Trending Games | Wizard101 | Guild Wars 2 | Star Wars: The Old Republic | Pirate101

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,946,932 Users Online:0
Games:778  Posts:6,368,769
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
2029 Online 2112: Revolution 2Moons 4Story 8BitMMO 9 Dragons A Mystical Land A Tale in the Desert III A3 ACE Online AD2460 ARGO Online Aberoth Absolute Force Online Absolute Terror Achaea Adellion Aerrevan Aetolia, the Midnight Age Age of Armor Age of Conan Age of Empires Online Age of Mourning Age of Wulin Age of Wushu Aida Arenas Aika Aion Albion Online Alganon All Points Bulletin (APB) Allods Online Altis Gates Amazing World Anarchy Online Ancients of Fasaria Andromeda 5 Angels Online Angry Birds Epic Anime Ninja Anime Pirates Anime Trumps Anmynor Anno Online Applo Arcane Hearts Arcane Legends ArchLord ArcheAge Archeblade Archlord 2 Archlord X Armored Warfare Ascend: Hand of Kul Asda 2 Asda Story Ashen Empires Asheron's Call Asheron's Call 2 Astera Online Astonia III Astro Empires Astro Lords: Oort CLoud Asura Force Atlantica Online Atriarch Aura Kingdom Aurora Blade Auto Assault Avatar Star Battle Dawn Battle Dawn Galaxies Battle for Graxia Battle of 3 Kingdoms Battle of the Immortals Battlecruiser Online Battlestar Galactica Online Battlestar Reloaded Beyond Protocol Bionic Marine Command Online Black Aftermath Black Desert Black Gold Black Prophecy Black Prophecy Tactics: Nexus Conflict Blackguards 2 Blacklight Retribution Blade & Soul Blade Hunter Blade Wars Blazing Throne Bless Blitz 1941 Blood and Jade Bloodlines Champions Boot Hill Heroes Borderlands 2 Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel Bound by Flame Bounty Bay Online Brain Storm Bravada Bravely Default Bravely Second Brawl Busters. Brick-Force Bright Shadow Bullet Run Business Tycoon Online CTRacer Cabal Online Caesary Call of Camelot Call of Gods Call of Thrones Camelot Unchained Canaan Online Cardmon Hero Cartoon Universe CasinoRPG Cast & Conquer Castle Empire Castlot Celtic Heroes Champions Online Champions of Regnum Chaos Online Child of Light Chrono Tales Citadel of Sorcery CitiesXL Citizen Zero City of Decay City of Heroes City of Steam City of Transformers City of Villains Civilization Online Clan Lord Clash of Clans Cloud Nine Club Penguin Colony of War Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances Company of Heroes Online Conquer Online Conquer Online 3 Continent of the Ninth (C9) Core Blaze Core Exiles Corum Online Craft of Gods Crimecraft Crimelife 2 Cronous Crota II Crowfall Crusaders of Solaris Cultures Online Cyber Monster 2 Cyberpunk 2077 Céiron Wars
D&D Online DC Universe DK Online DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 DV8: Exile Dalethaan Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Relic: Prelude Dark Solstice Dark Souls 2 Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkest Dungeon Darkfall Darkfall: Unholy Wars Darkwind: War on Wheels Das Tal Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide DayZ Dead Earth Dead Frontier Dead Island Dead Island 2 Dead Island: Riptide Deco Online Deep Down Deepworld Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Demons at the Horizon Desert Operations Destiny Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Divinity: Original Sin Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Age: Inquisition Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Fin Soup Dragon Heart Online Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Pals Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Call II Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dragons and Titans Drakengard 3 Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Rampage Dungeon Runners Dungeon of the Endless Dying Light Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online Dynasty of the Magi EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthrise Eclipse War Ecol Tactics Online Eden Eternal Edge of Space Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elder Scrolls Online Eldevin Elf Online Elite: Dangerous Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire Empire & State Empire Craft Empire Universe 3 EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Blue Moon Online Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Eternal Saga Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverEmber Online EverQuest Next EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Evony Exarch Exorace F.E.A.R. Online Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout 4 Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Fearless Fantasy Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy Type-0 HD Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forge Forsaken Uprising Forsaken World Fortnite Fortuna Forum for Discussion of Everlight Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
GRAV GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones: Seven Kingdoms Gameglobe Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gauntlet Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer Gloria Victis Glory of Gods GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods Rush Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Granado Espada Online Grand Chase Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall H1Z1 Habbo Hotel Hailan Rising HaloSphere2 Hand of Fate Haven & Hearth Hawken Heart Forth Alicia Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero Online Hero Zero Hero's Journey Hero: 108 Online HeroSmash Heroes & Generals Heroes & Legends: Conquerors of Kolhar Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Atlan Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Heroes of the Storm Hex Holic Online Hostile Space Hunter Blade Huxley Icewind Dale: Enhanced Edition Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Imperator Imperian Inferno Legend Infestation: Survivor Stories Infinite Crisis Infinity Infinity Iris Online Iron Grip: Marauders Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kartuga Kicks Online Kill Strain King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom Under Fire II Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kings Era Kings and Legends Kings of the Realm KingsRoad Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Age Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online Kyn L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Landmark Lands of Hope: Redemption LastChaos League of Angels League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Edda: Vengeance Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Grimrock 2 Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 2 Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Lego Minifigures Online Lichdom: Battlemage Life is Feudal Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lords of the Fallen Lords of the Fallen 2 Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia World
MU Online Mabinogi Maestia: Rise of Keledus MagiKnights Magic Barrage Magic World Online Manga Fighter MapleStory Martial Heroes Marvel Heroes Marvel Super Hero Squad Online Marvel: Avengers Alliance Mass Effect 4 MechWarrior Online Megaten Meridian 59 : Evolution Merlin MetalMercs Metaplace Metin 2 MicroVolts Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor Midkemia Online Might & Magic Heroes Online Might & Magic Heroes: Kingdoms Might & Magic X: Legacy MilMo Minecraft Mini Fighter Minions of Mirth Ministry of War Monato Esprit Monkey King Online Monkey Quest Monster & Me Monster Hunter 4: Ultimate Monster Madness Online MonsterMMORPG Moonlight Online: Tales of Eternal Blood Moonrise Mordavia Mortal Online Mourning My Lands Myst Online: URU Live Myth Angels Online Myth War Myth War 2 Mythborne Mytheon Mythic Saga Mythos N.E.O Online NIDA Online Nadirim Naviage: The Power of Capital Navy Field Need for Speed World Nemexia Neo's Land NeoSteam Neocron Nether Neverwinter Nexus: The Kingdom Of The Winds NinjaTrick NosTale Nova Genesis Novus Aeterno Oberin Odin Quest Odyssey RPG Ogre Island Omerta 3 Online Boxing Manager Onverse Oort Online Order & Chaos Online Order of Magic Original Blood Origins Return Origins of Malu Orion's Belt Otherland Forums OverSoul Overkings Overwatch Oz Online Oz World Pandora Saga Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Panzar Parabellum Parallel Kingdom Parfait Station Path of Exile Pathfinder Online Perfect World Perpetuum Online Persona V Phantasy Star Online 2 Phantasy Star Universe Phoenix Dynasty Online Phylon Pi Story Picaroon Pillars of Eternity Pirate Galaxy Pirate Storm Pirate101 PirateKing Online Pirates of the Burning Sea Pirates of the Caribbean Online Pixie Hollow Planeshift Planet Arkadia Planet Calypso PlanetSide 2 Planetside Planets³ Playboy Manager Pocket Legends Pockie Ninja Pockie Pirates Pockie Saints Pokémon X and Y PoxNora Prime World Prime: Battle for Dominus Priston Tale Priston Tale II Prius Online Prodigy Project Blackout Project Gorgon Project Powder Project Titan Forums Project Wiki Project Zomboid Puzzle Pirates Quest for Infamy Quickhit Football
R2 Online RAN Online RF Online ROSE Online Rage of 3 Kingdoms Ragnarok Online Ragnarok Online II RaiderZ Rail Nation Rakion Rappelz RappelzSEA Ravenmarch Realm Fighter Realm of Sierra Realm of the Mad God Realm of the Titans Realms Online Rebel Galaxy Reclamation Red Stone Red War: Edem's Curse Regnum Online Remnant Knights Renaissance Repulse Requiem: Memento Mori Rift RiotZone Rise Rise of Dragonian Era Rise of Empire Rise of the Tycoon Risen 3: Titan Lords Rising of King Risk Your Life Rivality Rockfree Rohan: Blood Feud Role Play Worlds Roll n Rock Roma Victor Romadoria Rosh Online Roto X Rubies of Eventide Ruin Online Rumble Fighter Runes of Magic Runescape Rust Rusty Hearts Ryzom S4 League SAGA SD Gundam Capsule Fighter Online SMITE SUN Sacred 3 Sagramore Salem SaySayGirls Scarlet Blade Scions of Fate Seal Online: Evolution Second Chance Heroes Second Life Secret of the Solstice Seed Serenia Fantasy Seven Seas Saga Seven Souls Online Sevencore Shadow Realms Shadow of Legend Shadowbane Shadowgate Shadowrun Online Shaiya Shards Online Shattered Galaxy Sho Online Shot Online Shroud of the Avatar SideQuest Siege on Stars Sigonyth: Desert Eternity Silkroad Online Skyblade Skyforge SmashMuck Champions Smoo Online Soldier Front Soul Master Soul Order Online Soul of Guardian South Park: The Stick of Truth Space Heroes Universe Sparta: War of Empires Spellcasters Sphere Spiral Knights Spirit Tales Splash Fighters Squad Wars Star Citizen Star Conflict Star Sonata 2 Star Stable Star Supremacy Star Trek Online Star Trek: Infinite Space Star Wars Galaxies Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Star Wars: The Old Republic StarQuest Online Starbound Stargate Worlds Starlight Story Starpires State of Decay SteelWar Online Stone Age 2 Stormfall: Age of War Stormthrone Storybricks Stronghold Kingdoms Styx: Master of Shadows Sudden Attack Supremacy 1914 Supreme Destiny Sword Coast Legends Sword Girls Sword of Destiny: Rise of Aions SwordX Swords of Heavens Swordsman
TERA TS Online TUG Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Tales of Solaris Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris TerraWorld Online Terraria Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Aurora World The Banner Saga The Banner Saga 2 The Black Watchmen The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Crew The Division The Epic Might The Hammers End The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing 2 The Legend of Ares The Lost Titans The Matrix Online The Mighty Quest for Epic Loot The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems The West The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Theralon There Therian Saga Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Tiger Knight Titan Siege Titans of Time Toontown Online Top Speed Topia Online Torchlight Torment: Tides of Numenera Total Domination Transformers Universe Transistor Transverse Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Triad Wars Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Trove Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War Tynon U.B. Funkeys UFO Online URDEAD Online Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Naruto Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Utopia Valkyrie Sky Vampire Lord Online Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos VoidExpanse Voyage Century Online W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WAR2 Glory WYD Global Wakfu War Thunder War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Mercenaries War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Warflare Wargame1942 Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warkeepers Warrior Epic Wartune Wasteland 2 WebLords Wild West Online WildStar Wind of Luck WindSlayer 2 Wings of Destiny Wish Wizard101 Wizardry Online Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Speed World of Tanks World of Tanks Generals World of Warcraft World of Warplanes World of Warriors World of Warships World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xenoblade Chronicles: X Xenocell Xiah Xsyon Xulu YS Online Yitien ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online Zombies Ate My Pizza eRepublik Discussion Forums

All Posts by aesperus

All Posts by aesperus

252 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Last
5039 posts found

There's been a few attempts across multiple games to implement such a feature. Some worked better than others.

The problem is that the role of the GM is to essentially dictate content. Which is basically what the developer's do currently. Now you can have player generated content (i.e. the foundary), but such systems tend to get easily exploited amongst most MMOs.

The result being that it's hard to allow total freedom like you'd enjoy being the GM of a traditional tabletop. If you exploit to much as a tabletop GM you may get a bad campaign that you'll have to start over, but it's still a temporary problem. In an MMO, it can ruin the entire game, and there are no do-overs.

Having GMs could work, but it tends to work better with temporary content & only a few players. Having a persistant world shared by thousands of people means that you can't really have multiple people dictating how that world gets shaped in it's entirety. You either need to fragment the world severely (instanced GM quests, for example), or you need to severely limit the powers one has as a GM.

Originally posted by filmoret
Originally posted by Axehilt
Originally posted by Malabooga

WvWvW has been insanely popular.

and zerg vs zerg....what bunch of poo....its massive pvp and if you call any group over 5  zerg...yes it will ALWAYS be zerg vs. zerg most of the prime time. No, you wont see 300 5 man groups running around PvPing. because ill form a zerg and gladly run over all your 300 5 man groups :) then youll form a zerg and we got ball rolling again :)

you dont get to beat imposible odds....every time. No your 5 man group is not uber and if it manages to take out 100 people of equal skill that just means theres someting terribly wrong with the game.

I don't think people expect to beat 10+ opponents with 5.  It can happen, but it's rare and not an expectation.

The bigger expectation is that PVP should revolve around skillful competition, and obviously the majority of games with massive PVP don't police team balance, which results in PVP not decided by skill (instead it's decided by whether you happened to join the overpopulated faction.)

 I never saw a 5 man take out a 20 man in GW2 but I have seen it happen in ESO.  When you become one of the elite you will do things that normal players think is impossible.  Just goto thornblade and look for Anomyous Elf's group which sometimes only has 5-10 people and they are holding off entire zergs by themselves.  The new change to 1.6 will be interesting to see how it turns out.  I really don't have a good answer on why 99% of the market ignores massive pvp.  I don't see much difference between 5 people trying to kill each other and 500.  Except its much easier to die.  1 Epic player can be a king in a 5 man fight but he is just a normal player mixed in with 500.

Really? Cause I have. I've been in 5 mans that've done it, and there are videos that demonstrate this online. There's even a few people that have proven to go 1v10+ and succeed. Medicat, Shattercat, & Koroshi are a few that come to mind off the top of my head, but there are plenty of other players at that level of play (or even better).

And tbh, I've found this to be true of every mass PvP game I've played. Even the ones w/ horrible class/skill balance. It all comes down to how large of a gap there is between skill / game knowledge, and coordination. Better players will be way more efficient with each and every skill. They'll make them count, and they'll make them count vs. multiple opponents simultaneously. Simulary, against players of comparable skill / coordination, the numbers need to be a lot more even (regardless of game balance).

Why the market majority tends to avoid this type of gameplay is simple. Look at 90% of games made in the past 20 years. Almost all of them are made to make the player feel like they are an absolute badass. You are the hero, and you alone are better than the rest. It doesn't matter how smart, or how skilled you are, the game ensures you succeed. It feels good. No one likes to feel like they've been pounded into nothing. But all PvP games have to allow for such possibilites. This gets amplified by large scale PvP, because you don't just feel like you've lost to a really good player. You feel like you've been stomped by 'the zerg', or worse you become the zerg and then realize you just got owned by that 5 man team. Mass PvP is much harder to design properly than smaller scale pvp, and it has a much harsher enjoyment curve. It's way too common for people to feel like they have either no chance of winning, or that they're completely dominating with no real resistance.

Getting good matches on small scale pvp games is hard enough, getting those really good mass battles in mass pvp games fluctuates greatly, and ESO has shown this quite clearly. Especially when you go look at the battles now vs. what was seen closer to launch.

Originally posted by d_20

Before ESO, a lot of people said Warhammer failed because it had only two factions. Three factions were supposed to ensure a kind of balance because the two underdog factions would join against the dominant one -- hearkening back to the good old (rose tinted?) glory days of DAoC. But it doesn't seem to be working out in ESO right now.

How did three factions work in DAoC? Was it balanced? Is there anything ESO can do differently (like DAoC or otherwise) to make 3-way pvp work in Cyrodiil?

Do you think the NA campaigns are faction-imbalanced now? (If you give an opinion, please say what faction you mainly pvp for.)

Are there any games that have managed to solve this type of problem? What can be done?

The missing element here is 'realm pride'.

Back in DAoC people actually gave a crap about their factions, and about winning. If you're territory was being invaded (or you lost DF) it was a big deal.

In these newer games, it's really hard to tell whether is a game mechanics problem, or just an issue with player apathy. How do you make people give a crap about winning PvP, without having too punishing gameplay? How do you keep enough people interested in a neverending PvP cycle, instead of constantly hopping to the next best thing? These are pretty important questions that affect the survival of such game mechanics. You need a lot of active players, and a lot of players who care for this type of PvP to be fun.

You lose either, or both of those, and the fun's over.

Cyrodiil is still the best made feature in ESO to date. There's not a whole lot 'wrong' with how it was made, and many people played ESO for Cyrodiil alone (though many also left due to a lot of bugs and server stability issues). It seems much more likely that today's gaming climate just doesn't support this type of PvP very well. That there are too many gamers that will game hop, or become disinterested.

World PvP only work in games that have a longterm / stable population.

Originally posted by delete5230

I don't think there are many people asking for easy :

- Little Johnnies mother is not making a phone call to developers asking to make mmos easy so her son can play !

- No one is asking for purely liner either.

- I don't even think ANYONE is asking for cash shops except people trying to play totally for free.

The point of all three issues are WE ARE NOT IN CONTROL OF BAD MARKETING.....This is pretty much only in the mmo industry !

This is why mmos suck !.....We are not in control of what we like.  Were told ! 

I think a bit of a reality check is in order:

1) The data shows contrary to what you think. In every game I've seen data for, roughly ~10-20% (or less) of a game's population partakes in it's most difficult content. MMOs aren't really that difficult to begin with, so that should tell you something right there.

Now, you may be thinking 'well I know 100 people on an internet forum that also don't want easy content!' and you may even be telling the truth. But let's do some math on that one. Nearly all MMOs have at least a thousand player, most having populations in the 10s or 100s of thousands. Take some of the more well known ones that have around 2-300k players, and you're talking about a population of around 3-6000 that likes the harder content. That is a lot of people, but it's still a small fraction of the total playerbase.

Have harder games become more popular? Absolutely. But the number of people who play video games has also grown substantially since the first / second generation of games.

2) Cash shops would not exist if they didn't make money. Cash shops cost the studios money to run them, to maintain them, and to handle potential issues such as faulty transactions. They wouldn't even bother making a cash shop if it haasn't been proven to be very profitable.

3) You were NEVER in control. The only way you have control over something is if you do it yourself. You want control over a game, create one yourself. The reality is much different than how you imagine it to be.

Don't confuse a lack of control with a lack of choice, though. You can still choose what you yourself buy into, what you play, and what you don't. You may not be able to sway others opinions, but you have complete control over your own.

Originally posted by ReallyNow10

In most MMO's, sword and shield ("sword and board") is for tanking only, and 2 handed weapons are for DPS only.

Why not expand those options and simply have the modes (Offensive and Defensive) make those weapon sets viable for tanking and DPS roles?

SO, a warrior with sword and shield could DPS, with the shield doing decent off-hand damage and spell interrupts.  The 2 handed weapon wielder would do good parries.

Sort of like the table below:

                                                              Main Hand DPS     Off Hand DPS    Blocking       Parrying

Tank Role, sword and board             Average                    Weak                 Strong         Average

Tank Role, 2 handed weapon           Average                     na                       na                 Strong

DPS Role, sword and board              Strong            +        Average              Average        Weak

DPS Role, 2 handed weapon            Very Strong              na                       na                 Average

Of course, "sword and board" can be any one handed weapon and shield.  And the "strong", "average", "weak" values above are just examples.  Main thing, is I think designs would work to allow more role variety for the "weapon and shield" and "2 handed weapon" folks.


The idea's been done before in a few different games. Maybe not exactly in the manner as your table, but it's been done.

It's a cool idea, but it is problematic for the games that are built around a trinity. Most dungeons have more than one boss, and you don't want to have to switch out tanks for each one. This tends to create issues where one form of tanking is generally viewed as 'superior' for certain (or in some cases all) dungeons, and thus the other types tend to get neglected.

Essentially what makes the trinity so popular is that it's combat dumbed down to be as simple as possible. When you start fragmenting the classes too much it counteracts the whole point of having the trinity to begin with.

Originally posted by kroz318 turn a genre I hate into something enjoyable. Over the years I've tried multiple mobas multiple times and just never liked them. Got a beta code for this today and absolutely love it. Don't even know why. It's just fun unlike the other times I've tried playing mobas. Thanks for the code by the way!

It's because, like other genres, they've taking everything that requires actual thought out of this one. The one exception being Starcraft 2.

HotS is definitely fun, but it's fun like Call of Duty is fun. It's good in bite sized chunks, but the gameplay is very shallow compared to it's peers within the same genre. It gets old imho.

I like the constant team fighting, but not the lack of strategy. Maybe they will change that, since they seem to be determined to make this into an esport, but I'm not holding my breath.

Originally posted by Avirell

I have provided the link to the "Game Summary" of Pantheon's website for their upcoming MMO. I personally hope that ALL of their "Game Tenents" and "Game Features" hold true upon release, as this is what I have been WANTING in an MMO since my first MMO "EverQuest" back in 1999. With the latest update video I saw as well, this game is moving up quickly on my personal "Hype" meter! They seem to have a mindset of the CLASSIC style of MMORPG many of us have been clamoring for on this site as of late. With McQuaid (I know he has issues with money heh) I KNOW the guy will create the type of  MMO  I want to play since he was co-creator of EQ !

Feel free to post your thoughts regarding the link to their game summary page.

Not to deflate the hype, but this is not exactly uncommon.

The general ideas behind many games sound great on paper. It's all up to the execution (and how much our own personal expectations clash with those realities) that determine how much we enjoy them.

Though I will agree, it does sound like a lot of good features / ideas / concepts. This is definitely a game on my radar, though I'm holding off on being too hyped about it for now.

Originally posted by filmoret
Personally I love massive pvp but for some reason its a niche thing that doesn't appear to be growing very well.  At first glance people usually just scream zergfest then cry and run away and goto a forum and write a post in utter despair.  Having played Rift's 180 person fights and actually paying attention to what was happening you could see group organization and tactics.  Same thing for GW2 but one can easily get bored of the player stacking that occurs.  But for someone to cry about ESO's cyrodiil just boggles my mind altogether.  What are people expecting from massive warfare?  You get rewards for winning and using strategies and tactics trump a mindless zerg any day.  Yet people will continually write articles about how zergy and crappy and pointless it all is.

There's a few reasons for this that I've noticed.

1) People don't like losing, and it's easy to feel like a game's 'unfair' when you get killed by 30 people (even if it's largely your fault for being in that position in the first place).

2) Burnout. Mass PvP games tend to get extremely repetative. The same general tactics tend to work for each game (with minor differences of course), but it's very easy for this games to turn into games of base / objective trading. And thus people tend to get tired of it. This is in part because these systems are persistent (which is a double-edged sword); but also because it's hard to make the objectives really feel significant to the game world without forcing pvp on members that do not wish to join in at that time. This  gets amplified by problems of attrition, as these systems require a healthy population to still be enjoyable.

3) Nearly every game in the last decade or more has been engineered to make the player feel like they are the strongest badass in the universe. You don't get to feel that way in massive PvP games unless you actually earn it.

As has been discussed numerous times over the passed few years, 'zergs' 'zerging' etc. are a fairly standard tactic. This is true of both actual warfare and virtual ones. This is where concepts like 'safety in numbers' come into play. Hell, even in traditional raiding you are typically gathering a bunch of your buddies to go beat up on 1 or a few guys.

- After the above the 3 reasons there tends to be a massive stigma around mass PvP, primarily being a zergy non-skill based, unbalanced mess. This is of course, not really true, but most players never get involved enough to actually learn this. Most of the strategy comes from organized groups (or strike forces) communicating over voice coms. Of which the average player is not invited into unless they show an active interest in participating & being useful. Which is a lot less common than it should be.

Originally posted by Electro057

I've realized in games of recent that there's a severe lack of support classes, that is classes that aren't healers but rather they specialize in buffing the party and using spells that control the field of battle or tempo of a fight. Things like Bards! What happened to this role in MMOs? It was always my favourite, playing strategist and mascot in the backlines.

There's a number of reasons.

Support classes haven't completely died, but they are indeed a lot less common (for your typical MMORPG that is). This is primarily due to solo / group dynamics in the current market. People don't want to be too dependant on others to get things done anymore. In the past you would need to group up to achieve most things. Today, most things are meant to be soloed, with only the hardest content requiring a group to beat. Furthermore groups have gotten much smaller. 5 man groups are much easier to obtain than 8 or even 10, let alone a full raid of 40+. It's the magic number that yields the highest chance of getting a group, without completely destroying the group dynamic.

All that said, there is just simply not enough room for traditional support roles within the mindsets of most gamers. The average gamer wants tank, healer, DPS. That's their group, and unless forced they don't give supports much thought. Furthermore, support roles generally require the highest level of understand of game mechanics to be effective. You need to understand when & where certain buffs are effective, when to use which debuffs, etc. etc. They usually don't have 1-size fits all rotations like the other archetypes do. It's a lot more situational and actually requires a good amount of thought.

From what's been seen with each new game, the average player tends to not want to think that much about what their doing, or rely on others to do that job in order for them to get the new shiny. It sucks, a lot, but it's sadly a reality. I'm sure we will see more support classes in the future, but not as long as we continue to play overly simplistic games.

Originally posted by Nanfoodle
Its confirmed its in the game on some level. Sounds like its not something that will happen in all situations but it will in some. How do you feel about that in a PvP game? Want it, or please make it gone!!!

I like the idea behind it, but I've played enough games with it to know that stupidity ruins mechanics like this. There are just too many players who don't like to think about what they are doing. People who just fire off abilities (spray & prey tactics), tunnel vision (kill, regardless of who is in the way), don't pay attention to surroundings (walk into your line of fire without realizing it), etc. etc. etc.

In most PvP games I've played with FF enabled, your teammates end up doing more damage to your team than the enemy does. It almost turns into a battle of who can commit suicide faster.

Sadly, it's for that reason that I think it should probably not be in the game, or at least hopefully it stays limited to certain abilities (maybe certain AoEs). Even then it's very easy to troll your teammates with it. We'll see how it turns out.

Originally posted by emi56

Is it pretty easy to get tomes of knowledge in sPvP? I don't do it that much... 

Planning on running Ascalonina Catacombs story mode  later today if anybody wants to join us! 

Yes, Tomes of Knowledge / Exp scrolls are pretty common while doing sPvP. It's a large part of how you lvl up via sPvP. Basically, nearly everything you do in this game gives you experience. Which means there is a ton of freedom as to how you choose to lvl yourself.

Originally posted by Wizardry

Point is pvp has become soooooooooooo dumb down it is always just Counterstrike in a different setting.Even worse is 90% of the time,players are standing out in the open ,no cover often times spamming to get lucky.I seriously do not see the intrigue in playing pvp like that,i guess it is a nice EASY design for good players to have it easy mode versus so many non pvp players just joining in for the popularity.

I have not seen one game improve on the first 4 or so pvp games that started all of this Unreal,Quake,HL,CS,COD.Everything outside of those games has been a terrible pvp design.I tried watching some Gears of War last night,the combat was so fast,i could barely follow it,made my eyes hurt.

The ONLY thing i enjoy about most of these games are some of the streamers are VERY entertaining,streamers often make a 3/10 game a 7/10.Devs should be paying the streamers because it is them who are making bad games popular.

First off, allow me to change your metaphor to say 'it is always just like Call Of Duty'. CS still has objective based gameplay, even if it is minimal compared to many other PvP games. COD has devolved into an IP that is basically all about kills and killstreaks.

That said, you're very much right. And as someone who enjoys PvP games (amongst other things) It frustrates me to no end. It's a problem I've been dealing w/  lately in SMITE. In order to play with players who understand the basic game mechanics you have to go pretty high up on the skill-brackets. The vast majority of players just run around with their brains turned off wondering why they're losing, or thinking they are the sh*t when they've done basically nothing of value.

This is a trend in a lot of games I've been seeing. Too many players unwilling to learn basic game mechanics, and instead just want to shut off their brain and autopilot. I understand the appeal, I just wish it would stay out of teambased gameplay. It's annoying when you're fate is shared with others, and part of your team are essentially vegetables.

Originally posted by hayes303

Its not the pvp that has hurt the genre, its that developers link pvp to ffa loot systems and sandbox gameplay. That seems to have created 2 things; 1. bitterness from a lot of people who enjoy sandbox gameplay and a open crafting world, and 2. games that cater to the lowest common denominator. These ffa loot gankfests that come out now seem designed for the griefers. Hard to attract new players when they are farmed like a resources.

If they could make a game with pvp that actually mattered, but make it voluntary as part of a larger sandbox world, I think it wouldn't be a problem (other than the endless class balance crying, but Rome wasn't built in a day). The way SWG did it was pretty good.

Except that it's usually the players who make these links, not the developers.

The developers are almost always doing what they think people will play (aka buy). Any developer that is worth anything knows what the term sandbox actually means, they understand that game mechanics are tool towards building a game, and not necessarily required features.

Players, on the other hand, make demands. They insist that game X must have features A, B, & C or else it's 'not a true game'. Players also frequently confuse the term 'sandbox' with the terms 'open world', 'seamless', and 'FFA'. All of these are clearly different things, but sometimes they get marketed as the same, because that's how players view them.

Originally posted by Vesavius
Originally posted by aesperus
Originally posted by Vesavius

If you're main focus is to be on 'the pvp mentality', then you need to more clearly define what you think that means.

or maybe, considering the terminology was very clear, it is up to others to ask if they do not understand instead of leaping to the kind of hostile argument that we have seen here in this thread?

PvP is a game mechanic.

It is. But the culture it breeds isn't.

Simply put.

If by 'very clear' you mean this: "Action over deliberation. Reflex over thought." then I fear you misunderstand my post entirely. If you were referring to a different phrase somewhere else in the thread, then I apologize, and a quote / page number would definitely be appreciated. There is absolutely nothing 'hostile' in what a posted. Just logic. Simply put; If you're trying to host an argument based on the stance that something you believe exists, you need to first show that it does.

Assuming that is the correct phrase, it is not clear enough. It mentions generalizations, yet fails to mention why you think this pertains to PvP, or to provide examples of 'the culture it breeds'.

- That said, going off your 'clear definition', you're stance is that PvP breeds an environment in which people act before thinking, and react without thought. And yet, this is exactly the opposite of what PvP games promote. You can take any of the top PvP games, and what separates the better players from the rest is decision making, tactics, and practice. Twitch skills do play an important factor (primarily in non-objective based FPS games), but those skills are often overemphasized by players of lower-skill.

This is why you get a lot of rage from higher Elo (MMR) players who get placed in games with people of low Elo / MMR. Because less experienced players don't understand the forethought, the planning involved. They don't connect action A to results B & C. They play for kills, and then wonder why they are losing when they gave up uncontested objectives.

That said, how is that behavior any different than raiding? Do people not also get mad when they bring in a newbie to a raid, who does not know the fight, and hasn't planned accordingly? Because I've seen this happen in every MMO I've played with high-end PvE.

It's a form of ignorance, and while it is indeed toxic, it is not limited to games of one mechanic or another.

Originally posted by Vesavius
Originally posted by Airwren
Originally posted by Vesavius

Let's look at the last decade. A decade where the PvP mentality has dominated. 

A decade where we have seen the PvP mentality demand that tab is dead and that twitch is the future again and again (yeah, looking at you Murphy!).

Action over deliberation. Reflex over thought.

Where has that brought us, really?

Are our communities better? Is the social heart of this genre (the only real thing that ever made it special...) healthier? Are we less transient, less toxic, for the push towards PvP dominated design?

Where has PvP, PvP, PvP brought us in the end?

I'm not really certain that I would agree with "PVP mentality has dominated".  The most successful MMO's over the last 10 years are not really PvP games at their core.  Sure, PvP is there, but I wouldn't say they are pvp-centric games.  At the end of the day I personally believe a shift has been made over the last 10 years with PvE being the focus of most MMO's, as this drives their revenue.  The PvP centered games are not having a lot of big dollar luck.  This discussion should really be about the shift to the FTP, early alpha/beta paid access, Kickstarter trends that seem to be where this genre is heading.  I think Pvp is the last thing people should worry about.

First off, thanks for the reasonable mature response. It's appreciated.

To be clear, it was not said that PvP games have dominated, it was said that that the PvP mentality has, which is not the same thing.

I think many in this thread have missed that point.

If you're main focus is to be on 'the pvp mentality', then you need to more clearly define what you think that means.

PvP is a game mechanic. One that focuses around players competing with each other.

You have players and developers that prefer such mechanics within their games. However neither of those particularly constitutes a 'mentality'. The way you assume all PvPers act can be considered a mentality, however player-preference is not.

Simply put, what you may be thinking of as a 'mentality' might actually not be one at all. The most logical alternative would be 'pvp focused games', but here you have explicitly stated that isn't what you're talking about.

Originally posted by Vesavius

Let's look at the last decade. A decade where to PvP mentality has dominated. 

A decade where we have seen the PvP mentality demand that tab is dead and that twitch is the future again and again (yeah, looking at you Murphy!).

Action over deliberation. Reflex over thought.

Where has that brought us, really?

Are our communities better? Is the social heart of this genre (the only real thing that ever made it special...) healthier? Are we less transient, less toxic, for the push towards PvP dominated design?

Where has PvP, PvP, PvP brought us in the end?

I disagree. If anything, we've seen primarily a focus on PvE oriented MMOs.

Things like raiding, gear grinding, personal storylines, etc. are things that most PvPers don't typically care about. And yet they are there in almost every main MMO. Heck, they drive most of these games.

Have there been more PvP-oriented MMOs? Absolutely, but they are the exception, not the rule.

Furthermore, what you're describing is basically 'action-combat', which is not PvP specific by any means. Heck, Devil May Cry & God of War are action combat games. They have zero PvP. As is darksiders, some of the newer Zelda games, Shadow of the Colossus, etc. etc.

It's a combat mechanic that has nothing to do with whether or not the game is PvP, and all to do with how engaging & exciting the combat is. You may prefer combat that is oriented around tab targetting, around turn-based, or around doing simple rotations around a simple aggro table. That doesn't mean those designs aren't dated or archaic, though. It also has nothing to do w/ the communities themselves.

Some of the best communities I've known are in games with PvP, and some of the most toxic in games that were primarily PvE (FFXI for example). Conversely I've played PvE games with great communities, and PvP games with horrible ones. The subjective of community has little to do with combat mechanics, and much more to do w/ the general attitude & involvement a game has w/ it's community. When a company takes an active stance to be invested in & nurture their community, it tends to thrive (gw2 is a good example of this, as was everquest). When companies just let their communities devolve into another internet toilet, you get toxic ones.

So how has PvP mindsets affected our communities within MMOs? They haven't.

Originally posted by monochrome19
If I can play WoW or any other MMORPG from the comfort of my bed with a tablet then I'll hope and pray that PCs die overnight. Because honestly, I use my tablet for everything nowadays, the only reason I use my PC is for gaming, photoshop, modeling, programming, etc ... (basically, really hardcore task). If I can transfer this workload to a more comfortable and easy to carry medium it would be greatly appreciated. However, tablets are nowhere near powerful enough to replace a pc with an i7 and gtx 970.

You can do some of those tasks on a tablet.

The thing is, why would you want to?

I don't know what capacity you work on such things, but for me I want all the screen realestate that I can possibly get. And that requires some sort of work station. Furthermore, if you're using a stylis (which most artists in that realm do), you need some kind of stable platform to use them on. It doesn't have to be a desk, but it does prevent certain scenarios from being practical. You can try working from a comfy couch, or a cushion, but you'd still need that work station to get anything reasonable done. Which is why, even for simple photo editing, tablets by themselves are usually to clumsy to be practical.

Originally posted by Rigamortis

First off,  I am old enough to disclose that my first PC was the Tandy 1000 I bought at Radio Shack back in the late 80's.  I also studied the architecture of the 8088 / 8086 chip.  Since then....I have owned and built more PC's then I can remember.  On the weekends I listen to a guy on the radio who does a Tech Show.  He is very knowledgeable and I respect his opinion the majority of the time.

However,  this last weekend he made a bold statement I completely disagree with.  He said the PC (as we know it) will go the way of the DoDo bird and not be around in 5 years.  He theorizes that everything will be going to "PC Tablets".  Sure,  the PC market has taken a sizable hit since the IPAD and other tablets have become very popular.  However,  with the multi-billion dollar video game industry as well as the major players in the GPU / Video cards,  there is no way (in my opinion) the PC will die.  Thoughts?


You're right to doubt him. It makes no sense.

We already have tablets. They serve a very different purpose than PCs do, and it has little to do with computing power (though you can definitely get a lot more computing power from a PC). PCs serve a function you just can't really get on other devices. You have a multi-billion dollar gaming industry, and a good amount of that involves PCs. PCs not only are capable of more computing power, but also function much better as work stations.

Portable devices serve great for tasks that are suited more for travel, or being on the toilet. However you aren't going to be playing a long involved game on a tiny screen. You aren't going to be doing complex video or sound editing on a tablet or your phone. You aren't going to be doing any sort of 3d graphics / modelling / animation either.

Essentially the market is getting more diverse, not less. That is what's happening. Will the PC as we know it change? Absolutely. There are limits to how much power we can get from current tech. There's also been prototypes with different ways of building PCs. But that doesn't mean PCs are going to die in the slightest.

Originally posted by Foomerang

Ive tried talking about the actual games Ive been playing in the past BUt its usually met with, "here's why I dont like that game". SO i stopped bothering.

Pretty much this ^

I will say, though, that seems primarily limited to MMOs / heavily monetized online games.

Originally posted by SirAgravaine

All of this information didn't amass into a cohesive thought until presently. The MMORPG demographic is an illusive shapeshifting pack of progressive, traditional, twitch, elitist, casual, role-playing, forum-dwelling, game-mongering animals. We try to define ourselves by the genre we play. However that is just too damned simplified.

If you can summarize that into a genre, good for you. However, I am going to go out on a limb and assume that there are no more than a half a dozen forum-goers that would fit my demographic. I am more than okay with that. But it makes me realize that the social consciousness of the MMORPG devout is in turmoil and resistant to change. There's a tug-of-war between the old and the new, the same and the different, and without a clear is just 20+ million different voices standing alone. Some might say, my voice is my wallet, perhaps it is. But your wallet won't get games made, and choosing to not buy games that don't cater to your demographic, well....that's a rather lengthy road that I'm not sure my devout soul is willing to travel. 


Alas, this isn't a thread meant to enlighten, sway, or otherwise evoke change, just the blustering of a hopeless/ful sap.

You've definitely got a good point. And here is the problem.

What you are describing is the biproduct of us defining our MMOs as a personal shopping list of features, instead of a general genre to try.

Think of it in this way, when you play other games (non-MMOs) how often do you think 'man it better have, A-B-C-D-E-F&G features, or I'm not playing it!? I'm willing to bet that if you do it at all, it's fairly rare. You may have a couple general expectations (it's an FPS, it should have a retical and some fun guns), but that's about it. For the most part when it comes to every genre BUT MMOs, we approach new games like.. well, new games. We try them as new experiences to play around with, and less like spiritual successors to every other game in the same genre.

For some reason, when it comes to MMO, we feel the need to compare each new MMO with every other MMO we've played in the past. We first judge it based on those games we used to enjoy (whether or not it lives up to those standards which we each have made individually), and if that fails we then compare them to the games that we did not like.

I think it's definitely a mentality problem, and it's preventing many of us from enjoying newer games. Not every MMO can be lightning in a bottle, but many of them are better games than we give them credit for.

252 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Last