Trending Games | Pillars of Eternity | Cabal 2 | Skyforge | Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn

  Network:  RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,959,476 Users Online:0
Games:801  Posts:6,392,357
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
A-C
2029 Online 2112: Revolution 2Moons 4Story 8BitMMO 9 Dragons A Mystical Land A Tale in the Desert III A3 ACE Online AD2460 ARGO Online Aberoth Absolute Force Online Absolute Terror Achaea Adellion Aerrevan Aetolia, the Midnight Age Age of Armor Age of Conan Age of Empires Online Age of Mourning Age of Wulin Age of Wushu Aida Arenas Aika Aion Albion Online Alganon All Points Bulletin (APB) Allods Online Altis Gates Amazing World Anarchy Online Ancients of Fasaria Andromeda 5 Angels Online Angry Birds Epic Anime Ninja Anime Pirates Anime Trumps Anmynor Anno Online Applo Arcane Hearts Arcane Legends ArchLord ArcheAge Archeblade Archlord 2 Archlord X Armored Warfare Ascend: Hand of Kul Asda 2 Asda Story Ashen Empires Asheron's Call Asheron's Call 2 Astera Online Astonia III Astro Empires Astro Lords: Oort CLoud Asura Force Atlantica Online Atriarch Aura Kingdom Aurora Blade Auto Assault Avatar Star Battle Dawn Battle Dawn Galaxies Battle for Graxia Battle of 3 Kingdoms Battle of the Immortals Battlecruiser Online Battlestar Galactica Online Battlestar Reloaded Beyond Protocol Bionic Marine Command Online Black Aftermath Black Desert Black Gold Black Prophecy Black Prophecy Tactics: Nexus Conflict Blackguards 2 Blacklight Retribution Blade & Soul Blade Hunter Blade Wars Blazing Throne Bless Blitz 1941 Blood and Jade Bloodborne Bloodlines Champions Boot Hill Heroes Borderlands 2 Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel Bound by Flame Bounty Bay Online Brain Storm Bravada Bravely Default Bravely Second Brawl Busters. Brick-Force Bright Shadow Bullet Run Business Tycoon Online CTRacer Cabal Online Caesary Call of Camelot Call of Gods Call of Thrones Camelot Unchained Canaan Online Cardmon Hero Cartoon Universe CasinoRPG Cast & Conquer Castle Empire Castlot Celtic Heroes Champions Online Champions of Regnum Chaos Online Child of Light Chroma Squad Chrono Tales Citadel of Sorcery CitiesXL Citizen Zero City of Decay City of Heroes City of Steam City of Transformers City of Villains Civilization Online Clan Lord Clash of Clans Cloud Nine Club Penguin Colony of War Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances Company of Heroes Online Conquer Online Conquer Online 3 Continent of the Ninth (C9) Core Blaze Core Exiles Corum Online Craft of Gods Crimecraft Crimelife 2 Cronous Crota II Crowfall Crusaders of Solaris Cultures Online Cyber Monster 2 Cyberpunk 2077 Céiron Wars
D-F
D&D Online DC Universe DK Online DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 DV8: Exile Dalethaan Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Relic: Prelude Dark Solstice Dark Souls 2 Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkest Dungeon Darkfall Darkfall: Unholy Wars Darkwind: War on Wheels Das Tal Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide DayZ Dead Earth Dead Frontier Dead Island Dead Island 2 Dead Island: Riptide Deco Online Deep Down Deepworld Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Demons at the Horizon Desert Operations Destiny Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Divinity: Original Sin Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Age: Inquisition Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Fin Soup Dragon Heart Online Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Pals Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Call II Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dragons and Titans Drakengard 3 Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Rampage Dungeon Runners Dungeon of the Endless Dying Light Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online Dynasty of the Magi EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthlock: Festival of Magic Earthrise Eclipse War Ecol Tactics Online Eden Eternal Edge of Space Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elder Scrolls Online Eldevin Elf Online Elite: Dangerous Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire Empire & State Empire Craft Empire Universe 3 EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Blue Moon Online Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Eternal Saga Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverEmber Online EverQuest Next EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Evony Exarch Exorace F.E.A.R. Online Fable Legends Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout 4 Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Fearless Fantasy Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy Type-0 HD Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forge Forsaken Uprising Forsaken World Fortnite Fortuna Forum for Discussion of Everlight Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
G-L
GRAV GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones: Seven Kingdoms Gameglobe Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gauntlet Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer Gloria Victis Glory of Gods GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods Rush Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Granado Espada Online Grand Chase Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall H1Z1 Habbo Hotel Hailan Rising HaloSphere2 Hand of Fate Haven & Hearth Hawken Heart Forth Alicia Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero Online Hero Zero Hero's Journey Hero: 108 Online HeroSmash Heroes & Generals Heroes & Legends: Conquerors of Kolhar Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Atlan Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Heroes of the Storm Hex Holic Online Hostile Space Hunter Blade Huxley Icewind Dale: Enhanced Edition Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Immune Imperator Imperian Inferno Legend Infestation: Survivor Stories Infinite Crisis Infinity Infinity Iris Online Iron Grip: Marauders Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kartuga Kicks Online Kill Strain King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom Under Fire II Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kings Era Kings and Legends Kings of the Realm KingsRoad Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Age Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online Kyn L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Landmark Lands of Hope: Redemption LastChaos League of Angels League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Edda: Vengeance Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Grimrock 2 Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 2 Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Lego Minifigures Online Lichdom: Battlemage Life is Feudal Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lords of the Fallen Lords of the Fallen 2 Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia World
M-Q
MU Online Mabinogi Maestia: Rise of Keledus MagiKnights Magic Barrage Magic World Online Manga Fighter MapleStory Martial Heroes Marvel Heroes Marvel Super Hero Squad Online Marvel: Avengers Alliance Mass Effect 4 MechWarrior Online Megaten Meridian 59 : Evolution Merlin MetalMercs Metaplace Metin 2 MicroVolts Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor Midkemia Online Might & Magic Heroes Online Might & Magic Heroes: Kingdoms Might & Magic X: Legacy MilMo Minecraft Mini Fighter Minions of Mirth Ministry of War Monato Esprit Monkey King Online Monkey Quest Monster & Me Monster Hunter 4: Ultimate Monster Madness Online MonsterMMORPG Moonlight Online: Tales of Eternal Blood Moonrise Mordavia Mortal Online Mourning My Lands Myst Online: URU Live Myth Angels Online Myth War Myth War 2 Mythborne Mytheon Mythic Saga Mythos N.E.O Online NIDA Online Nadirim Naviage: The Power of Capital Navy Field Necropolis Need for Speed World Nemexia Neo's Land NeoSteam Neocron Nether Neverwinter Nexus: The Kingdom Of The Winds NinjaTrick NosTale Nova Genesis Novus Aeterno Oberin Odin Quest Odyssey RPG Ogre Island Omerta 3 Online Boxing Manager Onverse Oort Online Order & Chaos Online Order of Magic Original Blood Origins Return Origins of Malu Orion's Belt Otherland Forums OverSoul Overkings Overwatch Oz Online Oz World Pandora Saga Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Panzar Parabellum Parallel Kingdom Parfait Station Path of Exile Pathfinder Online Perfect World Perpetuum Online Persona V Phantasy Star Online 2 Phantasy Star Universe Phoenix Dynasty Online Phylon Pi Story Picaroon Pillars of Eternity Pirate Galaxy Pirate Storm Pirate101 PirateKing Online Pirates of the Burning Sea Pirates of the Caribbean Online Pixie Hollow Planeshift Planet Arkadia Planet Calypso PlanetSide 2 Planetside Planets³ Playboy Manager Pocket Legends Pockie Ninja Pockie Pirates Pockie Saints Pokémon X and Y PoxNora Prime World Prime: Battle for Dominus Priston Tale Priston Tale II Prius Online Prodigy Project Blackout Project Gorgon Project Powder Project Titan Forums Project Wiki Project Zomboid Puzzle Pirates Quest for Infamy Quickhit Football
R-S
R2 Online RAN Online RF Online ROSE Online Rage of 3 Kingdoms Ragnarok Online Ragnarok Online II RaiderZ Rail Nation Rakion Rappelz RappelzSEA Ravenmarch Realm Fighter Realm of Sierra Realm of the Mad God Realm of the Titans Realms Online Rebel Galaxy Reclamation Red Stone Red War: Edem's Curse Regnum Online Remnant Knights Renaissance Repulse Requiem: Memento Mori Rift RiotZone Rise Rise of Dragonian Era Rise of Empire Rise of the Tycoon Risen 3: Titan Lords Rising of King Risk Your Life Rivality Rockfree Rohan: Blood Feud Role Play Worlds Roll n Rock Roma Victor Romadoria Rosh Online Roto X Rubies of Eventide Ruin Online Rumble Fighter Runes of Magic Runescape Rust Rusty Hearts Ryzom S4 League SAGA SD Gundam Capsule Fighter Online SMITE SUN Sacred 3 Sagramore Salem SaySayGirls Scarlet Blade Scions of Fate Seal Online: Evolution Second Chance Heroes Second Life Secret of the Solstice Seed Serenia Fantasy Seven Seas Saga Seven Souls Online Sevencore Shadow Realms Shadow of Legend Shadowbane Shadowgate Shadowrun Chronicles Shaiya Shards Online Shattered Galaxy Sho Online Shot Online Shroud of the Avatar SideQuest Siege on Stars Sigonyth: Desert Eternity Silkroad Online Skyblade Skyforge SmashMuck Champions Smoo Online Soldier Front Soul Master Soul Order Online Soul of Guardian South Park: The Stick of Truth Space Heroes Universe Sparta: War of Empires Spellcasters Sphere Spiral Knights Spirit Tales Splash Fighters Squad Wars Star Citizen Star Conflict Star Sonata 2 Star Stable Star Supremacy Star Trek Online Star Trek: Infinite Space Star Wars Galaxies Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Star Wars: The Old Republic StarQuest Online Starbound Stargate Worlds Starlight Story Starpires State of Decay SteelWar Online Stone Age 2 Stormfall: Age of War Stormthrone Storybricks Stronghold Kingdoms Styx: Master of Shadows Sudden Attack Supremacy 1914 Supreme Destiny Sword Coast Legends Sword Girls Sword of Destiny: Rise of Aions SwordX Swords of Heavens Swordsman
T-Z
TERA TS Online TUG Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Tales of Solaris Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris TerraWorld Online Terraria Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Aurora World The Banner Saga The Banner Saga 2 The Black Watchmen The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Crew The Division The Epic Might The Hammers End The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing 2 The Legend of Ares The Lost Titans The Matrix Online The Mighty Quest for Epic Loot The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems The West The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Theralon There Therian Saga Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Tiger Knight Titan Siege Titans of Time Toontown Online Top Speed Topia Online Torchlight Torment: Tides of Numenera Total Domination Transformers Universe Transistor Transverse Trapped Dead: Lockdown Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Triad Wars Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Trove Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War Tynon U.B. Funkeys UFO Online URDEAD Online Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Naruto Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Utherous Utopia Valkyrie Sky Vampire Lord Online Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos VoidExpanse Voyage Century Online W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WAR2 Glory WYD Global Wakfu War Thunder War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Mercenaries War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Warflare Wargame1942 Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warkeepers Warrior Epic Wartune Wasteland 2 WebLords Wild West Online WildStar Wind of Luck WindSlayer 2 Wings of Destiny Wish Wizard101 Wizardry Online Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Speed World of Tanks World of Tanks Generals World of Warcraft World of Warplanes World of Warriors World of Warships World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xenoblade Chronicles 3D Xenoblade Chronicles: X Xenocell Xiah Xsyon Xulu YS Online Yitien ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online Zombies Ate My Pizza eRepublik

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

All Posts by aesperus

All Posts by aesperus

255 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Last
5092 posts found

No offense, but I think Jason is missing a lot of obvious facts. Both about the game, and also about his examples.

I.E. in LotR the reason why they couldn't just fly eagles into mount doom was pretty well represented. There was an army there of 10s, 100s of thousands. They weren't all limited to hand-to-hand land-based combat. Plus there are the ring wraiths to deal with. Not to mention sauron / saruman. Which is partially why there is this long drawn-out story to deal with each threat as it came. In a war, any war, it is fairly rare that you use your best weapon straight away. There are too many risks involved with doing so. It can be destroyed (and you lose your advantage), it gives the enemy time to figure out a counter-strategy (and you lose your advantage), you're unlikely to have a decent follow-up strat (which generally means you lose the war), etc.

GW2 is kind of similar to this. Let's not forget the army of dragon's Zhaitan had at his disposal. You saw many of them at the end of the personal story. You don't just send a bunch of airships towards that without laying down some ground work first. Not to mention the whole part of the story were they talk about needing to actually build all those airships and mega lasers, and need time to stall so they can finish. The game doesn't start with all that stuff existing. It's all experiments that the pact was working on throughout the story, with them succeeding towards the end.

That stuff out of the way, we already know there will be no 'Sylvari vs. all' WvW. Maybe they could have a fun mini-event, similar to the PvP branded event they had around beta, but I don't see much else on that front.

Keep this in mind. We KNOW that not all sylvari are evil. It doesn't make sense to then force all PC sylvari to automatically be mordem monsters. We also KNOW that the nightmare court are primarily those influenced by the dragon, and that those who follow ventari's teachings have turned away from mordrem's influence. That right there paves a clear path for who is going to be evil and who isn't. We have some of the senior members of the Sylvari, the PC players, and maybe a few of the younger members. While all of the nightmare court, and many of the younger sylvari are likely to be mordem in the expansion.

- That said the question is still a good one. And it makes for a very interesting design challenge.

How do you create that kind of environment (full of prejudice & mistrust) without alienating sylvari players. Will they have vendors that refuse to sell to sylvari? Will it just be dialogue and vague insults? If they don't change the experience for PC syvari players, will it ruin the whole theme they've set for this new expansion? Will they just phone it in and solve the problem within the first few hours of storyline? All very good questions. And I hope that Anet is much more clever than the rest of us in this manner (well, and also specializations). Because this is one design problem I honestly don't have a great answer for. Not without placing a negative impact on sylvari players. I'm looking forward to seeing what Anet's solution is.

Originally posted by Horusra
Originally posted by Wizardry
Originally posted by Ozmodan
What do you need a mount in a MOBA for?

The real truth?Blizzard is all about marketing their KNOWN money makers.They rehash the WOW ideas over and over in many games.Mounts are one of the bigger reasons for WOW's success,so they are reiterating the same theory on money making.

The sad part about it is having played hundreds of games,i know mounts are going to be wanted by every single player.This will feed the cash shop straight up as a lame gimmick.

We USED to all agree that fluff was acceptable in cash shops,but the gamer's with common sense ,KNEW that once you open the door on cash shop gaming,it would get worse over time and sadly we have seen it get real bad in a VERY short time.

I know MANY will like this game,just because it is Blizzard and want to add yet another Blizzard game to their portfolio,to me,it i just another Moba no matter how any tries to spin it.

I say "just another MOBA" for a reason,Blizzard's last two games HS and now HOTS are throw backs on advancements in technical gaming and graphics and just everything that goes  into game design.I want to see some IMPROVEMENTS in game design,not old tech,old ideas rehashed in a cost effective game design.

Will it be fun,i am sure many moba fans will love it,weather they like it for the actual game or just because it is another E-sport idk.

I feel it was a big risk by Blizzard to try and crash the doors of LOL and DOTA but in reality,this game design is really cheap to make,so not a huge risk for them.I personally would like to see Blizzard use those multi millions....Billions,to advance gaming and be a LEADER in the industry.By LEADER i DON'T mean in making money,i mean in game design.

When you get a billion dollar company you can risk it all on being the leader.  Risk your livelihood and that of your employees.  Bllzzard takes proven ideas and twists or tries to improve them.  Big companies do not take the risks...that is for small indies.  MOBA's around about things like skins and occasional new heros.  What else you think they are going to make to generate money?

Nintendo might want a word with you.

You're acting like the only options these companies have is 'risk everything' and 'risk nothing, play to mass appeal'. Not so. Any company with the capital to fund multiple projects simultaneously (which Blizzard has) has the option to experiment with one or more of those projects. Blizzard chooses not to. Not only are they not a company founded on innovation, but they are more than happy to play it safe and engineer their games for what's popular.

Does it makes sense from a business sense? Absolutely. But this is exactly the same thing that EA has been doing, except EA's been doing it by absorbing other companies, while Blizzard just rips their ideas without acquisition.

The ironic thing is that we demonize EA for this, but Blizzard gets all the praise in the world. Blizzard is one of the best at what they do, but they get credit for a lot of things that were someone else's. HotS is a decent bite-sized MOBA in a basic sense, but (like Hearthstone) it actively strips all depth & strategy from the gameplay but the base necessary to still call it a game.

Originally posted by jdizzle2k13
Sounds interesting.  I would definitely like to see a game where strategy and teamwork is more valued than simply killing people as quickly as possible.
 
The only question I would have then, is would this game be able to appeal to enough people to keep it going?  I hope so.

Ditto to this ^

I would love to see more games with depth & strategy to them. I do worry about whether enough people will play it to keep it going. Hopefully i'm in the wrong on this one.

This column seemed a bit contrived, but I like that they do try and cover both sides of each issue.

A short answer is YES. MMOs are becoming too casual. All games are. The details aren't so simple, but the reality is clear. The problem is that most games try and cater to the most common denominator. Meaning they simplify, simplify, simplify until their game is in a state in which most people can easily understand the game with minimal / no effort. Now, at a fundamental level this is actually a good thing. Bringing more people into your game = more revenue, which means you can do more with the game or fund better projects in the future. It's essential to have a decent playerbase for any given game.

That said, most games unfortunately accomplish this by sacrificing depth. Games with depth tend to have more of a learning curve, which a lot of people seem to struggle with. But instead of having games that are easy to understand, difficult to master; we tend to get games that are easy to understand, easy to master. Devs see players struggling with certain game mechanics, and rather than engineer the game to push the players to do better, we get the challenge eroded from the game little by little. Dungeons become easier, DPS rotations less complex, tanking mechanics are stupidly simple nowadays, support roles limited to basically spamming 1-2 heals and an 'oh crap!' spell.

The sad thing is we do get games that are made to be challenging. However most of them get ignored by most players, because they are 'too hard' or they 'don't know what to do'. The few that do survive seem to suffer the same fate of gradually getting simpler and simpler. For example, look at what's happening w/ the MOBA genre, the latest game HotS basically strips most of the strategy out of the game, leaving the bare minimum required to have a working game mode. The focus is almost entirely on fighting (which a lot of people praise it for), but the depth is gone.

Originally posted by rounner
Originally posted by nolf

...  No one had any real idea where this supposed battlefield was.  A guy apparently knew a guy who knew a guy who gave him rough coordinates to it.  We wandered mostly aimlessly, in the general direction we thought we were meant to go. ...

 This isn't rose coloured glasses though, games weren't min-maxed and mapped out as much and people were generally less fussy about a lot because they didn't know any better. Someone posted a few weeks ago that it is the mystery that they are trying to recapture but there is little left. I'd say ironically games are deliberately trying to remove mystery in that they seek balance and fairness which is arguably its antithesis.

This sums it up pretty perfectly.

OP, you need to think about not only the games you were playing back then, but the CLIMATE that you played them in. When MMOs first started to become a thing was during a time when the internet was also still very much growing into... well we didn't know what it would become at the time. Many people still had dial-up, and while there were fan sites for various MMOs, it wasn't anywhere near what we have today.

Back then it was common to spend months just trying to figure out what was actually in the game. People would also often worry about messing up their characters because they didn't know any better, and didn't want to waste months of time spent lvling just to remake due to a mistake. Now? Regardless of how good a game is, all it's mysteries are discovered within days of release. Sometimes even prior to release, depending on how good the datamining is. And it's all up there on the internet for everyone to see.

The irony is that most of what we used to do back in the 'golden age' of MMOs, you can still do in modern games. We just don't anymore. Largely because we are no longer forced to, but also because of incentives. We are creatures driven by incentives, and as a result we will often choose the easiest / most seemingly convenient method to get what we want. Unfortunately when it comes to MMOs, that generally means ignoring 90% of the game's content, looking up spoilers for much of the rest, and skipping what can be skipped to 'get the loot' or reward at the end of the tunnel. A lot of gamers no longer play these games for the journey, they skip the journey to play for the rewards.

It's backwards, but we are as much to blame for it as the developers / games themselves.

Originally posted by vandal5627
Originally posted by aesperus

Honestly, yes, the constant whining & entitlement does get old. However, sadly, this is not going to change without a very significant (and positive) change to the education of the average gamer. And no, I'm not talking about degrees or diplomas, but rather a change of perspective / mindset / understanding.

We have too much entitlement, and it's not limited to MMOs. Many are too used to being catered to individually, to understand how to appreciate games that are not. Furthermore in a lot of ways the average gamer has been much more included in the actual development process (which is a good thing). The problem is, while developers have been making many efforts to be more transparent with us, very few of us have made efforts to be more understanding of developers. We still love to point fingers, find the easiest scapegoat for a problem, and many of us still will demand one feature, and then do a complete 180 once such feature gets implemented. I see it time and time again, enough that I've stopped keeping count.

Too often do we not ask the right questions, treat all problems as equal, only to fall for the same marketing gimmicks and blame others for it. With a more self-concious / aware playerbase I think many of these issues would diminish. People would be more inclined to appreciate games outside of their own comfort zone, which then promotes more innovation. We'd be more willing to support games with concept we like, rather than games that are the most addicting to our own behavior. We'd also probably stop buying games we know are crap.

Sadly, that's not the world we live in, and will likely not happen. As a result there are basically 3 options. Go with the flow & choose from what's available, stop playing, or make your own game without expecting it to make money.

A voice of reason, probably going to go on deaf ears though.  :)

lol, thanks. Wish I could say I wasn't kinda used to it by now :/

But alas these are still basically the only real forums for this genre for fans.

Originally posted by Foomerang

A lot of people say they want something different, but don't want to actually do something different. Same folks that complain about a game being too linear or all there is are dungeons and raids, tend to be the same folks who aren't interested in crafting, gathering, economy, rp, or other non combat activities.
A? ?l?o?t? ?o?f? ?t?h?e?s?e? ?p?e?o?p?l?e? ?a?r?e? ?j?u?s?t? ?P?C? ?e?l?i?t?i?s?t?s? ?w?h?o? ?a?r?e? ?i?n? ?d?e?n?i?a?l?.? You want diverse combat? Do yourselves a favor, p?i?c?k? ?u?p? ?a? ?u?s?e?d? ?p?s?3? ?o?r? ?3?6?0?, buy a bunch of bargain bin Acton games and get your fill. Them maybe you can move on to other MMO game systems and spare us the waterworks.

First part is spot on.

However it has NOTHING to do w/ PC vs. console. Not a damned thing. The same is true across ALL platforms. It's long been known (by the industry) that games that are more innovative don't sell as well as their more generic counterparts. That gamers often will ask for a series of changes, and will just as often reject them if implemented. Not only is this true of games, but the same thing happens in movies, in books, in music. Pretty much anything that relies on creativity suffers this dilemma. Purely original / innovative stuff doesn't tend to sell as well (you can still make a profit, just not nearly as large of one), however innovation is also necessary to drive progression. Once too many people forget that things start to stagnate and go down hill for a while.

When it comes to games, the problem I see over and over and over again (It doesn't even matter what part of the world;) is that too many people are unwilling to try something new. When the majority of us do play something new, we treat it 'too different' from something known and familiar, instead of like a new experience. And that is a problem.

Honestly, yes, the constant whining & entitlement does get old. However, sadly, this is not going to change without a very significant (and positive) change to the education of the average gamer. And no, I'm not talking about degrees or diplomas, but rather a change of perspective / mindset / understanding.

We have too much entitlement, and it's not limited to MMOs. Many are too used to being catered to individually, to understand how to appreciate games that are not. Furthermore in a lot of ways the average gamer has been much more included in the actual development process (which is a good thing). The problem is, while developers have been making many efforts to be more transparent with us, very few of us have made efforts to be more understanding of developers. We still love to point fingers, find the easiest scapegoat for a problem, and many of us still will demand one feature, and then do a complete 180 once such feature gets implemented. I see it time and time again, enough that I've stopped keeping count.

Too often do we not ask the right questions, treat all problems as equal, only to fall for the same marketing gimmicks and blame others for it. With a more self-concious / aware playerbase I think many of these issues would diminish. People would be more inclined to appreciate games outside of their own comfort zone, which then promotes more innovation. We'd be more willing to support games with concept we like, rather than games that are the most addicting to our own behavior. We'd also probably stop buying games we know are crap.

Sadly, that's not the world we live in, and will likely not happen. As a result there are basically 3 options. Go with the flow & choose from what's available, stop playing, or make your own game without expecting it to make money.

I'd be very careful of using 'addiction' as synonymous with 'immersion'. Addiction can be manufactured, farmville is addictive for many people. I wouldn't call it a good game, though. There's a reason the skinnerbox design model has been so popular in recent years with increased frequency. It preys on base human behavior to engineer addiction and to simulate the feeling of 'fun'. In fact most newer games we can thank this model for.

Immersion is something far different, and much more difficult to achieve. I could write books on the topic, but no one really knows entirely how this works. But it absolutely separates good RPGs from bad ones.

If you want addiction, you can go play any generic slot machine game and lose hours of your time and probably even a decent chunk of your bank account. If you want immersion, you need to figure out what is immersive for you (as it's different for every person individually).

Originally posted by Hyanmen
Originally posted by Temp0

You don't need raid gear EVEN IF you raid, its a reward from the raid so the raid obviously can be beaten without it. The expectation is that players want to improve their character, this is kindof a core component of rpgs. Would you say the same thing about character levels? That you werent intended to hit level 50? I fully understand that for some players this is a non-issue and for that, more power to you man. But as far as (at the least combat oriented) endgame goes, I do not like the setup and it marginalizes other content such as maps, hunts, beast quests, etc. and even if you dont think those things should be the best (they're not even good comparatively) there are many ways to add in relevant endgame content to rival raiding that makes more sense.

"Improving one's character" is not exclusive to raising an arbitrary item level so that your character's parameters go up slightly. It can be about anything, from chocobo raising to collecting minions, obtaining the perfect glamour gear or even simple achievements. Just because to you this concept seems alien doesn't mean that players find this sort of progression just as valuable as the gear treadmill. Adding alternative raiding equivalent progression is not as easy as you make out to be either without resorting to common MMO pitfalls like making no lifers the kings of the game.

For me the progression largely revolves around exploring the story and lore. I find value in that because SE has done a lot to build and flesh out the world without making every plot twist and detail obvious from the beginning. I also find value in it because rarely a feature gets implemented that doesn't have a story revolving around it, from barbers to clearing all beastmen quests. In other words SE has made it very rewarding to understand the world because they actually give a crap about it and have given since the time Yoshi-P was made the productor. Surely the raids are a big part of my objectives but not in the way that they are tools to raise my item level. They are simply extremely fun fights to be done with a good group that further drive my agenda in the game, exploring the world SE has created.

Honestly the same thing can be said about WoW. It doesn't stop it from being a raid-focused game, or one based around a vertical progression model. You can choose to ignore it in any game you play, and more power to you if you do; but it doesn't stop it from being there. The top guilds in the game that are focused around progression all focus on coil as their means to do so. Everything else is 'fluff' is 'secondary'. And just as Temp0 says, acquiring such items trivializes the rest of the game. Beating the latest turn of coil makes the rest of the game a joke by comparison.

It's still one of the best made traditional themeparks out there, but you can't pretend it's not one because you enjoy chocobo racing.

Originally posted by Rydeson
I would love to hear about your complex non-role playing combat, and which games those are..  Most people that complain about role combat often use broken bad examples to justify their position.. The reason your car keeps pulling to the right isn't because of snow tires, it's because you have one tire that is flat.. Fix the flat and the car drives just fine, don't argue that snow tires are bad..  :)
There are many games that have combat that doesn't rely on the trinity. And (while I'm sure this may have just been a typo on your end), there is no such thing as 'role playing combat' outside of LARPing. Class-oriented is a thing, and probably what you meant. It's what most games use. As for games that don't rely on the trinity system there are a number, I'll list a few of the MMOs, but because many of them aren't perfect examples, I know people tend to argue about them or discount them entire. However, some of the main ones we have are Eve, Planetside 2, GW2. That said, as a much more tangible example, I'll use a non-MMO game. Final Fantasy. While many of them have the option to turn your party into the standard trinity, ALL of them have enough customization as to that being unnecessary. Furthermore most bosses and encounters are much faster if you don't have your party setup as a typical trinity. I could go on, but this wall of text is getting bloated enough as is.

Originally posted by aesperus

I think you're confusing threat (as in aggro) with threat (as in intelligent battle-strategy).  ??? Merely pointing out that just because the words (threat) are the same, the meanings are not automatically interchangeable. There are different ways in which the word 'threat' is used, and you used one (as applied to video game AI) in relationship to another (as applied to assessing real-world danger). They are not even remotely close to the same thing. The AI threat does the exact opposite of what you do in your real-world examples. The AI is specifically designed so that the character that is the least dangerous (the tank) holds the greatest threat.

Aircraft Carriers get focused because they are the reinforcements. Not because they have the most armor, largest health pool, or best insults. Beep Beep back up the bus.. Who said anything about comparing a AC to a warrior?  I used the AC as one of many examples that a target gets and maintains attention for a number of reasons.. Did you miss the defensive end example that was in the same sentence?  Noticed how I said ALL-PRO defensive end.. Of course he gets special attention because he deserves it.. If it was just your average player, then he wouldn't get double teamed like the all pro.. YOU sir jump to conclusions not said.. 

No one explicitly stated this. But by using real world threat as a comparison to gaming threat, you've implied similarities. This is merely an extension of the above point that the meanings are NOT interchangeable. There are no conclusions here, just examples of why the same word doesn't apply equally to both situations. Because in each case it's being used in a very different way, with a very different meaning. One is a term adopted by a primitive AI system, the other is a term used to assess danger.

You are arguing about a broken formula.. MOBS target whatever the "code" tells them to target.. Everything in a computer game is either "random" or "code"..  (period)...What you are complaining about is a poorly written code, and trying to use it as the poster child why "code" needs to be abolished.. If a mob is ignoring the 200,000 points of damage because some dumbass dev formulated a code that gives the tank 500,000 points of taunt.. The problem is the BAD formula, not the use of a code..  Vanilla EQ was a good start to aggro management.. DPS had to wait for meat shield to get agro before casting.. and casters better learn how much damage they could cast, because often if they chain cast the mobs would peel away from tank and go directly after caster or healer.. Many times as a druid it was my duty to snare the mob so he wouldn't runaway when dying (notice how mobs don't do that anymore).. If the mob resisted my snare, it was my best interest to not recast it again so soon, unless I wanted agro..  If I sat down to meditate, I would pull agro if I was too close to the mob.. If a player was close to death the mob would target that player and ignore any taunts. EQ started off with a good threat(agro) meter formula..

Here is where you start to make assumptions about my meaning. I've never said anywhere about abolishing code, that would be foolish. I know how coding works, and have done a fair amount of programming myself. But I also know enough to know the difference between simplistic / primitive AI, and more advanaced AI. I know that just because a system is popular, doesn't mean it's the only way to solve the same problem, or even the best way. It just means it's the most commonly understood.


You bring up EQ as a good start to aggro management. And you'd be right. The problem is that for most MMOs, the aggro system hasn't EVOLVED since then. They're still basically using a 10+ yr old formula, because it's comfortable. And many of us gamers, have been using the same formula for so long that we ourselves have become convinced that it's the only way of doing things.

- GW2 by contrast, does have threat, but it's not your typically aggro chart (or table if you wish). It's more dynamic, and more similar to a pie chart. Threat is determined by a number of factors; who has the least health, who has the highest toughness, who is closest to the boss, who is doing the most damage, whether or not someone is reviving, etc. Each factor is weighted, and the player with the highest weight of factors is usually the one being targetted by the boss. There are certain bosses with mechanics that supercede this general mechanic, but they are rare. Lupicus being one of the more obvious examples.

It may not be a perfect formula, but it's a lot more complex than the typical linear aggro system w/ taunts.  Agreed all threat / agro formulas should have multiple variables so why are you addressing and confronting what I said.. You obviously misread something somewhere..  BTW. The carrier example, no one targets the carrier anymore if all the planes are shot down, or if the carrier is crippled.. Hell, Battleships are a thing of the past and often drew attention in battle as well in their day.. My position has always been "actions" dictate agro/threat, the tricky part is correctly writing the formula that doesn't break it.. (like WoW did)

I prefer having the choice of playing an Aircraft Carrier, Battleship, Destroyer, Cruisers, Frigates, Corvettes and Submarines as an example.. I think it's crazy to play a Naval vessel that does it all..  I like roles :)

Answered mostly up above.

I'm not sure we disagree on all points, I just think that many of your examples / comparisons are very much flawed. Real combat works very much differently than standard MMO combat. It is chaotic, it requires quick decision making, it's not structured unless you choose to make it so. Games can very much do that same style of combat, we just refuse to let them do so, because it requires more effort on our parts (we have to be more responsible for our choices in game).

I agree with more choice, I like being able to play many different things within a game. I like versatility. What I don't like is how most of these games have roles basically limited to 1 or 2 simple rotations and we applaud it. Right now we have so much flexibility in our single player and smaller-group multiplayer games. And yet for some reason we refuse to believe that any of that could ever be applied to an MMO. Even though that is exactly how this genre was founded.

Originally posted by Jean-Luc_Picard
Originally posted by Flyte27

Actually it wasn't that simple as people have pointed out many times.

It was actually. EQ is exactly the same as vanilla WOW when it comes to threat management.

The mobs were just as dumb back then than nowadays, and always attacked the target with the highest threat, gods, dragons and demons as stupid as a rock.

And then, the technology progressed, not only client side,  the scripting and what can be done server side nowadays is exponentially more than what you could do on any vanilla EQ server. If they had tried to put most of the modern WoW raid encounters in EQ back then, players wouldn't have died from the mobs, they would have died from lag. That's pretty much why early EQ relied on those more simplistic mechanics.

So at the end, the raid fights are actually less zergish and more varied and deep nowadays than they have ever been in the early (or even later) EQ times.

I have to backup Jean-Luc here. He's right.

The thing about original EQ is while it had the same formula as most modern MMOs, it was one of the first games of its kind. People playing it didn't come with all this pre-knowledge of 'how an MMO should be' and so every experience felt fresh and unknown. Many boss encounters seemed more complex because people honestly had no idea how they worked. It was all trial and error and experimentation.

Which is true of most games when you approach them with a fresh mind. Everything seems a lot harder until you get more familiar w/ them, then it's all too easy.

Originally posted by Lord.Bachus

GW2, would have been an even better game with a trinnity for PvE...

However GW2´s system works perfect for PvP...

They are currently adding taunting... and other stat to build agro... If they make the lacking healing stat more efficient in PvE only and add some healing stuff that works as grouphealing with a high healing stat, they can turn the current game into a semi Trinnity...   adding a system like Wildstar to CC bosses might also add more tacticall means to dungeon bossbattles..

However thats my opinion, some people just love GW2s curent system, i can live with it, no game is perfect and there are so many other things that GW2 is still on top of my list

Actually the opposite. Adding the trinity to GW2 would ruin the combat & class dynamics they spent so much effort creating. It would also remove the need to think about what you're doing. Many people point to the current zerker meta and 'how easy it is' but bring in someone who's new to the game and have them run dungeons in full zerk, and count the deaths. It seems easy to most people now because the game's been out for years now.

The problem w/ GW2's PvE isn't the classes. It's the clunky boss mechanics. Most of the original bosses can be glitched into corners, which makes any kind of trinity irrelevant. It's the reason why you can just on so many bosses and DPS them down. They have easily exploitable mechanics.

By contrast look at some of the newer encounters. Fights like TT, Teq, and VW have a need for a variety of different classes. All of those encounters have parts that need reflect teams, condition teams, in addition to your standard zerk teams. There's also a need for group buffs, and dedicated ressers in some cases. We'll see what happens after HoT, but this is the direction the game seems to be heading in.

Yes they are adding taunt, but it's not the same as what I think a lot of people are assuming. It's much more like a MOBA taunt mechanic. It's extremely temporary, and more of a form of CC than an aggro mechanic. The game already has aggro mechanics, they just aren't as simple as your typical linear threat table. The problem is most players never bother to learn how aggro actually works in this game.

Originally posted by Ender4

All you have done is proven that you do not have a PvP mentality. I don't care if the fight I get into is fair, what I want is to not instantly know what is going to happen. When a group of 5 dudes walks over the hill I want to have to stop, assess the situation, decide if they are friend or foe and react to the situation. Fair doesn't come into the equation, it never does in any serious form of conflict in the real world or in a virtual world. A game that is PvE heavy that has no threat at all of human conflict is just downright boring, it is what killed GW2 and what is likely to kill many future games for me.

The guy who thinks all PvP is high lvl people farming low lvl people and running has never really played a PvP game because that opinion is so ridiculous it is just funny. That is not how real PvP games work at all. That is how the victims who can't get past early levels see games, not the reality.

Can we please stop using this 'PvP mentallity' notion. We aren't insects, we do not have a hive mind. Everyone PvPs for slightly different reasons. Some for competition. Some because PvE is boring. Some because they like ganking. Some like ruining others playing experience (or trolling). There is no universal 'mentallity' revolving PvP. You have players who like it, and players who don't. We don't have a dogma and a membership pen for playing PvP games. We just like them.

For a guy who seems to speak for the rest of us PvPers, I sure find it ironic that you quit a game with isolated PvP because of its PvE.

 

Originally posted by PottedPlant22
I'm not talking about the PVE crowd and those for PVP that would like persistence.  But what about all the battleground players and RVR fanatics?  If visceral combat in skill based targeting is what PVPers keep asking for, they already can have it in Smite.

A number of reasons. Not the least of which being that people like different types of games, and many are fairly close-minded in what they play. That said:

1) Smite is a MOBA, and that term alone is enough to scare of a lot of people with thin skin. MOBAs can be stressful, and there is a learning curve not everyone is comfortable with transcending.

2) Many people played Smite back in early beta / alpha. They don't know (or don't care) that the game has improved drastically since then. I've actually heard some pretty ridiculous reasons why some people refuse to give this game a chance.

3) League of Legends. I hate to bring it up, but LoL has a bit of the WoW-syndrome when it comes to MOBAs. I've actually gotten a lot of former league players to try out Smite. Out of them, nearly all of them loved the game. They had a ton of fun, and have even stated they think it's a superior game to League. Care to guess what they all are playing now? Yep, not a single one is playing Smite currently, they're all back on League.

Why is this? Because one, many of their friends are still playing league. And these games are always more fun with friends. And two, they have so much invested in league, all those runes, masteries, exclusive skins, they don't want to just abandon them. It's pretty standard business strategy, and it works way more than it should. They're hooked.

That said, I have been able to get some others to try the game out. Some from MMOs, some from other online PvP games. Many of them still play. The game is probably one of the most underrated online PvP games on the market currently, but it is growing.

Originally posted by Rydeson
Originally posted by Jean-Luc_Picard

The worse is not the trinity. The worse is the threat mechanics, which are completely artificial. Afraid to tell, that threat mechanics are ALL around us, even in life..  There is a reason why Aircraft Carriers are primary focus.. There is a reason why the ALL-PRO defensive end gets double teamed..  There is a reason why cops subdue the guy first instead of his girlfriend (unless she's packing a gun), but then her threat number would change and she would be primary focus..  OUR Attention, as it should be in a game is all about "threat and grabbing attention".. Now I will agree that many devs FAILED to correctly design a better threat formula, but that is a different topic..

I still enjoy games with threat tables, but I've also played many games which were/are very good and didn't have one (UO, AC1, GW2) and it's refreshing to have some more realistic behavior of mobs than just bash the guy with the heaviest armor and the biggest health pool. GW2 doesn't have a threat table?  Then tell me how I always end up pulling agro 90% of the time when I'm nuking the shit out of the mob?  OH.. my dps is a bigger threat to him then the guy next to me that is 4 levels lower and not shelling out the damage.. EQ had the best threat formula I have played.. It wasn't perfect, but it was a far cry better and more realistic then anything since..  It's a shame devs couldn't tweak it more..

I think you're confusing threat (as in aggro) with threat (as in intelligent battle-strategy). Aircraft Carriers get focused because they are the reinforcements. Not because they have the most armor, largest health pool, or best insults. Tanks get focused because they are not only hard to kill, but also dish out way more damage than your average infantry. Snipers get focused because they are a hugely damaging threat. I could go on, but this all has to do with intelligence in accordance with each group's best interests. Or, as it relates to games AI. Threat as portrayed in video games is typically THE most simplistic AI they can possibly have in the game. Monsters do not act in their best interest in the vast majority of these games. They will repeatedly target classes which are the least threatening, but have the most 'aggro', while ignore everyone who's actually killing them.

- GW2 by contrast, does have threat, but it's not your typically aggro chart (or table if you wish). It's more dynamic, and more similar to a pie chart. Threat is determined by a number of factors; who has the least health, who has the highest toughness, who is closest to the boss, who is doing the most damage, whether or not someone is reviving, etc. Each factor is weighted, and the player with the highest weight of factors is usually the one being targetted by the boss. There are certain bosses with mechanics that supercede this general mechanic, but they are rare. Lupicus being one of the more obvious examples.

It may not be a perfect formula, but it's a lot more complex than the typical linear aggro system w/ taunts.

Not really. While trinity MMOs are fun in the sense that I can hop in and pay about as much attention to the combat as I do ordering a cup of coffee, it does get stale fairly fast.

I know I'm not in the majority on this, but I do enjoy challenges in my games. I like games that make me think. I like being able to use more than the most basic of strategies in a fight. I like how in the few non-trinity games I've played, combat may seem chaotic at first, until you actually learn what's happening and how to manipulate the situation to your advantage, and then it becomes crystal clear. Almost like a rubix cube.

I still play some trinity games, as we still seemed to be hooked on the idea that they are necessary. And I still enjoy them to an extent. But I hope we will get more games that try and implement more complex / interesting / thought provoking mechanics, instead of the usual simplistic stuff.

There's a few aspects of RvR that are unfortunately just the nature of the beast.

Tech is always going to be an issue. While GW2's maps def run smoother than ESO, they still had a lot of hurtles to overcome, and the maps aren't as large as Cyrodiil either. DAoC also had some issues for a while as well, though it's tough to beat that game's RvR.

Zerging is another issue that will always be there. Whenever you have multiple players fighting over anything there will be zerging. It's one of the most common and oldest tactics people have used throughout history. The term 'safety in numbers' comes to mind, and we've been employing similar ideas since the days of cavemen. That said, games can (and should) implement as many features to offer options to players so they aren't 'forced' to zerg. I have yet to play a game in which it's impossible to rvr as smaller groups, but it is more plausible in some games vs. others. All in how you approach your tactics.

The last, and largest issue is realm pride. This is something I'm not sure how it will ever get fixed. DAoC got it right in their timing, mixed with quite a bit of luck. But since then, people just don't care as much anymore. We enjoy Realm pvp a lot, but we also get sick of it a lot faster too. Burnout etc. Such games are so population dependent that they suffer much more than the standard themepark when people move on or take breaks for too long.

Definitely looking forward to what CU can do, but these are all pretty significant hurtles to overcome.

This shouldn't really be big news to anyone. Pretty standard stuff.

The writing on the wall doesn't look good for EQN (in general), but I doubt it will be flat out cancelled. The real question is how close (if at all) it will be to it's original vision.

Originally posted by GeezerGamer
Originally posted by scorpex-x

A developer will say anything before they make the annoucement, I've played many titles and I've seen the developers say they have no plans to go f2p and do it within months.

FFXIV could be playing a Rift where they see whether they can make any real traction with an expansion and make a decision after that or they could simply take the losses because of the FF brand name (to appear to be more successful than it actually is).  FFXIV hasn't gone past the period where most otehr titles move to f2p yet, so it's just a wait and see matter.  One thing to keep in mind though is that FFXIV has done no different than any other mmo that went f2p, keeping or losing the sub has nothing to do with being more or less successful than any other title.

Oh and as a last point, people need to stop using FFXI as any kind of proof of anything.  FFXI cannot go f2p, this isn't even an option because of ps2 limitations.  It will be impossible to add a secure cash shop etc.  FFXIV was designed from the start with the idea of buying a box, making you pay a subscription and having a cash shop.

What do you mean the game hasn't done anything different? How many other games have population locks on half their North American servers, with the rest still maintaining very healthy populations and to the extent where many server still have daily log in queues due to being full?

What they have done different is retained their player base batter than any other MMORPG since WoW. And if given percentages, I'd bet it's doing better than WoW on that ratio.

While what you say may be true, it isn't 'different'. A few games have similar trends, they launched w/ a bunch of servers, most of them full with queues, then people left, and the remaining ones tended to crowd the highest pop servers that were left. I've seen queues with SWTOR, with WoW, with GW2 (with WvW at least, the megaserver tech makes the rest kinda irrelevant), etc. recently. It definitely shows a healthy game, but it isn't a case for originality nor something which separates the game from others.

What scorpex is saying is true. The game is too integrated into the PSN to go F2P. That said, Yoshida doesn't own the IP, he can say all he wants and still have a business man in a suit change their mind sometime down the road. To point to the first sentence scorpex wrote, there is a clear difference between developer intent, and monetary concerns. A dev can have every intention of keeping a game subscription, only to have the rug pulled out from under them in a hurry by other invested parties. The sad thing is, most of the time, it's the dev that gets the flac for it, and not the person actually responsible.

That said, FFXIV is a good game for what it intends to be. It's a new WoW with a fresh (and beautiful) FF skin. There are some minor differences here & there, but the general format is very much the same standard themepark trinity with vertical gear-based progression. There is still very much a market for that sort of game, maybe not as large as it used to be, but large enough. This game will be around for a while more I'm sure.

255 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Last