|18 posts found|
Do those of you who say you like this game REALLY like it, or are you hoping you will eventually?
General Discussion « Age of Conan
6/06/08 2:43:12 PM
And the flames begin. . hahah how prophetic.
What I find fun is the dynamic nature of combat, adult themes, the environments, and the story lines. The PVP is open which has good and bad elements, Being a Shadowbane vet open pvp does not bug me.
So what I dont get in all these flames:
This game had a solid release. Don't thinks so? Are you forgetting about severs being down for days at release in other games, huge ques to play, missing lower level content, huge lag spikes . . etc. While not the release was not as clean as lotro it was much better than most games. They fleshed out the first 30-40 levels (60-80 hours of game play) and were going to go back in and flesh out the last 40. This is fairly standard. Often the first 3-4 patches in a game is adding funcionallity and late level content. Seems like funcom had to push this game out ahead of scheadul, and in doing so had to pick where they fleshed out, I think it was a wise choice to make the begining areas complete, and then focusing their development team on the later content. Instead of jumping in a fresh MMO and crying wolf wait next time buy it 3 month out and you will see a polished game. This is the MMO market if you have been involve with mmos at release you know this. I alway tell myself to wait but don't. . weirldly enough I dont blame the game. Sides I have alot less to gripe about (read nothing) in this game than WoW, EQ2, Vanguard, horizons, SB, Starwars at realease.
So take it in stride, stop complaining; "hey I got to the later levels in less than 2 weeks". . . . maybe sit back and read the stories these people have writen for you, enjoy the content you tend to skip pass and by the time the you get to the later levels, the development team will have caught up with you. . . they most likely only put in 40-60 hours a week into conan . . unlike some people.