| 140 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
6/19/12 11:05:17 PM#41
This is just a dry run for Titan. DamonVile- Games built for disposable players are now apparently built by disposable employees. |
|
|
6/19/12 11:09:11 PM#42
The people doing these chargebacks should expect a bill. Let me spell it out:
These are the obvious points. Now lets look at what happens to Blizzard when you charge back. Blizzard take £1 and 15% out of the buyer, listing the item. So for a £100 item sale, Blizzard recieve make £16. You are taking £100 off Blizzard. They lose £84.
Blizzard will get in touch with the CC companies, the CC companies will go "shit, we're sorry" (OR will they!? This could get quite interesting), and Blizzard will send you a bill of whatever you charged back, and you'll get bad credit and lose your RMAH access. I can actually see this catastrophe luring media attention, too. _________ Watching: Darkfall: Unholy Wars, Elder Scrolls Online, ArcheAge, Camelot Unchained, Bless, Black Desert Online, Lineage Eternal, MU 2. Always hating on instances in MMOs! Open worlds, open PvP, territory control and housing please. More persistence, more fun. |
|
|
6/19/12 11:12:11 PM#43
Gotta love online only for a single player rpg. |
|
|
6/19/12 11:14:40 PM#44
Originally posted by leftyZX So what was Blizzard supposed to do then? Just not launch the AH? Things are ALWAYS going to be changing in games like these, it's part of the goddamn genre FFS you... person. You know when you go to pet a strange dog, and it growls at you? It's not the poor dog's fault when you persist and get your f*cking hand ripped off, is it? No, it's yours. Blizzard 'growled' at you with their forum and blog posts. If you ignored them, it's your own f*cking fault. Forgive my profanity, but it just boggles my mind that people don't understand this. |
|
|
6/19/12 11:15:40 PM#45
Originally posted by Adam1902 4yrs into development time into sorting out legalities? lol, doesnt mean shit until it holds up in court. If that is true it just show's me what a sleezy business Blizzard has become. |
|
|
6/19/12 11:16:03 PM#46
Originally posted by Rednecksith
That is the funniest post i have ever seen, open and honest huh with a system based on greedy and designed to give a stream of money on items that don't exist and that could be easily exploited from day one by gold farmers lying in wait for the day it launched. Sorry but no, just no. |
|
|
6/19/12 11:16:08 PM#47
And this, my friends, is exactly why we don't want RMT within the game. |
|
|
6/19/12 11:19:03 PM#48
Originally posted by itgrowls Point out to me how they were NOT open and honest with the upcoming changes? Yeah, thought so. |
|
|
6/19/12 11:21:01 PM#49
Originally posted by itgrowls
Yup.. This. ^^ The entire game was designed for RMAH long before it was even due to come online. Makes me sick. Oh well, another great game series bites the dust. Sometimes I miss the days of text-only games, where the story was everything, and the artists that created them wanted to tell you the story and let you live it. I'm babbling and no one is reading this anyway. Oh well. I had a minute to spare. o7 Now Playing: Rift, Defiance, And occasionally TSW, APB
|
|
|
6/19/12 11:23:24 PM#50
Originally posted by Acidon Ever play "Pyramid" or "Bedlam" ?
Seems games have changed and not necessarily for the better my friend |
|
|
6/19/12 11:32:09 PM#51
So then, Blizzard pays the bill and the person that did the chargeback keeps the item anyway.
I think they should ban anyone that does a chargeback. That would stop the behavior pretty quickly. You would lose some customers and it would be a PR nightmare, but I think this is a situation where the behavior just needs to be stopped dead in its tracks.
I'm glad it's not going well for them. I'd rather not see this model repeated any time soon. SWTOR is the greatest mmo ever! |
|
|
6/19/12 11:32:39 PM#52
I find it very interesting that Blizzard can have a RMT auction house and still claim that players don't own the items sold there. I really hope some people with good lawyers take them to the cleaners over this...
Error: 37. Signature not found. Please connect to my server for signature access. |
|
|
6/19/12 11:34:51 PM#53
Originally posted by Souldrainer Latest Blizzard antics bring up an inner rage within me that is hard to contain. I can't really do anything about it besides get my money back, block charges on annual pass, and never give Blizzard another dime. Will they care? Nope. But, it makes me feel better. |
|
|
6/19/12 11:35:45 PM#54
Originally posted by Rednecksith They marketed RMAH as part of d3. They never said you were required to have a cell phone or purchase an authenticator. They changed the policy about that requirement so they have sold a product not as intended. My CC company seems supportive of the disputed charge.
Also, tried to get a hold of blizzard for a refund on the phone without connecting to someone and their phone queue booted me. Sent an email to sales per the purchase confirmation and never got a reply from them. They are avoiding refunds which I think is good enough for a dispute. |
|
|
6/19/12 11:38:22 PM#55
Originally posted by colddog04 I think the behavior that needs to be stopped is companies making real money auction houses with virtual goods that they can change on a whim.
Real money for virtual goods that can be changed at anytime.
Whatta Racket |
|
|
6/19/12 11:40:20 PM#56
My guess is the following:
1) The credit card companies need to contact Blizzard to get their side 2) Blizzard will show them the EULA the buyers agreed to before using the AH 3) Most CC companies will not let the chargeback go through 4) Everyone asking for chargebacks will be denied future use of the RMAH
The other issue is that players put more money on their BNET account than was needed for the disputed purchases. That adds a whole new issue. I do think it's lame that people may have bought items without knowing about the nerf. I'm not sure I would see it as big of a deal if they kept the stats but implemented diminishing returns.
|
|
|
6/19/12 11:42:44 PM#57
Originally posted by FrodoFragins You forgot step 4, where the CC companies laugh and giggle at Blizzard trying to push a EULA on them for virtual goods. |
|
|
6/19/12 11:44:52 PM#58
Originally posted by JimmydeanOriginally posted by Souldrainer Oh yeah. I think Blizzard has finally gone off the deep end. Always on wasn't about DRM or security... it's totally aboit increasing exposure to the RMT auction house. The whole game is just one huge funnel suckering sheeple into their new buy to win model, and with thunderous applause! Error: 37. Signature not found. Please connect to my server for signature access. |
|
|
6/19/12 11:45:13 PM#59
Originally posted by Rednecksith im already 2 step a head of u, i havent buy d game yet bcos i hearing all this server trouble, hack, RMAH, etc etc like parent always said "dont pet a strange dog if u dont know who belongs to", so......im not that stupid buying defect product, im keep waiting till this game perfectly playable and enjoyable i just want to know that blizz could nerf item first then launch RMAH do they? instead d opposite |
|
|
6/19/12 11:46:11 PM#60
Seriously, who didn't see this coming or wasn't told this was coming.
I'm not going to argue legality of a ToS/EULA/etc or how it affects pre-existing law. With enough money and time, it's been proven time and time again that someone will find a loophole and someone will fight that loophole with another loophole. What gets me is, what will Blizzard do. They are the big target of the entire industry. Their Activision brothers and their actions aren't well thought of as is. No matter how you look at it. No matter how it plays out. This is a PR nightmare that will dwarf previuos WoW fiascos. The sheer number of articles and debates over this will be huge. Opportunistic people will be lying in wait for the outcome and the possibilities that follow. And... this will not be the last problem with the RMAH. The box is open. |
|