| 67 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
12/03/12 10:38:33 AM#21
Originally posted by dannicus Well just like TV, some channels have adverts some don't. Watch the ones that don't if it bothers you. But don't accuse a company of some sort of ethical money grabbing crime when they are OPTIONAL. |
|
Originally posted by Maelwydd What are you talking about? I didn't accuse them of a crime or being ethical. I do think it's an unethical business practice by Funcom. |
|
|
12/03/12 10:55:18 AM#23
Originally posted by Thillian Yes but you are talking about the function of the ability, which alot of speccs have an interesting way of working, but also many times within the same school of abilties (blood, chaos, what have you.) they do not diviate vary much. Also the look of the abiltiy can be quite bland looking and sometimes even very minor diferences in appeanrce to other abilties in the game wheel. They kinda took the idea of focusing the areas of the wheel on one or maybe two facts too far, as if they had two or more ways of healing that were unique per school, such as a blood mage that could shield, or could redirect the damage being taken by the group around diffently or even funnel it to a certain person it would have gave more veriety to the wheel as well. Also the limited bar space lead to alot of feeling the abilties were confining as well as copied, i mean you do nnot need 20 active abilties, but having 10 to 15 would not have been bad an added more to the veiriety of the combat too.
I loved the idea of abilties having differing effects based on the status of the target when they are used, yet they kept the number of statuses rather limited as well, which seemed odd to me as you could have six types of statuses that would have lead to mroe abilties having alt effects based on the status of the target being target or casting it. One of the killers for me was the lack of a true pet-based or partical pet-based school, as really in myths an legends summoner style character that use minions or such are quite common, an for me one of those styles of combat i like for the micro-management side of the aspect. |
|
|
12/03/12 10:58:24 AM#24
Originally posted by dannicus
but tis ok for wow to have a sub and cash shop? |
|
|
12/03/12 11:03:14 AM#25
Originally posted by dannicus Why? Is it needed/required for you to play to buy from the shop? Does it give the players that pay an un-fair advantage against you? Are they swindling you out of your money unfairly or cheating you out of your money? Because in truth the fact is no one at funcom is telling you that you have to buy the item in the shop to play, or that you do not have other options to gain vanity items, but that you can buy items from the shop for a fee. Also it is within standard practices to charge a customer for extra for items or services that are outside of the original purchase. Such as charging you extra for cheese on a sandwitch that does not come with it, or extra letuce, or even for added features on a car that are not stadard issue. |
|
|
12/03/12 11:03:58 AM#26
It has become commonplace to have a cash shop of some kind associated with mmos. The biggest arguments have to do with P2W items in the cash shop, and most folks don't seem to mind at all when the items are merely cosmetic or vanity items. This is the TSW model.
|
|
|
12/03/12 11:05:19 AM#27
Originally posted by Asuran24 Please be more specific. I don't see any overlapping abilities. Each keyword (penetration, hit, glance, block, defense, evade, leech, heal, critical chance, critical power, health, hinder, impair, affliction.. did I forgot any), has about 4-5 active and passive abilities, and all abilities are kinda different. REALITY CHECK |
|
|
12/03/12 11:08:47 AM#28
best MMO on the market for me, nicest and most communicative devs. I like them a lot and spend a little extra on top of my lifetime B2P pack every now and then, to fund the monthly updates. Most of the stuff there is standard like name change, dimension transfer, barbershop coupons and special pets. Nothing else like the WoW shop.
But, NO DAMN F2P GAMBLING BOXES, and NO Pay2win, THEREFORE <3 FC FTW
|
|
|
12/03/12 11:22:59 AM#29
Originally posted by Thillian That is the fact you are talking about how the abilties fuction, while i am talking on how they look an feel while in combat. For me playing either a blood or choas dps-mage felt too similar as both apply a condition an than gain a buff or aguement to their abilties. But as i said above a blood mage-healer would largely shield their target an heal an that is well the sole focus of the blood healing. I think they could have added more depth an veriety to differing schools to make them have more ways of proforming thier duties. Also many fo the elmentalist attacks look much like they were re-skinned from other attacks in the other parts fo the wheel or even school. Like the thor hammer spell (might be wrong ont he name it is an elite skill.) looks rather uniue but feels somewhat similar to the fireball spell look. |
|
|
12/03/12 12:10:43 PM#30
Originally posted by lizardbones This is pretty much where I was at, though I don't even mind quest hubs that much. I played shortly after launch, played my free month and quit. The quests just might be among the best I've experienced in MMO's. Great atmosphere, great story, some pretty good puzzle concepts... the single player aspects were pretty much on par for a good single player game. If they had gone the GW2 B2P w/mt model, I might be playing, these days. I quit due to lack of content, the non-lack of bugs, and basically just a short playtime for an MMO. While the zones are good sized, the world is tiny, tiny, tiny. There's just not enough of anything to justify a monthly subscription. And finally, the combat was often just annoying, as the game world was mob-populated for a stand and attack game, so you'd keep getting adds as you dodged and moved. Lastly, there's almost no replayability; certainly no reason to roll a new toon since the story differences are just cosmetic and no faction has any exclusive playability. The moment in beta when I realized that almost every mission is repeatable I should have known what was coming: A non-linear Diablo-esque replay experience but without the loot. Rerun the missions over and over, fill out the wheel and get your purples. Still, I hesistate to call it a ripoff, as I paid 50 bucks for it like I would any SPG, played it til' "the end" and quit. I supposed I could say it's a rip since I could still play that game now if it were an SPG...
|
|
|
12/03/12 12:18:47 PM#31
There is no such thing as a rip-off in gaming because you can always choose NOT to play. For me, i am waiting for TSW to turn F2P. it is not ripping me off because i don't pay funcom a cent. |
|
|
12/03/12 12:20:08 PM#32
based on current subs, some 150K of the 200K buyers thought it was not worth the continued investment.
|
|
|
12/03/12 3:19:58 PM#33
Originally posted by Asuran24 There is no difference between Chaos and Blood Mage as a dps-er? Now I doubt you played it longer than a few hours. There is a huge diffference between Chaos and Blood in feel and mechanics. Chaos is almost totally melee-based focused on impairs and high burst instant damage and defense abilities (evade), whereas blood dps is based on ranged - slow affliction (dot) damage and penetration hits. Lots of blood abilities may also be paid by your health-pool instead of the usual resources, whereas chaos is strickly based on resources. Those are two opposing 'schools' in fact in mechanics and in overall feel. REALITY CHECK |
|
|
12/03/12 3:25:18 PM#34
I played TSW for a few hours in beta and hated it....I thought it was one of the worst games I had ever played (and I have nothing against FUncom as I still play AO).....TSW was so bad I wouldn't even bother downloading it if it was free.....SOme people really love this game for some reason and even went as far as paying 200 bucks to a company that many knew was probably on the way out.
|
|
|
12/03/12 3:27:21 PM#35
TSW has a lot to not like for me it was combat, but I never had an issue with the cash shop. Watch your thoughts; they become words. |
|
|
12/03/12 3:34:14 PM#36
Originally posted by Thillian People have been complaining of sub fees of late,so adding EXTRA cost onto sub fees is what the OP is not happy with and i agree 100%. EVERY single piece of content/asset shoud lbe obtainable to the players who sub. Where i accept cash shop is IF they are selling laziness but withotu affecting other players in any way. Example,i don't care if they sell a red shirt for 5 bucks if yo ucan get the same shirt in game>>>>reasonably,so that the cash shop is not forced. http://www.youtube.com/user/Napolianboo#p/u/15/rCYLLQCNc1w |
|
|
12/03/12 3:38:28 PM#37
I played TSW in Beta and while I loved the story and the atmosphere, the combat animations were awful to the point that I couldn't play it more than 20 minutes at a time.
|
|
|
12/03/12 3:40:54 PM#38
Originally posted by dannicus And once again, nobody is forcing anybody to open up their wallets and pay for it. "The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently." - Friedrich Nietzsche |
|
|
12/03/12 3:42:56 PM#39
YOu think its unethical to allow players to buy GASP cosmetic items? Good lord I guess all f2p games are unethical. Tsw is IMO one of the best mmos on todays market, a unique setting, skill wheel, actually difficult, good rp features, open world conent, and a fantastic story.
|
|
|
12/03/12 4:42:09 PM#40
Originally posted by Thillian Nice call. So much has been said about this game that isn't even a little true. DamonVile- Games built for disposable players are now apparently built by disposable employees. |
|