Trending Games | ArcheAge | Guild Wars 2 | WildStar | Warhammer 40K: Eternal Crusade

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,787,342 Users Online:0
Games:723  Posts:6,193,331
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
A-C
2029 Online 2112: Revolution 2Moons 4Story 8BitMMO 9 Dragons A Mystical Land A Tale in the Desert III A3 ACE Online ARGO Online Aberoth Absolute Force Online Absolute Terror Achaea Adellion Aerrevan Aetolia, the Midnight Age Age of Armor Age of Conan Age of Empires Online Age of Mourning Age of Wulin Age of Wushu Aida Arenas Aika Aion Albion Online Alganon All Points Bulletin (APB) Allods Online Altis Gates Amazing World Anarchy Online Ancients of Fasaria Andromeda 5 Angels Online Anime Trumps Anmynor Anno Online Applo Arcane Hearts Arcane Legends ArchLord ArcheAge Archeblade Archlord X Asda 2 Asda Story Ashen Empires Asheron's Call Asheron's Call 2 Astera Online Astonia III Astro Empires Astro Lords: Oort CLoud Asura Force Atlantica Online Atriarch Aura Kingdom Aurora Blade Auto Assault Avatar Star Battle Dawn Battle Dawn Galaxies Battle for Graxia Battle of 3 Kingdoms Battle of the Immortals Battlecruiser Online Battlestar Galactica Online Battlestar Reloaded Beyond Protocol Black Aftermath Black Desert Black Gold Black Prophecy Black Prophecy Tactics: Nexus Conflict Blacklight Retribution Blade & Soul Blade Hunter Blade Wars Blazing Throne Bless Blitz 1941 Blood and Jade Bloodlines Champions Bounty Bay Online Brain Storm Brawl Busters. Brick-Force Bright Shadow Bullet Run Business Tycoon Online CTRacer Cabal Online Caesary Call of Camelot Call of Gods Call of Thrones Camelot Unchained Canaan Online Cardmon Hero Cartoon Universe CasinoRPG Castle Empire Castlot Celtic Heroes Champions Online Champions of Regnum Chaos Online Chrono Tales Citadel of Sorcery CitiesXL Citizen Zero City of Decay City of Heroes City of Steam City of Transformers City of Villains Civilization Online Clan Lord Clash of Clans Cloud Nine Club Penguin Colony of War Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances Company of Heroes Online Conquer Online Conquer Online 3 Continent of the Ninth (C9) Core Blaze Core Exiles Corum Online Craft of Gods Crimecraft Crimelife 2 Cronous Crota II Crusaders of Solaris Cultures Online Cyber Monster 2 Céiron Wars
D-F
D&D Online DC Universe DK Online DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 DV8: Exile Dalethaan Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Relic: Prelude Dark Solstice Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkest Dungeon Darkfall Darkfall: Unholy Wars Darkwind: War on Wheels Das Tal Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide DayZ Dead Earth Dead Frontier Deco Online Deepworld Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Demons at the Horizon Desert Operations Destiny Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Pals Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Call II Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dragons and Titans Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Rampage Dungeon Runners Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online Dynasty of the Magi EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthrise Eclipse War Ecol Tactics Online Eden Eternal Edge of Space Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elder Scrolls Online Eldevin Elf Online Elite: Dangerous Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire Empire & State Empire Craft Empire Universe 3 EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Blue Moon Online Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Eternal Saga Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverEmber Online EverQuest Next EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Evony Exarch Exorace F.E.A.R. Online Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forge Forsaken World Fortnite Fortuna Forum for Discussion of Everlight Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
G-L
GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones: Seven Kingdoms Gameglobe Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gauntlet Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer Gloria Victis Glory of Gods GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Granado Espada Online Grand Chase Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall H1Z1 Habbo Hotel Hailan Rising HaloSphere2 Haven & Hearth Hawken Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero Online Hero Zero Hero's Journey Hero: 108 Online HeroSmash Heroes & Generals Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Heroes of the Storm Hex Holic Online Hostile Space Hunter Blade Huxley Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Imperator Imperian Inferno Legend Infestation: Survivor Stories Infinite Crisis Infinity Infinity Iris Online Iron Grip: Marauders Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kartuga Kicks Online King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom Under Fire II Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kings and Legends Kings of the Realm KingsRoad Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Age Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Landmark Lands of Hope: Phoenix Edition LastChaos League of Angels League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Edda: Vengeance Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 2 Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Lego Minifigures Online Life is Feudal Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia World
M-Q
MU Online Mabinogi Maestia: Rise of Keledus MagiKnights Magic Barrage Magic World Online Manga Fighter MapleStory Martial Heroes Marvel Heroes Marvel Super Hero Squad Online Marvel: Avengers Alliance MechWarrior Online Megaten Meridian 59 : Evolution Merlin MetalMercs Metaplace Metin 2 MicroVolts Midkemia Online Might & Magic Heroes: Kingdoms MilMo Minecraft Mini Fighter Minions of Mirth Ministry of War Monato Esprit Monkey King Online Monkey Quest Monster & Me Monster Madness Online MonsterMMORPG Moonlight Online: Tales of Eternal Blood Mordavia Mortal Online Mourning My Lands Myst Online: URU Live Myth Angels Online Myth War Myth War 2 Mytheon Mythic Saga Mythos N.E.O Online NIDA Online Nadirim Naviage: The Power of Capital Navy Field Need for Speed World Nemexia Neo's Land NeoSteam Neocron Nether Neverwinter Nexus: The Kingdom Of The Winds NinjaTrick NosTale Novus Aeterno Oberin Odin Quest Odyssey RPG Ogre Island Omerta 3 Online Boxing Manager Onverse Order & Chaos Online Order of Magic Original Blood Origins Return Origins of Malu Orion's Belt Otherland Forums OverSoul Overkings Oz Online Oz World Pandora Saga Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Panzar Parabellum Parallel Kingdom Parfait Station Path of Exile Pathfinder Online Perfect World Perpetuum Online Phantasy Star Online 2 Phantasy Star Universe Phoenix Dynasty Online Phylon Pi Story Picaroon Pirate Galaxy Pirate Storm Pirate101 PirateKing Online Pirates of the Burning Sea Pirates of the Caribbean Online Pixie Hollow Planeshift Planet Arkadia Planet Calypso PlanetSide 2 Planetside Planets³ Playboy Manager Pocket Legends Pockie Ninja Pockie Pirates Pockie Saints PoxNora Prime World Prime: Battle for Dominus Priston Tale Priston Tale II Prius Online Project Blackout Project Powder Project Titan Forums Project Wiki Puzzle Pirates Quickhit Football
R-S
R2 Online RAN Online RF Online ROSE Online Rage of 3 Kingdoms Ragnarok Online Ragnarok Online II RaiderZ Rakion Rappelz RappelzSEA Ravenmarch Realm Fighter Realm of the Mad God Realm of the Titans Realms Online Reclamation Red Stone Red War: Edem's Curse Regnum Online Remnant Knights Renaissance Repulse Requiem: Memento Mori Rift RiotZone Rise Rise of Dragonian Era Rise of Empire Rise of the Tycoon Rising of King Risk Your Life Rivality Rockfree Rohan: Blood Feud Role Play Worlds Roll n Rock Roma Victor Romadoria Rosh Online Roto X Rubies of Eventide Ruin Online Rumble Fighter Runes of Magic Runescape Rust Rusty Hearts Ryzom S4 League SAGA SD Gundam Capsule Fighter Online SMITE SUN Sagramore Salem SaySayGirls Scarlet Blade Scions of Fate Seal Online: Evolution Second Life Secret of the Solstice Seed Serenia Fantasy Seven Seas Saga Seven Souls Online Sevencore Shadow of Legend Shadowbane Shadowrun Online Shaiya Shards Online Shattered Galaxy Sho Online Shot Online Shroud of the Avatar SideQuest Siege on Stars Sigonyth: Desert Eternity Silkroad Online Skyblade Skyforge SmashMuck Champions Smoo Online Soldier Front Soul Master Soul Order Online Soul of Guardian Space Heroes Universe Sparta: War of Empires Spellcasters Sphere Spiral Knights Spirit Tales Splash Fighters Squad Wars Star Citizen Star Sonata 2 Star Stable Star Supremacy Star Trek Online Star Trek: Infinite Space Star Wars Galaxies Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Star Wars: The Old Republic StarQuest Online Stargate Worlds Starlight Story Starpires State of Decay SteelWar Online Stone Age 2 Stormfall: Age of War Storybricks Stronghold Kingdoms Sudden Attack Supremacy 1914 Supreme Destiny Sword Girls Sword of Destiny: Rise of Aions SwordX Swords of Heavens Swordsman
T-Z
TERA TS Online Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Tales of Solaris Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris TerraWorld Online Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Aurora World The Black Watchmen The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Crew The Division The Hammers End The Legend of Ares The Lost Titans The Matrix Online The Mighty Quest for Epic Loot The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems The West Theralon There Therian Saga Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Tiger Knight Titan Siege Titans of Time Toontown Online Top Speed Topia Online Torchlight Total Domination Transformers Universe Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Trove Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War Tynon U.B. Funkeys UFO Online URDEAD Online Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Naruto Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Utopia Valkyrie Sky Vampire Lord Online Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos VoidExpanse Voyage Century Online W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WAR2 Glory WYD Global Wakfu War Thunder War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Mercenaries War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Wargame1942 Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warkeepers Warrior Epic Wartune WebLords Wild West Online WildStar Wind of Luck WindSlayer 2 Wings of Destiny Wish Wizard101 Wizardry Online Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Speed World of Tanks World of Tanks Generals World of Warcraft World of Warplanes World of Warships World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xenocell Xiah Xsyon Xulu YS Online Yitien ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online Zombies Ate My Pizza eRepublik

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn

Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn 

General Discussion  » Free 2 Play

9 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Last Search
162 posts found
  Treabhair

Novice Member

Joined: 2/25/13
Posts: 20

 
OP  2/25/13 3:28:17 PM#1

 

Now that I have your attention, I'm not here to ask whether this game is f2p or to say that it should be, but rather to bring up some thoughts I had that might appease a wider audience.

 

FFXI was technically my first MMO, having only played PSO prior which was completely instanced outside of of lobbies. I can't say it was a shining example of fantastic game mechanics, but something about it seemed to bring together a great community and experience for the players who took the time to become engrossed by it. I currently play GW2 on occasion, though having been a fan of many GW1 mechanics, I can't say I'm entirely impressed by it, but that's a different discussion. Furthermore, GW2 and most MMOs I've played since FFXI have had communities that felt distant. I feel this is probably an issue with many MMOs adopting a solo centric grind more so than anything, but again, that's a different discussion. My point is that I loved FFXI mostly because of the community that it nurtured and I'd love to love FFXIV too. However...

 

My mindset has changed quite a bit since I played FFXI. I was a teenager with nothing better to do really. Now in my mid 20s with many responsibilities and productive things I could be doing, I seem to have adopted a different perspective which I'm sure others have as well. I understand games being a form of entertainment and despite being unproductive, not really being any less productive than the many other forms of entertainment out there. However, I find it hard to justify paying a monthly subscription to essentially burn my time away, especially on something I already purchased. There's probably many flaws in the way I see this, but it is how I see it. Still, I'm not here to say it should be f2p, but rather to look at possibilities to cater to more people.

 

I've noticed there are a number of people on both sides, those liking the p2p model in place and those who wish it were f2p/b2p. I don't want to take from the p2p crowd, especially since you all have the high ground right now and the game is already slated to go in your direction. I also see SE justification in using the p2p model out of honor as they said. They've promised a cheaper subscription to those who supported the game pre ARR and it wouldn't be good to those people, their biggest supporters, if they simply threw that incentive out the window in favor of an entirely different business model for ARR. The three main points I've seen for having this game release and remain p2p so far are:

  • p2p offers a better community
  • p2p allows the developer to focus on new content for subscribers instead of developing new cash shop goodies
  • p2p allows SquareEnix to remain honest to their more dedicated fans.

I personally feel all these points could be satisfied while still offering a f2p model for those of us who can't justify the $15 a month for whatever reason.

 

Firstly, I would suggest that the game either use a megashard system like GW1 or the upcoming ESO where everyone is a part of one world thats split into channels so that areas don't become over populated and so that the hardware can still split up the population and manage it without catching fire, or a world guesting service like GW2 except limited by only being able to guest to worlds where you have friends. The purpose behind this would be to allow subscriber only shards / worlds, without keeping subscription players from their friends who play without a subscription. That way, you have dedicated subscriber communities within the game for those that want it, and the open f2p communities for those who prefer that.

 

Next, keeping developer focus on the content and subscribers desires definitely requires an outside of the box solution. In FFXI, the developers had their own server (atomos I believe) for testing and tweaking new content. To keep the subscribers wants and desires closer to the developers, some of the subscriber only shards/worlds could be for testing some of this new content and getting the subscriber communities feedback. Essentially a constantly evolving beta shard/world which only subscribers have access to. And to keep SE attention on new content and not f2p goodies, leave the development of costumes / mounts / dungeons etc. to the players. Valve does this with Dota 2 and TF2 already with great success. Essentially give the tools to the players to create these new content with incentive to do so, have each submitted piece go through SE for approval, then post it to the cash shop. FFXI had a small modding community and don't think it would be hard to find players willing to put their work forward for a chance it having it added to the game, especially if they could get whatever they made for free and a bit of currency to throw at the cash shop.

 

Lastly, to stay true to their word with their most loyal players, SquareEnix could easily give them a lifetime discount of $5 from an optional subscription model that rewarded a monthly allowance with a few extra perks. With a tiered model, that would mean legacy members could play at a $5 a month subscriber status for free, $10 for $5, $15 for 10, etc. etc.

 

A service like the ever popular mmo auction house, except for advertising linkshells / guilds for players without to browse and request an invite, especially when compounded with features to build a linkshell or guild around a certain draw (hobbies, likes, objectives, etc.) would easily open the doors to tight knit communities. With the right tools in place, I think you can encourage tight communities without limiting them in any way, whether by using static servers to create a finite number of players or financial barriers to do the same.

 

I'm not saying this IS the solution or that this is what they should do, but I would be interested in hearing what others think, especially the people who are happy with the p2p model that's set for release.

  Dogblaster

Novice Member

Joined: 3/14/12
Posts: 505

2/25/13 3:35:11 PM#2

Sorry man, too long post :) And what is the first rule ... DONT make long posts because not many players will read it :)

 

about subscription model...

Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn is not going to be F2P and I hope it will never ever be. This is not only about how much money can company make from the model or how many players will play it, F2P have just more downsides.

I dont personally dont need more trolls/haters playing the game for free just to spamm the chat, forums how everyone who plays it is retarded bla bla bla.

 

If players really wants to play the game, pay for it :) Its going to be awesome game ! Easy acess or even free that F2P mode provides is THE BIGGEST downside of this model. You dont want great mmorpgs to be acessible for free to everyone, they need to have the prestigue in it and givit it for free is kinda opposite of it. When I see F2P game I see game that failed so it has no other choice than stay F2P (not always true ofc.)

 

All your suggestions are about your preference and personal suggestions, everyone is different so I dont agree with some but thats okey. But really suggestion to different F2P and P2P servers? I mean really? Maaan... dumbest idea ive heard. And about cash shop, players making dungeon, costumes, armors .. and then buy it from cash shop? Please no ...

 

I think ARR dont need F2P players just to have 1M+ Subs.. As long as it retain the healthy community it doesnt matter, even 100k would be enought.

 

I personally believe that developers of ARR know what they are doing very well. Esp. Naoki Yoshida! After reading all his posts, QAS, videos, etc. I am 100% about it. And I really dont like when random players that they know better so they should do X and Y...

 

But I will tell you one thing...

Final Fantasy XIV: ARR is going to be fucking blast and even more without F2P players.

  Treabhair

Novice Member

Joined: 2/25/13
Posts: 20

 
OP  2/25/13 4:02:16 PM#3

"Final Fantasy XIV: ARR is going to be fucking blast!"

 

I do hope so, but I'm afraid my brother, a few friends of mine, and myself won't get to take part without a f2p level of play.

 

And just to clarify, the the idea is a f2p model with an optional subscription like many of the games that started p2p and went f2p. The servers wouldn't particularly be different from one another, but a few would just be set aside so that only subscribers could access them, for those that don't want to deal with the f2p community. I believe ESO is doing something like this with their shards. questions are asked at character creation or something, and while you're not limited to which shards you'll be able to be in, you'll be auto placed in shards with people who answered those questions similarly, so that you can play with similarly minded players.

 

Additionally, to shorten up the long post for others, the concept I put forth is a f2p with optional subscription in such a way that the subscribers take priority and are given certain perks that don't nessicarily give them an advantage in the game but rather in other ways, non subscribers arent given access to places where they may spoil that subscriber community feel (forums, world chat, /shout), and a system to encourage developers to develop real content and not f2p toys.

  Dogblaster

Novice Member

Joined: 3/14/12
Posts: 505

2/25/13 4:04:52 PM#4

You forgot to mention those P2P game that went F2P becaues they kinda failed. Their subscription went from 1-2M to 500k and even lower. They had no choice. I bealive they would stay P2P if they could, sadly they couldnt and ONLY way to gain those numbers back was to make the game F2P. And I know what I am talking about, I bought every mmorpg released for past 10 years, in almost every each of them I have one or more maxxed out characters.

 

I just DONT see the reason to have P2P and F2P shards or whatever you suggested. For instance ..when I pay gym pass for 600 euro a year, I dont see any option availible to pay 0 euros but with limited acess or limeted uses fitness equipment. For those who want to try it out, there is trial (ingame) and something like free excersise (ingym)

 

Aaaanyway. I wont ever understant how 13 euro per month or w/e can BE ever a problem to pay? HOW, tell me? 13 euro for me is one cinema visit, not even half lunch in restaurant, etc. Its 13 euro per MONTH, not day... So either those F2P players dont take the game seriously and just wants free fun and play 10 F2P mmorpgs at same time or they are 12 years old kids with no money..

 

WHY it is so big deal to pay SO small amount of money per month for something you play daily several hours a day? If I wanted to do any outdoor activity every day for several hours a day (gym, tenis, golf, w/e) Just please think about it and STOP seeking and demanding ''free'' fun, thats not going to work.

  User Deleted
2/25/13 4:16:04 PM#5

I'm 39 years old have a full-time job and a pretty busy life that doesn't leave a whole lot of time for gaming.

Still, no matter how often I see it, I just can not get on board with the idea of "it was fine when *I* was younger and had more time. But now that *I* am older and have more responsibility, it's not good anymore for *me*. So now, the games should change to better suit *me*, so that *I* can continue playing as *I* would like to, without having to compromise *my* sense of enjoyment".

Note, I say "you" in the general sense here, because even though I'm responding to the OP, I see this logic argued by so many people that it really doesn't apply to any one individual. It relates to anyone who shares that way of thinking. And there are a lot of you.

It just strikes me as a shamelessly entitled and ego-centric mindset.  "My life has changed, so now the games should change to better suit my circumstances".

No. They shouldn't. You should change your expectations and adjust your priorities to suit your new circumstances.

Newsflash folks: It ain't "all about you". You are not the center of the universe. A change in your personal life situation is not a mandate for change in the way games are developed or sold, so you can continue to play as you'd like, and achieve what you'd like, on your own terms, without having to compromise.

So, you used to be able to spend 5 hours straight in-game going after that item you wanted, but don't have that kind of time anymore? Okay fine. So you make that realization, adjust your expectations and accept that, okay, so now it might take you 3 sessions of 2 hours to get that item you wanted. You're still getting it just not in one session. Can't enjoy the game as much that way? Well, then you should reconsider whether it's time to move on and find a new game that better suits your circumstances.

"But it's not fair", some might say?

Of course it's fair. That's called life. It's called growing up and realizing that nothing lasts forever, and you can't have your cake and eat it, too.

Say you play golf every weekend for 8 hours a day because you're single, free and clear. Then you get married and have children which take up more of your time. That doesn't mean the rules of golf need to change because they're no longer convenient to your life situation. It doesn't mean your membership fee for the Country Club should be reduced because "you don't feel it's worth that much anymore". It means you have to adjust your expectations and shift your schedule to work it in, and accept that you're just not gonna be able to play as much as you used to. You might have to cut that game short once in a while and not go the whole 18 holes.  That's life.

The other part of that attitude that irks me is how it just completely and utterly ignores and disqualifies those who do still have all that time to pour into a game that you used to. Those people still have a lot of free time. They shouldn't have the opportunity to enjoy these games the way you used to, because you've grown up, become more responsible and can't do it anymore? Really?

Can't justify the subscription fee because you don't feel you have enough time to make it worth while? Then pick another game that better suits your finances. Don't expect a game to change its entire revenue model, just because it no longer suits your sense of value.

 

Seriously folks. Get over yourselves.

  Dogblaster

Novice Member

Joined: 3/14/12
Posts: 505

2/25/13 4:23:15 PM#6
Originally posted by GamingGeek

I'm 39 years old have a full-time job and a pretty busy life that doesn't leave a whole lot of time for gaming.

Still, no matter how often I see it, I just can not get on board with the idea of "it was fine when *I* was younger and had more time. But now that *I* am older and have more responsibility, it's not good anymore for *me*. So now, the games should change to better suit *me*, so that *I* can continue playing as *I* would like to, without having to compromise *my* sense of enjoyment".

Note, I say "you" in the general sense here, because even though I respnoding to the OP, I see this logic argued by so many people that it really doesn't apply to anyone individual. It applies to anyone who shares that way of thinking.

It just strikes me as a shamelessly entitled and ego-centric mindset.  "My life has changed, so now the games should change to better suit my circumstances".

No. They shouldn't. You should change your expectations and adjust your priorities to suit your new circumstances.

Newsflash folks: It ain't "all about you". You are not the center of the universe. A change in your personal life situation is not a mandate for change in the way games are developed or sold, so you can continue to play as you'd like, and achieve what you'd like, on your own terms, without having to compromise.

So, you used to be able to spend 5 hours straight in-game going after that item you wanted, but don't have that kind of time anymore? Okay fine. So you make that realization, adjust your expectations and accept that, okay, so now it might take you 3 sessions of 2 hours to get that item you wanted. You're still getting it just not in one session. Can't enjoy the game as much that way? Well, then you should reconsider whether it's time to move on and find a new game that better suits your circumstances.

"But it's not fair", some might say?

Of course it's fair. That's called life. It's called growing up and realizing that you can't have your cake and eat it, too. It's time to get over yourself and realize the world doesn't revolve around you.

Say you play golf every weekend for 8 hours a day because you're single, free and clear. Then you get married and have children which take up more of your time. That doesn't mean the rules of golf need to change because they're no longer convenient to your life situation. It means you have to adjust your expectations and shift your schedule to work it in, and accept that you're just not gonna be able to play as much as you used to. You might have to cut that game short once in a while and not go the whole 18 holes.  That's life.

 

The other part of that attitude that irks me is how it just completely and utterly ignores and disqualifies those who do still have all that time to pour into a game that you used to. Those people still have a lot of free time. They shouldn't have the opportunity to enjoy these games the way you used to, because you've grown up, become more responsible and can't do it anymore? Really? Shameless, egocentric thinking.

Can't justify the subscription fee because you don't feel you have enough time to make it worth while? Then pick another game that better suits your finances. Don't expect a game to change its entire revenue model, just because it no longer suits your sense of value.

 

Seriously folks. Get over yourselves.

Come on ... When i read you article I was like: How the hell he could come up with something like this so fast .. cheater or bookwritter xD

 

Totally agree with you!

Just because someone became grandpa and dont have what it takes to pick up 18 years girls anymore doesnt mean that those girls have to change and become Oldophiles...

 
  Treabhair

Novice Member

Joined: 2/25/13
Posts: 20

 
OP  2/25/13 4:24:56 PM#7

I wouldn't consider them failures. The initial numbers after the release of a new MMO can't really be trusted. In the current state of the MMO ecosystem, all games are destined to be overhyped because of the dissappointment present with current MMOs. This means games are more than likely to bring big numbers at release, and then quickly fall off shortly after. What I've heard is many MMO's that started p2p and eventually go f2p end up making even more money with their f2p model.

 

That said, a successful subscription model is still the peak of the mountain and if they can acheive it, then there would be little reason for SquareEnix to even give f2p a thought. This would be bitter sweet to me since I certainly would like to see them succeed after that sacrifices they've made to fix this title, but at the same time, I'd like to play myself, which as I already stated isn't possible with a sub model since I can't justify paying a monthly fee to burn my time. I'm not saying that my time is particularly more important than others, but I just can't enjoy playing a game if the thought that I could be doing something more productive with my time and money is lingering in the back of my head.

 

Still, I understand you're quite happy with a sub model and thats fine too. I can see why people would want it, but as you noted, it does go against my personal preference both because of the aformentioned reason, and because it limits the community and people who can access the game.

  Dogblaster

Novice Member

Joined: 3/14/12
Posts: 505

2/25/13 4:27:05 PM#8

Yes and as I said ... One of the best P2P upsides is that it limits the acess to certain people.

 

Just for instance so you understand it better... I have about 5-10 gyms near where I am living. You know which one I think is the best? The most expensive one, you know why? Not only because it has the best equipment but because the price limits acess to certain people ... for instance teenagers in this case xD

In case of mmorpgs it limits acess to trolls, bots, haters, spammers, etc..

 

P.S.: You dont have a time or money? So make the time or dont visit KFC so often.

  User Deleted
2/25/13 4:28:21 PM#9
Originally posted by Dogblaster
 

Come on ... When i read you article I was like: How the hell he could come up with something like this so fast .. cheater or bookwritter xD

 

Totally agree with you!

 

 

lol! Neither... Just a really fast typer :).

 

And I make a lot of typos.

  revy66

Novice Member

Joined: 11/12/10
Posts: 470

2/25/13 4:31:13 PM#10
"It limits the people who can access the game", what a remarkable observation. A lot of things are limited to people who can afford them.
  Dogblaster

Novice Member

Joined: 3/14/12
Posts: 505

2/25/13 4:32:17 PM#11
Originally posted by GamingGeek

lol! Neither... Just a really fast typer :).

 

And I make a lot of typos.

I am not native english speaker so I dont care that much about grammar .. untill I have exam xD

  Treabhair

Novice Member

Joined: 2/25/13
Posts: 20

 
OP  2/25/13 4:35:03 PM#12
Originally posted by GamingGeek

I'm 39 years old have a full-time job and a pretty busy life that doesn't leave a whole lot of time for gaming.

Still, no matter how often I see it, I just can not get on board with the idea of "it was fine when *I* was younger and had more time. But now that *I* am older and have more responsibility, it's not good anymore for *me*. So now, the games should change to better suit *me*, so that *I* can continue playing as *I* would like to, without having to compromise *my* sense of enjoyment".

Note, I say "you" in the general sense here, because even though I respnoding to the OP, I see this logic argued by so many people that it really doesn't apply to any one individual. It relates to anyone who shares that way of thinking. And there are a lot of you.

It just strikes me as a shamelessly entitled and ego-centric mindset.  "My life has changed, so now the games should change to better suit my circumstances".

No. They shouldn't. You should change your expectations and adjust your priorities to suit your new circumstances.

Newsflash folks: It ain't "all about you". You are not the center of the universe. A change in your personal life situation is not a mandate for change in the way games are developed or sold, so you can continue to play as you'd like, and achieve what you'd like, on your own terms, without having to compromise.

So, you used to be able to spend 5 hours straight in-game going after that item you wanted, but don't have that kind of time anymore? Okay fine. So you make that realization, adjust your expectations and accept that, okay, so now it might take you 3 sessions of 2 hours to get that item you wanted. You're still getting it just not in one session. Can't enjoy the game as much that way? Well, then you should reconsider whether it's time to move on and find a new game that better suits your circumstances.

"But it's not fair", some might say?

Of course it's fair. That's called life. It's called growing up and realizing that you can't have your cake and eat it, too.

Say you play golf every weekend for 8 hours a day because you're single, free and clear. Then you get married and have children which take up more of your time. That doesn't mean the rules of golf need to change because they're no longer convenient to your life situation. It means you have to adjust your expectations and shift your schedule to work it in, and accept that you're just not gonna be able to play as much as you used to. You might have to cut that game short once in a while and not go the whole 18 holes.  That's life.

The other part of that attitude that irks me is how it just completely and utterly ignores and disqualifies those who do still have all that time to pour into a game that you used to. Those people still have a lot of free time. They shouldn't have the opportunity to enjoy these games the way you used to, because you've grown up, become more responsible and can't do it anymore? Really?

Can't justify the subscription fee because you don't feel you have enough time to make it worth while? Then pick another game that better suits your finances. Don't expect a game to change its entire revenue model, just because it no longer suits your sense of value.

 

Seriously folks. Get over yourselves.

 

Like I said, I wasn't saying this was a solution. I just wanted to gauge what other people thought. The idea wasn't to change the game to suit a different group of people, but rather to attempt to suit everyone, which is why I had mentioned that I was most interested in p2p gamers since they're already getting what they want. I have no desire to take from them, but rather come up with a solution that could please everyone for any future mmo, not just this one. I only picked this one since it's one I wish I could play myself.

I respect your opinions but I see the message as being one of complacency; that everyone should just accept things the way they are. 

Again, I'm merely looking at an idea to open up games to everyone, while keeping everyone content. Not at changing a game to cater to a different group of people.

  Alberel

Novice Member

Joined: 12/02/09
Posts: 1121

2/25/13 4:37:15 PM#13
Not sure if it's been mentioned already as most of these posts are rather wordy... Yoshi P stated that the F2P model is too unreliable in terms of a steady income as the money spent on the cash shop fluctuates from month to month. Subscriptions offer a guaranteed regular income that is much easier to predict and track which most publishers prefer by a long shot.
  Dogblaster

Novice Member

Joined: 3/14/12
Posts: 505

2/25/13 4:39:09 PM#14
Originally posted by Treabhair

Like I said, I wasn't saying this was a solution. I just wanted to gauge what other people thought. The idea wasn't to change the game to suit a different group of people, but rather to attempt to suit everyone, which is why I had mentioned that I was most interested in p2p gamers since they're already getting what they want. I have no desire to take from them, but rather come up with a solution that could please everyone for any future mmo, not just this one. I only picked this one since it's one I wish I could play myself.

I respect your opinions but I see the message as being one of complacency; that everyone should just accept things the way they are. 

Again, I'm merely looking at an idea to open up games to everyone, while keeping everyone content. Not at changing a game to cater to a different group of people.

This is the WORST THING that game can EVER EVER EVER DO.

 

Ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  Treabhair

Novice Member

Joined: 2/25/13
Posts: 20

 
OP  2/25/13 4:41:32 PM#15
Originally posted by Alberel
Not sure if it's been mentioned already as most of these posts are rather wordy... Yoshi P stated that the F2P model is too unreliable in terms of a steady income as the money spent on the cash shop fluctuates from month to month. Subscriptions offer a guaranteed regular income that is much easier to predict and track which most publishers prefer by a long shot.

 

That is a good point, and one of the drawbacks I had thought about. F2P is a bit unsteady and something developers are only recently taking seriously as a source of revenue. SE is already gambling having scrapped the original release and remaking the game and I'm sure that makes a traditional p2p model that much more appealing to them.

  Dogblaster

Novice Member

Joined: 3/14/12
Posts: 505

2/25/13 4:42:37 PM#16
Originally posted by Alberel
Not sure if it's been mentioned already as most of these posts are rather wordy... Yoshi P stated that the F2P model is too unreliable in terms of a steady income as the money spent on the cash shop fluctuates from month to month. Subscriptions offer a guaranteed regular income that is much easier to predict and track which most publishers prefer by a long shot.

Agreed. But there are certain retarded companies that throw keys into the cash shop in every possible ocassion and they find 100000 retarded players who bought them just to be pissed and all this just for sake of the F2P. I am so glad Final Fantasy wont be this case ever :)

  Treabhair

Novice Member

Joined: 2/25/13
Posts: 20

 
OP  2/25/13 4:44:41 PM#17
Originally posted by Dogblaster
Originally posted by Treabhair

Like I said, I wasn't saying this was a solution. I just wanted to gauge what other people thought. The idea wasn't to change the game to suit a different group of people, but rather to attempt to suit everyone, which is why I had mentioned that I was most interested in p2p gamers since they're already getting what they want. I have no desire to take from them, but rather come up with a solution that could please everyone for any future mmo, not just this one. I only picked this one since it's one I wish I could play myself.

I respect your opinions but I see the message as being one of complacency; that everyone should just accept things the way they are. 

Again, I'm merely looking at an idea to open up games to everyone, while keeping everyone content. Not at changing a game to cater to a different group of people.

This is the WORST THING that game can EVER EVER EVER DO.

 

Ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No, it's inherently a good thing a game could do.  It's just not been done successfuly.

I think theres a much better chance of success if rather than trying to please everyone with one option, multiple options are made available for everyone.

  Alberel

Novice Member

Joined: 12/02/09
Posts: 1121

2/25/13 4:46:08 PM#18
Originally posted by Dogblaster
Originally posted by Treabhair

Like I said, I wasn't saying this was a solution. I just wanted to gauge what other people thought. The idea wasn't to change the game to suit a different group of people, but rather to attempt to suit everyone, which is why I had mentioned that I was most interested in p2p gamers since they're already getting what they want. I have no desire to take from them, but rather come up with a solution that could please everyone for any future mmo, not just this one. I only picked this one since it's one I wish I could play myself.

I respect your opinions but I see the message as being one of complacency; that everyone should just accept things the way they are. 

Again, I'm merely looking at an idea to open up games to everyone, while keeping everyone content. Not at changing a game to cater to a different group of people.

This is the WORST THING that game can EVER EVER EVER DO.

 

Ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Agreed, I think most of the major failings of modern MMOs can be attributed to their desire to please everyone and thus failing to please anyone at all. They're better off targetting a specific audience as it makes it both easier to develop the game and it gives them a more stable and loyal playerbase. Most devs/publishers won't do this though as they're too greedy and want WoW numbers of subscriptions that they'll never achieve with development split across so many different playstyles.

  Dogblaster

Novice Member

Joined: 3/14/12
Posts: 505

2/25/13 4:47:26 PM#19
Originally posted by Treabhair

No, it's inherently a good thing a game could do.  It's just not been done successfuly.

I think theres a much better chance of success if rather than trying to please everyone with one option, multiple options are made available for everyone.

Every smart and experienced company owner / manager / marketer know that segmentation is very imporatnt in business and they SHOULDNT EVER try to satisfy every customer.

 

When you are starting the business, one of the first thing and key things you do is decide what segment of customers you want to please and which one you aim for. Then you can 100x easyly start your propagation, tweak your product, etc.

 

If you try to cater to every possible segment on the market, you are doomed to fail. Thats how it is and wont ever change.

 

Just think for a moment and you can clearly see that EVERY product is always aimed for certain people/segment.

  Treabhair

Novice Member

Joined: 2/25/13
Posts: 20

 
OP  2/25/13 4:52:34 PM#20
Originally posted by Dogblaster
Originally posted by Treabhair

No, it's inherently a good thing a game could do.  It's just not been done successfuly.

I think theres a much better chance of success if rather than trying to please everyone with one option, multiple options are made available for everyone.

Every smart and experienced company owner / manager / marketer know that segmentations and they SHOULDNT EVER try to satisfy every customer.

 

If you try to cater to every possible segment on the market, you are doomed to fail. Thats how it is and wont ever change.

 

Well I guess there are certain limitations to it. If we were talking about making many features that each required heavy development teams to mantain, then there would definitely be the chance of spreading yourself too thin. However, the changes I outlined I don't believe would require hardly any shift in dev resources from a traditional p2p model.

9 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Last Search