| 195 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
11/11/12 6:22:01 PM#81
Excuse me Sunshadow, but I'd like to know who are these games that you are talking about that have good security system and that playerbase and popularity of Blizzard's games?
|
|
|
11/11/12 6:25:09 PM#82
This isnt an individual lawsuit, its a class action lawsuit when Battle.net was hacked. So, yes, Blizzard is the victim of a crime and Blizzard was attacked on a massive scale. This is covered in the article that linked in the OP that you obviously didnt read.
|
|
|
11/11/12 6:26:43 PM#83
Originally posted by Razperil If Sony cares so much for their mmo customers, why are they also sellilng authenticators instead of making sure their security is good enough not to need to sell them? Or better yet, why aren't they giving them away for free? |
|
|
11/11/12 6:28:21 PM#84
Originally posted by Xiaoki When did they start locking accounts for loging in from a different IP? It has to have been sometime after this summer. My wife's account had no problems logging in from 3 different states in the span of a weekend when we were making a long trip and staying overnight in hotels. |
|
|
11/11/12 6:36:46 PM#85
Originally posted by muffins89
You really don't know what you're talking about. I quit WoW shortly after WotLK was released. Well over a year later, my account was hacked. And I had a very strong alphanumeric password which was nowhere near similar to any of my other passwords. Not keeping it safe? The ONLY place I had it, was inside my own head. I assure you, given the time from my last login, to the time I got hacked, combined with a strong password, the fault was NOT on my end. Blizzard have admitted at least once to have been hacked - you are extremely naive if you believe that has happened only once. |
|
|
11/11/12 6:54:18 PM#86
Originally posted by Netspook Unfortunately so many people have said that so many times and proven to be liars than no one believes it any more. Usually when they do it they call others things like "extremely naive" too. So while I can't say for sure what happened to you I can say the only people likely to believe you, or pretend to believe you, are Blizzard critics. I do know that according to Blizzard and every security pro I've talked to it's almost never hacking and almost always phishing or third party sights that compromises WoW accounts. "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice." ~Greys Law |
|
|
11/11/12 7:03:39 PM#87
Not to sound like a Blizzard appologist, but they do offer the authenticator free for anyone with a smartphone and they only charge for the keychain one which does not cost much.
"Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game."-Guybrush Threepwood |
|
|
11/11/12 7:03:43 PM#88
My account got hacked because my email and password were same as I used on MMORPG.com. When that happened, I changed my email and password, those are specific to WoW now, attached an authenticator and in the last 3 years never had a problem.
|
|
|
11/11/12 7:06:55 PM#89
Originally posted by zymurgeist Unfortunately, that stance has also been clearly stated, and disproven, enough to make it equally suspect. The truth lies somewhere in the middle, and no one, including, and perhaps especially, Blizzard, wants to have the conversation of how to contain the problem because that would require direct action against the hackers, phishers, and third parties, which would require Blizzard to spend money. At this point, I think both sides are nuts. Authenticators are, at least, a decent start, and I see no reason to believe malice is behind Blizzard's current nonposition. On the other hand, the amount of money it would take for Blizzard to actually take on the third party problems is miniscule compared to how much they currently make, and even more miniscule compared to how they could be making if they showed some balls and actually supported a friendly environment to game in. They slap band aids on the wounds, heal the symptoms, and don't care about how much more they could be making if they only put just a little bit of effort into containing those third parties that keep dragging them through the mud. I think the lawsuit will be interesting to watch. Blizzard will have a hard time proving they couldn't have done more, given the sheer length of time they've had to face the problem. Even if they don't lose, it still might be enough to force them, and the gaming industry as a whole, to seriously rethink their whole strategy and approach to containing problems related to third party abuses. |
|
|
11/11/12 7:25:22 PM#90
Originally posted by sunshadow21 Blizzard doesn't have to prove anything but that they comply with industry standard security practices. A low bar they'll easily hurdle. The plaintiffs have to prove damage. I don't see that happening. There isn't anything Blizard can do beyond the current that won't drive away more customers than it gains them. If there were they would be doing it. They already spend millions on security. It's just not that simple to combat. "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice." ~Greys Law |
|
|
11/11/12 7:32:06 PM#91
Originally posted by zymurgeist I sincerely hope you're wrong. If industry standards are that low, a lawsuit like this is needed to bring them up. |
|
|
11/11/12 7:34:28 PM#92
Would be a weird judgement, in case of a miracle. 1 million players bought an authenicator at 8 bucks a pop. However, their purchase undeniably provided some utility, so aa partial refund is the maximum judgement this court can rule. "Judgement against Blizzard, track those players down and refund them two dollars each, adjusted for inflation". Ludicrous. -Nearly every single bad trend in MMO development was started by the developers.--Wordiz |
|
|
11/11/12 7:40:51 PM#93
Authenticators can't save you if they break into the server and steal all the data. That was part of the fiasco here - there was enough information stolen that accounts can, and were, broken into - including those tied to authenticators. Because they had security questions & answers, they were able to go around the authenticator protection. There was some speculation if the mobile authenticator was hacked as well (since enough data was taken) - but I don't think that was ever proven. The "text/call" authenticator option proved to be utterly worthless - they had enough data they would just change the call-back number (and to Bliz's credit, they have disabled this form). Not every "hack" is because the user is stupid. Most, but not all. Once they were able to get into Bliz's servers, the liability is all on Bliz at that point. The lawsuit probably will get thrown out (because they would have to prove willful negligence, which I don't think you can do), but that doesn't necessarily mean that Bliz isn't at fault (at least partially) either. |
|
|
11/11/12 7:41:12 PM#94
Originally posted by Icewhite More likely would be a judgment or settlement that found some middle ground where Blizzard would do something more on their end to make Bnet more secure (and there is more they can do; they just don't want to, and until someone forces them to, they won't), while the other side acknowledged that they can't force Blizzard to abandon Bnet. |
|
|
11/11/12 7:43:05 PM#95
Originally posted by zymurgeist
Poor attempts on masking a "you are a liear" comment, feel free to be more direct next time. I'm not a Blizzard hater, in fact, i have 4 active WoW accounts. I've already talked about that a couple of times in multiboxing discussions. But I do not swallow everything Blizzard feeds me. And I certainly don't believe that unless Blizzard tells me there are problems, everything is perfect. Which clearly seperates us two, proven both by your comment about who migh believe me (or "pretend" to believe me), and your "according to Blizzard". Please, learn to think for yourself, it won't hurt you. Before you continue attacking my "lies", take a look at your own statements. I doubt many belives you have actually talked to a lot of "security pros" about this. You're doing what you're accusing me for, and it doesn't seem you're even realizing it. |
|
|
11/11/12 8:17:08 PM#96
The authenticator was a bad idea from the get go....Well at least charging customers for it was......Security is 100% the responsibility of the game company (well except for morons that give their password away anyway)......
|
|
|
11/11/12 8:28:16 PM#97
Authenticators were all good until RIFT invented Coin Lock...
DamonVile- Games built for disposable players are now apparently built by disposable employees. |
|
|
11/11/12 9:08:38 PM#98
Originally posted by Razperil Maybe because Blizzards network has never been hacked like Sony's or Turbine's were. They HAD to fix everything after that event. |
|
|
11/11/12 9:14:18 PM#99
Originally posted by Ridelynn You're spreading a lot of falsehoods here. Blizzard was never hacked of account names/passwords like sony and others were. |
|
|
11/11/12 9:19:51 PM#100
Originally posted by zipzap Yes I totally agree with this. If you are very tight on security you prob wont get hacked but most people are not like that so an extra layer of protection is always welcomed. The authenticator is free if you own almost ANY type of phone so I am dumbfounded at the notion that blizzard is profitting from the sell of them. Only way they get any money its if you are actually buying a physical copy, but then again you cant expect them to hand it out for free.... Oh yah thats right, they give me like 10 of those every year at blizzcon... At least with a sub game they know that people won't tolerate bullshit and leave. With anet we have no recourse but to buy our own lube so our assholes don't get too stretched out from getting bent over a table at Anets will. - Hrimnir |
|