Originally posted by Rthuth434

- waiting for another two MMO launches so they have a bevy of ideas to steal

- fighting to convince the suits to greenlight F2P/B2p instead of the sub model

Agree with your first one.  It will most likely have a lot of voice overs and a limited number of abilities, now they are just waiting on a few more games to rip ideas from since they can't come up with any good ideas on their own.

Well, I cracked the code.

The supposed newest "insider's friend information" reveals Battle.net changes with subscriptions. Now, Blizzard has stated that the game will not compete with World of Warcraft. So they have basically taken the SOE's model. "Pay monthly fee, play all our monthly subbed games." This way, the game won't in anyway compete with World of Warcraft. The best part about it is, it would business strategy wise be the smartest move. (Any MMO vs. WoW is still considered a subsidiary product, therefore it would compete with it.)

While Titan was a game I always meant to play when it eventually is released...after the awful piece of garbage known as D3...I feel like they will have a RMAH in Titan and if they do I won't ever play it.

This is just conjecture, but I see Titan being a social media driven game.  I think Blizzard sees the money in social media driven content and knows that many attempts have been made but nobody seems to be able to create something truely encompassing.

I think their key points will be:  

• Accessibility.  It is super easy to start playing the game (one click and you are playing, no account or character creation needed until you are some ways into playing.  That way people post a link on their facebook for anyone to join them and everyone is there in the game standing next to them without doing any work at all).
• Large amounts of people playing and communicating about it via social networks

Originally posted by Latronus

Originally posted by Rthuth434

- waiting for another two MMO launches so they have a bevy of ideas to steal

- fighting to convince the suits to greenlight F2P/B2p instead of the sub model

Agree with your first one.  It will most likely have a lot of voice overs and a limited number of abilities, now they are just waiting on a few more games to rip ideas from since they can't come up with any good ideas on their own.

Not sure what you mean by ripping ideas because they can't come up with their own. I mean they found a way to get more people into MMOs by taking other MMOs ideas, which isn't a bad thing. So if they take some other games ideas and improve on them, how is that a bad thing? Sure its annoying when people call games like DAoC, EQ2, heck even EQ1 WoW clones because Blizzard "invented" mmos, but still. 

Originally posted by iamthekiller

While Titan was a game I always meant to play when it eventually is released...after the awful piece of garbage known as D3...I feel like they will have a RMAH in Titan and if they do I won't ever play it.

I refused to play my free copy of D3 because of the RMAH.

Originally posted by wormywyrm

This is just conjecture, but I see Titan being a social media driven game.  I think Blizzard sees the money in social media driven content and knows that many attempts have been made but nobody seems to be able to create something truely encompassing.

Originally posted by jeffxsee
Titan was scrapped when the sweeping layoffs occurred back a year ago to streamline service and focus on WoW. They're now working slowly on Blizzard DOTA.

Is this real? According to which source? Do you have a link? How could this news escape so many people?