Originally posted by Zindaihas

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Taking away freedom from women and turning them into reproductive slaves, no better than cows.

That should be one of the official Social Conservatives' motto!

Liberals would have us believe women get pregnant through osmosis and no fault of their own. 

 how they get pregnant isn't relevant. What difference does it make? It's her body, no matter how she got pregnant.

 I see, so a woman can engage in the most risky promiscuous sexual behavior possible, get pregnant as a result of HER actions and if she happens to get pregnant, discard her baby as if it were nothing more than a bowel movement?  Is that what you believe?

Wow, I sure hope you are not in any way associated with the health industry or are a health teacher.

The real question is, "Would you want a tramp like that to actually birth a child and, if the child grows up, having another individual living off the welfare system or in jail?"

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Taking away freedom from women and turning them into reproductive slaves, no better than cows.

That should be one of the official Social Conservatives' motto!

Liberals would have us believe women get pregnant through osmosis and no fault of their own. 

 

how they get pregnant isn't relevant. What difference does it make? It's her body, no matter how she got pregnant.

It's completely relevant.

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Taking away freedom from women and turning them into reproductive slaves, no better than cows.

That should be one of the official Social Conservatives' motto!

Liberals would have us believe women get pregnant through osmosis and no fault of their own. 

Yet, Conservatives, such as yourself, try to use that failed comeback, while totally ignoring rape pregnancies.

Liberals always turn to rape pregnancies always ignoring that conservatives are for abortions in terms of rape, incest or if the life of the mother is in danger. Pull your head out.

 

I should have posted it earlier but I knew you would immediately jump to rape just like the trained monkey you are.

Stop speaking for all Conservatives.  Your opinion =/= all Consevatives.

Conservative-Based-Moroff is a prime example.  We all know he's still anti-abortion even when it comes to rape.  The evidence that proves this is that he runs away and hides everytime rape prengancy is mentioned as a counter to his beligerant arguments against abortion due to his excessive hatred of Liberals.

 

As to your last part, thanks for remaining consistant in your MO on insulting people when you can't argue a point Seatard.

I easily argued the point. As it stands the majority of conservatives are against abortion except in the terms I described. However, you try to counter and say that you know how ALL conservatives think. That pretty hypocritcal and assinine of yourself. I see you dipped to using insults also so go fuck yourself you retard. You can't argue from the high ground when your deep in the sewage yourself dumbass.

No, you ASSUME that the majority of Conservatives follow what you believe.  ASSUMING something is not the same as fact.  You might want to learn that next time.

Oh, look... Seatard is back to insulting because I'm destroying his arguments.  QQ Seatard... QQ.

EDIT:  Blue:  Where did I say that?  Oh wait... I didn't.  Next time... reading comprehension... learn it.

Looks like C-B-M was right. You are no longer arguing about the issue. You have twisted and turned the argument to be about me speaking for all conservatives. Can't argue the issue you have to turn the argument into something else that has nothing to do with the issue. It's a common and noticable tactic of people losing their argument.

So what does that make you when you insult people?

You make yourself look like a child.

Yet, despite your denials, that is what you did.  You were trying to speak for all Conservatives.  Trying to impose that your beliefs were the same as all Conservatives.  Which, they are not.  Yet, you keep dodging my factual statements and are now trying to deflect it upon me for your inadequacies.

I'm sorry your having a QQ fit and are trying to deflect things on me because you cannot make an adequate argument against my factual statements.  Maybe you should actually address the issue at hand rather than trying to deflect false information (stating that I said that I know what all Conservatives think).  It shows that you are clearly inadequate in forming a counterargument.

 

Blue:  Then you must be an infant.  And Conservative-Based-Moroff must be a cell.  Because you two are some of the worst offenders at insulting others.

You still haven't bothered to even talk about the original issue.

Originally posted by Vato26

The real question is, "Would you want a tramp like that to actually birth a child and, if the child grows up, having another individual living off the welfare system or in jail?"

Notice how, when Vato wants to use it to forward abortion, we CAN judge the woman all day and night to say "she's a tramp, she shouldn't have a kid"?  But if we WEREN'T talking about abortion and I called the woman a tramp for being promiscuous -- and let's say she didn't get pregnant -- Vato would be the first up to tell us how we're judgemental and we can't make assumptions and blah blah blah.  Hilarious.  I mean, if she's such a tramp and we wouldn't want her to birth a child, why don't we just sterilize her and then she can be a tramp as much as she wants?  Would Vato be for that?  LOL.

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Taking away freedom from women and turning them into reproductive slaves, no better than cows.

That should be one of the official Social Conservatives' motto!

Liberals would have us believe women get pregnant through osmosis and no fault of their own. 

Yet, Conservatives, such as yourself, try to use that failed comeback, while totally ignoring rape pregnancies.

Liberals always turn to rape pregnancies always ignoring that conservatives are for abortions in terms of rape, incest or if the life of the mother is in danger. Pull your head out.

 

I should have posted it earlier but I knew you would immediately jump to rape just like the trained monkey you are.

Stop speaking for all Conservatives.  Your opinion =/= all Consevatives.

Conservative-Based-Moroff is a prime example.  We all know he's still anti-abortion even when it comes to rape.  The evidence that proves this is that he runs away and hides everytime rape prengancy is mentioned as a counter to his beligerant arguments against abortion due to his excessive hatred of Liberals.

 

As to your last part, thanks for remaining consistant in your MO on insulting people when you can't argue a point Seatard.

I easily argued the point. As it stands the majority of conservatives are against abortion except in the terms I described. However, you try to counter and say that you know how ALL conservatives think. That pretty hypocritcal and assinine of yourself. I see you dipped to using insults also so go fuck yourself you retard. You can't argue from the high ground when your deep in the sewage yourself dumbass.

No, you ASSUME that the majority of Conservatives follow what you believe.  ASSUMING something is not the same as fact.  You might want to learn that next time.

Oh, look... Seatard is back to insulting because I'm destroying his arguments.  QQ Seatard... QQ.

EDIT:  Blue:  Where did I say that?  Oh wait... I didn't.  Next time... reading comprehension... learn it.

Looks like C-B-M was right. You are no longer arguing about the issue. You have twisted and turned the argument to be about me speaking for all conservatives. Can't argue the issue you have to turn the argument into something else that has nothing to do with the issue. It's a common and noticable tactic of people losing their argument.

So what does that make you when you insult people?

You make yourself look like a child.

Yet, despite your denials, that is what you did.  You were trying to speak for all Conservatives.  Trying to impose that your beliefs were the same as all Conservatives.  Which, they are not.  Yet, you keep dodging my factual statements and are now trying to deflect it upon me for your inadequacies.

I'm sorry your having a QQ fit and are trying to deflect things on me because you cannot make an adequate argument against my factual statements.  Maybe you should actually address the issue at hand rather than trying to deflect false information (stating that I said that I know what all Conservatives think).  It shows that you are clearly inadequate in forming a counterargument.

 

Blue:  Then you must be an infant.  And Conservative-Based-Moroff must be a cell.  Because you two are some of the worst offenders at insulting others.

You still haven't bothered to even talk about the original issue.

You still haven't bothered to even acknowledge that you don't speak for all Conservatives.  Nor, have you acknowledged that you were lying by stating that I said that I "know what all Conservatives think".

Sorry...  your deflection attempt has failed.

Originally posted by C-B-M

Originally posted by Vato26

The real question is, "Would you want a tramp like that to actually birth a child and, if the child grows up, having another individual living off the welfare system or in jail?"

Notice how, when Vato wants to use it to forward abortion, we CAN judge the woman all day and night to say "she's a tramp, she shouldn't have a kid"?  But if we WEREN'T talking about abortion and I called the woman a tramp for being promiscuous -- and let's say she didn't get pregnant -- Vato would be the first up to tell us how we're judgemental and we can't make assumptions and blah blah blah.  Hilarious.  I mean, if she's such a tramp and we wouldn't want her to birth a child, why don't we just sterilize her and then she can be a tramp as much as she wants?  Would Vato be for that?  LOL.

So... many... ASS-U-mptions about me in that post.  Without one... shred... of proof to back it up.

Congrats!  You have garnered the title Captain ASSUmption, Conservative-Based-Moroff.

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Taking away freedom from women and turning them into reproductive slaves, no better than cows.

That should be one of the official Social Conservatives' motto!

Liberals would have us believe women get pregnant through osmosis and no fault of their own. 

Yet, Conservatives, such as yourself, try to use that failed comeback, while totally ignoring rape pregnancies.

Liberals always turn to rape pregnancies always ignoring that conservatives are for abortions in terms of rape, incest or if the life of the mother is in danger. Pull your head out.

 

I should have posted it earlier but I knew you would immediately jump to rape just like the trained monkey you are.

Stop speaking for all Conservatives.  Your opinion =/= all Consevatives.

Conservative-Based-Moroff is a prime example.  We all know he's still anti-abortion even when it comes to rape.  The evidence that proves this is that he runs away and hides everytime rape prengancy is mentioned as a counter to his beligerant arguments against abortion due to his excessive hatred of Liberals.

 

As to your last part, thanks for remaining consistant in your MO on insulting people when you can't argue a point Seatard.

I easily argued the point. As it stands the majority of conservatives are against abortion except in the terms I described. However, you try to counter and say that you know how ALL conservatives think. That pretty hypocritcal and assinine of yourself. I see you dipped to using insults also so go fuck yourself you retard. You can't argue from the high ground when your deep in the sewage yourself dumbass.

No, you ASSUME that the majority of Conservatives follow what you believe.  ASSUMING something is not the same as fact.  You might want to learn that next time.

Oh, look... Seatard is back to insulting because I'm destroying his arguments.  QQ Seatard... QQ.

EDIT:  Blue:  Where did I say that?  Oh wait... I didn't.  Next time... reading comprehension... learn it.

Looks like C-B-M was right. You are no longer arguing about the issue. You have twisted and turned the argument to be about me speaking for all conservatives. Can't argue the issue you have to turn the argument into something else that has nothing to do with the issue. It's a common and noticable tactic of people losing their argument.

So what does that make you when you insult people?

You make yourself look like a child.

Yet, despite your denials, that is what you did.  You were trying to speak for all Conservatives.  Trying to impose that your beliefs were the same as all Conservatives.  Which, they are not.  Yet, you keep dodging my factual statements and are now trying to deflect it upon me for your inadequacies.

I'm sorry your having a QQ fit and are trying to deflect things on me because you cannot make an adequate argument against my factual statements.  Maybe you should actually address the issue at hand rather than trying to deflect false information (stating that I said that I know what all Conservatives think).  It shows that you are clearly inadequate in forming a counterargument.

 

Blue:  Then you must be an infant.  And Conservative-Based-Moroff must be a cell.  Because you two are some of the worst offenders at insulting others.

You still haven't bothered to even talk about the original issue.

You still haven't bothered to even acknowledge that you don't speak for all Conservatives.  Nor, have you acknowledged that you were lying by stating that I said that I "know what all Conservatives think".

Sorry...  your deflection attempt has failed.

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Taking away freedom from women and turning them into reproductive slaves, no better than cows.

That should be one of the official Social Conservatives' motto!

Liberals would have us believe women get pregnant through osmosis and no fault of their own. 

Yet, Conservatives, such as yourself, try to use that failed comeback, while totally ignoring rape pregnancies.

Liberals always turn to rape pregnancies always ignoring that conservatives are for abortions in terms of rape, incest or if the life of the mother is in danger. Pull your head out.

 

I should have posted it earlier but I knew you would immediately jump to rape just like the trained monkey you are.

Stop speaking for all Conservatives.  Your opinion =/= all Consevatives.

Conservative-Based-Moroff is a prime example.  We all know he's still anti-abortion even when it comes to rape.  The evidence that proves this is that he runs away and hides everytime rape prengancy is mentioned as a counter to his beligerant arguments against abortion due to his excessive hatred of Liberals.

 

As to your last part, thanks for remaining consistant in your MO on insulting people when you can't argue a point Seatard.

I easily argued the point. As it stands the majority of conservatives are against abortion except in the terms I described. However, you try to counter and say that you know how ALL conservatives think. That pretty hypocritcal and assinine of yourself. I see you dipped to using insults also so go fuck yourself you retard. You can't argue from the high ground when your deep in the sewage yourself dumbass.

No, you ASSUME that the majority of Conservatives follow what you believe.  ASSUMING something is not the same as fact.  You might want to learn that next time.

Oh, look... Seatard is back to insulting because I'm destroying his arguments.  QQ Seatard... QQ.

EDIT:  Blue:  Where did I say that?  Oh wait... I didn't.  Next time... reading comprehension... learn it.

Looks like C-B-M was right. You are no longer arguing about the issue. You have twisted and turned the argument to be about me speaking for all conservatives. Can't argue the issue you have to turn the argument into something else that has nothing to do with the issue. It's a common and noticable tactic of people losing their argument.

So what does that make you when you insult people?

You make yourself look like a child.

Yet, despite your denials, that is what you did.  You were trying to speak for all Conservatives.  Trying to impose that your beliefs were the same as all Conservatives.  Which, they are not.  Yet, you keep dodging my factual statements and are now trying to deflect it upon me for your inadequacies.

I'm sorry your having a QQ fit and are trying to deflect things on me because you cannot make an adequate argument against my factual statements.  Maybe you should actually address the issue at hand rather than trying to deflect false information (stating that I said that I know what all Conservatives think).  It shows that you are clearly inadequate in forming a counterargument.

 

Blue:  Then you must be an infant.  And Conservative-Based-Moroff must be a cell.  Because you two are some of the worst offenders at insulting others.

You still haven't bothered to even talk about the original issue.

You still haven't bothered to even acknowledge that you don't speak for all Conservatives.  Nor, have you acknowledged that you were lying by stating that I said that I "know what all Conservatives think".

Sorry...  your deflection attempt has failed.

Yay hypocrite.

Your own words: "So what does that make you when you insult people?

You make yourself look like a child."

Yup.  It's beyond easy to destroy your arguments.  It's like fighting a no-armed man.

Oh, you and Conservative-Based-Moroff share a few things in common.  Low intelligence, fanatical support of ultra Conservatism, and this (the true face and song for both of you)... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woySeSNBL3o

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Taking away freedom from women and turning them into reproductive slaves, no better than cows.

That should be one of the official Social Conservatives' motto!

Liberals would have us believe women get pregnant through osmosis and no fault of their own. 

Yet, Conservatives, such as yourself, try to use that failed comeback, while totally ignoring rape pregnancies.

Liberals always turn to rape pregnancies always ignoring that conservatives are for abortions in terms of rape, incest or if the life of the mother is in danger. Pull your head out.

 

I should have posted it earlier but I knew you would immediately jump to rape just like the trained monkey you are.

Stop speaking for all Conservatives.  Your opinion =/= all Consevatives.

Conservative-Based-Moroff is a prime example.  We all know he's still anti-abortion even when it comes to rape.  The evidence that proves this is that he runs away and hides everytime rape prengancy is mentioned as a counter to his beligerant arguments against abortion due to his excessive hatred of Liberals.

 

As to your last part, thanks for remaining consistant in your MO on insulting people when you can't argue a point Seatard.

I easily argued the point. As it stands the majority of conservatives are against abortion except in the terms I described. However, you try to counter and say that you know how ALL conservatives think. That pretty hypocritcal and assinine of yourself. I see you dipped to using insults also so go fuck yourself you retard. You can't argue from the high ground when your deep in the sewage yourself dumbass.

No, you ASSUME that the majority of Conservatives follow what you believe.  ASSUMING something is not the same as fact.  You might want to learn that next time.

Oh, look... Seatard is back to insulting because I'm destroying his arguments.  QQ Seatard... QQ.

EDIT:  Blue:  Where did I say that?  Oh wait... I didn't.  Next time... reading comprehension... learn it.

Looks like C-B-M was right. You are no longer arguing about the issue. You have twisted and turned the argument to be about me speaking for all conservatives. Can't argue the issue you have to turn the argument into something else that has nothing to do with the issue. It's a common and noticable tactic of people losing their argument.

So what does that make you when you insult people?

You make yourself look like a child.

Yet, despite your denials, that is what you did.  You were trying to speak for all Conservatives.  Trying to impose that your beliefs were the same as all Conservatives.  Which, they are not.  Yet, you keep dodging my factual statements and are now trying to deflect it upon me for your inadequacies.

I'm sorry your having a QQ fit and are trying to deflect things on me because you cannot make an adequate argument against my factual statements.  Maybe you should actually address the issue at hand rather than trying to deflect false information (stating that I said that I know what all Conservatives think).  It shows that you are clearly inadequate in forming a counterargument.

 

Blue:  Then you must be an infant.  And Conservative-Based-Moroff must be a cell.  Because you two are some of the worst offenders at insulting others.

You still haven't bothered to even talk about the original issue.

You still haven't bothered to even acknowledge that you don't speak for all Conservatives.  Nor, have you acknowledged that you were lying by stating that I said that I "know what all Conservatives think".

Sorry...  your deflection attempt has failed.

Yay hypocrite.

Your own words: "So what does that make you when you insult people?

You make yourself look like a child."

 

Yup.  It's beyond easy to destroy your arguments.  It's like fighting a no-armed man.

Oh, you and Conservative-Based-Moroff share a few things in common.  Low intelligence, fanatical support of ultra Conservatism, and this (the true face and song for both of you)... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woySeSNBL3o

C.

Originally posted by Zindaihas

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Vato26

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Taking away freedom from women and turning them into reproductive slaves, no better than cows.

That should be one of the official Social Conservatives' motto!

Liberals would have us believe women get pregnant through osmosis and no fault of their own. 

 how they get pregnant isn't relevant. What difference does it make? It's her body, no matter how she got pregnant.

 I see, so a woman can engage in the most risky promiscuous sexual behavior possible, get pregnant as a result of HER actions and if she happens to get pregnant, discard her baby as if it were nothing more than a bowel movement?  Is that what you believe?

Wow, I sure hope you are not in any way associated with the health industry or are a health teacher.

Yes.

When it's your body, you can decide to go to full term with the baby.

It's not your body, is it?

Originally posted by C-B-M

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

how they get pregnant isn't relevant. What difference does it make? It's her body, no matter how she got pregnant.

Oh, here's Ihmotepp to present his master abortion argument: it doesn't matter how the woman got pregnant, she had nothing to do with that.  She only comes into the picture afterwards.  It's like every woman is participating in virgin birth.

it's not her body before she gets pregnant, and then after she gets pregnant her body belongs to the STATE.

Well, in a country like Iran her body belongs to the state all the time, she can't even decide what clothes to wear,  but this is the US we're talking about.

Who said it belongs to the state?  It still belongs to her.  She just doesn't get to kill a baby.

By the way, it's amusing you're still using the "you're like a Mullah" argument after you blew it up by saying it's fine to ban mosques.  Apparently, you get to choose when people are like Mullahs.  LOLZ.

Originally posted by C-B-M

Who said it belongs to the state?  It still belongs to her.  She just doesn't get to kill a baby.

By the way, it's amusing you're still using the "you're like a Mullah" argument after you blew it up by saying it's fine to ban mosques.  Apparently, you get to choose when people are like Mullahs.  LOLZ.

\

Do you really think trying to deceive people with semantic tricks is persuasive?

Definition of BABY

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Originally posted by C-B-M

Who said it belongs to the state?  It still belongs to her.  She just doesn't get to kill a baby.

By the way, it's amusing you're still using the "you're like a Mullah" argument after you blew it up by saying it's fine to ban mosques.  Apparently, you get to choose when people are like Mullahs.  LOLZ.

\

Do you really think trying to deceive people with semantic tricks is persuasive?

 

Definition of BABY

1

a (1) : an extremely young child; especially : infant (2) : an extremely young animal b : the youngest of a group

2

a : one that is like a baby (as in behavior) b : something that is one's special responsibility, achievement, or interest

3

slang a : girl, woman —often used in address b : boy, man —often used in address

4

: person, thing baby>

— ba·by·hood noun

— ba·by·ish adjective

 

 

fe·tus

noun \?f?-t?s\

 

: an unborn or unhatched vertebrate especially after attaining the basic structural plan of its kind; specifically : a developing human from usually two months after conception to birth

 

 

 

 

Doctors play this game too. Did you know that when you are planning, considering or talking about aborting they refer to the "creature inside the womb" as a fetus. Although, if you are planning on carrying it to full term they refer to it as a baby as early as when you find out you are pregnant. It's a nice little trick so when people consider abortion they refer to it as something else. It makes it easier to destroy a life when you refer to it as less than human.

We do this in the military so it was easier to kill our enemies.

Regardless of whether or not she is actually innocent, she won't last long without protection for the rest of her life.  There's always one loon out there willing to do "God's Work" or whatever those fanatics use to justify themselves.  She'll never get a job again unless she capitalizes on this trial in some shameful way to make money off it.  Fry the b*tch.

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Originally posted by C-B-M

Who said it belongs to the state?  It still belongs to her.  She just doesn't get to kill a baby.

By the way, it's amusing you're still using the "you're like a Mullah" argument after you blew it up by saying it's fine to ban mosques.  Apparently, you get to choose when people are like Mullahs.  LOLZ.

\

Do you really think trying to deceive people with semantic tricks is persuasive?

 

Definition of BABY

1

a (1) : an extremely young child; especially : infant (2) : an extremely young animal b : the youngest of a group

2

a : one that is like a baby (as in behavior) b : something that is one's special responsibility, achievement, or interest

3

slang a : girl, woman —often used in address b : boy, man —often used in address

4

: person, thing baby>

— ba·by·hood noun

— ba·by·ish adjective

 

 

fe·tus

noun \?f?-t?s\

 

: an unborn or unhatched vertebrate especially after attaining the basic structural plan of its kind; specifically : a developing human from usually two months after conception to birth

 

 

 

 

Doctors play this game too. Did you know that when you are planning, considering or talking about aborting they refer to the "creature inside the womb" as a fetus. Although, if you are planning on carrying it to full term they refer to it as a baby as early as when you find out you are pregnant. It's a nice little trick so when people consider abortion they refer to it as something else. It makes it easier to destroy a life when you refer to it as less than human.

 

We do this in the military so it was easier to kill our enemies.

I've never been in a doctor's office talking about an abortion, but do Doctors try to talk you out of having one?   I'd think they simply find out the reason to see if its a medical danger  or just an inconvenience and decide if they'll do it or not.  

Originally posted by djvapid

Regardless of whether or not she is actually innocent, she won't last long without protection for the rest of her life.  There's always one loon out there willing to do "God's Work" or whatever those fanatics use to justify themselves.  She'll never get a job again unless she capitalizes on this trial in some shameful way to make money off it.  Fry the b*tch.

Oh, she's going to sign a book deal with someone and she will certainly profit.  I just hope FL gets every dime back that we paid searching for a baby, when she knew all along exactly where it was.  EVERY dime should be paid back.

Originally posted by Josher

Originally posted by djvapid

Regardless of whether or not she is actually innocent, she won't last long without protection for the rest of her life.  There's always one loon out there willing to do "God's Work" or whatever those fanatics use to justify themselves.  She'll never get a job again unless she capitalizes on this trial in some shameful way to make money off it.  Fry the b*tch.

Oh, she's going to sign a book deal with someone and she will certainly profit.  I just hope FL gets every dime back that we paid searching for a baby, when she knew all along exactly where it was.  EVERY dime should be paid back.

I say let her make big gobs of money, then sue her in civil court. Bye bye money.

Originally posted by Josher

Originally posted by seabass2003

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Originally posted by C-B-M

Who said it belongs to the state?  It still belongs to her.  She just doesn't get to kill a baby.

By the way, it's amusing you're still using the "you're like a Mullah" argument after you blew it up by saying it's fine to ban mosques.  Apparently, you get to choose when people are like Mullahs.  LOLZ.

\

Do you really think trying to deceive people with semantic tricks is persuasive?

 

Definition of BABY

1

a (1) : an extremely young child; especially : infant (2) : an extremely young animal b : the youngest of a group

2

a : one that is like a baby (as in behavior) b : something that is one's special responsibility, achievement, or interest

3

slang a : girl, woman —often used in address b : boy, man —often used in address

4

: person, thing baby>

— ba·by·hood noun

— ba·by·ish adjective

 

 

fe·tus

noun \?f?-t?s\

 

: an unborn or unhatched vertebrate especially after attaining the basic structural plan of its kind; specifically : a developing human from usually two months after conception to birth

 

 

 

 

Doctors play this game too. Did you know that when you are planning, considering or talking about aborting they refer to the "creature inside the womb" as a fetus. Although, if you are planning on carrying it to full term they refer to it as a baby as early as when you find out you are pregnant. It's a nice little trick so when people consider abortion they refer to it as something else. It makes it easier to destroy a life when you refer to it as less than human.

 

We do this in the military so it was easier to kill our enemies.

I've never been in a doctor's office talking about an abortion, but do Doctors try to talk you out of having one?   I'd think they simply find out the reason to see if its a medical danger  or just an inconvenience and decide if they'll do it or not.  

Most doctors are actually pretty unbiased but when refrencing what you want to do with it, is when they either call it a baby or a fetus.

My first son was supposed to be born with a myriad of seriously debilitating problems so the doctors counselled us on what we could be looking forward to. Then informed us of the option to abort the fetus based on scientific evidence that the fetus would most likely not live past 7 - 10 days. So we could terminate the fetus early. We talked about it and seriously considered doing so but her faith/religion and my belief in God told us not to do it.

That's when they started talking about him as "how is the baby" and "let's check the baby" and stuff like that. Only after we told them we were going to keep it and rely on and put faith in God to hopefully change the outcome.

When we had him he was born completely normal and had zero complications. All the tests had shown he should have been born completely deficient. We asked the doctors how they could have been wrong and several doctors came in and showed us the tests and the stats and what babies with his results turned out like. None had lived past 3 weeks. Most of the doctors except one said it was quite simply a miracle and couldn't be explained. A couple of the doctors even said maybe it was all the prayers that we and the staff had said. He is now 8 years old and has no idea how close he was to not even existing.

Originally posted by Ihmotepp

Originally posted by Zindaihas

 I see, so a woman can engage in the most risky promiscuous sexual behavior possible, get pregnant as a result of HER actions and if she happens to get pregnant, discard her baby as if it were nothing more than a bowel movement?  Is that what you believe?

Wow, I sure hope you are not in any way associated with the health industry or are a health teacher.

 Yes.

When it's your body, you can decide to go to full term with the baby.

It's not your body, is it?

 It's not her body either.  She's simply housing (or nurturing) an independent body for a period of time.  Most pro-abortionists don't argue that the fetus is a part of the woman's body.  If anything, I've heard most of them compare it to a virus or a parasite that the woman is better off getting rid of.