| 65 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
9/17/06 6:28:27 PM#41
LOL.
I wouldn't bother with him. He's just butthurt that we don't share the same views or opinions as him, and that drives him buts. Pity eh? :d Not only that, he's still TRYING to put down a game, he no longer plays. Or so he says anyway. Pathetic really. People like him shouldn't be allowed to breed at all with the way he thinks after all. Independant, Shinto, Lesbian, and Proud! |
|
|
Gameloading Because its beta. false and outright lies? like what? They pulled the review and made it hidden. But it was CNet that pointed it out from the Korean and US version. I believe Zeno as far I can throw him... I got lvl 36 Destoryer , lvl 30 Summoner , Lvl 30 Driver , and spend 5 days on RFonline servers. There is little to no activity on most servers... the only one with a spark of life .. is Spirit Cora side.
", but we're told that story-driven quest chains and even player-versus-player quests will be quite common" This is from the quests .. we got a lvl 41 , checking .. no pvp quests , nor story driven chains.. Been doing quests on every character since 1 to 27 , no where have there been story driven quests or pvp quests. The lvl 41 has done all the Moonelf quests up to Der and none have open up , non involve pvp or story driven. "weather will be in the game" I have not seen any weather .. nor has anyone I spoken with. ------- |
|
|
9/18/06 1:47:30 AM#43
|
|
|
Talking to a Korean website , they said that quests , only 2 so far as he knows open up at 60... So from 25 to 60 = grindfest O.o Cnet.net has people in Open Beta , they had a review of Archlord , its archive now , only impossible to find. Just after they pulled Archlord from there shelves , they removed the review and put a Gamespot review (preview?/Ad). The guy / girl who did the review listed everything up to lvl 35 , flaws , bugs and such , it was written around Sept 6 or 7. When you buy a game and see on the package "2500 quests" you are mislead to believe there are in fact 2500 , no matter which class/race you pick from. Canada has a law about this , Blizzard uses this in its Ads in the US but not in Canada because it punishable. (I had a NDA with Sir-Tech Canada... crash course in Canadian law and US law). This isnt the first time Codemasters has hand a in making thier games seem more than they are. In 80s , quotes on thier games came from within the company but were attributed to review magz and suck. The quotes came from founders , and CEOs. There is a record of complaint against Codemasters use of Ads dating back to 1987 or so. (You can look them on law history websites and developers sites.) There was even a Scottland based game/company/individual that were so upset with CM that they called them out.
|
|
|
9/18/06 3:57:58 AM#45
|
|
|
You can't sue them for that, simple as that. They advertise that 2500 quests are there. not once did it say that you can do then with only one character. Depends on the law of the country. In the US they are golden , only read basic law for England and Euro , but in Canada they could e fined or punished for this ad or if they put it on there box. You would have to file a complaint , then take it to civil court , if it didnt change. In Canada you could file a complaint with thier Justice Department , and then it would go from there. Blizzard , Mythic and SOE have all had this done. SOE is in the process in Canada of defending it self from the SWG deal that happen a while back. Some countries are more up to date with thier internet law then others. For example in the US , internet crimes are still filed under Mail Fruad... |
|
|
9/18/06 8:25:47 AM#47
so, lets get this right. IF a game advertised an mmorpg has 2500 quests, but you can't do them all with one character, its a scam? that is rediculous! |
|
so, lets get this right. IF a game advertised an mmorpg has 2500 quests, but you can't do them all with one character, its a scam? that is rediculous! Deceptive Ads are punished in Canada ... WoW had to change their ad of 7 million users to show proof that they had 7 million subscribers , not 7 million boxes sold or 7 million users over a certain period of time. Deceptive Ads have been pulled by SOE , to some games offering free time and PVP tourments from Korean companies. In the deal with some publishers fines and restrictions have been made. Game publishers in the US are becoming more libial (spelling) for game content , ads and other things. |
|
|
9/18/06 8:52:49 AM#49
Deceptive Ads are punished in Canada ... WoW had to change their ad of 7 million users to show proof that they had 7 million subscribers , not 7 million boxes sold or 7 million users over a certain period of time. Deceptive Ads have been pulled by SOE , to some games offering free time and PVP tourments from Korean companies. In the deal with some publishers fines and restrictions have been made. Game publishers in the US are becoming more libial (spelling) for game content , ads and other things. The only diffrence is that nothing is Deceptive about it. |
|
|
9/18/06 11:16:54 AM#50
Gameloading, if you truely are a representative of CodeMasters in way of a forum moderator, you have done more harm then good in this one thread. I admit that some of the members of this board can be combative, but at the same time you've given in and gone overboard with your commentary, even to the point of nearly attacking other members. There are more tactful ways to prove points then critisizing a critic. If you wanted examples, I could reword almost every post you have made in this thread, but then what would be the point, I'm sure you'll respond to this post like the others. Point for the beta, and what is beta closed vs open, they are both beta argument. The difference between closed and open, is that Open Beta, even though still in beta, is considered by most every gaming company out there to be an open preview to the game. Now everyone enters the open beta with the expectation of minor bugs, maybe a major bug but normally in a very untested section of the game (normally high end content), but in the end, the open beta is a showcase of what people can expect once the game goes live. Even at this point, most people expect to hear that there are issues right up until release, but in the last 2 weeks before release, patches normally do not impact major areas such as XP (Leveling), Gold (Economy), and Potions (Combat). Unfortunately leveling, economy, and combat are the three areas that you never want to modify to any great degree as these become the foundation of each MMO on the market. In one patch, people got understandably upset as the fundemental areas where changed. Further to this, the dev's admitted the fault and wanted to fix this issue with the potions, well that was all well and good, execpt that the patch isn't released yet, and if it is, I personally am still ripping through potions like a bad habbit. Admittingly I know myself that there doesn't seem to be many critical bugs that I personally have been able to find, but searching through the forums at Archlord, you can find examples of a few. I haven't played far enough into the game as I am a casual player, and have not seen much outside the area surrounding the starting city. What I have seen in my short time is that this game does not at all accomidate casual gamers. Casual gamers defined would generally be someone who plays less then 8 hours in a 7 day stretch. Yes I know there is a system in place to assist with that, but at paying nearly double the monthly fee, the math doesn't work out. The reason I say this is that with paying the higher amount, by going at my current rate, it would take me close to 2 to 3 years to make it to level 100. Obviously from time to time a casual gamer may be able to put in more time, but generally it stays pretty even. Further to this, the same system to "assist" casual gamers also speeds up the hardcore gamers end game. With this then the extra payments probably won't substantially increase anything as the Dev's don't want people flying from 1 to 100 in the first month, and conversly, the casual gamer suffers yet again. Now its definately not the dev's fault that casual gamers are just that, but there are systems in place that can help casual gamers compete and even succeed in online games. Unfortunately CM's approach is flawed from design. For an example of a better system for casual gamers, look at DAoC, WoW, and I'm sure a few others have very nice systems. If you don't know these systems which are common knowledge to everyone who plays these MMO's, I'd suggest possibly start reading up as this can make or break selling 100% or 200% or your product.
Your not a lawyer, and even if you where, the correct statement back by any representitive of any organization is, here's the email/phone number where you can direct this concern. Saying a law in a different country other then your own is rediculous does not make the law any less substantial or applicable to the product.
You wanted an example of an unprofessional response by you.
And another. There are many different ways this could have been handled, this would have been the wrong way.
And another. Slamming other products in favor of your own is highly unprofessional.
Your points may be valid, but you just stated that many MMO'ers out there will probably not like this game. Fair enough, nothing is for everyone. However, you cannot level threw clan politics, so this is not a feature more of a inherent issue you should expect playing the game. If there is a certain way to play the game, should this not be spelled out in a handy dandy manual stating: game expectations, examples of gameplay, who the game is tailored to, why you should consider or not consider the game, what constitutes actions where xp is involved, etc etc etc. Admittingly I have not read every last page of the manual, or the knowledgebase, but I suppose this could be in there. If you wonder how this would do any good? Well it would help moderators in the forums (point to faq/manual page) for most answers. Would help new players decide if they want to play. Would assist with many aspects that currently get argued over constantly.
This post and everything in it was a very professional response, although your information is inaccurate unfortunately. Red Moth's still have no textures, as are a few others I can't remember the names for, which was after the last patch. The chat exploit still happens from what I've seen so far. There are many reports of crashes on the forums, and many people who I know that play the game get CTD's or Blue screens from time to time. When submitting reports to support, they have not been much help. Further to this, there is no error handler on the login other then "Can't connect to login server". Which apparently covers everything from connection issues, login server actually being down, to wrong user/pass.
The sad part about CM's mentality, if this is truely the way they do things, is that it impede's making sales from go. With an open beta, if people do not feel confident in the game before release, then they simply won't buy it. Less sales, less people, will equal a game that goes nowhere and will be shut down in 12-18 months from release unless something major happens soon. It's happened to many games in the past, and it's unfortuantely that they have not learned from the mistakes of others.
Well, the reason why things are ok in Closed beta, but not Open Beta, is that in Closed beta, you have a controlled environment where you can test any number of things on the fly, during specified times, and with the right people. In open beta, it is more to show off what has been done, and work out any bugs that where not considered or did not show any major issues in closed beta. Now given the amount of bugs, and minor ones at that, just with textures for example, and the chat bug, those should have been found long before opening the floodgates. In defence of that, you can only do so much with the experience of the people doing the closed beta, so in hindsight, somethings just may have not been mentioned. Yet again, those review/previews that you where getting upset about look at these things and offer a glimpse at what the game has to offer both good and bad.
With 100 levels ahead of you, why wouldn't you want to improve your character. By that statement alone I'm guessing everyone should be level 1? XP allows you to get to the end game, in the pursuit of XP you get armor and equipment which thus also improve your chances of surviving to the end game, money allows influence with other characters in providing bribes and donations and loans, also the equipment you get from gaining said XP can be used in the same fashion. So judging by what you have stated before saying this is a political game, then why no XP for politics? So if improving your character is not supposed to be part of the game, then what is there? Just wondering as you seem to be eluding to something else.
-2cents _____________________________ http://mmofriendslist.com |
|
|
9/18/06 11:34:54 AM#51
|
|
|
9/18/06 12:22:43 PM#52
You do realize gameloading that you announcing that you are a moderator for Codemasters Archlord forums, even though you go by a different name there makes you no less responsible for your comments or actions on any boards ,anywhere. To probably most here you still are a reprsentative and your actions or comments will still be associated back to where you are a mod.I can honestly say that I both agree and disagree with alot of things you have said and will not waste my time announcing my own opinions of Archlord being that it seems everyone has an opinion on everyone's opinion on these boards. I am still a toss up on whether I will keep my pre-order or not, it is dependent on if they change this nerf patch. Yes i understand that beta is beta and I am willing to bet they are not using open beta as implied, which is a stress test, but to see how the western market will react to the eastern grind in this title.
|
|
|
9/18/06 12:27:00 PM#53
The info of me being a mod on the AL forums leaked out a long time ago. I have no intentions to hide it. but that does not mean I represent CM on this forum. if people think I do, then that is simply not my problem. |
|
|
9/18/06 1:06:22 PM#54
You are 100% correct,it is not your problem .....by you stating that you are a rep of codemasters of any form then that would make what you do Codemasters problem. Don't be foolish and make an argument of it, or put an NDA on your account stating that any of your opinions do not represent CM in any form. Im just make a suggestion to you being the fact that it is an "implied" that if i walk around wearing anything that shows my company logo upon it that i shall have the respect to not only to think of who i represent or any of my actions while displaying so. In fact the company I represent has certain policies such as not wearing company logos in a liquor establishment, while its not a law its suggested as a respect. I enjoy archlord but in many ways and choose to keep my positives and negative to myself for i believe each his own to make his/her opinion due to their own experience. I am just stating that while defending a game which you obviously try to represent in some way that you do it in a manner that is a bit more responsible and less attackful and argumentative, for just by me reading through this post merely looking for new AL information you have made me think twice of the game just because of you attitude. I think to myself if CM allows this person to mod then........ You get the point. |
|
|
9/18/06 1:15:23 PM#55
heading to play AL and wish for a change........be well
|
|
|
9/18/06 1:17:02 PM#56
Nice double-post?
![]() |
|
|
9/18/06 1:36:14 PM#57
I don't wear any company logo's, and I don't yell around that I am a moderator. simple as that. I will say this once more, I do not represent any company or game, simple as that. also, if you want to judge my abilites as a moderator, then do so on the official Archlord forum. over there, I "work" for CM (for the lack of a better word) .Over here, I am just a fan. |
|
|
9/18/06 1:44:38 PM#58
This clown is actually a mod somewhere? Lol wow. This guy is always trying (and failing) to put people down. Makes you wonder how smart these AL guys are. No wonder he defends it so desperatly. I knew something was up with the way he defended this game that pretty much EVERYONE cept for him and a few select others know is garbage..... |
|
|
9/18/06 1:48:01 PM#59
Really? I am putting people down? I don't really remember me doing that (except for you, after you flamed me to oblivion for having a diffrent opinion then you do). you are actually the one that is flaming and bashing people who don't agree with you.you should stop mixing up your posts with mine. also, everyone hates it? thats weird, because AL is gaining more players by the day. go ahead, quote me where I insulted and flamed people. There is a reason why you have been banned 3 times in record time, and I have been banned not ONCE since I joined this forum 2 years ago. oh, and what was your excuse? You completely ignored all your flame and insults, and stated that all moderators are corrupt. the fact that you use SteveIrwin as a nickname shortly after the good man died shows what kind of sick person you are. |
|
|
9/18/06 1:54:25 PM#60
Reread what I said, I never said you put anyone down. I said you TRIED to, yet failed. Ive read your sad defense posts and you insult, or better yet TRY to insult quite a few people, who all ended up putting you down. You dont get banned because you have been here for a while and the mods here are not corrupt, just not the harvard potential...... |
|