| 186 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
6/21/12 7:24:27 PM#101
When it come to their existing Warcraft, Diablo and Starcraft franchises... no. I am a tiny-bit interested in finding out what Titan is, but only because I would *hope* they are smarter than they seem (lately) and would make a product that is so divergent from WoW that it would be impossible to compete with it. Thusly, it might be up my alley - though, that might be giving them way too much credit at this point. Writer / Musician / Game Designer Now Playing: Skyrim, Wurm Online, Tropico 4 |
|
|
6/21/12 7:29:48 PM#102
It's getting harder and harder to want to but I've never had a problem with customer service which would be my main issue. The games are necessarliy bad, but they arent heading in a direction I really like. |
|
|
Scarlyng
Novice Member
Joined: 5/01/12
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. -- Mark Twain |
6/21/12 7:32:33 PM#103
I would buy another Blizzard MMO, but only if they deviate from the typical MMO formula. Since I expect the likelihood of that to be approaching zero, I picked absolutely not. The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw |
|
6/21/12 7:47:24 PM#104
Originally posted by itgrowls but whats to say that those games you pointed out wont do the same thing? WoW only fault was being a good game that appeal to most MMO gamers. So future MMO built from there.
if GW2 became as popular, than whats to stop MMO developers making lots of GW2 like MMO? wouldnt you get tired of that as well after 8+ years of GW2 like MMO, since you complain about the same situation with WoW?
|
|
|
6/21/12 8:02:46 PM#105
Originally posted by WhiteLantern This, basically. It really all depends on whether they make any interesting games in the future. I wouldn't be surprised if they did, and I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't. |
|
|
6/21/12 8:05:55 PM#106
Not in a million years. I still have Facebook friends who say Diablo 3 is not buy-to-win though, so I guess opinions vary. It only takes one b2w game for a company to be a total failture IMO though, and D3 is that game and more. Edit: It really boggles my mind when I see people claiming "server instability at launch" as Diablo 3's big flaw. No, the big flaw is that all paths point to the RMT auction house, and it's one big boiling frog experiment for the future of their company. What is a boiling frog experiment? Biologists say that you can put a frog in a pot of hot water, and slowly raise the temperature. If done gradually enough, the frog will stay in the water until it boils and the frog dies. Error: 37. Signature not found. Please connect to my server for signature access. |
|
|
6/21/12 9:45:33 PM#107
I buy games that I find fun. I don't make a point of seeing who made it. - Al Personally the only modern MMORPG trend that annoys me is the idea that MMOs need to be designed in a way to attract people who don't actually like MMOs. Which to me makes about as much sense as someone trying to figure out a way to get vegetarians to eat at their steakhouse. |
|
|
6/21/12 10:53:05 PM#108
Yea. But only Diablo titles. Starcraft is dead to me. Starcraft 2 sucks ass, and is the biggest scam of the century. I'm not paying full price for 1/3 of a game. Anyhow. I honestly feel like the only guy in the universe who's actually 'enjoying' Diablo 3 and having fun.
|
|
|
6/21/12 10:59:13 PM#109
As long as it isn't another disasterous Diablo title then I am ok. They know Warcraft and Starcraft but that is about it so far. |
|
|
6/21/12 11:16:54 PM#110
There is no entry for my option which is: Blizz went from being a day one purchase to now being a wait til reviews/free trials possible purchase. |
|
|
6/21/12 11:19:44 PM#111
Originally posted by Lord.Bachus Haha funny how you only mention the server problems in Diablo. The release of WoW was alot worse man.. |
|
Originally posted by MMOExposed Look at it like this, considering that I could take a level 30 character in GW2 and go to a level 10 zone and still get good dynamic content, rewards/exp/and challenge, then one would get an insane amount of replayabilty, thats literally more pve content than any game out there. Not only that, It comes with an entire world ment for the sole purpose of WvW pvp, and a structured pvp system for tournaments. GW2 focuses on fun and skill progression, WoW focuses on endless gear grind and no customization, I have no idea how anyone finds that fun anymore and theres no comparison of the two. Played-Everything |
|
|
6/21/12 11:45:57 PM#113
Blizzard hasn't wronged me so my answer to your question is 'Yes, I will continue to give Blizzard my money in exchange for their wonderful games.' |
|
|
6/21/12 11:48:11 PM#114
I never really got into the Warcraft and Starcraft franchises, so those are definitely a no no. I have no idea about Titan. I guess it’s a wait and see.
|
|
|
6/21/12 11:48:49 PM#115
I won't buy a blizzard game as readily as before. Slow content development, slow patches, and weak QA. Compared to other companies, they're being left in the dust. "For the Angel of Death spread his wings on the blast, |
|
|
6/21/12 11:52:11 PM#116
I was worried about Blizzard at points during WoW's life cycle, but since they did such a tremendously good job with StarCraft 2 and now Diablo 3, my faith's been restored. I may even give WoW a chance again now that they're at long last making Pandarens playable. - vigilo confido - |
|
|
6/22/12 12:02:52 AM#117
Originally posted by itgrowls I would totally believe you if you weren't completely talking out of your ass. You've obviously not actually played the game for any good amount of time at all. Reduced useful drops? They actually increased them. Required RM for purchases? There is still an up and thriving gold AH you can use where you can find a boatload of gear. And you don't even need that since they've increased yellow drops on bosses and made inferno easier. Content boost? What "content" boost are you talking about? In all likelyhood they are working on an expansion while they tweak the game now. http://eu.battle.net/d3/en/blog/5238315/Patch_103_Now_Live-20_06_2012
The only things they've nerfed is stuff people were exploiting and botting for gold farming. |
|
|
6/22/12 12:05:12 AM#118
Originally posted by doragon86 Really? Weak QA? There is coined term in the industry it's "Blizzard Polish" look it up somtime. From what I've seen blizzard has less game breaking bugs than any company I've seen. |
|
|
6/22/12 12:05:59 AM#119
Originally posted by Souldrainer Diablo 3 "Buy-to-win"??
Against who? What for? Win what?
It is not Battlefield 3. It is not League of Legends. It is not a pvp game, you are NOT required to compete against anyone or get left behind or get ganked and laugh at.
Therefore I find your notion of Diablo 3 as "Buy-to-win" as being quite funny and lacking logic.
Diablo 3 is nothing more than a single player time grinder game with an engine that can allow you to play with other people easier. You can grind just fine with whatever you looted/crafted by yourself. |
|
|
6/22/12 12:10:24 AM#120
Since WoW I haven't bought any of their games. They used to make games that I found fun like D2 and Starcraft but not anymore. Titan has me mildly interested. |
|