Trending Games | Neverwinter | Guild Wars 2 | Star Trek Online | Marvel Heroes
Network: Gamertube FPSguru RTSguru
| 872 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
10/19/12 7:01:13 AM#101
I'm concerned that Smedley just knows that "sandbox" is this huge buzzword, but he doesn't know or care what it really means. Will it just be a sandbox, the way the first EQ was (not!) a sandbox?
When I want a single-player story, I'll play a single-player game. When I play an MMO, I want a massively multiplayer world. |
|
|
10/19/12 7:01:58 AM#102
Originally posted by JeroKane Its not hard to improve on that heaping pile of excrement. Back to the topic, Sandbox was really the only viable option for them, and to be honest it suits the Everquest franchise. Yes it was the first themepark, but it also has a lore and world far deeper than anything released since. They cant out-themepark the big themeparks, they tried with EQ2 and its just not going to happen, the only way for them to succeed with EQ3 is to fill the sandbox market. |
|
|
10/19/12 7:07:59 AM#103
Originally posted by evilastro I just spat my coffee all over my boss which is my dad lol. Seriously though that was funny as hell. But on a serious note i actually like TSW but asking for EQNext to go the same route as TSW is just dumb. Seem JeroKane hasn't been reading what Smed has said lol.  |
|
|
10/19/12 7:09:22 AM#104
Originally posted by ShakyMo it better have underwater raids :) zerg style raids! remember doing Ntov raids having 5 and 6 100+ size guild trying to bum rush mobs,omg monks wiping full raids !!!!! great times |
|
|
10/19/12 7:10:56 AM#105
Originally posted by Vhaln He said "type of sandbox" that does not mean it's going to be a total sandbox game, i think from what he has said in the past that it will take some elements from Vanguard and EQ1 with updated features. Hybrid is the way. |
|
|
10/19/12 7:28:41 AM#106
Are we even going to be playing games on the PC when this game comes out?
|
|
|
10/19/12 7:30:08 AM#107
Originally posted by BlitzVF Speak for yourself, PC gaming is here to stay. |
|
|
10/19/12 7:42:08 AM#108
Everquest is definitely my favourite brand for mmorpg's, every other doesn't have the right touch.... Had a lot of fun with eq1 & eq2 it's actually a bit worrying they will go a different route and make a sandbox - hoping it works out wont be really touching other mmo's anymore
|
|
|
10/19/12 7:42:32 AM#109
I am just happy to see another EQ world coming. Love the lore behind EQ. Started with UO and ended up in EQ a few months after launch and have played EQ2 off and on for its existance. I do hope it doesn't go the way of GW2, some people love that game, it just wasn't for me. I do hope the hybrid way they go is Vanguard'ish. I am not a huge sandbox fan, but EQ lore would draw me to it. Really wish it was not so far off.......... |
|
|
10/19/12 7:55:44 AM#110
theres more to it than just this game. If it does well well see more worlds. I cant see that as being a bad thing. I have to be honest with you. We have completely blown up the design of EverQuest Next. For the last year and a half we have been working on something we are not ready to show. Why did we blow up the design? The design was evolutionary. It was EverQuest III. It was something that was slightly better than what had come before it. It was slightly better.What we are building is something that we will be very proud to call EverQuest. It will be the largest sandbox-style MMO ever designed.--Smed |
|
|
10/19/12 8:00:49 AM#111
Smed's not known for honest assessment of games...
|
|
|
10/19/12 8:02:39 AM#112
Originally posted by Ripostethis This guy is already moaning and bitch, incredible haha. Sony has more money than any other mmo company. |
|
|
10/19/12 8:06:06 AM#113
Originally posted by Istavaan Well i think we sent him packing back to the messiahs forum. |
|
|
10/19/12 8:09:21 AM#114
Originally posted by Icewhite Where EQ is concerned Smed tells it like it is, nothing come before his first MMO child. Nope, Smed will go all out to make EQNext an epic rebirth of the original EQ. |
|
|
10/19/12 8:11:23 AM#115
Originally posted by Rimmersman Did he send you a t-shirt to wear? Picture for your wall? |
|
|
10/19/12 8:12:24 AM#116
Originally posted by Istavaan Not really it does not. Sony is in big trouble atm, it is losing money as crazy and it lost alot of it's worth in last years. SoE is not in bad shape, but Sony overall it is.
|
|
|
10/19/12 8:18:54 AM#117
Originally posted by Icewhite Nope but having played the game for six years i won't hide the fact i'm an avid EQ fan and where EQ is concerned a Smed fan. So put that in you're pipe and smoke it. |
|
|
10/19/12 8:25:47 AM#118
Originally posted by RimmersmanOriginally posted by Incomparable An economy that revolves around controlling strategic locations by building cities or guild castles to have easier access to these points of interest. And these are areas that might be the housing for intents and purposes... but more about actual use than decoration, and it of course involves pvp. Possibly including destructible houses or just guild castles that are destructible. And new guilds castles can levy high taxes to try to force out existing players to sell their land or possibly other tools the devs can introduce to make the game have non instanced housing ( which might mean capacity is reached) that is fun and realistic that involves a player generated economy and destructible houses and/or guild castles. Also there should be ai/npc involved with the usages of these areas and how it affects the areas and npcs, since I believe npc alignment should play a major role in how it affects the world. Since we do a lot of quests for people it is essentially building favor for the area or even race which may be scattered, or even relocated affecting events in the world. “Write bad things that are done to you in sand, but write the good things that happen to you on a piece of marble” |
|
|
GeezerGamer
 Advanced Member
Joined: 4/03/12
Who ever said "Familiarity breeds contempt" didn't have an internet connection. |
10/19/12 8:32:42 AM#119
Originally posted by Thorqemada Even if it wasn't SOE. Not going to make any judgements until I see somthing solid here. Certainly, not boarding any hype trains. If the conversation turned "Tit-for-Tat", and I've stopped posting, Consider it your win. |
|
10/19/12 8:33:21 AM#120
Originally posted by evilastro This coming from somoeone who wouldn't listen to one negative thign about GW2. Where does your 'reasonable crticism' goes when it comes to other games? something you people can't stop parroting about on GW2 forums? |
|
Friends: vgchartz.com
Not a member? You can still subscribe to our newsletters and daily updates here!
May 25, 2013 10:36 AM
- Page Created in 0.625 seconds -
