| 31 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
robert4818
Spotlight Poster
Joined: 4/14/03
"Everyone is born with just a spark of madness. You mustn't lose it." --Robin Williams |
To alot of people, the idea of a "Sandbox" game is one of 100% total freedom. Nothing can hamper your choices and you are free to make any character, and do anything. The majority of the content in the game is player made. They point to games like EVE, UO, and (shudder) Darkfall. The analogy to the sandbox is that in the sandbox, you get a pile of sand, and you can do with it what you want. The other end of the spectrum is the Themepark game. In this game, the world is practically linear. There may be a choice here or there but these paths eventually put you back in the exact same spot. The quests are all in a line, they lead from one to the other ad nausium. In the end Every chracter of the same class is practically identical. The analogy is to something like Disney world, where you have the exact experience that the company wants you to have. You go on their rides, and you have their definition of fun. I'm more of a middle guy. I don't want the sandbox, I don't want to go to Disney world. I want to go play at the city park. Its big, open. I have just as much room to play with my imagination. PLUS its got swing-sets, slides, monkey bars, and all sorts of things I can play on. Maybe I'm going over a lava pit on the monkey bars, or maybe I'm just on monkey bars....who knows. In a City-Park game, you get the best of both worlds. You may have classes, but a class is more of an archtype, you would have dozens of skills that you choose from, all of them related to the archtype you chose. Down the road, you may have specialist classes you can go into that are more limited, but stronger in their area of expertise, of course you might just stay the generic route. There are quests and quests lines that are completely optional. Perhaps you stumble upon a merchant being robbed by brigands. You save him, only to end up in a quest line that deals with wiping out this brigand group all together. However Quests would be there for the finding, and not a mandatory part of the game. There are in-game systems that push and pull your character (NPC Nation Politics), but with the world being a bit more dynamic, no two characters would have the same story. In a city-park game, you get alot of the systems that make theme-park games fun, but the are throttled back to be a part of the world, as opposed to the focus. They become a part of the experience, one that you can choose to take or not. These games would take a bit more work to make, as it would be a hybrid. You would have much more freedom, and the ability to feel apart of the world, much more than in a theme-park, but you would have a few more limitations, and guided content than you would in a sandbox game.
So long, and thanks for all the fish! |
|
10/20/09 6:39:35 PM#2
I like games which have 20% themepark and 80% sandbox. EQ was like that, WoW is a bit too much themepark and Aion is total themepark suckness. I like a tiny bit of themepark, but it should be mostly sandbox. Darkfall was just a tad too much sandbox, EQ was just right. |
|
|
Dewm
Spotlight Poster
Joined: 5/29/09
Players come for the game, but they stay for the people- Most Devs have forgotten this. |
10/20/09 6:54:35 PM#3
We have lots of parks where I live. |
|
adderVXI
Apprentice Member
Joined: 1/08/05
You cannot defeat our quad laser! The bullet is enormous! |
10/20/09 7:07:36 PM#4
Vanguard!! it is the mix you seek! |
|
10/20/09 7:50:29 PM#5
Vanguard! Vanguard! Try it it is what you might be looking for. There is a 14 day free trial on SOE's site. |
|
|
10/20/09 7:55:37 PM#6
Add in my vote for Vanguard. as well. :) |
|
|
adderVXI
Apprentice Member
Joined: 1/08/05
You cannot defeat our quad laser! The bullet is enormous! |
10/20/09 8:07:16 PM#7
If you have the comp, i would go for it. Its really the best pve mmo out. So much to do, and sandbox-ish. Flight, diplomacy, excellent crafting. Its not without a few bugs but what mmo isnt? |
|
Mazin
Novice Member
Joined: 5/10/09
It's time to kick ass and chew bubblegum, and I'm all outta gum. |
10/20/09 8:11:14 PM#8
I think the closest a game has come to what you want is SWG during its brief CU period. CU kept most of the sandbox of precu and added themepark stuff with the new planets Kash and Musty (although Musty was in the CU period for like a week or two) |
|
10/21/09 9:33:14 AM#9
I think Shadowbane (RIP) had it right, and I'm not even a PVP player most of the time. You can have goals within a sandbox setting, and therein lies the feeling of freedom that truly makes a gameworld live and breathe. In Shadowbane, I might want to farm for gold, find a certain NPC trainer, or shop for gear in the city or town, all the time hoping to avoid ambush by other players or getting my gold lifted by a Thief character. Every single time I logged into that game was exciting. Now Shadowbane had other issues, mostly technical, but the design was the perfect sandbox. Following a chosen goal is much more fun than following a quest script. |
|
|
10/21/09 9:42:38 AM#10
Most of you don't know what you want, which is why we have what we have. Hat's off to the OP for being able to clearly articulate his view of a great MMO. |
|
|
10/21/09 9:44:36 AM#11
Vanguard is the way to go for that type of game, its exactly that! I have played since CB1 and although launch was a disaster it has much improved! It to me is currently the best mmo on the market right now...unfortunately alot of people are jaded and put off by it due to the poor launch and opening days and months it had. I play on the pvp server which is FFA anything goes. There are tons of politics involved, you can do crafting, ship sailing, pvp, questing, diplo, pvp, gathering, the quests dont really lead you to the next area as the world is so huge you can pretty much go to any continent and work on whatever you like. The dungeons are massive and well designed! It does have its bugs and issues but alot of them are all cleared up. So I would definately recommend giving it a try! |
|
|
10/21/09 10:04:04 AM#12
OP-
You need to try Fallen Earth. The game is exactly what you're talking about....a Hybrid Sandbox/Themepark MMO and people are loving it. You have all the Freedom of a Sandbox (if you like to Explore, this is the game for you) with some of the best elements of a Themepark mmo built in...creating a VAST, seamless world in a sort of Western-Gunslinging-Post-Apoc Environment that is a blast! Out of the 3 MMO's recently released (Champions Online, Aion, Fallen Earth) , Fallen Earth was by Far, the underdog but it's shaping up to be one of the best MMO's in many years.
Try it! |
|
|
Kyleran
Elite Member
Joined: 9/13/06
A simple truth-"What people want and what is good for an mmo is not always the same thing"-mrw0lf |
10/21/09 10:11:07 AM#13
For all purposes, the OP described EVE. (which is a bit light on the quest content I'll grant you)
"Just because you aren't paying doesn't mean it's not PTW." - Amaranthar |
|
robert4818
Spotlight Poster
Joined: 4/14/03
"Everyone is born with just a spark of madness. You mustn't lose it." --Robin Williams |
Originally posted by Kyleran I've got my own issues with Eve, that I won't go into here. To me, the game is just not fun. I'll leave it at that. So long, and thanks for all the fish! |
|
10/21/09 10:18:34 AM#15
Originally posted by Shadowist
You mean the same Fallen Earth that people loved so much that on IGN critics gave it a 6 and users gave it a 6.6?? Or perhaps the one on N4G where they gave it 6/10? |
|
|
10/21/09 10:19:17 AM#16
Originally posted by robert4818 I've got my own issues with Eve, that I won't go into here. To me, the game is just not fun. I'll leave it at that.
Agreed |
|
|
10/21/09 10:25:01 AM#17
Originally posted by mmaize
Yeah...the one that's currently ranked #1 on mmorpg.com.
Yep, that's the one. |
|
|
10/21/09 10:52:20 AM#18
Originally posted by mmaize
Players want "things to do", but you can have that without a quest trail or a storyline script to follow. If there are clear goals (i.e., levelling, acquiring specific items for loot or crafting, raising faction, seeking out trainers or special skills, even trekking across a continent), then those are enough for players to fill their plates with. No MMO need be on rails, is what I'm saying. But that many are indicates more about developers than gamers. Many dev's underestimate the players' abilities to address challenges and therefore spoon-feed them content. |
|
|
10/21/09 11:02:25 AM#19
Originally posted by pencilrick I have to agree with you, Shadowbane was an excellent Sandbox game, I loved the fact that the game was based off the player community. Guilds constantly battling eachother for domination, large and small guilds rising up, only to be later destroyed. And the PVP was soo much fun, you really had to be careful when you encountered a person on your journeys. I also liked the fact there were tons of different stats and skill combinations, there was no ultimate right way to make a character, there were soo many variations. I wish they would make another Shadowbane, or a game very similar to it. I know that there is a group of people trying to emulate it and basically bring it back, but I think its due for a serious upgrade in graphics, some new content...basically a whole new makeover, but with the key concepts that made it soo great. |
|
|
10/21/09 11:51:41 AM#20
Originally posted by mmaize
Heh show how little those reviews are worth, most reviews these days give their ratings after how much add money the game is worth to the review site anyway. FE is the ugly duckling of 2009 MMOs, a true gem and by far the best MMO released in years. "You are the hero our legends have foretold will save our tribe, therefore please go kill 10 pigs." |
|