| 91 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
1/18/13 6:35:47 PM#21
Brother dcoy is a player they should treat like gold. He has come along way in developing the very difficult skill set of being able to command in this game. I've watched him go from just a guy that logged in and played to one of the sides leading command personas. While I dont hand out compliments very often (people like jsilec actually figured out how to command also) you cant dick these type of players around and think for a minute that its good for your game. You see they are your game and make things happen
Being able to understand the game at this level and influence and provide others on a massive scale entertainment is not even in the majority of players out there. Its the trully dedicated people like dcoy that have been shit on over and over through the years and had the game designed around them *cough anti squad/player freedom mechanics* that will kill ya eventually.
|
|
|
whats even funnier is that dcoy left allies after they treated him like shit and now leaves ghc when CRS treats them like shit
|
|
|
1/18/13 6:44:29 PM#23
I dont count any hc dancing queen episodes against anyone. Players get involved with it because they are forced to in order to play. Having game mechanics that put all your eggs in few peoples laps and expect them to deal with some of these unnessacery scenarios was a bad idea on paper.
|
|
|
1/18/13 7:33:53 PM#24
Originally posted by DOC-CRS But most games have updates and something called "developers", oh they dont also class f2p players as "freeloaders" keep staying classy though |
|
|
1/18/13 8:06:02 PM#25
Originally posted by DOC-CRS I doubt anyone here thinks they are helping in anyway. And once again with the condescension. As I said in my deleted post I don't have to have run a game for 12 years to know how your actions make me feel as a paying customer. I also said no one questions your hard work and drive. Just your judgment. Like the poor judgement shown in your post here. A simple question. Why was capturing locked while we were in Aarschot AB and obviously going to beat the 5 minute server reset timer? |
|
|
1/18/13 8:12:52 PM#26
why the hell has this game been popping up on the mmorph forums so much in the past week...used to fly under the radar prio then BAM all i see on topics is this dam game.
|
|
|
1/18/13 8:47:39 PM#27
Originally posted by DOC-CRS and neither have you.
|
|
|
1/18/13 9:07:23 PM#28
Well it looks like DOC and some of the allied players think that this is funny. If you still have access to the forums the link's below.
The developers of this game have an extremely restricted forum; you need a subscription just to view the threads and it's gotten to the point now that any post that isn't happy thoughts is immediately deleted. They can also go weeks without posting a public update. So several former and current players come here to talk about game changes, it's direction, etc.
|
|
|
1/18/13 9:12:05 PM#29
Originally posted by Dantae87 The company is doing a big marketing push on this site, big number one. And number two, the company brass has been embroiled in several controversies recently, and everybody comes here to discuss it.
*edit* david06 beat me to it, consider my version to be shorthand for his... |
|
|
1/18/13 9:23:35 PM#30
Originally posted by DOC-CRS You do a good job of hurting the game without any of our help. You are quite behind all the hater propaganda so I will give you some time to catch up. Thanks for calling.
|
|
|
1/19/13 6:11:02 AM#31
Talk of making a mountain out of a molehill.
Axis were OVERPOP when going for Anterwp, like they are regularily. So the that means when overpop comes around they can have a go at taking it again. Its not the end of the world, unless you someone who is out to score points against the game, its devsn and its players.
|
|
|
1/19/13 6:23:58 AM#32
Originally posted by Stug What a silly post. I'm not out to score points against anyone, I was defending Antwerp when the server went down.
Whether or not they were overpop, hours and hours of work attacking the most strategically important town on the map was destroyed unnecessarily. |
|
|
1/19/13 6:44:24 AM#33
For the game's sake I hope that you are just a regular player or fan, and not a CRS employee posting under an alternate account because your post illustrates a now-classic disconnect that the company has with it's player base.
|
|
|
1/19/13 8:42:16 AM#34
Originally posted by DOC-CRS Another vague DOC answer saying the players (customers) are all wrong, don't understand blah blah blah. You undertake the server resets at the time you feel like it. Many people find it annoying that you don't have a set time for server resets but just randomly choose a time then say "server down in 15mins", thus negating anyones work. Your always going to piss people off but atleast COMMUNICATE. You could at the very least say to players "we're doing a server reset in 1 hour 30mins, if antwerp not capped it has to go to allies, sorry". Instead you give no warming and show the attitude to players of "stop whining your honoured to play this game". You come across with that attitude players leave, like 100's have done. Subscribers go down then members of CRS which people respect a bit more say "come on guys, leaving is not the right way to put a message across. Now give us $100,000 to make a game you don't want".
'Successful'? It's crumbling by the wayside. If any of the big game companies like Blizzard knew a niche and badly developed game would still be going 11 and a half (not 12) years they would of made one and developed it alot better (and would be alot more successful). The ONLY thing that has kept you going is a core of veteran players who believe in the original CONCEPT of the game. World War 2 online is only still alive because loyal community members are perpared to pay LOTS of money. From those 300+ new builders you are generating $9000 revenue a month alone. Then you add in the loyal community members with their second accounts and your revenue runs into 10's of thousands of dollars a month (maybe even into the hundreds of thousands). Thus you could probaly keep this game running for a long time yet, people will still pay up but that by no means can be called 'success'
You created a niche game that attracts players with big loyalty (alot ex armed forces) and deep pockets. Your only success is making a game that caters to a lucrative market not in any developing success |
|
|
1/19/13 9:15:55 AM#35
Originally posted by david06 Pretty much sums everything up. Bravo |
|
|
1/19/13 10:52:17 AM#36
A lot of what you guys say here is true, can't argue that. I will point out that David you're wrong on the 300 builder accounts. That 300 number was new subs, heroes & the welcome back soldier for a month subs. I hope they seriously have hired someone or are in the process of hiring someone to work on the game instead of just managing what they have.
|
|
|
1/20/13 9:41:22 AM#37
The Antwerp fiasco was the last straw for me. I dont think I can forgive the game makers after how theyve treated their PB and some of the better officers players and leaders of the game. Campaign 88 isnt Axis vs Allies, its Axis vs CRS/Allies. During this campaign too much BS has occured for it to be a coincidence.
Let it be known I in no way begrudge the Allied community, I have been very lucky to play alongside many of them in the past when they visited Axis for a campaign or two, theyve all been truly great guys. Either way I cannot with any faith recommend this game anymore. If I play a game, I want to play with each team having the ability to win, not have a winning side decided before and game manipulation to occur to ensure it. It is a real shame, its a great concept and has a great community, I made many friends. Too bad about the owner though!
|
|
|
1/20/13 10:36:22 AM#38
Originally posted by pittpete I dont know what to think about this "goal of 300 new subs ect by febuary" I cant see it showing how healthy the game is to manage to get a new dev thus an update. Someone could just sub for only a month then unsub. I think the game needs hell of alot more subs to pay for a dev and update it contentwise, fix the server problem so we dont need reboots. |
|
|
1/20/13 12:15:18 PM#39
Honestly, if you are afraid to use your real game name its hard to take anything that person says seriously.
|
|
|
1/20/13 12:17:16 PM#40
Originally posted by pittpete Does it matter if anyone uses their gamename in a forum which isnt dedicated to this game?unless you want a witchhunt? |
|