| 145 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
TruthXHurts
Apprentice Member
Joined: 6/20/10
I am here to chew bubblegum and to kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum! |
8/25/12 11:05:08 AM#61
Originally posted by rygard49 Don't you ever use the words new or creative to describe a EA/Mythic title. It makes you look like a complete tool. "I am not in a server with Gankers...THEY ARE IN A SERVER WITH ME!!!" |
|
8/25/12 11:08:04 AM#62
f what EA owns. Im in a mood so this thread is about to get blown up if it continues with any kind of setiment towards EA. I have a very large compiling response in my mind .....
|
|
|
8/25/12 1:15:20 PM#63
Originally posted by Scot An MMO doesn't need cutting edge graphics. WoW lookslike garbage but people play it.
Originally posted by Crazy_Stick Last two MMOs? WAR and DAoC? DAoC was amazing. Originally posted by rygard49 Incorrect, if any of the people originally behind DAoC or UO1 were making this game, and EA was involved, I'd be excited. But neither of those things are true. Here is what I do know. EA has never made a good MMO. Their most recent four Ultima games were complete and total garbage. So excuse me for not getting excited.
|
|
|
8/25/12 1:23:00 PM#64
Originally posted by Tibernicus I agree...But the very mention of UO 2 stirs something of excitment in my bones. As much as I hate EA I would probably give this a shot knowing its going to fall short but still (possibly) surpassing the current sandbox attempts we currently have. |
|
|
TruthXHurts
Apprentice Member
Joined: 6/20/10
I am here to chew bubblegum and to kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum! |
8/25/12 1:25:15 PM#65
UUoUU
"I am not in a server with Gankers...THEY ARE IN A SERVER WITH ME!!!" |
|
8/25/12 2:40:50 PM#66
Originally posted by Tibernicus those guys are making TESO. |
|
|
8/25/12 2:42:55 PM#67
well i believe EA owns UO...so youll have to dance with the devil no matter what to play UO2.
id say give them a shot...worst case scenario ...i dont play it. I have to be honest with you. We have completely blown up the design of EverQuest Next. For the last year and a half we have been working on something we are not ready to show. Why did we blow up the design? The design was evolutionary. It was EverQuest III. It was something that was slightly better than what had come before it. It was slightly better.What we are building is something that we will be very proud to call EverQuest. It will be the largest sandbox-style MMO ever designed.--Smed |
|
|
8/25/12 3:22:05 PM#68
Originally posted by rungard Pretty zen approach. I approve. - vigilo confido - |
|
|
8/25/12 3:33:04 PM#69
Everything EA "owns" eventually comes out the EA poop machine completely tarnished, so it is automatically doomed anyways. Have at it Mythic.
Enter a whole new realm of challenge and adventure. |
|
|
8/25/12 3:35:52 PM#70
Originally posted by Tibernicus IF Shit Frontiers was so well recieved by the majority of the players then why did it end up losing about 70% of its population within months of its release? In a world of sharp knives, you would be a spoon. |
|
|
8/25/12 3:44:43 PM#71
Originally posted by Tibernicus
As a former DAOC player I can attest to this. New Fronteirs was the "good" expansion. It was very well received. TOA was not and created a bigger grindfest. People didnt want to grind, they wanted to PvP and fight in Darkness Falls (which was a GREAT concept) Of course once EA comes along, they stop anything thats an improvement. In this case, its the rollback to classic. Idk where you got that 70% number. I doubt its legit. I played the game. |
|
|
8/25/12 3:56:03 PM#72
Originally posted by doragon86
Ugh, stop moaning like some hurt teenagers. What do you have to lose to make you snub the idea of a UO2? Who cares if you don't like the company. There may be a slight chance that you will like the game, and you don't want it created because you don't like the companies behind it? Like I said before, you're not losing anything, let them make it, if it's bad don't play it...
At the very least it would be interesting to see how it turns out. |
|
|
8/25/12 3:58:23 PM#73
Originally posted by ShakyMo No, only ONE of those guys is making TESO. Sadly, its not enough. He sounds like he's doing the RvR right, but the PvE sounds absolutely awful. The guy preached about the virtues of open dungeons (which I agree with) then in the same breath talks about how TESO will have phasing and instanced storylines. THEY DO NOT WORK TOGETHER> |
|
|
8/25/12 3:59:03 PM#74
Originally posted by Vladamyre Because Trials of Atlantis came out around the same time and people hated it? |
|
|
8/25/12 4:33:48 PM#75
If they want to remain true to the spirit of Ultima then i'm all for it.
If however they want to include elves, ninja's, goofy weapons with a million edges, or armor that makes you look like a cross between a power ranger and a hummer, then i'm definitely against it. The Secret World - Ultima Online - Age of Wushu |
|
|
8/25/12 4:35:56 PM#76
Originally posted by Indol You mean, the stuff that EA Bioware and Mythic have alreadyed added to original UO? |
|
|
8/25/12 4:41:39 PM#77
Facepalm.....Mythic like Funcom....2 of the most epic fail studio's....they should work together to make a decent mmo.....wait a minute, that woulnt work either to much fail. http://speedtest.net/result/2112016336.png |
|
|
8/25/12 4:42:58 PM#78
Originally posted by Tibernicus Yes. The Secret World - Ultima Online - Age of Wushu |
|
|
8/25/12 4:46:52 PM#79
Tibernicus:
It's not just Matt frior, the number 2 guy on TESO is ex ultima dev and there are several ex mythic & origin people working on TESO |
|
|
8/25/12 4:48:01 PM#80
Originally posted by Mothanos Nothing's wrong with Mythic. But EA Mythic. Or Bioware Mythic, whatever they call it now... is awful. At least they're no Blizzard though. |
|