Trending Games | Wizard101 | World of Warcraft | Pirate101 | Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,899,574 Users Online:0
Games:751  Posts:6,268,263
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
A-C
2029 Online 2112: Revolution 2Moons 4Story 8BitMMO 9 Dragons A Mystical Land A Tale in the Desert III A3 ACE Online ARGO Online Aberoth Absolute Force Online Absolute Terror Achaea Adellion Aerrevan Aetolia, the Midnight Age Age of Armor Age of Conan Age of Empires Online Age of Mourning Age of Wulin Age of Wushu Aida Arenas Aika Aion Albion Online Alganon All Points Bulletin (APB) Allods Online Altis Gates Amazing World Anarchy Online Ancients of Fasaria Andromeda 5 Angels Online Angry Birds Epic Anime Trumps Anmynor Anno Online Applo Arcane Hearts Arcane Legends ArchLord ArcheAge Archeblade Archlord X Ascend: Hand of Kul Asda 2 Asda Story Ashen Empires Asheron's Call Asheron's Call 2 Astera Online Astonia III Astro Empires Astro Lords: Oort CLoud Asura Force Atlantica Online Atriarch Aura Kingdom Aurora Blade Auto Assault Avatar Star Battle Dawn Battle Dawn Galaxies Battle for Graxia Battle of 3 Kingdoms Battle of the Immortals Battlecruiser Online Battlestar Galactica Online Battlestar Reloaded Beyond Protocol Black Aftermath Black Desert Black Gold Black Prophecy Black Prophecy Tactics: Nexus Conflict Blacklight Retribution Blade & Soul Blade Hunter Blade Wars Blazing Throne Bless Blitz 1941 Blood and Jade Bloodlines Champions Boot Hill Heroes Borderlands 2 Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel Bound by Flame Bounty Bay Online Brain Storm Bravada Bravely Default Bravely Second Brawl Busters. Brick-Force Bright Shadow Bullet Run Business Tycoon Online CTRacer Cabal Online Caesary Call of Camelot Call of Gods Call of Thrones Camelot Unchained Canaan Online Cardmon Hero Cartoon Universe CasinoRPG Cast & Conquer Castle Empire Castlot Celtic Heroes Champions Online Champions of Regnum Chaos Online Child of Light Chrono Tales Citadel of Sorcery CitiesXL Citizen Zero City of Decay City of Heroes City of Steam City of Transformers City of Villains Civilization Online Clan Lord Clash of Clans Cloud Nine Club Penguin Colony of War Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances Company of Heroes Online Conquer Online Conquer Online 3 Continent of the Ninth (C9) Core Blaze Core Exiles Corum Online Craft of Gods Crimecraft Crimelife 2 Cronous Crota II Crusaders of Solaris Cultures Online Cyber Monster 2 Cyberpunk 2077 Céiron Wars
D-F
D&D Online DC Universe DK Online DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 DV8: Exile Dalethaan Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Relic: Prelude Dark Solstice Dark Souls 2 Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkest Dungeon Darkfall Darkfall: Unholy Wars Darkwind: War on Wheels Das Tal Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide DayZ Dead Earth Dead Frontier Dead Island Dead Island 2 Dead Island: Riptide Deco Online Deep Down Deepworld Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Demons at the Horizon Desert Operations Destiny Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Divinity: Original Sin Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Age: Inquisition Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Fin Soup Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Pals Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Call II Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dragons and Titans Drakengard 3 Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Rampage Dungeon Runners Dungeon of the Endless Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online Dynasty of the Magi EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthrise Eclipse War Ecol Tactics Online Eden Eternal Edge of Space Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elder Scrolls Online Eldevin Elf Online Elite: Dangerous Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire Empire & State Empire Craft Empire Universe 3 EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Blue Moon Online Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Eternal Saga Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverEmber Online EverQuest Next EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Evony Exarch Exorace F.E.A.R. Online Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout 4 Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Fearless Fantasy Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy Type-0 HD Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forge Forsaken Uprising Forsaken World Fortnite Fortuna Forum for Discussion of Everlight Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
G-L
GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones: Seven Kingdoms Gameglobe Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gauntlet Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer Gloria Victis Glory of Gods GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Granado Espada Online Grand Chase Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall H1Z1 Habbo Hotel Hailan Rising HaloSphere2 Haven & Hearth Hawken Heart Forth Alicia Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero Online Hero Zero Hero's Journey Hero: 108 Online HeroSmash Heroes & Generals Heroes & Legends: Conquerors of Kolhar Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Atlan Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Heroes of the Storm Hex Holic Online Hostile Space Hunter Blade Huxley Icewind Dale: Enhanced Edition Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Imperator Imperian Inferno Legend Infestation: Survivor Stories Infinite Crisis Infinity Infinity Iris Online Iron Grip: Marauders Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kartuga Kicks Online King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom Under Fire II Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kings Era Kings and Legends Kings of the Realm KingsRoad Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Age Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online Kyn L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Landmark Lands of Hope: Redemption LastChaos League of Angels League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Edda: Vengeance Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 2 Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Lego Minifigures Online Lichdom: Battlemage Life is Feudal Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lords of the Fallen Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia World
M-Q
MU Online Mabinogi Maestia: Rise of Keledus MagiKnights Magic Barrage Magic World Online Manga Fighter MapleStory Martial Heroes Marvel Heroes Marvel Super Hero Squad Online Marvel: Avengers Alliance Mass Effect 4 MechWarrior Online Megaten Meridian 59 : Evolution Merlin MetalMercs Metaplace Metin 2 MicroVolts Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor Midkemia Online Might & Magic Heroes: Kingdoms Might & Magic X: Legacy MilMo Minecraft Mini Fighter Minions of Mirth Ministry of War Monato Esprit Monkey King Online Monkey Quest Monster & Me Monster Madness Online MonsterMMORPG Moonlight Online: Tales of Eternal Blood Moonrise Mordavia Mortal Online Mourning My Lands Myst Online: URU Live Myth Angels Online Myth War Myth War 2 Mythborne Mytheon Mythic Saga Mythos N.E.O Online NIDA Online Nadirim Naviage: The Power of Capital Navy Field Need for Speed World Nemexia Neo's Land NeoSteam Neocron Nether Neverwinter Nexus: The Kingdom Of The Winds NinjaTrick NosTale Novus Aeterno Oberin Odin Quest Odyssey RPG Ogre Island Omerta 3 Online Boxing Manager Onverse Oort Online Order & Chaos Online Order of Magic Original Blood Origins Return Origins of Malu Orion's Belt Otherland Forums OverSoul Overkings Oz Online Oz World Pandora Saga Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Panzar Parabellum Parallel Kingdom Parfait Station Path of Exile Pathfinder Online Perfect World Perpetuum Online Persona V Phantasy Star Online 2 Phantasy Star Universe Phoenix Dynasty Online Phylon Pi Story Picaroon Pillars of Eternity Pirate Galaxy Pirate Storm Pirate101 PirateKing Online Pirates of the Burning Sea Pirates of the Caribbean Online Pixie Hollow Planeshift Planet Arkadia Planet Calypso PlanetSide 2 Planetside Planets³ Playboy Manager Pocket Legends Pockie Ninja Pockie Pirates Pockie Saints Pokémon X and Y PoxNora Prime World Prime: Battle for Dominus Priston Tale Priston Tale II Prius Online Prodigy Project Blackout Project Gorgon Project Powder Project Titan Forums Project Wiki Project Zomboid Puzzle Pirates Quest for Infamy Quickhit Football
R-S
R2 Online RAN Online RF Online ROSE Online Rage of 3 Kingdoms Ragnarok Online Ragnarok Online II RaiderZ Rail Nation Rakion Rappelz RappelzSEA Ravenmarch Realm Fighter Realm of Sierra Realm of the Mad God Realm of the Titans Realms Online Reclamation Red Stone Red War: Edem's Curse Regnum Online Remnant Knights Renaissance Repulse Requiem: Memento Mori Rift RiotZone Rise Rise of Dragonian Era Rise of Empire Rise of the Tycoon Risen 3: Titan Lords Rising of King Risk Your Life Rivality Rockfree Rohan: Blood Feud Role Play Worlds Roll n Rock Roma Victor Romadoria Rosh Online Roto X Rubies of Eventide Ruin Online Rumble Fighter Runes of Magic Runescape Rust Rusty Hearts Ryzom S4 League SAGA SD Gundam Capsule Fighter Online SMITE SUN Sacred 3 Sagramore Salem SaySayGirls Scarlet Blade Scions of Fate Seal Online: Evolution Second Chance Heroes Second Life Secret of the Solstice Seed Serenia Fantasy Seven Seas Saga Seven Souls Online Sevencore Shadow Realms Shadow of Legend Shadowbane Shadowgate Shadowrun Online Shaiya Shards Online Shattered Galaxy Sho Online Shot Online Shroud of the Avatar SideQuest Siege on Stars Sigonyth: Desert Eternity Silkroad Online Skyblade Skyforge SmashMuck Champions Smoo Online Soldier Front Soul Master Soul Order Online Soul of Guardian South Park: The Stick of Truth Space Heroes Universe Sparta: War of Empires Spellcasters Sphere Spiral Knights Spirit Tales Splash Fighters Squad Wars Star Citizen Star Sonata 2 Star Stable Star Supremacy Star Trek Online Star Trek: Infinite Space Star Wars Galaxies Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Star Wars: The Old Republic StarQuest Online Starbound Stargate Worlds Starlight Story Starpires State of Decay SteelWar Online Stone Age 2 Stormfall: Age of War Stormthrone Storybricks Stronghold Kingdoms Styx: Master of Shadows Sudden Attack Supremacy 1914 Supreme Destiny Sword Girls Sword of Destiny: Rise of Aions SwordX Swords of Heavens Swordsman
T-Z
TERA TS Online TUG Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Tales of Solaris Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris TerraWorld Online Terraria Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Aurora World The Banner Saga The Black Watchmen The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Crew The Division The Epic Might The Hammers End The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing 2 The Legend of Ares The Lost Titans The Matrix Online The Mighty Quest for Epic Loot The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems The West The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Theralon There Therian Saga Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Tiger Knight Titan Siege Titans of Time Toontown Online Top Speed Topia Online Torchlight Torment: Tides of Numenera Total Domination Transformers Universe Transistor Transverse Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Trove Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War Tynon U.B. Funkeys UFO Online URDEAD Online Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Naruto Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Utopia Valkyrie Sky Vampire Lord Online Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos VoidExpanse Voyage Century Online W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WAR2 Glory WYD Global Wakfu War Thunder War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Mercenaries War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Warflare Wargame1942 Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warkeepers Warrior Epic Wartune Wasteland 2 WebLords Wild West Online WildStar Wind of Luck WindSlayer 2 Wings of Destiny Wish Wizard101 Wizardry Online Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Speed World of Tanks World of Tanks Generals World of Warcraft World of Warplanes World of Warships World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xenoblade Chronicles: X Xenocell Xiah Xsyon Xulu YS Online Yitien ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online Zombies Ate My Pizza eRepublik

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

General Discussion

General Discussion 

The Pub at MMORPG.COM  » If F2P is the most profitable business model...

6 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 » Search
114 posts found
  cranthug

Novice Member

Joined: 2/06/07
Posts: 62

Thought begets heresy.

 
OP  8/21/13 12:36:51 PM#1

Why are the majority of AAA MMO's releasing with aspirations of being P2P?  Regardless of people's predictions of how many months til a games "inevitable" conversion to a F2P cash shop, P2P is still and will always be the preferred business model for game makers.  It benefits the devs and players alike, and if a game has the longevity and the fun factor built into it you should be required to compensate the game makers for providing you this service.  

If people want to be nickel and dimed for content that should already be available to them for a small fee each month, more power to them.  If kiddies can't get their parents to cough up a credit card so they can game, I say get a damn job.  The problem with P2P isn't the business model, it is the fact that there have been no games released in recent memory worth paying a sub for. 

Nothing in life is free except the grace and favor of the Lord.  Support the developers that give you hours of entertainment.  Long live P2P!  Huzzah!

 

  nariusseldon

Elite Member

Joined: 12/21/07
Posts: 20123

8/21/13 12:44:31 PM#2
Originally posted by cranthug

Why are the majority of AAA MMO's releasing with aspirations of being P2P? 


 

Uh?

Here is a list of recent 2013 MMO releases.

http://games.gamepressure.com/games_encyclopedia.asp?KAT=7&SOR=2

Tell me how many are sub-only.

 

  cranthug

Novice Member

Joined: 2/06/07
Posts: 62

Thought begets heresy.

 
OP  8/21/13 12:49:33 PM#3
Originally posted by nariusseldon
Originally posted by cranthug

Why are the majority of AAA MMO's releasing with aspirations of being P2P? 


 

Uh?

Here is a list of recent 2013 MMO releases.

http://games.gamepressure.com/games_encyclopedia.asp?KAT=7&SOR=2

Tell me how many are sub-only.

 

I failed to locate a AAA mmo on that list, though I did see a few that aspired to P2P but fell to their own short comings.  FF XIV, Wildstar, and ESO are all releasing as P2P.  I would consider those AAA games.  I suppose it's a matter of one's opinion on what a quality AAA game is, my apologies for using my opinion as a blanket statement!  :D

The question remains however...if the three games I mentioned are releasing as P2P, do you think they have made a grievous error in profitability?  Because as I see it, if they maintain healthy subscription numbers...will it not be a more profitable and sound endeavor for them?  I know I personally take comfort in knowing my monthly budget amount before the bills start rolling in...instead of worrying about selling enough lemonades at my stand to keep my electricity on next month.

  nariusseldon

Elite Member

Joined: 12/21/07
Posts: 20123

8/21/13 1:07:46 PM#4
Originally posted by cranthug
 

I failed to locate a AAA mmo on that list, though I did see a few that aspired to P2P but fell to their own short comings.  FF XIV, Wildstar, and ESO are all releasing as P2P.  I would consider those AAA games.  I suppose it's a matter of one's opinion on what a quality AAA game is, my apologies for using my opinion as a blanket statement!  :D

The question remains however...if the three games I mentioned are releasing as P2P, do you think they have made a grievous error in profitability?  Because as I see it, if they maintain healthy subscription numbers...will it not be a more profitable and sound endeavor for them?  I know I personally take comfort in knowing my monthly budget amount before the bills start rolling in...instead of worrying about selling enough lemonades at my stand to keep my electricity on next month.

Ah .. in that case, i have no problem of your statement. The number of sub-only release is factual, and the specific games going sub-only is also factual.

I don't think anyone knows if they will be profitable. However, it would not surprise me if they have contingency plans, and can turn f2p if they want to. I suppose it boils down to how much money they are going to make. I have no doubt ESO is hoping the name is big enough to keep subs. We know that is not always true from TOR.

They are certainly bucking the trend. If they crash and burn, no one else will probably try sub-only in the west again. If they are successful, may be the market will segment.

 

  cranthug

Novice Member

Joined: 2/06/07
Posts: 62

Thought begets heresy.

 
OP  8/21/13 1:35:35 PM#5
Originally posted by nariusseldon
Originally posted by cranthug
 

I failed to locate a AAA mmo on that list, though I did see a few that aspired to P2P but fell to their own short comings.  FF XIV, Wildstar, and ESO are all releasing as P2P.  I would consider those AAA games.  I suppose it's a matter of one's opinion on what a quality AAA game is, my apologies for using my opinion as a blanket statement!  :D

The question remains however...if the three games I mentioned are releasing as P2P, do you think they have made a grievous error in profitability?  Because as I see it, if they maintain healthy subscription numbers...will it not be a more profitable and sound endeavor for them?  I know I personally take comfort in knowing my monthly budget amount before the bills start rolling in...instead of worrying about selling enough lemonades at my stand to keep my electricity on next month.

Ah .. in that case, i have no problem of your statement. The number of sub-only release is factual, and the specific games going sub-only is also factual.

I don't think anyone knows if they will be profitable. However, it would not surprise me if they have contingency plans, and can turn f2p if they want to. I suppose it boils down to how much money they are going to make. I have no doubt ESO is hoping the name is big enough to keep subs. We know that is not always true from TOR.

They are certainly bucking the trend. If they crash and burn, no one else will probably try sub-only in the west again. If they are successful, may be the market will segment.

 

Are they really bucking the trend, though?  SWTOR and TSW, big games made by big developers, wanted to be P2P.  When their game failed to "deliver the goods" that is when they made the switch. 

A developer that doesn't rely on investors to produce their game, but funds it from in house, can afford the luxury of attempting a P2P model.  They don't have those hungry investors on their backs looking for the big payback, so they can feel things out as far as their games success.  They don't have to squeeze their players for every cent before those players get bored and leave.

You are right in that the market is being saturated with F2P games right now.  Competition to retain players is high, populations of the games are spread out.  But when a quality game finally comes along that uses P2P it will be more profitable for the devs than any one of those F2P games, simply because they require that fee to take the ride.

I do however think that all games should offer a free trial of some sort, paying for the box or otherwise.  Faith in their product would go a long way I think.  It's the lack of faith in retaining players that is causing this F2P trend, imo.  Not necessarily because they think their game is bad or because they stand to make more money F2P, but because of the over saturation of the game market as it is now.  People can game jump now more than ever, so they need to get what they can while they can.

  nariusseldon

Elite Member

Joined: 12/21/07
Posts: 20123

8/21/13 1:48:56 PM#6
Originally posted by cranthug

 

Are they really bucking the trend, though?  SWTOR and TSW, big games made by big developers, wanted to be P2P.  When their game failed to "deliver the goods" that is when they made the switch. 

When i look at the list of released MMOs ...

http://games.gamepressure.com/games_encyclopedia.asp?KAT=7&SOR=2

Most are F2P. So yes, they are bucking the trend.

TOR and TSW found out they cannot stay sub-only. You can hypothesize all day about what went wrong, but the bottomline is .. they have to go f2p to survive. They are clearly not the only ones. Rift, Tera .. many have converted. By definition, that is also a trend.

 

  cranthug

Novice Member

Joined: 2/06/07
Posts: 62

Thought begets heresy.

 
OP  8/21/13 2:12:59 PM#7
Originally posted by nariusseldon
Originally posted by cranthug

 

Are they really bucking the trend, though?  SWTOR and TSW, big games made by big developers, wanted to be P2P.  When their game failed to "deliver the goods" that is when they made the switch. 

When i look at the list of released MMOs ...

http://games.gamepressure.com/games_encyclopedia.asp?KAT=7&SOR=2

Most are F2P. So yes, they are bucking the trend.

TOR and TSW found out they cannot stay sub-only. You can hypothesize all day about what went wrong, but the bottomline is .. they have to go f2p to survive. They are clearly not the only ones. Rift, Tera .. many have converted. By definition, that is also a trend.

 

I have a biased opinion on the quality of a F2P game  vs P2P right out the gate.  It is my thought that if a game uses P2P it considers itself a quality game with much to offer in the long run, and not another F2P iteration to be used and tossed aside. 

With that being said, the trend I was referring to is one in which "AAA mmos" made by well known developers on big budgets try to use P2P because it is the most profitable in the long run.  EQ Next aside, because their whole stable of games has adopted the freemium method so I assume it is only natural that they think to add EQN into that mix.  It is working for them.  It brings in mass amounts of players throughout all the games and stands to make them a profit, as opposed to any single one of those games having enough staying power to hold high subs in the long run.

I have not researched as thoroughly as you, but are there any big budget games on the horizon, EQN aside, that aren't trying to go P2P?  Because as I said, it seems to be that the heavy hitters with potential to retain high sub numbers have been and are still preferring the P2P method.

  nariusseldon

Elite Member

Joined: 12/21/07
Posts: 20123

8/21/13 2:21:08 PM#8
Originally posted by cranthug
 

I have a biased opinion on the quality of a F2P game  vs P2P right out the gate.  It is my thought that if a game uses P2P it considers itself a quality game with much to offer in the long run, and not another F2P iteration to be used and tossed aside. 

With that being said, the trend I was referring to is one in which "AAA mmos" made by well known developers on big budgets try to use P2P because it is the most profitable in the long run.  EQ Next aside, because their whole stable of games has adopted the freemium method so I assume it is only natural that they think to add EQN into that mix.  It is working for them.  It brings in mass amounts of players throughout all the games and stands to make them a profit, as opposed to any single one of those games having enough staying power to hold high subs in the long run.

I have not researched as thoroughly as you, but are there any big budget games on the horizon, EQN aside, that aren't trying to go P2P?  Because as I said, it seems to be that the heavy hitters with potential to retain high sub numbers have been and are still preferring the P2P method.

Personally i think it is not useful to have perceived notion between groups of games because at the end, game preferences are very personal. I would much rather play the game, and decide if i like it or not. For example, i like STO much better than Eve, probably different than most here. Why? Because i tried them both and found the pve combat in Eve is easy, simple with no variation and not fun. And STO ship combat is better. You won't know until you try it out.

Secondly, what is AAA is debatable. So i won't even attempt to go there.

Here is what i know. In the next year, many games will be released as F2P including EQN. 3 will be sub-only. I know which one i am going to try first.

As far as big budget game is concern, there is GTA online, Destiny, Division, ....

But personally i also don't care much about the MMO label, and i watch non-MMO but close enough games too. I am probably more excited about the D3 expansion (btw, i probably will have enough in my RMAH to pay for it, so it is F2P for me ... hhehehehe .. if i happen to spend my D3 money .. well then it will be b2p, but certainly not sub-only) than any MMO.

 

 

  spizz

Novice Member

Joined: 7/11/04
Posts: 2585

8/21/13 2:34:59 PM#9
Originally posted by nariusseldon
Originally posted by cranthug

Why are the majority of AAA MMO's releasing with aspirations of being P2P? 


 

Uh?

Here is a list of recent 2013 MMO releases.

http://games.gamepressure.com/games_encyclopedia.asp?KAT=7&SOR=2

Tell me how many are sub-only.

 

If these are AAA titles nowadays no wonder the mmorpg genre is a dying breed when it comes to quality and content. I have not seen a single F2P title which is a georgous quality mmorpg in the last years.

  nariusseldon

Elite Member

Joined: 12/21/07
Posts: 20123

8/21/13 2:58:53 PM#10
Originally posted by spizz
 

If these are AAA titles nowadays no wonder the mmorpg genre is a dying breed when it comes to quality and content. I have not seen a single F2P title which is a georgous quality mmorpg in the last years.

They are what they are. If you don't like them. You don't have to play.

And no genre last forever anyway. A lot of the innovation in gaming is not in traditional type of MMOs anyway. Games like Destiny, Division, MOBA, even online ARPG may be more popular than MMOs.

So if mmorpg dies, i will just do something else. It is not like i only play mmorpg today.

 

  Mendel

Hard Core Member

Joined: 7/22/11
Posts: 643

8/21/13 3:00:58 PM#11
Originally posted by cranthug
<snip>.

I have a biased opinion on the quality of a F2P game  vs P2P right out the gate.  It is my thought that if a game uses P2P it considers itself a quality game with much to offer in the long run, and not another F2P iteration to be used and tossed aside. 

I think these statements are completely off-base, in my opinion.   The quality of a game is based on the amount of money spent in development and the skill in spending that money wisely.   The F2P or P2P option occurs only after the game is complete and is designed to recoup that development cost as quickly as possible.   If the revenue generation covers these initial costs and any on-going operational costs, the stockholders will be happy and the game will be a 'success', at least financially.

The business model for generating revenue is in no way tied to the product except in the minds of gamers.

Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority.

  DamonVile

Hard Core Member

Joined: 11/22/05
Posts: 4909

8/21/13 3:01:39 PM#12

If you were going to launch an AAA mmo which would you choose.

 

Launch with a box and sub collecting $60 + 15/month for 6months to a year from everyone that can't wait to play your game. Then switch to free to play and get the huge rush of people coming back getting your game back into the spot light...or

 

Launch free to play and not cash in on all the P2P games are better!!! people

 

 

  Mr.Kujo

Novice Member

Joined: 5/23/12
Posts: 392

“Discussion is impossible with someone who claims not to seek the truth, but already to possess it.”

8/21/13 3:19:02 PM#13

Originally posted by cranthug

Why are the majority of AAA MMO's releasing with aspirations of being P2P?  Regardless of people's predictions of how many months til a games "inevitable" conversion to a F2P cash shop

 

Because the P2P model brings more profits and brings a certain type of players, and they can always change to f2p model to give the game a kick and bring in the other type of players. This is the best strategy currently avaliable. No one cares about voiced opinions, it is statistics that matter.

Originally posted by nariusseldon

 They are what they are. If you don't like them. You don't have to play.

And no genre last forever anyway. A lot of the innovation in gaming is not in traditional type of MMOs anyway. Games like Destiny, Division, MOBA, even online ARPG may be more popular than MMOs.

So if mmorpg dies, i will just do something else. It is not like i only play mmorpg today.

 

I have yet to see a genre that dissappeared, which ones are you refering too? So far every one od them 'lasts forever'. I only see new genres and sub-genres appearing. Even point and click adventure games still get released as often as the more new and fresh genres do.

And what innovation are you talking about in other genres? They seem to be staying true to their origins. FPS, RTS, platformers. All the new games have classic form with some slight improvements in terms of gameplay. I don't count graphics of course. So what are you talking about exactly?

Only mmo players have this weird opinions about genres, change and innovation.

Originally posted by DamonVile

If you were going to launch an AAA mmo which would you choose.

Launch with a box and sub collecting $60 + 15/month for 6months to a year from everyone that can't wait to play your game. Then switch to free to play and get the huge rush of people coming back getting your game back into the spot light...

 

Yes, this ^

 

  nariusseldon

Elite Member

Joined: 12/21/07
Posts: 20123

8/21/13 3:32:18 PM#14
Originally posted by Mr.Kujo

I have yet to see a genre that dissappeared, which ones are you refering too?

Text adventures. It was big back in 80s. Now there is still some hobbyist around, but no real commercial development.

Locked room mystery novels. Not written anymore in the US after the old age of masters like John Dickson Carr. To be fair, it has a revival in Japan, but certainly not in the US.

Radio drama is another. I listen to old radio shows produced in the 40s & 50s. They "died" right around 1960.

  cranthug

Novice Member

Joined: 2/06/07
Posts: 62

Thought begets heresy.

 
OP  8/21/13 3:34:59 PM#15
Originally posted by Mendel
Originally posted by cranthug
.

I have a biased opinion on the quality of a F2P game  vs P2P right out the gate.  It is my thought that if a game uses P2P it considers itself a quality game with much to offer in the long run, and not another F2P iteration to be used and tossed aside. 

I think these statements are completely off-base, in my opinion.   The quality of a game is based on the amount of money spent in development and the skill in spending that money wisely.   The F2P or P2P option occurs only after the game is complete and is designed to recoup that development cost as quickly The as possible.   If the revenue generation covers these initial costs and any on-going operational costs, the stockholders will be happy and the game will be a 'success', at least financially.

The business model for generating revenue is in no way tied to the product except in the minds of gamers.

That's exactly my point.  The potential for quality in a game can be based largely around the amount of resources you can throw at it in its development.  Not saying that it is any guarantee that the amount of resources used can ensure a successful game, but it surely doesn't hurt.  Companies that are paying for the most skilled dev's and using top of the line tech stand a better chance of producing "quality". 

F2P mmo's do not throw the same amount of time and money into development as a AAA P2P mmo.  They are designed from the start as F2P and cater towards casual users that most likely will not spend years playing.  The payment method for a game is known from the beginning.  Cash shops aren't added as an afterthought...they are directly connected into the game design. 

  Mendel

Hard Core Member

Joined: 7/22/11
Posts: 643

8/21/13 4:09:53 PM#16
Originally posted by cranthug
Originally posted by Mendel
Originally posted by cranthug
.

I have a biased opinion on the quality of a F2P game  vs P2P right out the gate.  It is my thought that if a game uses P2P it considers itself a quality game with much to offer in the long run, and not another F2P iteration to be used and tossed aside. 

I think these statements are completely off-base, in my opinion.   The quality of a game is based on the amount of money spent in development and the skill in spending that money wisely.   The F2P or P2P option occurs only after the game is complete and is designed to recoup that development cost as quickly The as possible.   If the revenue generation covers these initial costs and any on-going operational costs, the stockholders will be happy and the game will be a 'success', at least financially.

The business model for generating revenue is in no way tied to the product except in the minds of gamers.

That's exactly my point.  The potential for quality in a game can be based largely around the amount of resources you can throw at it in its development.  Not saying that it is any guarantee that the amount of resources used can ensure a successful game, but it surely doesn't hurt.  Companies that are paying for the most skilled dev's and using top of the line tech stand a better chance of producing "quality". 

F2P mmo's do not throw the same amount of time and money into development as a AAA P2P mmo.  They are designed from the start as F2P and cater towards casual users that most likely will not spend years playing.  The payment method for a game is known from the beginning.  Cash shops aren't added as an afterthought...they are directly connected into the game design. 

I think we disconnect at your second paragraph.   You seem to indicate that makers of F2P games make their games intentionally substandard and quickly, rolling out the final product only to start the revenue cycle as early as possible.   That's a choice of the development team (or more likely, the marketing and accounting departments for the project).   But that's not exclusive to any specific revenue model.   Games using any type of revenue model can and do use 'good enough' software engineering practices.  And this extends well beyond the game development businesses.  Microsoft practically pioneered the 'good enough' software concept.

I will grant that cash shops do add some additional design decisions, and usually result in additional work for the art department.

However, a company's revenue model does not say anything about the resulting product, or how that company views and/or treats its customers.   Compare the art work in a P2P game, WoW for instance, with a game that is primarily F2P, like PWI.   There's not an appreciable difference in the quality of the art, both fit a particular style.  There's actually more art work associated with PWI, with the various numbers of special costumes developed over the years.  The basic game play between the two games is comparable, and both games contain some very well written story lines.   About the only real functional difference is how they approach Auction Houses, WoW with a unified AH/mail system, and PWI with it's individual cat-shops.

As to how much it cost to build both games, I am certainly not aware of the development costs incurred by each project.  Both appear to have similar amounts of content, a similar number of game-play mechanics, and even similar amounts of support code.  The only difference in costs that I can see is that Blizzard pretty much wrote their own game platform, and PWI was developed in Asia and may have had smaller salary costs.   If you have reliable knowledge of specific game development costs for these (or any other) projects, I'd be very interested in seeing them.   To my knowledge, access to those kinds of numbers are private, and neither company cares to share them with the general public.

As far as I can see, there is no evidence to indicate that companies making F2P games spend less in development or cater towards casual users or expect those customers to leave.   Certainly, there's no direct connection, as you seem to imply.

Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority.

  cranthug

Novice Member

Joined: 2/06/07
Posts: 62

Thought begets heresy.

 
OP  8/21/13 5:21:15 PM#17
Originally posted by Mendel
Originally posted by cranthug
Originally posted by Mendel
Originally posted by cranthug
.

I have a biased opinion on the quality of a F2P game  vs P2P right out the gate.  It is my thought that if a game uses P2P it considers itself a quality game with much to offer in the long run, and not another F2P iteration to be used and tossed aside. 

I think these statements are completely off-base, in my opinion.   The quality of a game is based on the amount of money spent in development and the skill in spending that money wisely.   The F2P or P2P option occurs only after the game is complete and is designed to recoup that development cost as quickly The as possible.   If the revenue generation covers these initial costs and any on-going operational costs, the stockholders will be happy and the game will be a 'success', at least financially.

The business model for generating revenue is in no way tied to the product except in the minds of gamers.

That's exactly my point.  The potential for quality in a game can be based largely around the amount of resources you can throw at it in its development.  Not saying that it is any guarantee that the amount of resources used can ensure a successful game, but it surely doesn't hurt.  Companies that are paying for the most skilled dev's and using top of the line tech stand a better chance of producing "quality". 

F2P mmo's do not throw the same amount of time and money into development as a AAA P2P mmo.  They are designed from the start as F2P and cater towards casual users that most likely will not spend years playing.  The payment method for a game is known from the beginning.  Cash shops aren't added as an afterthought...they are directly connected into the game design. 

I think we disconnect at your second paragraph.   You seem to indicate that makers of F2P games make their games intentionally substandard and quickly, rolling out the final product only to start the revenue cycle as early as possible.   That's a choice of the development team (or more likely, the marketing and accounting departments for the project).   But that's not exclusive to any specific revenue model.   Games using any type of revenue model can and do use 'good enough' software engineering practices.  And this extends well beyond the game development businesses.  Microsoft practically pioneered the 'good enough' software concept.

I will grant that cash shops do add some additional design decisions, and usually result in additional work for the art department.

However, a company's revenue model does not say anything about the resulting product, or how that company views and/or treats its customers.   Compare the art work in a P2P game, WoW for instance, with a game that is primarily F2P, like PWI.   There's not an appreciable difference in the quality of the art, both fit a particular style.  There's actually more art work associated with PWI, with the various numbers of special costumes developed over the years.  The basic game play between the two games is comparable, and both games contain some very well written story lines.   About the only real functional difference is how they approach Auction Houses, WoW with a unified AH/mail system, and PWI with it's individual cat-shops.

As to how much it cost to build both games, I am certainly not aware of the development costs incurred by each project.  Both appear to have similar amounts of content, a similar number of game-play mechanics, and even similar amounts of support code.  The only difference in costs that I can see is that Blizzard pretty much wrote their own game platform, and PWI was developed in Asia and may have had smaller salary costs.   If you have reliable knowledge of specific game development costs for these (or any other) projects, I'd be very interested in seeing them.   To my knowledge, access to those kinds of numbers are private, and neither company cares to share them with the general public.

As far as I can see, there is no evidence to indicate that companies making F2P games spend less in development or cater towards casual users or expect those customers to leave.   Certainly, there's no direct connection, as you seem to imply.

I have yet to encounter a gameplay experience for free that offers anything close to the experience I as a "hardcore" mmo vet have had in a successful P2P game.  I attribute this to the casual nature of F2P games.  Opinion, whatever. :)

I think though that a publishers revenue model of choice certainly says much about their resulting product and the gameplay.  P2P is designed around keeping customers over a long period of time.  They are trying to make the game fun or addicting to keep you paying that sub.  F2P publishers are catering to game jumpers and casual players.  A casual player is less likely to pay a monthly fee, less likely to spend hundreds of hours in front of a computer, but very likely to spend money on something they are enjoying in the moment.  F2P games are designed around getting your addiction and then exploiting that by charging you to progress at a rate that isnt a horrible grind.  Or charging you for everything they can before you get bored and quit because they lack content.  Or charge you to upgrade an item, only to have the possibility of losing that item and upgrade which you paid for in the process.  Or selling you lottery tickets for the chance to possibly get the item you want out of a random box.  This is based on my observations and experience.  I'm sure no F2P publishers will admit to this tactic, but when they milk a player base for a few months and then release a near identical game under a new moniker shortly after...is it not evident?

Do F2P publishers like Nexon not just churn out game after game?  They have 22 in their catalog.  Perfect World developed and released 7 games in four years...I mean how much quality and innovation can possibly be going into this stuff.  I don't think there needs to be evidence to support the claim that game makers like Square Enix and Blizzard are investing more time and money into their games and staff than F2P publishers.  Isn't it evident by the amount of F2P games being released vs AAA games?

Edited to remove opinion unrelated to topic.  Actually most of this post is off-topic but whatever :)  I am sure noone will disagree that the successful P2P games of the past and hopefully the future are more profitable than any of the successful F2P games to date.  By games meaning AAA mmorpg experience.  What we all yearn for.

  Fly666monkey

Advanced Member

Joined: 10/25/11
Posts: 136

8/21/13 5:37:26 PM#18

I'd like to point out that for all these arguments that are thrown around bashing the shady practices in the F2P market, many of us forget about all the equally shady things P2P games did, and still do.

We so easily forget how horribly padded many P2P games were just so that they keep you playing as long as possible, or how often they would punish the player for not keeping their sub going. (Example: In Ultima Online, if you don't log in for 30 days, your house is destroyed. You look me in the eye and tell me that isn't a ploy to keep you paying your sub.)

As for the argument that P2P games translate into quality products: never forget that Mortal Online was a sub game for years. So was vanilla FF14. And Horizons. And Shadowbane. And APB. And Auto Assault. And... well, you get the idea.

  LeGrosGamer

Novice Member

Joined: 7/06/13
Posts: 214

8/21/13 5:39:28 PM#19
Originally posted by cranthug

Why are the majority of AAA MMO's releasing with aspirations of being P2P?  Regardless of people's predictions of how many months til a games "inevitable" conversion to a F2P cash shop, P2P is still and will always be the preferred business model for game makers.  It benefits the devs and players alike, and if a game has the longevity and the fun factor built into it you should be required to compensate the game makers for providing you this service.  

If people want to be nickel and dimed for content that should already be available to them for a small fee each month, more power to them.  If kiddies can't get their parents to cough up a credit card so they can game, I say get a damn job.  The problem with P2P isn't the business model, it is the fact that there have been no games released in recent memory worth paying a sub for. 

Nothing in life is free except the grace and favor of the Lord.  Support the developers that give you hours of entertainment.  Long live P2P!  Huzzah!

 

This guy (or woman) deserves a medal of intellect.    To continue on your thought,  problem I got with F2P titles being released like crazy every 2-3 weeks, is that people think the F2P model is awesome since a lot of people play when the game releases. That's true, until the next F2P releases 2-3 weeks later and those same players will flock around the new release and only a handful will stay and play that now 6 week old F2P title.   P2P models are still growing in numbers while F2P keep declining because there is no sense of belonging, when I play a F2P title with friends, it's like we're playing with no real purpose but if you put real money to enhance yourself then you'll start being considered like a God and have people wanting to party with you more often.  That the illusion and the trap of F2P titles, they make you seem all powerful when in fact you're just feeding more cash to the Devs.  And if that F2P ain't profitable anymore, they just release a new one and leave that old title alone with barely no updates.    Every P2P title I've played, be it Nexus TK , EVE Online , WoW , FF11, I always felt at home, more at ease and the community is always better on P2P titles then on F2P titles.  F2P titles are being released by the 3 dozens a year!  Back in the early 90's and early 2000 we would be amazed at a MMORPG being released since it didn't happen that often. Today? We're all pfff another crappy title, it's insane how these games are being more released then movies, there used to be pride in working and releasing a MMO, today it's all about racking in as most cash as possible off a cash shop, once we start losing cash, we'll just release a new cash shop MMO.   Sad part about this, people still flock around new releases after new releases giving the false impression that the new releases are good when in fact it's the same playerbase from that 4 week old title that are jumping over to the new release.

  nariusseldon

Elite Member

Joined: 12/21/07
Posts: 20123

8/21/13 5:51:08 PM#20
Originally posted by LeGrosGamer
  problem I got with F2P titles being released like crazy every 2-3 weeks, is that people think the F2P model is awesome since a lot of people play when the game releases. That's true, until the next F2P releases 2-3 weeks later and those same players will flock around the new release and only a handful will stay and play that now 6 week old F2P title.  

You make it sounds like a bad thing.

You get to play more games. More variety, instead of stuck with one.

I don't know about you, but that sounds like a win to me.

And btw, 6 weeks is way longer than SP games already. And who says i cannot go back for more if i like the game enough. It is free .. so it is easy to drop it and pick up later.

 

6 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 » Search