Network Sites: FPSguru.com RTSguru.com UnboundGamer.com
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Games:611  Guilds:3,081
Members:1,595,463  Online:0
Guests:0  Posts:4,848,560
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
D-F
D&D Online DC Universe DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Solstice Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkfall Darkwind: War on Wheels Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide Dead Earth Dead Frontier Deco Online Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Desert Operations Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Runners Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthrise Eden Eternal Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elf Online Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire & State Empire Craft EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Evony Exarch Exorace Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forsaken World Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
G-L
GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Grand Chase Europe Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall Habbo Hotel Haven & Hearth Hedone Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero 108: Online Hero Online Hero's Journey HeroSmash Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Holic Online Hostile Space Huxley Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Imperator Imperian Infinity Infinity Iris Online Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kicks Online King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Lands of Hope: Phoenix Edition LastChaos League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia Online
T-Z
TERA TS Online Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris Terra World Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Elder Scrolls Online The Legend of Ares The Matrix Online The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems There Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Toontown Online Top Speed Torchlight Transformers Universe Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War U.B. Funkeys UFO Online Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Valkyrie Sky Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos Voyage Century W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WYD Global Wakfu War Rock War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Wargame1942 Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warrior Epic WebLords Wild West Online WildStar WindSlayer 2 Wish Wizard 101 Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World War II Online World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Tanks World of Warcraft World of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xiah Xsyon YS Online ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online eRepublik

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

EVE Online

EVE Online 

Jita (General)  » It's tough to play a good guy.

6 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 » Search
114 posts found
  User Deleted
10/21/09 11:01:53 PM#81
Originally posted by metalhead980
Originally posted by Enkindu

 

 

I still don't understand how wraith's missioning is having a negative impact on your gamining experience.

 

Since Im not a miner I can't really bitch about mission runners saturating the market with reprocessed goods but im sure you can read a ton of hate threads on Official forums. Other than having billions of isk with no effort due to a inbalance CCP seems to be taking forever to fix, Nothing.

Doesn't mean I can't bitch about a inbalance on these forums though lol. I mean honestly we've all had rebalancing fuck with us, what makes mission runners so special? look at the Sov revamp coming and how that will change everything we know about 0.0 yet reducing isk per hour of an activity that yields no risk in a high risk game seems wrong?

 


 

If you are going to complain about a balance issue, don't you think there should actually be an issue to complain about?

I always hear hardcore PvPers railing against "carebears" like they are the spawn of satan, and yet (once again) even when asked directly you were unable to to describe a SINGLE way that empire carebears have any effect on your game.

I am forced to conclude that all of the PvPer "hate" toward carebears amounts to nothing more than a temper tantrum with no logical basis.  You are simply angry because there are others playing the game (paying customers, I might add) that aren't doing it the way you think they should.  I have long suspected this was true, thank you for helping me prove it. 

  metalhead980

Apprentice Member

Joined: 6/11/08
Posts: 2699

 
10/21/09 11:11:29 PM#82
Originally posted by Enkindu
Originally posted by metalhead980
Originally posted by Enkindu

 

 

I still don't understand how wraith's missioning is having a negative impact on your gamining experience.

 

Since Im not a miner I can't really bitch about mission runners saturating the market with reprocessed goods but im sure you can read a ton of hate threads on Official forums. Other than having billions of isk with no effort due to a inbalance CCP seems to be taking forever to fix, Nothing.

Doesn't mean I can't bitch about a inbalance on these forums though lol. I mean honestly we've all had rebalancing fuck with us, what makes mission runners so special? look at the Sov revamp coming and how that will change everything we know about 0.0 yet reducing isk per hour of an activity that yields no risk in a high risk game seems wrong?

 


 

If you are going to complain about a balance issue, don't you think there should actually be an issue to complain about?

I always hear hardcore PvPers railing against "carebears" like they are the spawn of satan, and yet (once again) even when asked directly you were unable to to describe a SINGLE way that empire carebears have any effect on your game.

I am forced to conclude that all of the PvPer "hate" toward carebears amounts to nothing more than a temper tantrum with no logical basis.  You are simply angry because there are others playing the game (paying customers, I might add) that aren't doing it the way you think they should.  I have long suspected this was true, thank you for helping me prove it. 

 

LOL don't give me that much credit dude, im only one player. maybe we can get some people here to argue with ya.

I know a few miners and ship builders that could give you full blown essays on how carebear mission runners fuck shit up lol.

Your right in saying most pvpers are just pissed that carebears make all that isk and are basically untouchable. As for me I don't care about that im more on the side of CCP.

If they say mission runners make to much with no risk and need to gtfo of empire im all for it. its simple as that.

If I see a balance issue it bugs me for no other reason than me knowing its not right, doesn't have to effect me at all. If your doing something and CCP thinks its fucked up and needs changing im down with them.

CCP is right and if you disagree your wrong and gtfo.

PLaying: EvE, Ryzom

Waiting For: Earthrise, Perpetuum

  User Deleted
10/21/09 11:25:12 PM#83
Originally posted by metalhead980

 

LOL don't give me that much credit dude, im only one player. maybe we can get some people here to argue with ya.

I know a few miners and ship builders that could give you full blown essays on how carebear mission runners fuck shit up lol.

Your right in saying most pvpers are just pissed that carebears make all that isk and are basically untouchable. As for me I don't care about that im more on the side of CCP.

If they say mission runners make to much with no risk and need to gtfo of empire im all for it. its simple as that.

If I see a balance issue it bugs me for no other reason than me knowing its not right, doesn't have to effect me at all. If your doing something and CCP thinks its fucked up and needs changing im down with them.

CCP is right and if you disagree your wrong and gtfo.


 

I build all my own ships and I frequently buy low end minerals is mission systems because they are cheap there, and if someone is trying to make a living mining trit and pye in empire then I pity them FAR more than I pity any mission runner.

I'm sorry, but I don't see logic in any of your arguments.   Unless someone can show me LOGICAL reasons as opposed EMOTIONAL reasons that hisec mission runners are somehow bad for the game,  I won't be changing my mind.  Until then I think the answer to the question is pretty clear.

  metalhead980

Apprentice Member

Joined: 6/11/08
Posts: 2699

 
10/21/09 11:40:58 PM#84
Originally posted by Enkindu
Originally posted by metalhead980

 

LOL don't give me that much credit dude, im only one player. maybe we can get some people here to argue with ya.

I know a few miners and ship builders that could give you full blown essays on how carebear mission runners fuck shit up lol.

Your right in saying most pvpers are just pissed that carebears make all that isk and are basically untouchable. As for me I don't care about that im more on the side of CCP.

If they say mission runners make to much with no risk and need to gtfo of empire im all for it. its simple as that.

If I see a balance issue it bugs me for no other reason than me knowing its not right, doesn't have to effect me at all. If your doing something and CCP thinks its fucked up and needs changing im down with them.

CCP is right and if you disagree your wrong and gtfo.


 

I build all my own ships and I frequently buy low end minerals is mission systems because they are cheap there, and if someone is trying to make a living mining trit and pye in empire then I pity them FAR more than I pity any mission runner.

I'm sorry, but I don't see logic in any of your arguments.   Unless someone can show me LOGICAL reasons as opposed EMOTIONAL reasons that hisec mission runners are somehow bad for the game,  I won't be changing my mind.  Until then I think the answer to the question is pretty clear.

Pity them all you want its a valid complaint.

As for emotional and logical reasons to not like mission running I already gave you my answer and I feel its too the point.

BECAUSE CCP SAID SO!

They make the game, they deliver this awesome universe to us, what they say goes.

Ask CCP whats wrong with mission running then post it. Ill agree to that.

 

 

 

 

PLaying: EvE, Ryzom

Waiting For: Earthrise, Perpetuum

  User Deleted
10/21/09 11:47:31 PM#85
Originally posted by metalhead980

Pity them all you want its a valid complaint.

As for emotional and logical reasons to not like mission running I already gave you my answer and I feel its too the point.

BECAUSE CCP SAID SO!

They make the game, they deliver this awesome universe to us, what they say goes.

Ask CCP whats wrong with mission running then post it. Ill agree to that.


 

"Because I said so" is a very bad business model.  CCP isn't that stupid.

They have not kept the game alive this long by making foolish, arbitrary decisions, and they won't start now.  They will not offend a large segment of the playerbase without a good reason.  Until I hear of a good reason I am of the opinion that nothing is going to change.

  Wraithone

Advanced Member

Joined: 7/09/04
Posts: 2660

If you can't kill it, don't make it mad.

10/22/09 1:08:28 AM#86
Originally posted by Enkindu
Originally posted by Wraithone

Nothing is preventing the low/no sec farmers from moving to high sec... Except the fact that they make a LOT more in their current locations, than they would be able to in high sec... CCP thoughtfully(with malice aforethought no doubt ^^) made most of the really valuable materials available only in gank space. Low/nosec and WS.  Trit these days being the exception, and another unintended consequence of some of their changes.  Just about everything I loot ends up melted down(98% plus) and either stockpiled, or sold. Are you seriously making the OLD argument about "Will someone think of the low/no sec FARMERS!"??

What is this "risk free" mantra some of you endlessly recite?  Do you really believe that unless everyone faces the *same* "risk", that the game is inherently "unbalanced"?  Nothing is preventing anyone from walking the Path of the CareBear, if they so wish.  But thats not good enough. They insist that everyone play the game their way.  This argument has gone on endlessly for years now. CCP knows which side of the bread their butter is on. While it no doubt annoys them(most of them being PvP types), they have to face the economic reality. There are a lot more CareBears than PvP types. Thats why they keep adding PvE content.

 


 

There are no lowsec/ 0.0 "farmers."  You can't farm in those areas because the players that have bothered to develop their skills in eve beyond afk high sec missioning will come vaporize your ass.

There is no malice on the part of CCP putting the valuable assets in 0.0.  If you are going to be a chickenshit and hide in high sec you don't DESERVE access to the good stuff.

Metal is correct when he says that hisec carebears contribute NOTHING to the game.  The only reason I am defending your right to exist in new eden is because you don't do anything to HARM the game either.  Essentially if you run missions in high sec 100% of your eve life you are no more important to the events in the game than the NPCs.

I also disagree that pure carebears represent any majority in the game.  Most people go through a carebear "phase" but evolve to spend some or all of their time in lowsec/ 0.0.  Don't misunderstand me: I agree with metal that you are missing out on EVERYTHING that makes eve worth playing.  If I limited myself to high sec missions I would have quit out of RAGING BOREDOM 4 years ago.  While I defend your right to play the way you wish, I personally think you are missing the WHOLE POINT of the game.  If I thought that pointless hisec carebears had any negative effect on the game I'd be at the front of the line screaming to kick their asses out of the game.  In my opinion, however, players like yourself have no effect whatsoever on anything besides your wallet balance, and as such I defend your right to keep playing.

EDIT- also, the ONE THING that makes eve different from other games in the hardcore PvP both in combat and in the market.  THAT is where the staying power of eve comes from.  If everyone did nothing more than hisec PvE this game would have folded years ago.  As things stand I am glad that players like yourself support eve by paying your bill each month.

 

It is well that you edited that

We CareBear scum thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Humor aside for the moment, as I've stated I have no interest in MMO PvP. I started out in UO. Over the time since then I've seen endless examples of how not to do a MMO PvP system. I'm to the point now that I really have no interest what so ever in MMO PvP. I do how ever still enjoy FPS PvP from time to time.  I enjoy Eve because of the theme, the graphics, the mission game play aspect and the conversation in the help channel.  While that may be entirely alien to many of you, you might be surprised at how many people are like that <shrug>

  Wraithone

Advanced Member

Joined: 7/09/04
Posts: 2660

If you can't kill it, don't make it mad.

10/22/09 1:20:54 AM#87
Originally posted by metalhead980
Originally posted by Enkindu
Originally posted by metalhead980

 

LOL don't give me that much credit dude, im only one player. maybe we can get some people here to argue with ya.

I know a few miners and ship builders that could give you full blown essays on how carebear mission runners fuck shit up lol.

Your right in saying most pvpers are just pissed that carebears make all that isk and are basically untouchable. As for me I don't care about that im more on the side of CCP.

If they say mission runners make to much with no risk and need to gtfo of empire im all for it. its simple as that.

If I see a balance issue it bugs me for no other reason than me knowing its not right, doesn't have to effect me at all. If your doing something and CCP thinks its fucked up and needs changing im down with them.

CCP is right and if you disagree your wrong and gtfo.


 

I build all my own ships and I frequently buy low end minerals is mission systems because they are cheap there, and if someone is trying to make a living mining trit and pye in empire then I pity them FAR more than I pity any mission runner.

I'm sorry, but I don't see logic in any of your arguments.   Unless someone can show me LOGICAL reasons as opposed EMOTIONAL reasons that hisec mission runners are somehow bad for the game,  I won't be changing my mind.  Until then I think the answer to the question is pretty clear.

Pity them all you want its a valid complaint.

As for emotional and logical reasons to not like mission running I already gave you my answer and I feel its too the point.

BECAUSE CCP SAID SO!

They make the game, they deliver this awesome universe to us, what they say goes.

Ask CCP whats wrong with mission running then post it. Ill agree to that.

 

 

 

 

 

Thats the FUNNY part of all of this. CCP does dislike mission runners. They want everyone to be doing PvP. They can't understand mission runners, since they are mostly hard core PvP types themselves. But over the years, they have come to realize that the scum that are the reviled CareBears make up a good portion of their PAYING CUSTOMERS.  That being the reality(like it or not) their personal self interest has won out. Thus we see the introduction of more PvE content.  As I'm fond of saying, the howls of outraged Gankers is such SWEET music to my fuzzy CareBear ears... Thats also why they are rather unlikely to do much that would alienate a good sized section of their player base.  Its been estimated(by CCP itself) that around half of the player base seldom, if ever leaves high sec.  That being the case, the dreams of the PvP types of having all of those nice CareBears for target practice are not likely to come to pass, any time soon.

  metalhead980

Apprentice Member

Joined: 6/11/08
Posts: 2699

 
10/22/09 6:52:05 AM#88
Originally posted by Wraithone
Originally posted by metalhead980
Originally posted by Enkindu
Originally posted by metalhead980

 

LOL don't give me that much credit dude, im only one player. maybe we can get some people here to argue with ya.

I know a few miners and ship builders that could give you full blown essays on how carebear mission runners fuck shit up lol.

Your right in saying most pvpers are just pissed that carebears make all that isk and are basically untouchable. As for me I don't care about that im more on the side of CCP.

If they say mission runners make to much with no risk and need to gtfo of empire im all for it. its simple as that.

If I see a balance issue it bugs me for no other reason than me knowing its not right, doesn't have to effect me at all. If your doing something and CCP thinks its fucked up and needs changing im down with them.

CCP is right and if you disagree your wrong and gtfo.


 

I build all my own ships and I frequently buy low end minerals is mission systems because they are cheap there, and if someone is trying to make a living mining trit and pye in empire then I pity them FAR more than I pity any mission runner.

I'm sorry, but I don't see logic in any of your arguments.   Unless someone can show me LOGICAL reasons as opposed EMOTIONAL reasons that hisec mission runners are somehow bad for the game,  I won't be changing my mind.  Until then I think the answer to the question is pretty clear.

Pity them all you want its a valid complaint.

As for emotional and logical reasons to not like mission running I already gave you my answer and I feel its too the point.

BECAUSE CCP SAID SO!

They make the game, they deliver this awesome universe to us, what they say goes.

Ask CCP whats wrong with mission running then post it. Ill agree to that.

 

 

 

 

 

Thats the FUNNY part of all of this. CCP does dislike mission runners. They want everyone to be doing PvP. They can't understand mission runners, since they are mostly hard core PvP types themselves. But over the years, they have come to realize that the scum that are the reviled CareBears make up a good portion of their PAYING CUSTOMERS.  That being the reality(like it or not) their personal self interest has won out. Thus we see the introduction of more PvE content.  As I'm fond of saying, the howls of outraged Gankers is such SWEET music to my fuzzy CareBear ears... Thats also why they are rather unlikely to do much that would alienate a good sized section of their player base.  Its been estimated(by CCP itself) that around half of the player base seldom, if ever leaves high sec.  That being the case, the dreams of the PvP types of having all of those nice CareBears for target practice are not likely to come to pass, any time soon.

 

Yes the introduction of pve content you wont use.

Thats the problem you ONLY want to run those level IV missions, You hold CCP back when it comes to pve content. Speedboat missions will fail, any fleet content will fail.

God forbid CCP creates challenging content you wont run it if there is even a possiblity that you could die.

How is CCP supposed to improve on one of its worse features (missions) if you guys wont run anything?

Sad thing is most players are like you in empire this is why I say its a waste to cater to you guys.

 

Edit: Toned post down so mods wouldnt.

PLaying: EvE, Ryzom

Waiting For: Earthrise, Perpetuum

  Wraithone

Advanced Member

Joined: 7/09/04
Posts: 2660

If you can't kill it, don't make it mad.

10/22/09 7:30:31 AM#89
Originally posted by metalhead980
Originally posted by Wraithone
Originally posted by metalhead980
Originally posted by Enkindu
Originally posted by metalhead980

 

LOL don't give me that much credit dude, im only one player. maybe we can get some people here to argue with ya.

I know a few miners and ship builders that could give you full blown essays on how carebear mission runners fuck shit up lol.

Your right in saying most pvpers are just pissed that carebears make all that isk and are basically untouchable. As for me I don't care about that im more on the side of CCP.

If they say mission runners make to much with no risk and need to gtfo of empire im all for it. its simple as that.

If I see a balance issue it bugs me for no other reason than me knowing its not right, doesn't have to effect me at all. If your doing something and CCP thinks its fucked up and needs changing im down with them.

CCP is right and if you disagree your wrong and gtfo.


 

I build all my own ships and I frequently buy low end minerals is mission systems because they are cheap there, and if someone is trying to make a living mining trit and pye in empire then I pity them FAR more than I pity any mission runner.

I'm sorry, but I don't see logic in any of your arguments.   Unless someone can show me LOGICAL reasons as opposed EMOTIONAL reasons that hisec mission runners are somehow bad for the game,  I won't be changing my mind.  Until then I think the answer to the question is pretty clear.

Pity them all you want its a valid complaint.

As for emotional and logical reasons to not like mission running I already gave you my answer and I feel its too the point.

BECAUSE CCP SAID SO!

They make the game, they deliver this awesome universe to us, what they say goes.

Ask CCP whats wrong with mission running then post it. Ill agree to that.

 

 

 

 

 

Thats the FUNNY part of all of this. CCP does dislike mission runners. They want everyone to be doing PvP. They can't understand mission runners, since they are mostly hard core PvP types themselves. But over the years, they have come to realize that the scum that are the reviled CareBears make up a good portion of their PAYING CUSTOMERS.  That being the reality(like it or not) their personal self interest has won out. Thus we see the introduction of more PvE content.  As I'm fond of saying, the howls of outraged Gankers is such SWEET music to my fuzzy CareBear ears... Thats also why they are rather unlikely to do much that would alienate a good sized section of their player base.  Its been estimated(by CCP itself) that around half of the player base seldom, if ever leaves high sec.  That being the case, the dreams of the PvP types of having all of those nice CareBears for target practice are not likely to come to pass, any time soon.

 

Yes the introduction of pve content your to chicken shit to use?

Thats the problem with pvers like you. you ONLY want to run those level IV missions, players like you hold CCP back when it comes to pve content. Speedboat missions will fail, any fleet content will fail.

God forbid CCP creates challenging content you wont run it if there is even a possiblity that you could die.

How is CCP supposed to improve on one of its worse features (missions) if you guys wont run anything?

Sad thing is most players are like you in empire this is why I say its a waste to cater to you guys.

 

Metal, I'm not moved by your name calling. Either its an attempt to provoke an emotional response, or its a sign of someone who doesn't think things through.  Given your past posts, I'll go with the former.  You have no standing with me to justify an emotional response. There for none will be provided. 

I will address some of the issues you raise though.  If you speak of WS in your first sentence, then yes I and many others will not be using it. You already know why. It takes us into gank space.  While attacking mission runners(fitted with rat specific resists) may be entertaining for the ganker set, I'd hardly term it a challenge. But it is a risk to be factored in.

As for "holding CCP back" only CCP makes the determination of what they will focus on. That determination no doubt takes into account what will appeal to the CareBear demographic. But given CCP's PvP focus, I seriously doubt thats the only factor.  They also have more than sufficient resources to have multiple teams in operation at one time.  If they choose to use some of those resources for PvE, thats their determination, not yours nor mine.

As for the other, its a cost/benefit analysis in terms of missions. If I stand to gain from the mission(in terms of what is to be risked), I'll tend to run it. Its not just gankers that are risks. There are internet connection "issues" client crashes, server "issues" and power outages to factor in. In a game with a harsh death penalty such as Eve, those have to be taken in to account on the margin.

As for why CCP doesn't just dump PvE, we both know that answer as well. Self interest and attention to their bottom line.  As much as the PvP crowd likes to rant and rave about mission runners, the fact is that there are more of us, and we are paying customers and those numbers add up to a lot of potential lost revenue.  This argument has been going on for years and years now. Its likely never going to be settled. But thats simply the reality as it exists.

  uttaus

Apprentice Member

Joined: 12/06/05
Posts: 119

10/22/09 9:19:55 AM#90

I have pretty much thought this for a long time. Untill another company puts out a compareable space sim MMO  that has a less harsh failure/ death penalty you PVPers will have to get use to us hanging out in your game.

If we did leave in  mass for another game I think you pvpers would feel a sharp pain at the loss of all that cash flow form the care bear, businesses, buyers, and miners disappearing.

 

Just my thought there.

Asheron's Call, Champions Online, Dark Age of Camelot, EVE Online, EverQuest, Lineage 2, Star Wars Galaxies and World of Warcraft.Waiting for SWTOR

  Malcanis

Hard Core Member

Joined: 8/17/09
Posts: 2440

"A very special kind of stupidity"

10/22/09 10:41:13 AM#91
Originally posted by uttaus

I have pretty much thought this for a long time. Untill another company puts out a compareable space sim MMO  that has a less harsh failure/ death penalty you PVPers will have to get use to us hanging out in your game.

If we did leave in  mass for another game I think you pvpers would feel a sharp pain at the loss of all that cash flow form the care bear, businesses, buyers, and miners disappearing.

 

Just my thought there.

 

Ah, the old "you need our money" argument.

CCP became profitable when they hit 50k subs. Obviously their outgoings are higher now, but it might take more ragequits than you think.

Anyway, I have no objection to people playing how they wish as long as they dont agitate for game changes that break the sandbox spirit. By all means, miners, missioners and makers should be protected - by the efforts of those miners, missioners and makers, not by intrusive game mechanics.

Give me liberty or give me lasers

  Wraithone

Advanced Member

Joined: 7/09/04
Posts: 2660

If you can't kill it, don't make it mad.

10/22/09 10:56:05 AM#92
Originally posted by Malcanis
Originally posted by uttaus

I have pretty much thought this for a long time. Untill another company puts out a compareable space sim MMO  that has a less harsh failure/ death penalty you PVPers will have to get use to us hanging out in your game.

If we did leave in  mass for another game I think you pvpers would feel a sharp pain at the loss of all that cash flow form the care bear, businesses, buyers, and miners disappearing.

 

Just my thought there.

 

Ah, the old "you need our money" argument.

CCP became profitable when they hit 50k subs. Obviously their outgoings are higher now, but it might take more ragequits than you think.

Anyway, I have no objection to people playing how they wish as long as they dont agitate for game changes that break the sandbox spirit. By all means, miners, missioners and makers should be protected - by the efforts of those miners, missioners and makers, not by intrusive game mechanics.

 

The evolution of Concord indicates that CCP thinks other wise.  Given that they are very pro PvP, that says they understand the threat to their business model that ganking in high sec represents.

  Gdemami

Hard Core Member

Joined: 9/23/08
Posts: 4558

10/22/09 11:21:00 AM#93


Originally posted by Malcanis
Ah, the old "you need our money" argument.
CCP became profitable when they hit 50k subs. Obviously their outgoings are higher now, but it might take more ragequits than you think.
Anyway, I have no objection to people playing how they wish as long as they dont agitate for game changes that break the sandbox spirit. By all means, miners, missioners and makers should be protected - by the efforts of those miners, missioners and makers, not by intrusive game mechanics.

New Eden without 'intrusive mechanics' would be same shit as Darkfall.

Asking for changes of this type is as dumb as carebears crying for more safety on their missions.


You both equaly promote your own playstyle only without any care about the game.

  metalhead980

Apprentice Member

Joined: 6/11/08
Posts: 2699

 
10/22/09 11:55:01 AM#94
Originally posted by Wraithone

 

 

I will address some of the issues you raise though.  If you speak of WS in your first sentence, then yes I and many others will not be using it. You already know why. It takes us into gank space.  While attacking mission runners(fitted with rat specific resists) may be entertaining for the ganker set, I'd hardly term it a challenge. But it is a risk to be factored in.

As for "holding CCP back" only CCP makes the determination of what they will focus on. That determination no doubt takes into account what will appeal to the CareBear demographic. But given CCP's PvP focus, I seriously doubt thats the only factor.  They also have more than sufficient resources to have multiple teams in operation at one time.  If they choose to use some of those resources for PvE, thats their determination, not yours nor mine.

As for the other, its a cost/benefit analysis in terms of missions. If I stand to gain from the mission(in terms of what is to be risked), I'll tend to run it. Its not just gankers that are risks. There are internet connection "issues" client crashes, server "issues" and power outages to factor in. In a game with a harsh death penalty such as Eve, those have to be taken in to account on the margin.

As for why CCP doesn't just dump PvE, we both know that answer as well. Self interest and attention to their bottom line.  As much as the PvP crowd likes to rant and rave about mission runners, the fact is that there are more of us, and we are paying customers and those numbers add up to a lot of potential lost revenue.  This argument has been going on for years and years now. Its likely never going to be settled. But thats simply the reality as it exists.

So you agree that you wont be taking part in the up coming pve stuff CCP is putting out for you.

And with you saying most pvers are like you. Then you should also agree that that type of pve content shouldn't be even bothered with.

That's what I said to start this whole back and forth lol!

Thanks. Moving on.

 

PLaying: EvE, Ryzom

Waiting For: Earthrise, Perpetuum

  Wraithone

Advanced Member

Joined: 7/09/04
Posts: 2660

If you can't kill it, don't make it mad.

10/22/09 12:13:36 PM#95
Originally posted by metalhead980
Originally posted by Wraithone

 

 

I will address some of the issues you raise though.  If you speak of WS in your first sentence, then yes I and many others will not be using it. You already know why. It takes us into gank space.  While attacking mission runners(fitted with rat specific resists) may be entertaining for the ganker set, I'd hardly term it a challenge. But it is a risk to be factored in.

As for "holding CCP back" only CCP makes the determination of what they will focus on. That determination no doubt takes into account what will appeal to the CareBear demographic. But given CCP's PvP focus, I seriously doubt thats the only factor.  They also have more than sufficient resources to have multiple teams in operation at one time.  If they choose to use some of those resources for PvE, thats their determination, not yours nor mine.

As for the other, its a cost/benefit analysis in terms of missions. If I stand to gain from the mission(in terms of what is to be risked), I'll tend to run it. Its not just gankers that are risks. There are internet connection "issues" client crashes, server "issues" and power outages to factor in. In a game with a harsh death penalty such as Eve, those have to be taken in to account on the margin.

As for why CCP doesn't just dump PvE, we both know that answer as well. Self interest and attention to their bottom line.  As much as the PvP crowd likes to rant and rave about mission runners, the fact is that there are more of us, and we are paying customers and those numbers add up to a lot of potential lost revenue.  This argument has been going on for years and years now. Its likely never going to be settled. But thats simply the reality as it exists.

So you agree that you wont be taking part in the up coming pve stuff CCP is putting out for you.

And with you saying most pvers are like you. Then you should also agree that that type of pve content shouldn't be even bothered with.

That's what I said to start this whole back and forth lol!

Thanks. Moving on.

 

 

NP. Any time.  I'd love to do some sparring with the Sleepers. They sound interesting. But I'm not going into gank space to do so.

  Malcanis

Hard Core Member

Joined: 8/17/09
Posts: 2440

"A very special kind of stupidity"

10/22/09 1:35:24 PM#96
Originally posted by Gdemami

 


Originally posted by Malcanis
Ah, the old "you need our money" argument.
CCP became profitable when they hit 50k subs. Obviously their outgoings are higher now, but it might take more ragequits than you think.
Anyway, I have no objection to people playing how they wish as long as they dont agitate for game changes that break the sandbox spirit. By all means, miners, missioners and makers should be protected - by the efforts of those miners, missioners and makers, not by intrusive game mechanics.

 

New Eden without 'intrusive mechanics' would be same shit as Darkfall.

Asking for changes of this type is as dumb as carebears crying for more safety on their missions.


You both equaly promote your own playstyle only without any care about the game.

 

 

 

 

Calm down. I'm not asking for any changes. I'm merely asking people to play the game as it is, for what it is.

 

PS wasn't it you who derided CCP for making EvE "themepark online" with the Dominion expansion?

Give me liberty or give me lasers

  Gdemami

Hard Core Member

Joined: 9/23/08
Posts: 4558

10/22/09 3:32:43 PM#97


Originally posted by Malcanis
 
Calm down. I'm not asking for any changes. I'm merely asking people to play the game as it is, for what it is.
 
PS wasn't it you who derided CCP for making EvE "themepark online" with the Dominion expansion?

Yeah, playing the game your way...


Yep, Dominion will:

1) change 0.0 into something absurd
2) achieve absolutely nothing apart from faster sovereigntly claiming

In both cases it will be epic fail. It is already a failure, 5 weeks before launch and there is not much to see on test server.

  metalhead980

Apprentice Member

Joined: 6/11/08
Posts: 2699

 
10/22/09 3:42:45 PM#98
Originally posted by Wraithone
Originally posted by metalhead980
Originally posted by Wraithone

 

 

I will address some of the issues you raise though.  If you speak of WS in your first sentence, then yes I and many others will not be using it. You already know why. It takes us into gank space.  While attacking mission runners(fitted with rat specific resists) may be entertaining for the ganker set, I'd hardly term it a challenge. But it is a risk to be factored in.

As for "holding CCP back" only CCP makes the determination of what they will focus on. That determination no doubt takes into account what will appeal to the CareBear demographic. But given CCP's PvP focus, I seriously doubt thats the only factor.  They also have more than sufficient resources to have multiple teams in operation at one time.  If they choose to use some of those resources for PvE, thats their determination, not yours nor mine.

As for the other, its a cost/benefit analysis in terms of missions. If I stand to gain from the mission(in terms of what is to be risked), I'll tend to run it. Its not just gankers that are risks. There are internet connection "issues" client crashes, server "issues" and power outages to factor in. In a game with a harsh death penalty such as Eve, those have to be taken in to account on the margin.

As for why CCP doesn't just dump PvE, we both know that answer as well. Self interest and attention to their bottom line.  As much as the PvP crowd likes to rant and rave about mission runners, the fact is that there are more of us, and we are paying customers and those numbers add up to a lot of potential lost revenue.  This argument has been going on for years and years now. Its likely never going to be settled. But thats simply the reality as it exists.

So you agree that you wont be taking part in the up coming pve stuff CCP is putting out for you.

And with you saying most pvers are like you. Then you should also agree that that type of pve content shouldn't be even bothered with.

That's what I said to start this whole back and forth lol!

Thanks. Moving on.

 

 

NP. Any time.  I'd love to do some sparring with the Sleepers. They sound interesting. But I'm not going into gank space to do so.

First time I took a ship into Wormhole space it was a freaking cruiser. You could easily go along with a few of your buddies bring a cheap BC and atleast check them out.Your going to be shocked at how WH space feels. Honestly it's nothing like walking into a low sec gate camp most of the systems are empty. If you bring a cloaked scout alt you can easily watch a wormhole exit and warp tfo if you see anyone.

If you don't want to lose anything you could always ask a couple friends to go on test server with you and find a wormhole.

Atleast to try them for fun.


 

 

 

 

PLaying: EvE, Ryzom

Waiting For: Earthrise, Perpetuum

  Malcanis

Hard Core Member

Joined: 8/17/09
Posts: 2440

"A very special kind of stupidity"

10/22/09 4:48:38 PM#99
Originally posted by Gdemami

 


Originally posted by Malcanis
 
Calm down. I'm not asking for any changes. I'm merely asking people to play the game as it is, for what it is.
 
PS wasn't it you who derided CCP for making EvE "themepark online" with the Dominion expansion?

 

Yeah, playing the game your way...


Yep, Dominion will:

1) change 0.0 into something absurd
2) achieve absolutely nothing apart from faster sovereigntly claiming

In both cases it will be epic fail. It is already a failure, 5 weeks before launch and there is not much to see on test server.

 

Man, I just love your indomitable optimism. What, what's the "something absurd" that 0.0 will be changed into?

Give me liberty or give me lasers

  nightbird305

Novice Member

Joined: 11/11/05
Posts: 258

10/22/09 5:02:21 PM#100
Originally posted by Malcanis
Originally posted by Gdemami

 


Originally posted by Malcanis
 
Calm down. I'm not asking for any changes. I'm merely asking people to play the game as it is, for what it is.
 
PS wasn't it you who derided CCP for making EvE "themepark online" with the Dominion expansion?

 

Yeah, playing the game your way...


Yep, Dominion will:

1) change 0.0 into something absurd
2) achieve absolutely nothing apart from faster sovereigntly claiming

In both cases it will be epic fail. It is already a failure, 5 weeks before launch and there is not much to see on test server.

 

Man, I just love your indomitable optimism. What, what's the "something absurd" that 0.0 will be changed into?

 

Something you can't even begin to imagine!

6 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 » Search