| 67 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
6/06/11 4:40:14 PM#21
How long do you think it will be before WoW has NPC tanks and healers for all the DPS that are tired of waiting over thirty minutes for a group using the Dungeon Finder tool? Vault-Tec analysts have concluded that the odds of worldwide nuclear armaggeddon this decade are 17,143,762... to 1. |
|
|
VengeSunsoar
Elite Member
Joined: 3/10/04
GRIND DOES NOT EXIST. IT IS ENTIRELY YOUR PERCEPTION. |
6/06/11 9:14:12 PM#22
Originally posted by Palebane You may laugh but I'd be seriously all over that. EQ has the mercs and I love them. Venge edit - maybe thats just me but I have very limited time and really am not the most patient person. I hate being delayed by people or things when IMO there reallyl is no good reason for the dely. No that is not an instant gratification syndrome. I work damn hard for what I have and I put in the time. But I don't want to have to wait for someone else to get their slow rear into gear before I can start doing the things I want to do, or need to do. You know, in ancient Egypt. One of the hieroglyphics on the walls of the pyramids actually says 'I am upset as my heir will ruin my kingdom' or something to that affect. This is 5000BC stuff and you know what? Nothing has changed. :P |
|
6/06/11 9:20:01 PM#23
Originally posted by VengeSunsoar I'm sure we all get tired of waiting on others at times but this kind of attitude is the driving force behind MMOG's becoming massively online single player games! Sad but true. |
|
|
6/06/11 9:23:55 PM#24
Well if they had NPC's that would fill in groups so you can do dungeons and raids that would make it a life saver however the raids could be interesting i mean would npc's know how to react in a raid and for that matter how would loot roles go with players vs npcs in a group/raid ? lol |
|
|
6/06/11 9:29:26 PM#25
Originally posted by Palebane Probably by the next expansion. It seems right now a DPS levels fastest if he can queue with a tank in the DF. |
|
|
6/06/11 9:33:11 PM#26
Originally posted by SlyGamer79 NPC loot ninjas??? LOL... GW2 "built from the ground up with microtransactions in mind" |
|
|
6/06/11 9:59:37 PM#27
Originally posted by VengeSunsoar Guild Wars has them too. |
|
|
Azrile
Novice Member
Joined: 7/29/08
Any new or returning player to WOW, send me a PM for some help getting started. |
6/06/11 10:17:10 PM#28
Originally posted by Neverdyne
Dungeon-finder is the product of developers figuring out what is ´fun´about the game. It is the dungeon encounters. Social - For people that say DF kills the social aspect of the game, what happened before DF? A lot of players would sit in town an spam public channels looking for a group. is this social? typing ´/2 ranged dps lfg for heroic´. and then repeating that same line 3 hours until you find a group? That is not social. DF is actually an improvement because now you can queue for a dungeona and LEAVE the city to do daily quests or some mining etc. In the past, you had to sit where the public chat was and constantly spam. But the really important part of the DF is that it is for casual and solo players. Guilds still do dungeons by themselves... the DF doesn´t affect their social behavior in any way. The DF allows solo players to see the ´fun´part of the game without constantly having to spam public chat channels. Fun - I hear all this stuff about ´lobby´. And again, it is backwards. Like I said, having a LFD tool for solo players frees them from having to sit in town. The other part is travel. People say it makes the world ´smaller´ if a DF tool ports you into a dungeon. Wow, so taking a 5 minute flight path while you afk to the bathroom is better? How about those fun dungeons that were far from the city where you were spamming /trade to find your group. So you spend an hour spamming trade, you finally found 5 people to group with you.. now comes the 20 minute ordeal of figuring out which people are going to actually take the afk flightpath across the continent to the dungeon.... and hope someone in the group doesn´t decide to quit the group becasue that means you have to port back to the city to spam to find a replacement. Fun is beating bosses. Fun is using your combat abiltiies to kill mobs. Fun is not spamming trade chat looking for a group, or taking 20 minute flightpaths while you eat lunch. There will NEVER be another game that backtracks on a DF tool. I promise you NO game will require you to spam a public channel to find a group and then travel with that group to a dungeon. The future is now, players don´t want to have to play 3 hours to complete a 30 minute dungeons. They also don´t want 3 hour dungeons at all. WOW definitely has issues, but the DF is not the problem. But again, it is hard to argue that point on a forum about MMORPGs. because all of us are so far away from being the áverage´player that our views are jadded. If you are an ex-wow player and want to come back. Scroll of Rez gives 7 free days, boost a character to 80 a realm and faction change. Send me PM for an invite. Only 1 per day available |
|
6/06/11 10:37:01 PM#29
Originally posted by gainesvilleg Hilarious Vault-Tec analysts have concluded that the odds of worldwide nuclear armaggeddon this decade are 17,143,762... to 1. |
|
|
6/08/11 3:46:29 PM#30
Originally posted by Neverdyne
And people complains about no down-time to chat? Waiting for the dungeon to pop is the perfect time to chat. And what is wrong with a lobby game? Diablo is a lobby game and it is 100x more fun than most games out there. And i dont complain about the world being too empty. Just the other day, a guy stole the titanium node i was trying to mine. I wont complain if he wasn't there. |
|
|
6/08/11 3:49:00 PM#31
Originally posted by SlyGamer79
NPCs are probably more competent than some of the tank/healers out there. If a tank/healer can't get through the first trash pull, i am quiting. |
|
|
Zekiah
Apprentice Member
Joined: 1/06/07
Hype (noun) |
6/08/11 3:53:59 PM#32
Dungeon Finder is just a symptom of the real underlying problem. The problem is that players whine for more and more and more until there's nothing left to ask for. Then one day, after everything has been handed to the gamers by the developers who want to please their customer base because of dollar signs, everyone turns around and wonders why the MMOs of today are broken and boring. The moral of the story? Be careful of what you whine for. "Censorship is never over for those who have experienced it. It is a brand on the imagination that affects the individual who has suffered it, forever." - Noam Chomsky |
|
6/08/11 3:55:22 PM#33
What happened before lfd. Before lfd you actually had to make friends. |
|
|
6/08/11 5:39:06 PM#34
Dungeon Finder:
|
|
|
6/08/11 10:23:32 PM#35
If I put a loaded gun on the table and you pick it up and start shooting people, is the loaded gun the problem or you? Dungeon Finder is not the problem. Anyone who thinks so is ignorant.
|
|
|
6/08/11 11:13:38 PM#36
Dungeon finder is a good way of allowing players to complete group content quickly, but it has sort of divorced a lot of the social aspect of MMOs. It can be used as a diagnostic tool to understand what's going on though. Part of the problem is the reward system encouraging dungeon finder behaviors that are not the most ideal. If should not have to feel like a chore to have to pug your random, so it's not so much the dungeon finder that's the problem , but rather the concepts of dungeons themselves and both the reason for running them and the people that do. Dungeon Finder really isn't the problem, or a symptom, but rather a megaphone. Any problems become amplified by it, and any benefits become amplified as well. It's not a bad thing, but it certainly spotlights many bad things. Currently Watching: TSW. << Very Eager for a Beta invite. Have experience with Beta Testing. |
|
|
6/09/11 3:55:16 AM#37
It's just a symptom of Modern MMO's. Content is designed to be soloed except for the dungeons which need a group. People spend their entire time soloing so don't need or talk to other people. When they need to enter a dungeon they have no friends to ask for help, they lack the social ability to ask over chat channels for help, plus they've been playing solo the entire time so really don't want to be bothered with grouping anyway. And so to help these no-friend skill-less idiots out, they put in a Dungeon Finder to allow the soloers to effectively summon a bunch of people to help them solo through a dungeon. To be honest, it's really pathetic the way MMO's have gone since their glory days. |
|
|
6/09/11 4:03:50 AM#38
Originally posted by UsualSuspect I wouldn't call it a symptom but more of a 'control/power' type design. If your game forces grouping before the level-cap, you are effectively limiting the growth of your playerbase as eventually the existing playerbase levels beyond the grouping content. This leaves any new players at the mercy of existing player's 'goodwill'. You can kinda of mitigate via mentoring/reward system but at the end of the day, the game developer has now lost control of the growth of the playerbase. This is probably not acceptable for a lot of companies (esp publicly listed ones). If your game has grouping as optional than the vast majority of the playerbase will not group and solo it through. Wonder why there seems to be more haters on the internet? Read this by an actual marketing guy to find out why. |
|
|
6/09/11 5:04:51 AM#39
Dungeon finder is a good solution for all the wrong reasons.
The real problem underlying games like WoW is that they're poorly designed. Players want to experience game content and have fun with their friends, but the leveling mechanic makes this difficult. People level at different rates, and the power differential alienates individuals that may have started playing together, as one can no longer keep up with the other. Players power through to the level cap, because of a prevailing misconception that the game starts at the end, and so the leveling curve is getting increasingly shorter. To facilitate this, and to help new players who can't find other players to experience low-level content, the Dungeon Finder was created. However, it's been co-opted by the same mentality that the game doesn't start until the end, and so again, you get players running dungeon after dungeon just to get to max level, max badges etc. It's all part of the same treadmill that PVE games create: you run dungeons to power-level, then you run more dungeons to get better gear, so you can run more dungeons to get even better gear ad infinitum.
It's the commercialisation of virtual space. MMOs started off as virtual worlds where people could escape and live out a fantasy. As they've evolved, they've become more and more commercial, and more and more sinister. What's the difference between a perpetually growing economy in which people have to keep spending on items that break, to fuel a chain of consumption, and a system in which the only goal is to get gear, so you can kill higher-level monsters, to get better gear? I'll tell you what they both have in common: they generate huge amounts of money at the cost of the individual, and they're both unsustainable in the long run. In terms of an economy, resources will eventually run out. In terms of a game, the demands on the developer, and the extraordinary cost and complexity of churning out expansion after expansion, ultimately undermine the whole point of the exercise. Even now, the WoW playerbase is consuming content so fast that Blizzard has stated they will decrease the time between expansions, but there's a finite limit to the speed at which a quality product can be produced.
The solution to all of this is to remove levels altogether. There are other game models out there that are far more robust in the long run. Hell, UO is still going after all this time, and it looks like something I drew in 2nd grade. Even MUDs are still going strong, and they have no graphics to speak of. The real problem is that creating games like this is risky, and the outlay on a modern triple A title is massive, with no guarantee of return. There's a solution to that as well; use older, proven technology, tone down graphics, stylise art direction, and rely on fun, simple mechanics. Create player freedom, and give them control over they way they move in the gamespace. There's a lot to be said for things like gliding in Aion, or being able to run up walls and bounce off objects. Make gear disposable, and have a variety of pastimes that are part of the internal architecture; e.g. chocobo racing, poker, gambling, fishing, flying/gliding, etc. Finally, make a game that you think will be fun to play, not a game that you think will sell well. |
|
|
6/09/11 6:52:15 AM#40
Originally posted by Brakedancer Disagree. Giving players the choice of how they wish to play is a good thing rather than forcing them to a specific playstyle. Rather than forcing the issue, offer incentives.
As a person who does shares if a company I have invested money into does the last line (and they are NOT Google/Apple) I'd be fairly upset as an investor/shareholder. Wonder why there seems to be more haters on the internet? Read this by an actual marketing guy to find out why. |
|