| 57 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
8/07/09 4:18:59 AM#41
Originally posted by downtoearth
if i remeber right CO was supposed to marvel i could be wrong
I think so too. Cryptic and Microsoft were making it for Marvel. Then all of the sudden, Cryptic had there own game coming out. I always found that odd, how that played out. I personally think Cryptic scammed Marvel out of a game, but I could be wrong and readiing too much into it. When we get back from where we are going, we will return to where we were. I know people there! |
|
|
8/07/09 4:27:24 AM#42
Originally posted by purewitz
I think so too. Cryptic and Microsoft were making it for Marvel. Then all of the sudden, Cryptic had there own game coming out. I always found that odd, how that played out. I personally think Cryptic scammed Marvel out of a game, but I could be wrong and readiing too much into it.
Marvel shut that project down, Cryptic sold of COH to ncsoft so they could devolope and publish Champions online on their own guess they got tired of larger companies screwing them over. |
|
|
8/07/09 4:39:18 AM#43
Work has restarted for the Marvel MMO by a different developer, my guess is that it'll take a considerable amount of time before we see any results. |
|
|
8/07/09 4:52:37 AM#44
CoX has nothing to worry about. CO is not bringing anything new or innovative in terms of gameplay or visuals. Unless you consider Microtransactions and "lifetime" subscriptions the pinnacle of innovation. Get in the beta and see for yourself. I can't tell you much since the NDA is still in effect. |
|
|
8/07/09 5:03:05 AM#45
Originally posted by TwwIX
In beta also. It does bring some things that are new and it has what you would expect from an mmo the point is it offers what coh does plus abit more and with a company that is has proven to bring good regular updates to game. People keep moaning about these Microtransactions.... they are simply extra character slots/costume packs etc which CoX has aswell. The CoX devolopers have forgotten their community, adding some face skins or adding a colour option to powers are not what should be considered an Issue update. AE Should be fixed or removed. At the moment they are just adding feactures you would of expected to be in the game a long time ago. |
|
|
8/07/09 5:32:20 AM#46
Originally posted by Kelador
In beta also. It does bring some things that are new and it has what you would expect from an mmo the point is it offers what coh does plus abit more and with a company that is has proven to bring good regular updates to game. People keep moaning about these Microtransactions.... they are simply extra character slots/costume packs etc which CoX has aswell. The CoX devolopers have forgotten their community, adding some face skins or adding a colour option to powers are not what should be considered an Issue update. AE Should be fixed or removed. At the moment they are just adding feactures you would of expected to be in the game a long time ago.
|
|
|
8/07/09 7:35:02 AM#47
i still like city of heroes and play it when i can get a cheap time card on ebay . i dont think its worth the current monthly subscription fee though . its looking quite old now . did i hear there may be a graphics engine update soon ? i cant comment on champions online i ve not played it but if it offers decent pvp it ll have one up on city of heroes in my book . anyway we ll just have to wait and see i guess . |
|
|
8/07/09 7:40:09 AM#48
Originally posted by TwwIX
And when you do I'll be sure to tear apart your "points". CO is fine. |
|
|
8/07/09 8:10:11 AM#49
Originally posted by Vagrant_Zero
And when you do I'll be sure to tear apart your "points". CO is fine. Fine, as in disappointingly mediocre? Yes, it is Mr. Internet Tough Guy. You make a good point.
|
|
|
8/07/09 9:28:54 AM#50
Originally posted by TwwIX
And when you do I'll be sure to tear apart your "points". CO is fine. Fine, as in disappointingly mediocre? Yes, it is Mr. Internet Tough Guy. You make a good point.
Lol no one can win this fight due to the NDA so lets table it until its lifted and then we can all agree to disagree lol |
|
|
8/07/09 9:51:52 AM#51
CO simply improves upon everything that they did with CoH. In fact it's the game that CoH should have been when they were originally starting to make the game. I followed CoH way back from the beginning and CO has a lot of the ideas that they were forced to compromise on in order to get a publisher (NCSoft) for the game. CO is simply the next generation in superhero MMOs. There's not really any reason to choose CoH over Champions Online. "Because it's easier to nitpick something than to be constructive." -roach5000 |
|
|
dalestaines1
Novice Member
Joined: 9/29/06
Don''t cry if you don''t like a game. Find another and have fun! |
8/07/09 10:07:39 AM#52
Originally posted by Kelador
And when you do I'll be sure to tear apart your "points". CO is fine. Fine, as in disappointingly mediocre? Yes, it is Mr. Internet Tough Guy. You make a good point.
Lol no one can win this fight due to the NDA so lets table it until its lifted and then we can all agree to disagree lol
NDA has nothing to do with it. If someone doesn't like it, they don't like it. |
|
8/07/09 10:33:14 AM#53
Originally posted by TwwIX
And when you do I'll be sure to tear apart your "points". CO is fine. Fine, as in disappointingly mediocre? Yes, it is Mr. Internet Tough Guy. You make a good point.
I'm not JUST a Tough Guy on the internet. I also play one in Champions Online. A game which is Fine TM. Dissapointly mediocre would be your food stamps.
Also one last thing... rawr. |
|
|
8/07/09 4:11:12 PM#54
CoH has nothing to worry about, Chanpions online doesnt even merit a "look-see" to me. |
|
|
8/10/09 1:44:19 PM#55
|
|
|
8/13/09 5:56:44 PM#56
Originally posted by MikeB
As for point #1, I've seen the screens and videos of Champions. It looks more "cartoony", which may or may be "better" than CoX graphics. For a game that is over 5 years old, CoX still looks pretty good. It didn't get outdated as quick as say EQ1. Point #2, I personally have never heard many complaints about the Architect. None of my friends or sg mates have said anything but positive things about it. It's a system that adds new content daily, complete with it's own rewards. Ok now #3 is about PvP, which this is like beating a dead horse. The majority of players in CoX do not want more pvp, repeatedly when asked co-op zones are asked for more than pvp. That is why they added more co-op content and not more pvp zones. The majority playerbase simply isn't asking for it. Yet some other people keep hammering the poor dead horse about it, since some people feel pvp is a MUST for a mmo to be good. Which isn't the case. Can't really say much about #4 except that I would surely hope cryptic would learn from what worked and didn't in CoX and apply it to Champions. Point #5 is the only real thing NCSoft should be worried about. The ability for every player to make it's own unique counterpart could be the single most thing that draws people to Champions. Lastly, #6 tells me the author hasn't actually played CoX in a few years. Right around when CoV came out, yes updates were very slow. Since NCSoft took charge we have been getting more updates quicker. They said they wanted to average around 3 months between issues. You can see that shortly after I15 came out we started getting teaser info about I16, so they're not sitting on their hands doing nothing. |
|
|
8/13/09 7:46:44 PM#57
Originally posted by DrowNoble
I will also add that there were a couple years when the game updates were limited to 15 developers before Crypitic sold the game to NCSoft. Now there has been an influx of 50 plus, and major and more updates are occuring. |
|