| 32 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Israel attacks Lebanon, leaving many dead
Off-Topic Discussion « General Discussion 7/25/06 11:17:11 PM
Well, I have sofar resented a lot of facts. Each and everyone one of which is on public record like the statements of US WMD envoy Kay, former Republican StateSec Powell, UN WMD envoy Hans Blix, etc. You on the other hand have sofar only brought insults. I look forward to reading your facts. A debate is a give-and-take, a presentation of different points-of-view, of different facts. It is not a collection of only 'Yes'-sayers. |
|
|
Israel attacks Lebanon, leaving many dead
Off-Topic Discussion « General Discussion 7/25/06 11:11:31 PM
Turkey will have to wait a long time before joining the EU. Its civil liberties and human rights record are still too bad. See the oppression of the Kurds as one example of that. Also they are still denying the Armenian genocide. The Roman Empire point is correct, though I admit that I fail to see its importance here. Lebanon and Iraq were also part of the Mongol Empire, yet you don't see Mongolia fretting over it. The EU btw, especially France, is very nvolved. It was left to the French President, Jacques Chirac, to call most clearly for a ceasefire, a resumption of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, and the implementation of Resolution 1559, “on the clear understanding—and all the Lebanese have to understand and recognize this— that there cannot be a politically stable Lebanon shouldering her responsibilities and pursuing her development, a democratic Lebanon, if part of her territory is occupied by militia who do not obey the central Lebanese government.” |
|
|
Israel attacks Lebanon, leaving many dead
Off-Topic Discussion « General Discussion 7/25/06 10:58:48 PM
And that comment contributes to the debate going anywhere how? |
|
|
Israel attacks Lebanon, leaving many dead
Off-Topic Discussion « General Discussion 7/25/06 10:31:03 PM
Europe is not on the same continent as the war. The Iraq war and the Israeli-Lebanon conflict are both in Asia.
Actually the European Central Bank thinks the € is too strong vs. the US$. A strong € makes European exports into the US more expensive, while foreign imports paid in US$ become cheaper. They'd prefer a 1:1 parity. I'd be less worried about the € and more about Beijing. If China starts calling in those Federal Bonds and the US has nothing to pay them back with, China will be in its right to confiscate any collateral the US might have used to secure those Federal Bonds, i.e. gold reserves, land, etc. The US is currently the world's main spender and consumer and no longer a producer. Last year Germany, in a deep economic crisis and with only 30% of the population, created and exported more goods than the US. |
|
|
Israel attacks Lebanon, leaving many dead
Off-Topic Discussion « General Discussion 7/25/06 9:34:40 PM
Juiceman, I doubt that would have done anything to the US economy. The US $ is still the world's main reserve currency, while the € is a very young, and untested one. The current US budget and US national debts are far more dangerous, as is the US dependency on oil. Get rid of those 1mile/gallon (ok, exaggeration, but not by much) SUVs and use a high-efficiency compact car instead. The US is at the moment loaning money from China and then giving it right back to China by buying Chinese goods. Just check the origin of most non-food consumer goods in your average WalMart. The average US credit card debt is a staggering US$ 8.500!!! US Federal Interest rates have only been going up since 2001 making bank debts and mortgages more expensive. The average US savings index is now negative, i.e. US consumersc are actually spending more money than they get in. If anything is going to crack the US economy, that is. Not the €. |
|
|
Israel attacks Lebanon, leaving many dead
Off-Topic Discussion « General Discussion 7/25/06 8:40:12 PM
Ok, for the first that list is terrible. Several of the points are actually repeats of one another, like 9 and 11. Also, most, if not all, have meanwhile been proven to be lies. Ad.1) What WMD? Dr. Kay, a WMD specialist hand-picked by President Bush and SecDef Rumsfeld and approved by a Republican Congress, toured Iraq extensively after the war. No WMD. The US armed forces in Iraq have sofar come up with nothing tangible. Narly every site then StateSec Powell pointed out in that infamous UN speech has been proven NOT to be WMD. Powell now distances himself from that speech. Ad. 2/5/7) The US declared war on Iraq, which had no WMD, which had no intent to attack the US and was generally just a bigmouth well-contained. North Korea has nuclear weapons and has declared its intentions to attack the US with such weapons if threatened. The US reaction to that: talks. As for regime change and dictators, no US military action on Belarus's Lukashenko, none on Zimbabwe's Mugabe, none on any dictators and potentates around the world. Not even n Cuba's Castro, the perennial bad man of US politics. ad. 3) So, instead of hunting down Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan, who orchestrated the bombing of the WTC parking garage, the bombing of the US Juan Cole, the bombing of the US embassies in East Africa, and not least the master mind of 9/11, you go after Saddam Hussein, who had no connection to that at all. Furthermore, 15 of the 20 9/11 terrorists were Saudi. none was Iraqi. Yet Saudi-Arabia is untouched and Iraq in pieces. ad .4) Iraq was in violation of one UN resolution. Israel is currently in violation of UN resolutions 106,111, 127, 162, 171, 228, 237, 248, 250, 251, 252, 256, 259, 262, 265, 270, 271, 279, 280, 285, 298, 313, 316, 317, 332, 337, 347, 425, 427, 444, 446, 450, 452, 465, 467, 468, 469, 471, 476, 478, 484, 487, 497, 498, 501, 509, 515, 517, 518, 520, 573, 587, 592, 605, 607, 608, 636, 641, 672, 673, 681, 694, 726, 799. 32 further were veto'ed by the US. ad 5)(again) Example: Equatorial Guinea. A dictatorship. With lots of oil. Which it sells to the US. The President has lately declared protesting against him an act of terrorism. He has forbidden newspapers and bookshops as 'he will tell the people what they need to know.' He has said that criminals, including people who want to vote against him or protest against him, have no human rights. Another example the vote fraud riots in Uzbekistan which the US ignored because it needs the Uzbecki air bases. Reaction from the White House: not a peep. The US is doing the same in the WoT as it did with comminism during the cold war. Any two-bit dictator who declares himself an anti-terrorist gets US help. Even if it means ignoring the actions of said dictator. At the same time any action against terrorist declared by whomever get seal-of-approval from the US. ad. 6) Hans Blix was the chief UN weapons inspector in Iraq. He and his teams scoured the country for WMDs. None were ever found. See ad.1) for what the Bush-chosen inspections found. ad 7) And some liberation it is. Oilfields and the oil ministery are protected. schools, hosptals, museums and ibraries are not and therefore plundeed and burned. The Iraqi National Museum still lists 7000 items as missing. The FBI has a list of some of them on its website. The Iraqi National Library was burnt down, destroying books and writings from the first sultanate. Theinsurgency has now been in its 'last throes' for several years. Iraq has 'turned a corner' more often than your average Indy 500 driver. There is still no permanent water or electricity supply in most of the major cities. The Kurds are about to split off, triggering a war with Turkey whch does not want a free Kurdstan. The Shi'ites are about to join Iran. Iraq is on the brink of civil war with 'only' 3600 dead this month sofar. A statue toppled for the media is no liberation. ad 8) What Al-Qaeda connections? The closest proven connection ever was a contact between an Iraqi ntelligence officer and an Al Qaeda operative in Prague. Else nothing. And I'm pretty sure that Bush and the White House would have shouted it from the rooftops if they had found any true proof. Also Iraq was a secular Ba'athist nation, Saddam and the Ba'athist party above all. Al Qaeda are radical-fundamentalist islamist, Allah and Islam above all. Not compatible. ad 9.) Threat? He was a big bluffing, blustering bigmouth with no weapons. If that's all it takes for the US to declare someone an 'imminent threat' and invade, they'd need to invade half the planet. ad 10) see above. No WMD, nothing to disarm. ad 11.) see above. Saddam was all mouth, no action. |
|
|
Israel attacks Lebanon, leaving many dead
Off-Topic Discussion « General Discussion 7/23/06 10:56:23 AM
Read between the lines. It is inferred. An armed force cannot order a civilian population to leave. They can ask them to, but not order it. If th civilian population chooses not to leave, then the armed force must, within reasonable limits, work around them. They can't just say 'You were warned' and bomb it all to pieces. I think the Lebanese government would love to get Hezbollah out of Lebanon, they just don't have the means to it. They just ended 18 years of Israeli occuation followed by 6 years of Syrian occupation. The NYC Police is better armed than the Lebanese Army. Give their armed forces the physical means to remove Hezbollah, tanks, small arms, figghter jets, a navy, and they'll do it in full compliance with UN resolution 1559. They might then however ask that Israel then follows UN resolutions 106,111, 127, 162, 171, 228, 237, 248, 250, 251, 252, 256, 259, 262, 265, 270, 271, 279, 280, 285, 298, 313, 316, 317, 332, 337, 347, 425, 427, 444, 446, 450, 452, 465, 467, 468, 469, 471, 476, 478, 484, 487, 497, 498, 501, 509, 515, 517, 518, 520, 573, 587, 592, 605, 607, 608, 636, 641, 672, 673, 681, 694, 726, and 799, which Israel sofar all ignores. |
|
|
Israel attacks Lebanon, leaving many dead
Off-Topic Discussion « General Discussion 7/23/06 9:29:55 AM
One name: Timothy McVeigh. |
|
|
Israel attacks Lebanon, leaving many dead
Off-Topic Discussion « General Discussion 7/23/06 9:28:44 AM
Protocol I, Art. 50 & 51, condensed The civilian population is protected under the Geneva Conventions and these protections are not affected by the presence of combatants in the population. (Protocol I, Art. 50, Sec. 3) These protections include the right to be free from attacks, reprisals, acts meant to instill terror, and indiscriminate attacks. Civilian populations must not be used as civilian shields. (Protocol I, Art. 51) As for terrorism being used as a military tactics, that too is forbidden by the Geneva Conventions. So since they were instituted armies and commanders who use it, tend to find themselves declared criminals and executed. Nuremberg and its Japanese equivalent come to mind. Arrests are never easy, thus you pay taxes so propfessional policemen can do it. Many criminals are heavily armed and few go wilingly, yet justice somehow still seems to work. Ironically, the UK has a few days ago sent an official complaint through its ambassador to Israel. The UK demands that any glorification/memorials regarding the Irgun attack on the King David Hotel be stopped and that Israel recognize it as an act of terrorism. The UK had declared Irgun a terrorist organisation. It had declared the bombing of the King David Hotel an act of errorism. Israel has chosen to ignore all that. The leader of Irgun Menachem Begin still made it to be prime minister. Just shows you the typical development: yesterday's terrorist is today's freedom fighter is tomorrow's head-of-state. |
|
|
Israel attacks Lebanon, leaving many dead
Off-Topic Discussion « General Discussion 7/22/06 10:55:40 PM
Personally I'm not too impressed. The destruction of the newly built Beirut Lighthouse on the Corniche, the Beirut harbour promenade, is a good example. No military function, almost purely built as a sign of Beirut's renewal after decades of civil war and to serve its yacht harbour, yet the Israelis destroyed it on day one. They may claim dual-use (military and civilian), it doesn't fly for me. If Syria is supporting Hezbollah, they'd do so by land, not through a harbour that is watched by the Lebanese Chrstians and Druse as well. Same for Beiruts newly-built airport. As for the Israeli claims that they are warning the population to move away from the warzone, that too is both deeply ironic and border-line war crime. Ironic, for how exacly is the civilian population to withdraw into safety when the roads, railraods and bridges have been bombed to impassability? Border-line war crimes, because displacing civilians in war is illegal under the Geneva Conventions. Terrorism is a crime., not an act-of-war. Arrest them, put them through the mills of justice like any other criminal and incarcerate them for life. By declaring them military targets you glorify them and their actions as brave resistance against whatever. By executing them you glorify them as martyrs for the faith. |
|
|
Israel attacks Lebanon, leaving many dead
Off-Topic Discussion « General Discussion 7/22/06 9:18:17 PM
There is also that little often neglected thing called 'military law'. A soldier who kills a civillian without justification becomes a murderer, even in a warzone. Military law is far more ruthless than civil law, so the death penalty awaits. Both under the US Code of Military Justice as well as international military law. And calling out that you were only 'following orders', doesn't help you either. The US, UK, France and USSR together made that quite clear in the Nuremberg Trials. |
|
|
Israel attacks Lebanon, leaving many dead
Off-Topic Discussion « General Discussion 7/21/06 4:27:53 PM
Israel wants Lebanon to disarm the Hezbollah.
What they don't tell you is that in the 18 years Lebanon was partly occupied by Israel, they couldn't do that themselves. Now they expect Lebanon, which just shook off Syrian occupation, and has virtually no armed forces, to do it. |
|