| 69 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
12/07/12 5:41:14 AM#21
Originally posted by DarknessReign Do I think it's a clone? No. It's Final Fantasy. There are no talent trees, that I know of, and crafting is no where near WoW's. Do I think it's the best of both? I hope so. Time will tell of course, I haven't gotten a chance to play the new version, which is fine, it will make the release so much the sweeter, but until then I'm hopeful. I think it's a fair assessment to say they are modernizing it using many of the staples we've come to expect, most of those stemming from what WoW did with the genre. My only gripe, and it's a small one, is the yellow ! over the heads. Not sure why they didn't keep it the blue and white kind from version 1. I kind of hope they change the color scheme a bit more on the UI as well, as it looks a bit cheesy, hopefully it's something they are constantly working on. |
|
|
12/07/12 5:42:39 AM#22
Originally posted by zanfire The reasons you listed apply to most if not all Themepark type games, not just WoW. You would do better by just saying you want more sandbox aspects, which I can respect and maybe even agree with in some cases. |
|
|
12/07/12 8:31:33 AM#23
Originally posted by elocke True, but WoW is the game that basically made those things i dont like the standard....like the Wii brought in stupid motion controls. Hence why i find it WoW-like, because everyone considers it the standard. |
|
|
12/07/12 8:35:43 AM#24
Originally posted by DarknessReign So you never played WoW and yet you are upset that people are calling FFIV a WoW clone? Very mature. If you had read any of the producers letters you would know that they are pretty much cut and pasting most of the functionality of WoW into FFIV. This is why it is being labeled a WoW clone. This doesnt make it a bad game, it just means it is going to be a user friendly themepark, which is what anyone following this revival should have expected.
|
|
|
12/07/12 8:40:00 AM#25
This is a quote by the producer of FFIV: "I think it would've been good if they tried seeing what happened if they turned World of Warcraft into Final Fantasy. So, because they tried only to make something that was 'different from FFXI,' they ended up with not much of anything. "They should have said, 'Hey you, go play WoW for a year [for inspiration].' http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/11/27/yoshida-another-mistake-like-ff14-would-destroy-square
It is very publicly known that the producer is borrowing heavily from World of Warcraft, as he feels that is the direction the game should have gone in the first instance. |
|
|
Inigo_Montoya
Elite Member
Joined: 11/10/12
I was a 5 star elite member but my awesomeness was showing and the Mods cant have that |
evilastro , do me a favor and look at the thread called All FFXIV ARR INFO found here , who started that thread ? who maintains that thread ? you assume to much. What I don't like is how people make the entire game to sound like it just totally copied WoW every aspect of it. That is not true. The same point I make that Call of Duity and say Battlefield have the same weapons , same controls , same general features , but different areas they set there games in.b No one calls it a clone and by this communitys standards just implementing a updated quest system like WoWs and a jump suddenly its a exact replica of WoW. so you miss interpreted what my questions are.
http://absoluteretribution.enjin.com/ Guild Website and Recruitment link |
|
Vannor
Elite Member
Joined: 8/11/03
I am the lucid dream. BOW DOWN BEFORE THE GOD OF DEATH! |
12/07/12 9:14:38 AM#27
I'll bite.. and I'll be honest. Originally posted by DarknessReign
If you've never played a game like WoW.. then the first one you play will seem like a breath of fresh MMO air. You'll love it. What you need to realise though is that is why you can't understand why a WoW clone 'could' be a bad thing, the majority of WoW clones are bad for people who have properly played a game in that format already so evidence suggests that the chance of a WoW clone being good is not very high. Everything gets old eventually. To you it might be fresh, but to us it's stale. And that right there is the problem you are having. You can't comprehend our point of view so you refuse to accept it. |
|
12/07/12 9:23:04 AM#28
Funny when your reposes pretty much say "your wrong" or invalidae their observations on the game.
I'm half convinced they are Rhetorical baiting questions. |
|
|
12/07/12 9:26:51 AM#29
Originally posted by DarknessReign Try being a little less defensive and protective about this game. Go out and get some air. You've turned this particular forum into an unhealthy obsession. |
|
|
12/07/12 9:50:19 AM#30
Originally posted by DarknessReign
No matter how cynical you become, its never enough to keep up - Lily Tomlin |
|
|
12/07/12 10:10:25 AM#31
I will say this was not the best way to bring up your questions. As some have said it would have been better to ask "Whats wrong with it having things in common with WoW?". I look at it like this XI had standard combat as well minus the hot bar now in XIV you'll have one and the pace of combat is 3 time faster than in XI all good. In my opinion action combat is not very FF like if you ask me and this was the way to go. Now to questing yes as many thought the side quest are very run of the mill but with 3 different story arc quest lines there will be plenty that are meaningful too. I like this because it gives you more options for leveling, questing, F.A.T.E., leve's,and EXP parties with exp chains.
|
|
|
12/07/12 10:12:21 AM#32
Originally posted by apocoluster LOL, nice |
|
|
12/07/12 10:47:15 AM#33
Originally posted by DarknessReign Your entire questionaire set out to be obnoxious and elitist. I don't need to look at your thread, and it doesnt make you the authority on FFXIV, just makes you a fanboy. You assume too much, I have a very good understanding of the state of the new game... for undisclosed reasons obviously. What I dont like is people who argue for the sake of it when they dont even understand the arguement. Did you even read my post? You didnt play WoW, how would you know that it isnt a clone? They have adopted from WoW very heavily for ARR. This isnt a bad thing, the User Interface and questing in the original version of FFIV were horrendous. I played WoW for I guess 2 years off and on. I also played FFXIV for a few months while it was free, but eventually couldnt even bear to bother with that. Also played FFXI for about a year and I can guarantee that FFXIV has more in common with WoW than FFXI, aside from the lore and world obviously.
|
|
|
12/07/12 10:52:57 AM#34
Too much drama and too many overreactions. People in this community will often: a) Hate on WoW for no logical reason b) call anything they dislike a "WoW clone"
It essentially comes down to this: "... this game has quests! It's a WoW clone!" Who cares if a community prone to blind hatred dislikes something you like? Keep liking what you like. The best way to ruin a game is to visit the forums for that game. |
|
|
12/07/12 1:35:43 PM#35
Originally posted by TaoMcDohl
Somewhere in one of the threads here, I posted a gigantic post filled with all kinds of jarble and somewhere in there; I mentioned there was almost a harmful infighting particularly with the Final Fantasy crowd. And yeah everytime I felt a need for some lolz and such I'd go hit the forums up and watch people eat eachothers intestines. Sadly, it's the type of the thing that drives many away or is in some cases the last straw before the hopeful person says fck it and bails. That post dealt with a lot of topics, also about a fairly racist following of the game as well. I can't count how many times I personally would be trying to get in a group in FFXI and be told <English> <Thanks for the offer but I'll have to pass.>.
I did a bit of research on XIV when it came out, and just thought omg, this looks awful. The fact these guys take the time to make this totally beautiful CGI scenes which have like NOTHING to do with the actual in game situations really irked me. And the name Eoarzia just rubbed me wrong from the get go. Seeing it spell out I was like do each of the letters mean something or is this just a bunch of random syllables that escaped somebodies mouth and they though it sounde.. oh it's a bunch of random syllables that somebody thought sounded cool together. I have been bent over more than a couple times by MMO companies and will never EVER pre-order or life time sub or any "insert expletives of choice" like that ever, I think the most recent wave of vomit inducing horse fecies to hit the market has re-affirmed that logic for me even moreso (SW:ToR is particularly foul). I will never fund a kickstarter, but I will follow a game, and rarely will I jump up and cast something down or brand it, until I've played it. In general I liked final fantasy, up until XIII most games were palatable for me. I even had a strange inkling to play XII from time to time even though before XIII I found it to be by far the worst in the series for it's butchering of the mmo style play into a single player set some macros up and go boil some ramen. Additionally the story of XII far and away was awful. I've seen people say VIII was awful story, and drawing sucked out the few enjoyable aspects of combat etc.. but XII was stupid. That you had to buy your gambits to set your macros up was beyond ball crushingly stupid imo; and money was a total cluster fck most of the time; liscense board was not my cup of tea either, Vaan.. you know I'll get off it, this is about XIV.
WoWclone or not, it will stand or fall on it's own merits. Honestly I like most of what I've seen of ARR. I think adding jumping but not having it used as a way to circumvent walking around a ledge is just sloppy/lazy, but not a game breaker for me. I'd rather have the option to jump around like a jack ass or walk like a jack ass as opposed to just walking like a jack ass. The combat still seems kinda lifeless to me. Although grapically the game is amazing it just seems kinda plasticy. I saw some voiced videos a while back, and saw a Taru Taru (not sure what the XIV version of that word is) talk and was put off by the Euro Trash voice acting he got. I just always imagined them to sound like angry kids or something. Again that they would take the time to put the polish on the game like CGI trailers and cut scenes is awesome. That they'd go and just demolish other aspects of play astounds me. It seems like priorities were all wrong before. Let's totally go for the WHOA factor and give them flashing lights and stuff and it will distract them enough so they won't see we forgot what makes an MMO an enjoyable MMO. I think at some point the people who were making this game stopped making the game players wanted to see and were making a game they thought they wanted to play, until they actually played it @ _@. Not sure if that makes sense. Anyhow I've drizzled enough of my bs on whoever is reading this eyes'. Overall I'm fascinated by it, and would like to play it. |
|
|
12/07/12 3:02:16 PM#36
Originally posted by KhinRunite I know it's huge and has been popular for a long time, but to be factual games like EQ popularized the questing hub system that WoW later adopted. Sometimes things become so big you can't see around them to remember there was stuff before it. Games like EQ and Ultima were the founding frame works for what later got implemented into the beast Blizaard created. This gamer is one who wishes the questing hubs would go away. I enjoy the questing style in GW2 where I am encouraged to be an adventurer. It is enjoyable in games like that to have the quests play out infront of me with voice acting rather than walls of text. I am looking forward to playing ARR, but have my concerns with stuff like the questing in the game. There are many implementations in the game that I do enjoy the idea of, one being the NM fights and the ease of job switching. Blank-man |
|
|
12/07/12 9:05:29 PM#37
People Are calling this a WoW clone . So i want to ask HOW is it a clone ? In detail please. Well i played wow for 1 hour and then unistalled the game ( not lieng). I played Tera wasn't bad but when i played their pet class I unistalled. What im trying to say is WoW and games that copy it went down the drain. But to the quest What i heard is the quests progression is exactly like wow. I Have some Questions that people can awnser PLEASE BE HONEST! Question one Did you ever play FFXI and for how long? I played FF XI for 4 years Question two Did you play V1 of FFXIV and for how long? Yes since the release of FFIV to end of trailer. Question three Did you play WoW and for how long? HELL NO Question four Be specific what aspects of FFXIV:ARR are like WoW ? The quest level progression. I think the whole quest idea is a bad move it feels like a copy and a dumb move. However i know these quest aren't a requirment to do to level or to progress to the main story. Question five Define what a "clone" is? Copy of one self like a duplication of it. Like the iphone and the android for example. Question six What specific aspects are like FFXI if any ? Hmmm the main core of the came is like FF XI. Like the magic/battle system. The class and jobs are as well. The chocobo raising system ( Some what an aspec most likely an improvement). The main aspect of the games "Avatars" or summons is directly related to the entire final fantasy franchise and XI. To be honest this has many things WoW does not so technically it isn't a clone of the game it just has the quest "SPAM" progression which is a bad move. Question seven Do you think it is fair to pass judgement on a game that is only in a alpha build? Yes and No. yoshi was going to the right path with all the changes to 1.0. But he completely changed it what we imagined when they released the "2.0" speech that got everyone excited. What he should've done is kept the 1.0 feel with just all the newupdates from AAR. Which hes some what is doing don't get me wrong but when he copy something that people sees in almost every new MMO ( Starwars,Tera, and Raiderz) it just gonna make people think WTF? and that something is quest progression that where he shoul'dve stopped. HOWEVER the game still feels like final fantasy beside the quests. Now this is only alpha and i believe people will change his mind and make him remove the spam of quest and just leave the quest system as it was. But im going to "NO" the game is only in alpha people should just wait until the game is near end of beta before that shout out judgements. Question nine Are you a Hard Core gamer or a casual one ? Guess im casual the only games I actually play is Final Fantasy MMO and Planetside nothing else. Question ten How old are you ? 21.
Also so far the only thing they copied was the "quest spam" Nothing else is similar to WoW. Now note this quest spam is optional. You can level the old fashion way like XI or do leves. This is what ARR has that WoW doesn't Primals "Primal Avatars" / "Primal essance" Housing Chocobo Raising Faith Leve Quest Armory System Hamlet Defence Relic Weapons Grand Company Airships classes/jobs Other things i can't think of right now and its only in alpha phase.
Now Final Fantasy was a clone of everquest but it had its own core and many things everquest doesn't have. ARR is doing exactly that it adding element from wow and putting their own idea into the game not "CLONE TO THE MAX with just final fantasy skin". |
|
|
12/08/12 3:37:50 PM#38
This is a modern game, with a modern-ish/standard style quest system that a player may completely ignore if they so wish. Other viable (And possibly better) methods of leveling are the old group and grind, and guild leve's. Among others that I have not yet explored. I urge everyone to remember that other paths of xp and leveling are indeed necessary with the armory and job system. While there are certainly a lot of quests available, I've not come across any that are repeatable. Calm the anti-hype train. AAR is a vast improvement over 1.0. Let's see how things turn out. |
|
|
12/08/12 4:18:12 PM#39
I can't be bothered to answer your little questionare because it's completely pointless, but I will respond to the main question and a few things you've said. For starters, when XIV initially released, NOBODY called it a WoW clone. Everybody called it an awful game. The two games had nothing in common. Second, the way you've presented the question is accusatory and is asking for flames.
There are a few reason why people are calling ARR a WoW clone. The first one is because the producer made some statements about how they would look to WoW and modern MMO's to inform game design. Instead of making an original and "Final Fantasy" feeling MMO from the get-go, they are more concerned with feature parity compared with the modern MMO market, which is a smart move, but one that will obviously make people suspicious and draw heavy criticism from the anti-WoW brigade.
Another reason is because of the latest video showing the incredibly typical ho-hum questing system we've seen for years. Yellow exclamation point offers you a quest. No need for exploration, just look at your map and head to the glowing area. Click on something, kill some stuff, collect some animal parts etc. Return to quest giver for money/XP/items. Rinse and repeat. FFXI had these types of quests that were totally unrelated to everything, but they were almost pointless to do aside from raising reputation. In ARR, they seem like they will fill a larger role.
The last and probably most frustrating reason for you is that people call everything that uses ideas from WoW a WoW clone. Some of them are trolling because people like you constantly feed them. Some of them just really really really REALLY hate WoW because it's "killing the genre" or some such over-emotional rhetoric.
The bottom line is that aside from some features that are considered standard for a themepark MMO, XIV ARR is not a WoW clone just like Rift and GW2 aren't WoW clones. It's an overused and often improperly used word especially on these forums, but I suspect you know that. I'm not expecting ARR to be a WoW clone, but I am expecting the game to have feature parity and offer what modern themeparks offer. |
|
|
12/08/12 5:44:31 PM#40
Originally posted by ezpz77
Well put. |
|