am saying is the game, any game,  needs a lot more

D

E

P

T

H

My experience is this:  if you don't have any friends playing with you, then EQ2 is a bitch, plain and simple.  I have played EQ2 on and off a lot, and have never found it fun without company.  That being said, its easy enough to find a guild in game, but it may take a while considering you need to be at a medium level before most of the good ones will take you, and getting to the 30's solo is just too much for me to bare because I couldn't find anyone else to group with (Lucan D'lere server).