I feel dumber even opening this thread .. This is moronic and the what the OP says is pure fallacy..

"A fallacy is an argument which provides poor reasoning in support of its conclusion. Fallacies differ from other bad arguments in that many people find them psychologically persuasive. That is, people will mistakenly take a fallacious argument to provide good reasons to believe its conclusion. An argument can be fallacious whether or not its conclusion is true.

Example

Argument: Cutting people is a crime. Surgeons cut people. Therefore, surgeons are criminals.
Problem: Cutting people is only sometimes a crime. "

Just curious, from the vids i have seen there are cutscenes with no voice acting at all.. But i have also seen vids with japanese voice acting.. So i am wondering if its just bc of it being a beta that there isnt any english cutscenes or english voice acting at all? Will there be?

Originally posted by Emotions

First off I doubt it will dent wow population cause wow is still growing.
Second, if you read up on the forums you would know that pvp players from wow don't like the "slow" combat in this game. So I doubt those people will come here.

My gueses this game will get about 2 million max people (hopefully more)

And no it is not a wow killer. Cause wow is to casual based pve and warhammer is more of a casual/hardcore based pvp game.

 I wouldnt say that WoW is a casual pve game.. there is so much grinding in that game it remindes me of playing EQ sometimes.. huge timesinks for everything .. Raiding ... you might have to give up your job and girlfriend to do that, i know i wasnt able to so i never really raided.. Even the pvp in Wow is a grind and not even fun.. lets all do race AV over and over and over and over and over..

Yay finally started.. not sure how you guys get so fast dl's , i have a 100mb conection and i am only getting about 275-300kbs

Mine keeps freezing while updating .. never gets done..

Originally posted by Belsameth

 

Originally posted by singsofdeath

 

As for the rest....well, I am will really be bummed out not to have -CELEBRITIES- playing with me. I really miss my WoW sessions with Angelina. She had such a great way to motivate people to Raids.

 

 

 

That comment made me LOL irl :(

 

Anyway. Conan might fail, I'm still on the fence about that. (Even tho I keep my CE pre-ordered)

But giving an open beta of 13 levels won't have anything to do with it. I'm actually quite happy about it. So far everybody I saw complaining about it are people I rather not have in the same game as me :)

Might fail? you serious? Must be playing a different pvp weekend then i am.. Even all the worst pug groups i played in were ok.. But when you get into a fight with good players and your friends backing you up its a blast..

I am using the gamespot dl manager now.. working perfect for me so far.. 100% on 2 .. working on  3 and 4.. cruising at a good 300kb average..

I say it should be allowed.. then it would matter if you can trust your guild or not =)..

Brings a bit more politics into it..

Good to see my thread is still around.. I didnt see any threads about this so i am glad it answerd some questions..

Basicly all the threads right now are not about the game , but rather if it will be good or not.. it has yet to be seen so there really is no point in talking about it..

/bump

A little basicly the short of it.. Aquilonians and Chimmeran can both be barbarians.. So would one race be "better" at that class or both equal but different look...

Like i was saying.. ive looked around on the offical forums and such and couldnt find a answer..

If i was to make a Barbarian .. would a Aquilonian make just a good of a barbarian as a Chimmerian?

Just curious because i kinda like the roman history and i wanted to try a barbarian .. But i dont want to play a gimp version of a barbarian heh..

Any info would be great..

Ill prob go with a barbarian to start... then make a bear shaman, necro or ranger alt..

I think that any MMO should have it.. bc if you dnot aftera  while tradeskills become pretty much pointless bc you get 1 of the best swords or set of armor and you never have too buy anything ever again..

I would think that if your weapons and armor can break it would make it more real and actually make a trade system usefull..

Turning into a demon and undead sounds really cool too.. i might try a mage then.. bc i like pet classes .. but ill prob try a rogue too

---

Originally posted by Araknyd

---

Originally posted by millbro

Originally posted by Araknyd

Originally posted by GameloadingI really don't understand some of the people here. people already predict this game is going to fail, and the number one complaint is it doesn't have pvp, because the game focus on pve. my question is, what is so bad about this? I look in the mmorpg list, and about 80% of the mmorpg's there have pvp, and some of them are even fully focused on pvp. what is so bad about ONE game focusing on PvE?

I myself am sick of PvP. To many games have it and when I use it, i can't see why its so great. Just my opinion.
I haven't played a game since SB that was PvP too me... not sure why ppl say too many games have pvp.. WoW kind of PvP is not pvp.. Pvp is losing somthing when you lose.. a town, your money, your clothes.. somthing.. not just spawn back at a camp with everything... That is pvp, even City of villains is not pvp.. you dont lose anything from losing in there either..

---

Dude, PvP means player vs player...

---

Uhh yeah, Pvp means player vs player, wow i never knew... /sarcasm off ...but true pvp is having somthing too lose.. anything.. be it items, money or land... just having PvP with no true winner is not true pvp too me...

You have WoW Pvp, which is just a sick joke.. or UO or SB pvp where you can loose your house and have your town burnt too the ground and all your money and items taken from you.. now thats pvp