| 330 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Dracus
Novice Member
Joined: 7/14/04
"Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars." |
8/28/09 3:12:18 PM#261
I believe such programs work with Indies where the developers need to maintain good relations since they have a small customer base. And that is why... Conservatives' pessimism is conducive to their happiness in three ways. First, they are rarely surprised -- they are right more often than not about the course of events. Second, when they are wrong they are happy to be so. Third, because pessimistic conservatives put not their faith in princes -- government -- they accept that happiness is a function of fending for oneself. They believe that happiness is an activity -- it is inseparable from the pursuit of happiness. |
|
8/28/09 3:12:44 PM#262
Originally posted by veritas_X
It's been that way since it's inception, as is any community volunteer program attached to an mmorpg. Does anyone truly believe that a volunteer will have any sway over the developer of a for-profit product? Lol.
No but the community should to a point. What's wrong with adding a 'republic' like senate in a sw mmo forum to hash out the best interperatation of what the community desires? Better than decifering it all yourself and using your own interperatation? It could work just as well or better...if used. If not used, what kind of company would do that? ya. |
|
|
TUX426
Inquisitor
Joined: 8/04/09
Always remember that you're unique. Just like everyone else. |
8/28/09 3:19:57 PM#263
Originally posted by Daffid011
Thank you!!! You seem to understand something that so few can until it happens to them. |
|
TUX426
Inquisitor
Joined: 8/04/09
Always remember that you're unique. Just like everyone else. |
8/28/09 3:47:28 PM#264
Originally posted by j1flaw
I know what you mean MC :) No worries :D But...about the GCW Update...ya know, that Update is sink or swim for SoE...they can NOT afford to fail on it. If they do, game over. And I did NOT want the game to be over. I would have been in every thread asking every question, demanding they do things RIGHT, not just fast. I would have been a pain in the ass tbh...but it would have ONLY been to make sure they didn't botch it...not just to be a douche. They ignored my repeated pleas for better battle ground communication (chat or voice), a better que system, more que options (like JOIN NEXT), the ability to join a battle in progress, the ability for neutrals to utilized as "fillers", the suggestion that bunkers be ONE STORY, auto flip Overt timers...all of those would have prevented the battle field breakdown we have going on. They ignored them all. I was not going to let them ruin the GCW the same way. Hanse has no problem blaming the Art team for the **edit**ed up bunkers HE PLACED in-game...he would have no such excuses with the GCW Update. Things would have been busy...but that update meant a lot to me and I would have given 110%. Like I said earlier...now I just hope the game dies. ;) |
|
8/28/09 3:49:00 PM#265
Originally posted by j1flaw
I understand that you don't think it is awesome that tux was banned, but your reflection on the subject is just very typical in these situations where soe acts this way. The focus is always shifted to the people who are now rejected from the community and away from soe. The real problem of how soe is conducting themselves is almost entirely glossed over and ever so slightly pushed onto the players who were wronged. Right now you are still doing it. Do you really think the problem with the senate is the lack of quality people?
Looking at the state of SWG over the time the senate has been around, can you honestly say that soe has reacted to the wishes of the players as described by the senators? I don't see a long history of players cheering the direction of the game as a result of their feedback through the senate system. I see top 5 lists with issues that date back to the implementation of the nge. I see long lists of people complaining about loot cards, lag, neglected systems, exploits and bugs, population issues and so on that go unattended for years. I don't recall people asking for pink ewoks and zombies however.
In the underlined passage above, I think you are sugesting the senate is about to implode as a result of the new CRM being a total wanker and some bad chemistry of senators, but that isn't exactly how it comes off in your words.
|
|
|
8/28/09 4:19:03 PM#266
In my eyes, the devs are very lucky to have such a dedicated bunch that sacrifice a lot of time to make up the senate. The community supported the senate on the grounds that the senate would be an influencial part of the community. Well it has yet to be used as such and it was doomed from the start as a lot of us saw. Tragic really. The talent and dedication is there. They had the opportunity to gain back a lot of the hatred that has developed by taking player contributions and ideas and runnign with them. Instead, most were outright denied and nothing was ever said. I'm not saying SOE is obligated to listen to the senate, but the tools were there to bring in player feedback in a way that I've never seen in other games and really take it home. The game could've seen some great ideas and great content added... I don;t know the politics behind it all, but if the senate was able to drive the community respones to bring content to the game, we wouldn't have some of these really sad looking updates involving valentines day cards... We'd have Star Wars. Do I find it shady that the horror master Dotanuki pushed for zombies and bailed? absolutely... The justification that it is EU material doesn't make sense to me, as only 5% of the playerbase will probably read that book, but 100% of us have seen the movies... obviously I can't prove those numbers, but just think about it... The community wants Star Wars, The senate listens to the community and wants to bring Star Wars, so what's the problem? Meh, I get depressed thinking about it lol |
|
|
8/28/09 4:38:32 PM#267
Cosmo For the record... I said it's for the best for HIM. He needed to get out of there. In the end it was causing too much stress and hardship, that he needed to get out. Yes it sucks he left the game, that's not what I wanted, but things have a way of working themselves out. and I am glad you know what is best for Tux! I played this game every day for a looooong time. I played every day for five years and two months...leveled over 20 combat toons and had every crafter? So what?
EDIT: And ayelin, you know as well as I do that TUX was getting burned out, so you can't say this was a good experience for him to be going through Tux wasn't getting burned out. He was frustrated, disappointed and determined to honestly represent players NOT burned out.
|
|
|
8/28/09 5:10:04 PM#268
Originally posted by Daffid011
There is ONE positive side to all of this... And I can say this as a person who's also been kicked out so I'm in the same boat as TUX... The senate is a house of cards... From the outside it looks strong and sturdy... But once you take a few cards away... It doesn't take much more for the entire thing to come falling down... And within the community... That's exactly what I see happening. Public opinion and faith in the program is at an all time low and for the time being... Its only getting worse. Its like I said in an e-mail to Brasse... It seems to me as if SOE has basically screwed themselves. Public opinion is already at an all time low thanks to what they did to TUX... And now they're removing senators simply because SOE doesn't like their "style". I mean at least when they kicked me... They made up some what of an excuse... Though their excuse was complete double talk and the facts don't support their claim... At least they made some effort to come up with an excuse... By the time they removed DrDista... They didn't even bother doing that much... They simply kicked him down to blue glowie.
So three senators removed... And none of us were removed for breaking the rules. That sends a HUGE message to the players. And given the number of locked/deleted threads on the forums... That message has been well received.
But that's just my 2 cents on it.
|
|
|
8/28/09 5:34:38 PM#269
Originally posted by AnXieTyX
eh, |
|
|
8/28/09 5:38:36 PM#270
You guys have the ability to create your own senate in game. Thats whats great about swg...you don't really need the devs help or permission . You could make your own website, elect your own senators, and have the almighty /cancel at your disposal. If you guys are really serious, screw SOE...do it without them. I know some of you remember how. Soe will not 'save' anything. But, risking of a new type of player organization taking off would be risky. A player union within a game. may not work, but it could light a spark for the future. Use zombies as your first cause. Or be polite and contructive with SOE..yes sir and thank you and what not. SWG is a freak experiment...so experiment. Mix some shit together and see what happens. |
|
|
8/28/09 6:17:22 PM#271
Originally posted by Iheamylap
A senate seat is a forum rank... And nothing more. It doesn't enable or disable someone from posting/PM'ing and making a difference... It doesn't enable or disable your ability to step up to lead a community either. And to think because you have that rank suddenly your granted all of the above is simply foolish. Long before I became a senator I was posting and PM'ing devs and making a small difference (which is as much as any player, senator included, can hope to make). Who a person is and what they do doesn't come a rank. Long before becoming a senator I was hassling the devs with ideas and suggestions... I was on TC testing things, gathering data, and working along side QA to try to squash bugs... A senate tag didn't enable or disable me from doing any of that.
Your "point" about my behavior or TUX's is a quite moot point and for one simple reason... Our "behavior" never broke the rules of the forum. Its like I said in the blue glowie forums to you... The rules of the forum are the rules of the forum. It doesn't matter who you are... There are one set of rules, and that one set of rules applies to all. None of us were removed for violating the official forum rules... We were all removed because the current CRM doesn't have an ounce of professionalism. A point that's validated due to the fact that even after being internally investigated after what he did to TUX... He still ran his mouth about me in private to other players. And as for the things I posted in the senate forums... While I cant defend all of them... I can easily defend the majority. When someone posted something that had some negative impact on either the commando community... Or the PvP'ing community in general... Yea I did speak up... And I did post and tear the idea down... And 99% of the time I never went after the poster... Simply the posters idea. You see that's major flaw with most of the current batch of senators... And that's the inability to separate an impersonal debate over an idea from a debate that's personal.
|
|
|
8/28/09 6:19:53 PM#272
What Fikus says holds much truth. The current senate is largely ineffective as it has been set up and is not the fault of the players. The senate obviously is not having any results that will benefit the players and soe continues to march to their own drum. The only party that benefits from the senate is soe by giving the players false hope that they have a say in how the game is developed. That ishow "working within the system" has been designed and it is the only desired result.
I doubt lucas arts would be happy with soe if even the possibility of a bad press release was to come out of SWG while they are trying to build up hype for the old republic. A little solidarity would go a long way I think. If you really want to help the game then something needs to change, because what is happening isn't working. |
|
|
8/28/09 6:43:48 PM#273
ROFLMAO I started a thread on the O-Boards about the senate asking the question if there could be a "Lion of the SWG senate".
This topic has moved: /swg/posts/list.m?topic_id=986751 **Thread removed. Reason Code 013: Politics and/or Religion** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, if you want a subject offed, I would guess this would be as good as any other reason. |
|
|
8/28/09 8:00:04 PM#274
Originally posted by FikusOfAhazi
I've never given a QFE before, EVER. But I absolutely love this line of thinking form Fikus! /QFE!!
|
|
|
8/28/09 8:54:47 PM#275
Originally posted by FikusOfAhazi
Hmm... Anxiety, have you been talking to Fikus? lol |
|
|
8/28/09 9:28:39 PM#276
Originally posted by j1flaw
Hmm... Anxiety, have you been talking to Fikus? lol
No, we do it in the open here. What I type is mine. We also don't need to imply our point. We just post it. Theres a report button on the page if you don't like our post. Give it a shot. What are you implying? |
|
|
8/29/09 1:37:46 AM#277
Originally posted by FikusOfAhazi
No, we do it in the open here. What I type is mine. We also don't need to imply our point. We just post it. Theres a report button on the page if you don't like our post. Give it a shot. What are you implying?
His post had no malicious intent. What he's eluding to is that we've had talks about that in the past. That idea/concept is something we've discussed previously, and is still a possibility.
|
|
|
8/29/09 4:25:06 AM#278
Originally posted by AnXieTyX
No, we do it in the open here. What I type is mine. We also don't need to imply our point. We just post it. Theres a report button on the page if you don't like our post. Give it a shot. What are you implying?
His post had no malicious intent. What he's eluding to is that we've had talks about that in the past. That idea/concept is something we've discussed previously, and is still a possibility.
Ok. Had no idea what he was talking about. I was like wtf does that mean? I don't know you guys. No big deal. Sorry for assuming he was implying something. and its a possibilty for all mmo gamers. About time to make a decision isnt it? How do you want your community to be remembered? I knew there was a reason people stayed after the NGE. Or not. It's your decision, your community. |
|
|
8/29/09 11:05:11 AM#279
Ugh more reasons to not like Draakull, bad first impression with that TCG friday feature and perma bans my forum account while I was on my vet trial for telling him he needs more training in his job after reading some of his emo posts. And I thought Elias and Garva were bad. SWTOR: sub ended, no thanks to Georg Zoeller! |
|
|
8/31/09 5:00:33 PM#280
I just read the forums, commando got a new senate that... uh, fell from the sky, I wonder how this one will go. SWTOR: sub ended, no thanks to Georg Zoeller! |
|