Originally posted by eyelolled
I'm hearing more and more about how people can't play their characters the way they want, but end up having to take particular and specific builds to suit the role they want to play.  If everyone has to follow a specific build, than what is really the difference that makes the TSW system better?

Originally posted by Celcius

Originally posted by bcbully

Originally posted by Celcius

Originally posted by bcbully

Originally posted by Bladestrom
And yet bc in this thread people are saying gw2 has no end game, the first themepark ever to have no end game, odd isn't it.

Well a lot of people in this thread have questioned if GW2 has endgame. You wouldn't deny that would you?

Its funny this is the same guy who claimed that TSW had a good combat system. Can you take anything he says seriously?  I certainly can't. Any sub number or box number sales announcements yet? I am sure Funcom would love to announce those! Oh wait, sorry, the game is doing so terrible they won't. ArenaNet will announce sales probably within the first week because it will sell atleast twice as many copies of TSW sells in a lifetime that first week. It is obvious this guy is just trying to stick to his guns (World of Warcraft style item grind) and cannot comprehend that people can play games other then to increase the statistics of one of there characters. People like him are the reason MMORPGs are a joke as an E-sport and as a gaming genre. If you like item grinds, you can keep liking them thats cool, but don't just consider everyone elses opinion as being wrong just because you like something different. 

well since you brought TSW up. TSW gives you verticle (stats) horizontal (abilities) and cosmetic endgame progressions.  

 

I'm thinking 750k will be announced on the 8th of this month btw.

 

 

No, thats not end game. I don't count that sorry. Doing the same few dungeons over and over again with no raiding? Wow, no endgame. Clearly a terrible game. Not to mention the bad gameplay. Who would keep playing a game after they beat it with bad gameplay? I mean seriously! Can't wait until that announcement though! 

Originally posted by jdnyc

Originally posted by Zooce

Originally posted by jdnyc

Originally posted by Zooce

I thought TSW was an 8.5 too before I left Kingsmouth.  Link to your chronicle Suzie? 

You do know linking of chronicles 9/10 from people aren't really them right?

I would ask for yours, but you'd just do the same thing and pick someone who's played the hell out of the game and say it's you.  Who's to know?  amirite?

I linked my chronicle weeks ago on this site.  That was two weeks of playtime, I have't logged into the game since the 14th.

Suzie?

 

You played all the missions and Transylvania and dungeons?  No you didn't.  Here's what you did.  You did PvP.  Look at your Talismans LOL.  Greens QL9 -QL10?  LOL

w/e....you have no idea the full content TSW offers.  You should log back in and do the actual content when it hits horizontal progression.

Originally posted by Nitth

8.5 sounds good, and i agree with it.

I dont understand the tension here tho, you could have cascade of titles at 8.5 i dont see why people want a lower score because another game is popular.

Originally posted by TheAncient

Originally posted by Suzie_Ford

Originally posted by toddze

The real reviews of a game come from the players now and only the players. It is not just this site that has stopped giving real reviews of a game all game sites have.

Funny. The average score for TSW on Metacritic with over 600 USER/GAMER/PLAYER reviews is 8.4. Go figure. ;)

See for yourself: http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-secret-world/user-reviews

 

 

And yet the critics gave it just 7.1.

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-secret-world