| 177 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
9/05/12 7:25:19 PM#141
I can't even compare GW2 against SWTOR. I left SWTOR after 4 weeks even though I had a 3 month sub. GW2 has a great business model. e.g. I know I will play for a long time but in those moments when I feel like having a break I don't unsub or panic about the cost. I know I will pop back in at some point. I know a lot of people will do the same so the population will be maintained and that means more cash shop sales and when an expansion comes out, more sales again. SWTOR just feels way too linear and small to me. Its like a poor single player game trying to be an MMO. GW2 has that big world feel which I love.
|
|
|
9/05/12 7:33:39 PM#142
Originally posted by Gaborik Haha are you joking? The biggest IP in any media in THE WORLD, and despite that, they never broke 500k subs. They didn't crash and burn, they never left the runway. They've just coasted along for years. So much so that they had to go FTP just to get some extra cash flow going. |
|
|
9/05/12 7:37:38 PM#143
"Same fate as SWTOR" meaning? #2 sub-based MMO? Switching pay models? Surpassing TSW, Aion, and Tera in numbers? Or did you mean intensely hated and downplayed by many mmorpg.com users? Just wondering.
Error: 37. Signature not found. Please connect to my server for signature access. |
|
|
9/05/12 7:37:57 PM#144
Originally posted by Tibernicus I don't consider it the largest ip out there nor did I see their turn to f2p as a failure. They did better than expected with DDO so of course they reconsidered their venture in LotR. Was it a resounding success? No Certainly isn't anything remotely like you claim either. 1. For god's sake mmo gamers, enough with the analogies. They're unnecessary and your comparisons are terrible, dissimilar, and illogical. 2. To posters feeling the need to state how f2p really isn't f2p: Players understand the concept. You aren't privy to some secret the rest are missing. You're embarrassing yourself. 3. Yes, Cpt. Obvious, we're not industry experts. Now run along and let the big people use the forums for their purpose. |
|
|
9/05/12 7:42:44 PM#145
Originally posted by TibernicusOriginally posted by Gaborik I understand you are trying to make a point a very silly one at that but if your going to quote me or anyone cutting out the part that explaines the part you left clearly shows that person was correct and you were trying to hide something. Nice try buddy EPIC fail by you. |
|
|
9/05/12 7:44:52 PM#146
Originally posted by Wickedjelly I was involved with LotRO from when it was called Middle Earth Online, until launch. I have never before seen a game that was better in alpha than when released, but Middle Earth Online was a far FAR superior game to LotRO. But, it wasn't mainstream enough, so they changed it to be just like WoW, and lost the vast majority of their fan base in the process. I lived 10 minutes away from Turbine's offices, I saw the radical shift in quality (for the worse) they company went through over the years. It was sad to witness and I'm still upset over what could have been.
You don't take an IP like LotR, hot off the release of 3 record breaking movies... and then not even beat the sub numbers of old dial up games...and then call it a great success. |
|
|
9/05/12 7:45:35 PM#147
Originally posted by Souldrainer You mean... merging servers and firing half your staff within 3 months, and not turning a profit? |
|
|
9/05/12 7:47:44 PM#148
Originally posted by Tibernicus I never said it was a great success. What I said was your assertion was ludicrous. Pretty safe to say if things went as bad as you claim it would not still be live let alone coming out with another expansion. 1. For god's sake mmo gamers, enough with the analogies. They're unnecessary and your comparisons are terrible, dissimilar, and illogical. 2. To posters feeling the need to state how f2p really isn't f2p: Players understand the concept. You aren't privy to some secret the rest are missing. You're embarrassing yourself. 3. Yes, Cpt. Obvious, we're not industry experts. Now run along and let the big people use the forums for their purpose. |
|
|
9/05/12 7:49:23 PM#149
Originally posted by TibernicusOriginally posted by Souldrainer They merged servers. They fired staff... otherwise, your numbers are WAY off... and BTW, Bioware insists to this day that the game is turning profits. So yeah... hate much? Error: 37. Signature not found. Please connect to my server for signature access. |
|
|
9/05/12 7:51:03 PM#150
Originally posted by Tibernicus I don't really want to turn this into a ME:O vs LoTRO thing, but do you really think if Turbine stuck to the ME:O course it would have done better? Like you said ME:O was not mainstream in anyway, permanent death itself would have been a huge turn off to many players. I'd actually put LOTRO's only moderate success down to bad marketing and management, considering how well SWTOR sold initially. |
|
|
9/05/12 7:55:08 PM#151
Originally posted by TibernicusOriginally posted by Wickedjelly First turbine never ever released its sub numbers so for you to state it never beat a dial up game just shows you are bias against lotro. Just so you know lotro has been around for over 5 yrs! A failed game would not have survived 5 yrs would not be releasing another expansion NEXT MONTH!! would not have the most preorders since moria would not be releasing the largest expansion since moria. You can hate all you want. Just because it doesnt say it has 10 million players does not mean its a failed game. |
|
|
9/05/12 7:55:45 PM#152
Originally posted by Wickedjelly Asheron's Call 1 still has monthly expansions even though barely anyone plays it. Expansions are not a mark of doing "retty damn good". They're a mark of something turning a profit. |
|
|
9/05/12 7:58:47 PM#153
Originally posted by Gaborik All things considered for what it was SUPPOSED to be, its a pretty dismal failure. Now it didn't collapse in the same fashion as WAR or AOC or SWTOR, but it never did well as a game. |
|
|
9/05/12 8:02:13 PM#154
Originally posted by Tibernicus Your point? I never said it was a "huge success" or "retty damn good" with the mmo market in general. What I said was your assertion it was a failure simply isn't true. 1. For god's sake mmo gamers, enough with the analogies. They're unnecessary and your comparisons are terrible, dissimilar, and illogical. 2. To posters feeling the need to state how f2p really isn't f2p: Players understand the concept. You aren't privy to some secret the rest are missing. You're embarrassing yourself. 3. Yes, Cpt. Obvious, we're not industry experts. Now run along and let the big people use the forums for their purpose. |
|
|
9/05/12 8:03:33 PM#155
Originally posted by Tibernicus Since no game has done well in the west since WoW, I think it's a pretty hard call to make. Even GW2 (though I have every confidence GW2 will do extremely well) has yet to prove its mettle. From the list of MMOs, LoTRO is not a failure in any sense. |
|
|
9/05/12 8:05:17 PM#156
Originally posted by meari So from the list of failed MMOs LotRO isn't AS BIG a failure... which is what I have been saying. It still isn't a roaring success. Especially not compared to the amount of buzz it had in beta. |
|
|
9/05/12 8:06:42 PM#157
Originally posted by Wickedjelly When the biggest IP in the world cannot generate massive subs, coming off 3 blockbuster record shattering movies... that's a failure. We don't need sub numbers to know that LotRO never broke 500k subs. |
|
|
9/05/12 8:06:51 PM#158
Originally posted by TibernicusOriginally posted by Gaborik
|
|
|
9/05/12 8:08:30 PM#159
Originally posted by Tibernicus No, I mean no MMO period. Name a MMO that has done well in the West since WoW. Darkfall did not do well, please describe how you qualified that. |
|
|
9/05/12 8:10:23 PM#160
Originally posted by Tibernicus Right...so LOTRO was a failure in your eyes but Darkfall did quite well. Yes...I mean what the fuck? Not even worth going further... 1. For god's sake mmo gamers, enough with the analogies. They're unnecessary and your comparisons are terrible, dissimilar, and illogical. 2. To posters feeling the need to state how f2p really isn't f2p: Players understand the concept. You aren't privy to some secret the rest are missing. You're embarrassing yourself. 3. Yes, Cpt. Obvious, we're not industry experts. Now run along and let the big people use the forums for their purpose. |
|