|
|
9/27/07 4:57 PM
|
|
Viewed 596, Replies 14
|
|
|
Still playing CoX that gots a great character development and instanced (or not) missions. The good thing is that actualy there is a trial, you you loose nothing trying it. It is for usa, but if you need an euro invitation I can get one for you, just send a PM. |
|
|
|
9/27/07 4:24 PM
|
|
Viewed 1770, Replies 32
|
|
Originally posted by Pappy13
|
|
|
|
9/26/07 4:52 PM
|
|
Viewed 8132, Replies 135
|
|
Originally posted by ParkCarsHere My first MMORPG ever was Nexus TK (Nexus what!?), a small MMORPG that had 1,000 people on at peak times during the day, generally more like 300. I paid $10 a month for that, and the graphics were terrible but it had the BEST community and the BEST roleplaying I had ever seen. The community made hunting for experience fun and the roleplaying made the game ever evolving, even though the devs only updated like once a month, if that.
Total agree but, not all games "sucks", I think that are some games that really offers good things that are not profited enought: The problem seems to be the community (dont flame please). What I mean is that there are lot of people "crazy" about leveling, that goes mad if dont get 10 levels a day and dont get the "best" sword, this are a "lot" of peep that need to be superior than other in the game, that runs doing missions or killing mobs, just leveling the character. People that lot of times preffer to solo cause they get more exp (hey is a mmorpg! is a game to play with others!), also, seems that the games are trying to stay, not advance, just moving with names, attracting with them fanbois. Instead of this, time ago, I remember games like UO or shadowbane. When I saw the first time L2, I thought it was a crap, "o my god you cant configure your attributes!?" aye, what cand of "rpg" game is this that you cant have "your character", your "alter ego". At the end, the community, is all, is very strange finding people that "wants to help", and is easy to find elitist hardcore levelers, that dont have any problem being rude with others. Very strange to find people that act "in character", thing that can be really funny I think, no need to talk during hours and roleplay like crazy, just, dont talk constantly about "mobs", live in a hurry of xp and stuff hunt. I got a friend that is waiting for aoc. He thinks it will be great, with the combat system, the merc oportunity for players, the sieges and casttles, the cities... but... at the end, whats the point! everything will end in numbers, in "wich is the best build", "wich is the more stronger class", "where can I farm"... all this... people dont create a character that really like, creates a character that "owns everything", winning in a game is not the important part, or the one with most level; the fun is the important think. |
|
|
|
9/26/07 4:23 PM
|
|
Viewed 4378, Replies 62
|
|
Originally posted by huntter
L2 is quite old and from the first time was presented as a "hardcore" mmorpg. And really it is, it takes LOOOOOONG time to get level, LOOOOOONG time of griding... and long time of "work" to get fun... (personally, I dont understand this philosofy).
In the other side of the balance, seems that wow is really inspired on it, if Im not wrong was the first to put casttles sieges, and city management as "competition" (you fight to be the "one" that rules the city/casttle), it got classes, like Shillien Knight, that are original and combines aspects that other games, that are up to date, dont got, not everything inspired in D6D like lot of games seems to do, and, gorgeous graphics, love the dark elves and orcs.
So I think if this game was deeper in pvp and quest, deeper in competition and kills of the grind, Iwt will be really worth to pay for it. |
|
|
|
9/18/07 9:19 AM
|
|
Viewed 753, Replies 16
|
|
|
Lot of you are talking, and justifying, the graphics engine in fron 100vs100 battle... but... ey! rfonline already have it and have a good graphic engine!!
About the fps and the fighting engine, you think that you can have a FPS in a 100vs100? with no lag? you sure the technology of our lines permit to do this? I think 200 people firing together and getting "no lag"... and "aiming" in real time is not possible. For they that says: What other game got this fighting system or similar - Tabula rasa, neocron2 etc... (and neocron 2 is old enought)
as I said, Im not flaming the game, I was very interested but cant found why is really ... "special", I took a look to the oficial webpage, and still the same one year ago... dunno if people talk about vaporware or whatever, but perhaps the features and the engine was thought 2 years ago and now got old? |
|
|
|
9/18/07 9:01 AM
|
|
Viewed 849, Replies 23
|
|
Originally posted by elitexion Gw level cap is a "illusion". IS SKILL BASED. So the level in gw is not important... you can got a lvl 20 character too soon, cause, the level IS NOT IMPORTANT. As someone said, is one of darkfall promises... so...
and ton of features, yes it gots, when it comes out it bring los tof new things, like the gw system and the ladder system, the skill and the respec/customization system. no offense, but you have no idea about gw. |
|
|
|
9/17/07 6:36 PM
|
|
Viewed 753, Replies 16
|
|
|
This game is announched as "next generation" game:
so "technology never before seen, andadvanced features": First of all: Where is the "technology never before seen"? in graphics, I dont see how good graphics are, this is not the most important thing of a mmorpg game for me, but, just want to know where this "technology" is.
I think the skill system could be great, but, also, could be a crap, if you they put a cap on it, will be the same that leveling, if they dont put it, players will get overpowered characters with skills in sword, magic, armor etc.. what I mean? is that everyone will be the same, will have the same "build", cause you can have it all. So "skill cap" = "levels"?
Think this is nothing new... and about conquer.
famous Guild Wars Body Block.
So "WHAT are next generation games like this"? What are the features no other game will have? conquer ciies (like conan or Shadowbane) RvR (like daoc, war etc...) gvg (like Gw) fully pvp zones with npc and players (like cox)? I cant found where is the "new things", or is just a mix? will be the combat system point & click or something new like Chronicles or Aoc?
Dont give me wrong, perhaps is a very pesimist view of the game, but Im seeing lot of people excited about it and dunno why, I will join it if is a good game, like war, aoc, chronicles, etc... but, Seems that graphic engine is very old, and the features are nothing about "new" or "next gen", so perhaps you can explain me what it is. |
|
|
|
9/17/07 6:21 PM
|
|
Viewed 849, Replies 23
|
|
|
Originally posted by daarco
So... you cant have a "real mmo" free? gw is mmo, and have no fees, and all other the games that are free? like flyff, like silkroad, you can talk about the quality of the server or the patches but you cant say they are not "real", and if you dont pay they arent good. So people paid 50€/$ for WoW and pay a fee everymonth and the updates are really poor, the content is... "sad", so... is a real deal for blizzard, but where are all the thousand of fees going on? where are the new clases/races? where are the new..? in an expansion with 2 new races and some "poor" content that cost 40$ more? .. think before you qualify "free" games like "unreal mmo".
Also the guy that tlak about "noobs" in f2p games... what an elitist shame! games are for fun, you will never get a prize in real life that is worth of the time you invest in the game, games are for fun, and you pay for fun, not to be the best, if you want some real competition go and play some chess. |
|
|
|
9/17/07 5:20 PM
|
|
Viewed 1614, Replies 29
|
|
Originally posted by Fikroc Never heard this, what I heard is that Warhammer online will be like Daoc Pvp, cause is also, rvr and with the same development concept.
Also, it dont needs to be like Daoc to be "TRUE free world pvp" ... in other way, why are you comparing a fully "old" game like daoc with another that is in closed beta? better said. How can you compare games this way? is like you compare Ultima Online with Tabula Rasa... |
|
|
|
9/17/07 5:18 PM
|
|
Viewed 206, Replies 7
|
|
Originally posted by Jolar
As ever I will recommend the games I like: First of all. City of heroes/villains, you say you already played it so in this style dunno if there is another game you can have fun. For me never though this games stills being funny for me after some time! cause I got bored very quickly, think what it has is GREAT Character development and design, so, you dont get the fun getting gear and being "more than the others", you take fun growing your own toon, with the chance to make it like you want, so, is not best or worst, is yours, and think this is the real key of this games. Also instances permit to do great battles when you got a full team in max difficulty.
Guild wars can be good, but, I dont think, If you like wow, will like this one, foccused on pvp, very elitist and agressive community.
Perhaps you must wait for Warhammer, Chronicles of Spellborn, Age Of Connan... to see if there is something new and/or interesting.
|
|
|
|
9/17/07 5:13 PM
|
|
Viewed 678, Replies 8
|
|
Originally posted by Kurir
Perhaps they should take a look to cox where you have 5 different difs (reputations). Also, think that Guildwars should take the same idea... |
|
|
|
9/15/07 9:28 PM
|
|
Viewed 1188, Replies 18
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stormsblade
but, sorry about the question, at last is confirmed that darkfall will see the light? and... what you mean with "artifically prepared mmo's". What does this mean? that Darkfall is... ¿? natural not artificial? so... you know is a game... a computer game... is imposible that is not artificial...
btw, there are some:
- I like CoX pvp but its not a "full pvp" - Gw pvp is good, perhaps, too elitist - Some people love wow, other says it is chaotic and fully gear dependent. I hate this game so, better dont tell you what. - I was in fury test, but, some performance issues (I supose cause the beta state) didnt let me see a good pvp game. Hope the fee mode I hear about dont unbalance it.
Or perhaps
Wait for warhammer or Age of connan. |
|
|
|
9/15/07 7:40 PM
|
|
Viewed 1347, Replies 23
|
|
Originally posted by Sornin
Definetly, think you are positioning in a "defensive stance" |
|
|
|
9/07/07 7:59 AM
|
|
Viewed 4402, Replies 114
|
|
Originally posted by FE|Tachyon What they did in CoX is to put "detector" or "perception" pluses and put a cap in stealth, I think its not perfect but its a beggining. |
|
|
|
9/07/07 7:45 AM
|
|
Viewed 5636, Replies 118
|
|
Originally posted by METALDRAG0N
Seems that you didnt read all the post just... "something". If you take a look to why I wrote before you will see that its not mee who you must ask this
Originally posted by Xennith
Yes some people do, and is what Im asking. Why some people is so blind that ensures games got new features and is creative when I cant see this "new and creative" features...
Originally posted by METALDRAG0N
Originally posted by ImixZinz Perhaps not "Next-Gen" but what is? WAR certainly has FAR more NEW and CREATIVE things in it then any other MMO being released in 07 or 08. Originally posted by Xennith
Originally posted by METALDRAG0N I could be totally off base because I haven't really been following WAR's development but I don't remember seeing the company hailing it as "Next Gen". They never did they called it Evolutionary not Next Gen. Thats why the OP's title to this topic is so misleading.
Sorry about all this quotes but... seems that every of us is talking about different game |
|
|
| |