| 215 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Give-Away PC & PS3 BETA KEYS!
General Discussion « Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn 6/14/13 5:26:50 PM
Not THAT desperate! xD Thanks, though. |
|
|
Give-Away PC & PS3 BETA KEYS!
General Discussion « Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn 6/14/13 5:25:01 PM
FOR PC: I know when BETA 3 starts, which is June 14th - not heard of a PHASE 4, but I know that Aug 27th is the release date.
Close enough? ;D |
|
|
Destiny: Gameplay Trailer Shown at E3
News & Features Discussion « General Discussion 6/11/13 6:08:27 AM
Looked like Borderlands sans the humor / cartoony, cell-shaded graphics. Considering what we've seen from Destiny, it looks a lot like Borderlands with all its dungeon crawling, loot, enemy levels, and talent trees - and I don't know about you guys, but Borderlands' actual gameplay got boring to me after a couple of hours .. and it was the tongue-in-cheek nature of the plot that kept me going. It didn't appeal to me one bit. Nothing particularly new, just a reskin of an old game I never really liked. |
|
I'm sure all of them also had tons of jumping puzzles, dynamic events, WvW all with an actual physics engine at release. Could you explain to me what physics engine, exactly, that GW2 uses.. and to what it applies to in-game? I haven't seen anything remotely dependent on this. |
|
|
GW2 why the story implementation works(for me)
General Discussion « Guild Wars 2 2/13/13 4:44:33 PM
Whenever a thread about GW2 starts, I can always count on one of two people being in it. I was not disappointed. On topic: The story, both in implementation and quality, I found absolutely dreadful. And that's not a rip on GW, as I find pretty much every modern MMO's story rather bland and tasteless. That said, Guild Wars 2's personal stories ( I've done all the starting variations ) were entirely unimaginative and had absolutely no impact on my immersion. I'd much prefer there be NO personal story. |
|
|
Because a thread like this, with its obviously controversial title and clearly bias OP, is clearly looking for a well-rounded argument and not just a circle jerk of like-minded individuals. Isn't that what the GW2 forums are for? I don't recall any MMO devs who've directly accredited ArenaNet / GW2 as their source of inspiration, like many still do for World of Warcraft. A lot of people in this thread act like, because a game has one or two similar features, that they directly took it from GW2 (which, let's be honest, has done NOTHING original and ONLY adapted already established mechanics) while never even considering that - just maybe - the companies have had these ideas since development began. MMOs aren't made in a matter of minutes. GW2 hasn't been out long enough to call it the most influential anything. Period. This topic is just a bunch of hopes and well-wishes - and a lot of flaming back and fourth. I'm surprised this thread hasn't been locked yet. |
|
|
You know game has issues when forum mods become censors
General Discussion « Guild Wars 2 2/08/13 5:33:52 PM
I hope you have a lot of fire resistance. You're going to need it.
|
|
Originally posted by Koukikid That looks alright. Unfortunately, I've never heard of Gamingo - and reasearch did't make me feel any better about the game. |
|
|
I had never heard of those games. That's pretty neat! But yes, I was speaking specifically in the AAA realm of MMOs. Is it really the lack of interest? Last I recall Deus Ex sold pretty successfully. |
|
|
Lately, we've been treated to a plethora of fantasy MMOs. To be honest, there's no point in even listing them as they're pretty much the staple of most RPGs in general. Why haven't we seen a legitimate attempt at cyberpunk in an MMO? Games like Deus Ex and Cyberpunk are rich with lore and character progression in unique ways. How come we haven't seen something similar? *Note: I am not suggesting Deus Ex or Cyberpunk be transformed into an MMO. Those are merely examples. Thoughts, ideas? |
|
|
Than*
|
|
|
Ascalonian Catacombs and my first Dungeon Experience
PvE & Crafting « Guild Wars 2 11/05/12 1:39:14 PM
Originally posted by Aerowyn Your statement makes no sense because, regardless of the perceived "chaos", the mobs / bosses are still only performing a limited script of actions. Therefore, you're pretty much ALWAYS doing the same thing over-and-over again; however, in GW2 you're much more likely to die because the aggro mechanics are practically non-existant. "Chaos" has nothing to do with dungeons getting stale. It's still the same dungeon, it's still the same bosses, and they still perform the exact same moves. |
|
|
Your reply is humorous because this patch was initiated to combat the speed-runners. Saying you don't care about why the patch was put it out, then complaining that people don't like it, is essentially getting your feathers ruffled for absolutely no reason. If you don't care about the speed-runners, then go do your monotonous dungeons for an entirely unsubstantial reward and claim it was totally "fun". The sheer fact this game has SO much grinding, and that ANET is dead-set on making the grind as insufferable as possible, doesn't bode well for the future. So far, they've done nothing but make decisions that are entirely anti-casual, anti-fun, and all for what? Allegedly, to keep farmers from ruining their precious economy. |
|
Originally posted by eggy08 The trade-off? You have to be joking. There is no trade-off, like, at all. They did't make dungeon paths any more appealing than before; in fact, all they did was enforce their intended method of dungeoning. All that's going to happen now is that the speed-runners are going to pick the TWO easiest pathes and farm the ever-loving crap out of them, while other people struggle with the horrendously made others out of ~respect~ for ANET's design decision. They literally changed nothing, save the fact you get less rewards if you manage to complete a dungeon faster than they intended. |
|
Originally posted by eggy08 Other paths viable? You do understand that, regardless of how many locks or difficulty patches they release, players will still find the easiest and fastest-completed dungeon to run to maximze their efforts, right? If you think ANYTHING else, then it's YOU who's the fool. They're trying to force people to experience parts of the game that, frankly, are unappealing to the playerbase; otherwise, this wouldn't even be a topic because everyone would already be doing all the dungeon paths in the first place. It would be different if half the other paths in this game weren't mind-numblingy long, boring, or BROKEN ENTIRELY. Heaven forbid players actually want to break even when leaving dungeons, what with getting sneezed on by enemy mobs seeming to reduce your armor to shreds. |
|
Originally posted by xpiher Teaching the players how to play is quite self-explanatory. They're modifying the game in a way to promote their version of play, instead of how the actual customers prefer. Regardless of designer's intention, players will find a playstyle that suits them - it doesn't matter if it was what the Devs had in mind. This has been true since the dawn of MMO's. GW2 being so different from WoW, to me, is also pretty obvious. The WHOLE time it was being promoted, from beta to all the other PR events, it was hailed as something revolutionary and entirely different that what was already on the market. IE - Big dog on the block: WOW. Since then, that's all everyone can talk about: "OMG, DOES THIS SO MUCH BETTR.", " SO DFFRNT FROM WOW", "LOL WOW BABY", "SO GUD. BETTER THAN WOW" And yet ANET hasn't done absolutely nothing but continue to turn it into GW1, what with arificially difficult dungeons, anti-farm codes, and forcing players ( the elite, supposively ) to utilize particular classes, with certain weapons and traits to run dungeons for tokens so that they can get pretty-looking skins. Let's not forget also how many times you have to run these pitiful things just to get a single piece of gear, combined with how buggy and down-right broken most of them are - on top of the now reduced reward and inflated difficulty. Half of the dungeon tactics revolve around: "DODGE RED CIRCLE, KITE, KITE, KITE" anyway. I hardly see how that's any different or more fun than anything else we've been taught over our years of MMO-gaming. "Oh, that boss with a stupid amount of health and no mechanics was boring? Okay, instead of reducing his health and giving a few abilities that might actually make you sweat.. we'll just tack-on a bunch of untested mechanics and INCREASE his already astounding healthpool so that, not only do you have to stick on a single mob for 45 minutes, but also run around dodging 15 different, buggy mechanics. -- Also, he'll go invulnerable from time-to-time. We don't know why, but who cares! It's more fun this way. Trust us! Just L2P and you'll be fine." At least in Warcraft, the grind wasn't excruciatingly mind-numbing without reward. Hell, you could even do whatever dungeons you preferred to get your rewards thanks to universal tokens / points. You could even be ANY CLASS IN THE GAME, WITH ANY SPEC and still contribute effectively. So much for being grind-less, casual friendly, and ultra revolutionary ANET. |
|
Originally posted by wowfan1996 How else are you supposed to teach them how to play? Since GW1, it's been pretty clear the Devs only care about enforcing their ideas of "fun" and "fair" by forcing particular builds, making artifically difficult PVE content, and simply pigeon holing over all. Don't expect anything different from GW2. They're trying so hard to be different than WoW that they're forgetting what made it a massive success in the first place. As they're making these terrible decisions, all they're clinging to is "Oh, yeah, we intended it that way. You're playing wrong! At least it's NOT Warcraft. RIGHT? AM I RIGHT?" At least when I played WoW there was some diversity in what I could play in regards to both PVP and PVE content. |
|
|
Guild Wars 2: Game Sales Reopen, New Trailer Released
News & Features Discussion « General Discussion 9/10/12 2:30:23 PM
What an awful trailer. I approve of the game, but this has absolutely nothing to do with GW2, save for the very last couple of seconds at the end. All the symbolism in the world doesn't make it any better, or more artsy - yes, there's a message.. but it's mucked between poor live-action bits and the limited time of a trailer. As far as making someone think.. the only thing I thought when I saw this was: "WTF is this? Please tell me this is fan-made, not official." If I saw that trailer, unknown to the context of the game.. I wouldn't even reasearch that game, much less buy it. |
|
|
Guild Wars 2 Needs a more robust Tutorial (for Novices)
General Discussion « Guild Wars 2 8/13/12 5:18:32 AM
One-hundred percent agree. Regardless of your opinion on the game, World of Warcraft's tutorial is very nice: it explains everything from the most common methods of walking, combat, and itemization to the functions of UI and their retrospective buttons. I don't see why ANet wouldn't be working on this, seeing how they are clearly trying to appeal a market of less-than-savvy MMO players. |
|
|
+ There's a lot of them, and almost all heart quests involve them in some shape / fashion - Just like everything, it will get stale as you continue to experience them / level alts |
|