| 672 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Foundational Principle #8 This should be a chaotic game
General Discussion « Camelot Unchained 2/26/13 3:21:05 PM
I like the statement about the land will be affected by players actions. Sounds like there will be areas where magic is powerful and others where it will be almost useless, makes for a good mix for melee characters. Also anything random in a game is always great. If there is a very small chance of having something backfire or miss it always makes it a bit more interesting.
|
|
|
"US free-to-play audience outnumbers pay-to-play 6 to 1"
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 2/23/13 3:50:29 PM
Who cares. I would rather play with a smaller tight knit population than a huge on the go population of passer through players. I will not play F2P games.
|
|
|
THIS NEW TESO news is going to shock you all, literally.
General Discussion « Elder Scrolls Online 2/23/13 1:52:04 PM
The bigger waste of money and time is trying to make a 1st person view where you see your hands for the few that are crying about wanting it in the game which they will never use after they see that its worse than playing it in 3rd person.
|
|
|
[Column] General: Wayback Machine to the Future
News & Features Discussion « General Discussion 2/22/13 10:39:11 PM
Leisure Suit Larry
I would love to see Oregon Trail, good one Rob. |
|
|
THIS NEW TESO news is going to shock you all, literally.
General Discussion « Elder Scrolls Online 2/22/13 9:30:32 PM
Its old news. Why would anyone be shocked? What new AAA game has quest lines and NPC's you have to read anymore? Skyrim is fully voiced.
|
|
|
I thought they were going to announce titan, but it was only d3. lol
|
|
|
Since Mark has said the game will be class based, I see probably 6 per realm at launch. Could be less, say 3 classes like warrior/mage/archer type of thing but I wouldnt be suprised to see 6 or more with different variations on each base type.
|
|
|
Is the community bringing another promising game down?
General Discussion « Elder Scrolls Online 2/18/13 3:46:56 PM
I was looking forward to the game since it was announced but since actually seeing the population they have targeted though, it has died down alot. Actually stepping back and looking at the genre's new audience it has me doubting there will ever be any game I can get into anytime soon, that is for another topic though. But for this one it seems to me they are trying to please too many people here at once and will end up pleasing nobody. MMO fans are hard as hell to please, actually pretty much impossible. They like to cry about everything and always want something else than what they have in the game. Most mmo gamers today like to get everything for free and love easy casual games (GW2, COD or any other F2P game out there) hence while games only last a few months than fade away. This is the market they are targeting, these are the people who will be playing the game. TES fans are mostly console players and probably don't even have a computer from this decade that will run this game so they are already crying about that. TES fans also are impossible to please and are always crying about anything new in any of the games and the series has really turned into a watered down playable book instead of a game. TES fans also are used to very slooooooow repetative combat looking through first person while fighting 3-4 mobs at a time at the most where they can pause it and drink 20 pots to heal or stop to think about what they will do next and maybe even reload the game before they got into trouble. They will also probably never get into the PvP part of the game and leave after they run through the story once. But I played Skyrim for 1000 hours, yeah and you were alone so you obviously like being alone but this is a MMO. What is this post even about? I don't know, it was just a small rant but to answer the OP question, yes. The community will probably canabalize the game in a few months and spit it out moving on the the next victim. If they cave into to the crying of too many different groups they will only shoot themselves in the foot by half assing the rest of the game and not pleasing anyone. I think I will turn my attention to smaller niche games because these mass marketed games are really not worth it anymore. I will still check the game out (as long as its not F2P) and hope it turns out well but like I said before after seeing the people who will actually be playing the game, I have my doubts now. |
|
|
Destructive criticism the cancer of gaming forums
The Pub at MMORPG.COM « General Discussion 2/15/13 2:32:40 PM
I don't think destructive criticism helps anyone except the person posting it. If you are unhappy with a game, sure vent a post about it. Its when you continue to pick it apart that really borders on trolling with a vengence, what is the point to stick around in something that you don't like? Its like going to a movie that you hate over and over to scream in the theatre about how the movie sucks and how you would like it to have been made your way. Sure you can do it, but what purpose does it serve in the end?
|
|
|
I have never backed a game before in KS but this one so far is looking like it might be my first. Unless something comes out that I don't like I see myself throwing some cash at it. There is still a lot of time left before it goes up, so I'am keeping a close eye on it. So as of right now, its a yes but still waiting to hear more about what he has plans to do.
|
|
|
I think its pretty smart. He is not making a game for everyone and wants to see if there is a actually a population that is actually interested in it. He said they will be asking for 2 mil and if it is met, he will throw in 3 mil of his own money to make the game. If its not met the game is dead and nobody loses any money.
|
|
|
A very interesting survey someone on the ESO subreddit made
General Discussion « Elder Scrolls Online 2/13/13 3:29:53 PM
AD/HighElf/Healer-Support here, looks like I will be in high demand.
|
|
|
Foundation Principle #4 Choice Matters!
General Discussion « Camelot Unchained 2/13/13 1:19:42 PM
Yeah I agree, I've liked them all, but this one is the best so far. I like to have choices that have good and bad consequences.
|
|
|
Since when did anything for free not attract d-bags from all walks of life. Get used to it, they are the future of F2P gaming. LOL
|
|
|
Must See about ESO and mmorpgs in general.
General Discussion « Elder Scrolls Online 2/12/13 9:21:44 PM
I agree with the dude to a certain point about alot of the things he is saying, but I can't stop thinking while watching him that little one liner "Cocaine is a helluv a drug". I doubt ESO will be for hardcore fans though, I don't think we will really see any anymore. Also damn I hate the Yankee's. Phillies/Eagles fan here and we know lots about losing.
|
|
|
[Column] General: F2P and the Consumer Choice Narrative
News & Features Discussion « General Discussion 2/12/13 3:59:22 PM
Originally posted by darkhalf357x Yes I think GW2 is a crap fest. They can't even fix the game becasue they are rushing out holiday events so they can cash in off the gem store while disregarding the actual game part. I'am not talking about chain restaurants chief. Really? You think you get more value out of free stuff when your talking about a product? Do you buy some cheap peice of crap in a store if it has some other peice of crap that comes with it free over something thats a bit more expensive and is built better and think you got a deal? |
|
|
[Column] General: F2P and the Consumer Choice Narrative
News & Features Discussion « General Discussion 2/12/13 2:25:36 PM
I disagree entirely. Its ruining the genre into a type of fast food crap fest where nobody is part of a community within these games anymore. Your just a random number drooling ATM machine for these companies that try to entice you into buying some crap from a cash shop to make some money off you. When I play a game or go out to eat, I expect top notch service and a quality experience. I don't go to buffet's because you get neither, as I don't play F2P because you get neither. F2P just allows a crap game to stick around longer than it should, there is no quality control built in with it. A subscription game allows players to show if the game is good or not, if the game is crap you lose all your players, hence you lose your income. F2P you only need a few players who dish out tons of money to keep it alive with droves of others that just pop in to try it out, which is the same as the old free trial system which had nothing wrong with it. |
|
|
[Column] World of Warcraft: A New Hope
News & Features Discussion « General Discussion 2/11/13 12:41:07 PM
Will there be people that never move with ! over their heads in the movie?
|
|
|
I can live with that if it will be tied into the different pay models or even fluff, I just don't like seeing stuff in a game that has to be purchased with real money if I'am paying a full sub on top of it.
|
|
|
Mark, I have been reading all your Foundation Principals so far and have been agreeing with almost all of it so far. But today reading your #3 blog, I have to say the comment about the cash shop has been off-putting to say the least. I will pay a sub if a game is good and I enjoy playing with no problem, but I will not buy anything from cash shops and think they are crap in this genre. Everything else I like so far, this cash shop talk though makes me hesitant on supporting this project now. I never have given money to Kick starter companies because nothing has compelled or interested me enough too. I was planning on contributing some when your ks goes live if I still like the sounds of your vision, but this cash shop talk is questionable. So a simple question... What as a developer are the advantages of having a cash shop in the game and how does that allow you to improve the quality of the game for the customers?
|
|