| 150 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
6/28/11 11:11:25 AM#81
Originally posted by Dolmong Honestly I doubt if they promised their first borns there would be no game changing items in their MT the vocal minority would still complain and say CCP will eventually add it. :\
|
|
|
6/28/11 11:12:58 AM#82
Originally posted by Dolmong Why would they sign an agreement like that? What's their motivation? The vocal minority in these games that gets emotionally invested enough to post on the boards and to nerdrage about RMT or whatever ALSO turn around and spend TEN TIMES as much on RMT as the silent majority. A few canceled subs and some people flipping their shit online isn't enough for a company to cut themselves off at the knees and promise to never, ever, ever do something that the vocal minority claims to hate, especially when those same players tend to spend the most money anyway. That would be stupid. CCP might be doing some damage control now to get the PR back under control, but I highly doubt they're going to change course. Also, signing an agreement like that would shift control of the game from CCP to the vocal minority. Won't happen. Ever. I can't think of a single game development studio that would put that much power over their game in the hands of message board posters. |
|
|
6/28/11 11:14:50 AM#83
Originally posted by Gdemami
"Over reacting"?... Thats a rather subjective value judgement, that really only applies to you. It would seem that to several thousand people(at least), that this was the straw that broke the camels back. One of the most fundamental principles of the exchange involved in various markets sectors, is the on going examination of value. As long as the good/service being offered is considered to be of more value than that which is being exchanged(in this case money), the transactions continue. Once that changes, consumers take their time and money to ones competitors, or to an entirely different market sector. Voting with ones wallet is seldom "over reacting". As I've stated, I suspect that their Chinese partners have been telling them of the Sweet Profits to be had in cash shops in Asia. The problem is that even these days, the easterm markets and western markets are still rather different in that regard. It remains to be seen how this turns out, but for now, many in the west do not take well to the idea of cash shops. |
|
|
6/28/11 11:18:05 AM#84
Originally posted by Gdemami My point is you said what I said but worded it differently. lol Yes they are like them and over time they will realize that when you show your balls people tend to kick them. However for now they will continue to do so and I like that, it's refreshing to have a company be that transparent but only time will tell if they change (and they always do.) So yes it was a game of semantics. ^_^
Edit: The middle paragraph is in replay to your second point. I should have made that clearer.
|
|
|
Ceridith
Novice Member
Joined: 11/24/09
The more you hype an upcoming game in your mind, the more it will fail to meet your expectations. |
6/28/11 11:18:27 AM#85
Originally posted by Gdemami You're arguing that everything is fair game because someone will be upset no matter what you do. Going by that logic, then the line of acceptable MT exists nowhere, and CCP can freely start selling overpowered ships to players to one shot other players who have no way to defend against it... short of buying their own overpowered ships from the item store. People would be upset by it, but it doesn't matter, because people would be upset about something no matter what so might as well make money off it, right? Just because you might draw the line at combat affecting MT, others may draw it at vanity MT. You're no more right or wrong than they are. They have every right to be unhappy about vanity MT as you do about combat affecting MT being added to the game. Which is my point, the line of acceptability varies per individual, and each individual has every right to be upset over a change, no matter the change. Whether it's adding new content, to needed balance nerfs, everyone is entitled to their own opinion and if they should choose to stop playing because of vanity MT being added to the game, then they're no more 'ridiculous' or 'throwing a fit over nothing' than you would be if you chose to stop playing were combat impacting MT added to the game. |
|
6/28/11 11:21:21 AM#86
Originally posted by DarkPony
I agree with DarkPony above. Also, I am troubled with that internal memo that was leaked. Even it it was hypothetical, or for fun, it showed a sort of disregard for the players that I never imaged this developer could have. On a side note, a horse = a carrot :) Still the funniest image I've ever imagined LOL Noone isn't a word; It's "no one". On a side note, you can guess where the word "none" came from. |
|
|
6/28/11 11:22:15 AM#87
Sure, and I explicitly said that they should leave forever. The act of leaving as a demonstration of their opinion - the protest, is pointless as I thoroughly explained later.
|
|
|
6/28/11 11:22:40 AM#88
Originally posted by rashhero |
|
|
6/28/11 11:23:17 AM#89
Originally posted by Illyssia Actually we are dumb morons, because people DO buy the stuff ESPECALLY if its a mmo with PVP and cash shop/MT items can make them do 1 more damage than someone without the cash shop items. I'm not kidding pvptards as I like to call them will pay anything even for a 0.5% advantage over their enemy. Look at it this way, if there wasn't a market for it, they wouldn't put it in. To the 1 mil CCP lost in subs? I guarnteed they gonna make that up and them some in less than a month after their MT stuff is in full swing. So in reality CCP just wins in the end, plus with less people player=less bandwith costs which = more profit for CCP. Being a pessimist is a win-win pattern of thinking. If you're a pessimist (I'll admit that I am!) you're either: A. Proven right (if something bad happens) or B. Pleasantly surprised (if something good happens) Either way, you can't lose! Try it out sometime! |
|
|
qazyman
Gurista
Joined: 10/04/06
A Good Sandbox isn't about your characters abilities. It's about the players ability. |
6/28/11 11:28:35 AM#90
Originally posted by Siveria
Going head to head with Blizzard has rarely resulted in a Win for anyone but Blizzard. Just Sayin' |
|
6/28/11 11:29:42 AM#91
Originally posted by Gdemami Yep, that sounds about right most players have more than one account. But what I'm waiting for is for them to stick to their convictions. If they believe CCP aren't listening then they should delete their characters and never return to EVE. |
|
|
6/28/11 11:35:18 AM#92
Originally posted by qazyman
Not really. I seldom use the word "greed", because its been badly abused by various collectivists. But self interest(enlightened and other wise) is indeed one of the major motivators in most areas of human activity. Its as true in business, as it is in science, the medical fields, technology, music, writing ect. Fire was likely an accident, which was seized upon for its utility(self interest...). "Greed" tends to be (in the popular mind at least) considered to be "negative" and one dimensional. But in reality its more complex than what would fit into a sound bite or on a bumper sticker. The wheel made transport easier and less back breaking(self interest...). Peniclliin was a wonderful accident, and the result of observation into that accident. But its development was very much a matter of self interest. Irrigation made farming much more productive(self interest...). In other fields its the search for fame, pleasing ones audience, or being accepted by ones peers that is one of the major motivators(again self interest). Charges of "greed" are meant to be discussion/thought stoppers, much as "racism" and other such are. The trick is to see beyond the surface, and examine things in more than a single dimension. |
|
|
qazyman
Gurista
Joined: 10/04/06
A Good Sandbox isn't about your characters abilities. It's about the players ability. |
6/28/11 11:38:07 AM#93
Originally posted by Aki_Ross
All accounts are not created equal. Some generate 50K worth of activity, some 50 mil, and some even more. CCP probably doesn't want to do the math on the level of activity generated by these accounts.
|
|
6/28/11 11:40:10 AM#94
It's not *currently* affecting me. It's the direction CCP is going in: The lying about never having non-vanity items in the shop. You don't pay much attention to the real reason behind the protest or why people are upset. It's not the stupidly priced vanity content. That's just CCP stupidity rearing its stupid head. It's the lying (Again) from CCP, who is notorious for lying and then asking for trust. |
|
|
6/28/11 11:42:00 AM#95
Why delete? You a bit envious of the protester's moxie? Perhaps CCP gets new management in a year or two and cleans house, making people willing to give the game another shot. But you want them to delete? Spite much? |
|
|
6/28/11 11:44:39 AM#96
Originally posted by qazyman Most likely, they already have. Running those kinds of analytics would be easy for CCP, since they have all the numbers. |
|
|
qazyman
Gurista
Joined: 10/04/06
A Good Sandbox isn't about your characters abilities. It's about the players ability. |
6/28/11 11:47:31 AM#97
Originally posted by eric_w That will be the end of CCP and EVE. Might as well play STO or Battlestar Online at that point. LIke I said, going head to head in the PVE model is a graveyard with a long history. |
|
6/28/11 11:50:50 AM#98
Originally posted by eric_w66 People have been quitting these games in a nerdrage since UO, and having all sorts of grandiose dreams of management being fired over it. Oddly enough, it has never happened, at least IIRC. |
|
|
6/28/11 11:57:53 AM#99
Originally posted by Gdemami
Not really. They have demonstrated that they have principles, and in more than five months I've never had a client crash. The most I've seen is a few disconnections, and over the last few days major lag because of the massive influx of players from EVE. But they are working VERY hard to fix that. Thats LEAGUES away from the two groups you mention. |
|
|
6/28/11 12:02:24 PM#100
Originally posted by Malickie Most of the people who have cancelled a sub didn't do it because they hate the game, or CCP they did it because they are angry and frustrated but ultimately they did it because they care. The care about the game and the community and don't want to see it ruined but the only way they can see of getting through to CCP, and its investors is to hit the unsub button. Many will come back after a week or a month or even a few months, and some will come back if they can get some solid feedback from the devs or the CSM. Some people say its just people who cant get their own way having a tantrum but in reality its the only way many of us can see of telling CCP enough is enough and they need to make some changes. Because if they don't those kind of cancelled subs will happen and will permanently stay cancelled. CCP is already in a minor amount of difficulty financially and the way they have neglected the game has come back to haunt them as the growth of subscribers has dramatically dropped. At the moment they see MT and item shops as the solution to their problems when the reality is very different, all CCP needs to do is produce more expansions of the same quality as Apocrypha and the growth will come back. Currently playing: EVE online (Ruining low sec one hotdrop at a time) Gravity Rush, (Waiting for) Metro: Last Light, |
|