| 66 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Starvault does not have the manpower to produce a full fantasy world MMO within the time period slated. They most likely will not have this game out by the end of the year, and if it is you can expect another darkfail or AOC.
Why would anyone trust a company with no reputation?? why give them 75 dollars or more... They can't even get their page updated
this company has never made a game before...so chances are this will be their first mistake. Maybe in the future they will produce better games, but for now you are just paying so they can get money and make a real game.
|
|
|
7/23/09 12:02:46 AM#2
LOL you can hope... I personally knew some guys who did this with another game in the past, they hyped it buzzed it sold it, cashed in, pulled the plug, waited 2 months changed the name rehyped it, buzzed it, cashed in again on the same game again, pulled the plug again, waited 6 months and did it again. It was kinda funny because if you hung around with these guys in the dev chat two or there of them would be totally honest about how it was all a scam and how much money they were making off stupid Americans. Nobody ever learns, its like PT Barnum says, there is a sucker born every minute. |
|
|
yeah definetly, and these fanboys will defend the game until it comes out as a scam.
98% of the features they said will be in the game will never happen.
I expect the company to pull the plug by the end of the year. |
|
|
7/23/09 12:15:39 AM#4
Originally posted by Genleo Obvioulsy if it does launch this year with more than 2% of it's advertised features you'll be here eating humble pie right? Nah, you'll probably be off trolling another game by then. |
|
|
7/23/09 12:20:28 AM#5
Originally posted by Sorrow
Oh, you mean Tiamat, Egomancer, JulieBlue, and that lot of losers from the Mourning debacle? Remember when you swore they were "imposters" when they were ranting on the forums here and getting their game kicked to the curb because of their bullshit? You were actually a defender of those slimeballs. For shame. |
|
|
i was looking forward to this game actually. Im just pissed off that these european companies say they will have all these features in teh game and it will be great and out, and its all broken promises.
I have heard on the official forums there are ZERO mobs in the game, You pretty much just run around doing nothing, and you can't even attack stuff because there is no attack animations. This game is in alpha stage not beta.
It wont be out at the end of the year for sure or probably ever, and im sick of these lies from stupid independent companies. |
|
|
7/23/09 12:26:47 AM#7
*kicks the Sea Creature of Early Conclusions back in the Ocean of Ignorance* - If it weren't for indy's there wouldn't be EVE. - Not meeting targets isn't reserved for indy devs; plenty of big releases have been postponed as well. - Don't judge a book by it's cover. We know virtually nothing yet on how this beta will pan out in the coming months. - If you read up on MO mechanics and gameplay features there is a whole lot of bright and new ideas which kick established developer butt with sheer brilliance. - If it weren't for indy devs who don't aim for WOW like sub numbers, every game would be bland and dumbed down to appeal to as big of a crowd as possible. And once again: I don't give a damn if it is not done at this time or when it will be released. As long as it gets there! |
|
|
7/23/09 12:27:43 AM#8
You might be right and the game is not what was promised to be. However, how does that tie with the title of this thread? Where is the argument regarding independent companies and their inability to make MMOs? |
|
|
Well basically in the last year we had Funcom fail Aventurine SA fail and soon to be Starvault fail |
|
|
7/23/09 12:40:27 AM#10
Originally posted by Genleo It's three days into beta . . . It's an indie company, this isn't a "come trial our game" beta, it's a real beta with bugs, very limited features etc. Honestly whether they will succeed or not, who knows right now, the odds are probably against it. But one thing is sure, whining about it 3 days in just makes you look like a tool. They've set the bar high with a bunch of promises, and I'll slag them off with the best of them if they don't produce, but really after three days? |
|
|
7/23/09 12:41:39 AM#11
Originally posted by Genleo
you heard wrong. |
|
|
7/23/09 12:44:14 AM#12
The only thing we know about this game is the avatar's have huge shlong's. And that isn't saying much. _________________ |
|
|
7/23/09 1:45:08 AM#13
For what people say looks more like alpha than beta. |
|
|
7/23/09 2:52:21 AM#14
This thread pretty much sums it all up, the community doesnt know what a Beta is anymore or an alpha for that matter, that is really companies faults for labeling their free hype previews with the name beta so they can excuse themselves of bugs when in reality beta over the past 4 years has been used as a soft release. SV is a small company and there is no guarantee they will make it, they do however have a very good engine, their beta is gonna be exactly that a beta, most people (people who bought the game) bought it in the hopes of playing the soft release of MO and blindly hyped up by the game (nothing wrong with that just sometimes people forget to read the documentation properly) are now a bit disapointed that they are actually testing and not playing the game, if you read what they have released about the Block A beta you can see that their focus is for Crowd testing, synching and other low level stuff and that is achieved by limiting the content so people are funnelled to the areas that need testing. Bottom line, sorry guys this isnt a soft release this is gonna be actual stress testing and polishing of features it is going to be limited im guessing at least until block C/E of beta are in, again there is nothing wrong with this just people dont know what a beta is anymore.
|
|
|
7/23/09 3:13:54 AM#15
I am going to stray away from the topic slightly and say the most obvious thing that people usually forget. Beta = Testing You are called a Beta Tester for a reason, test stuff, report bugs and errors. THE END |
|
|
Yamota
Elite Member
Joined: 10/05/03
Money in politics is the root of all political evil. It is corruption at it's worst. |
7/23/09 3:18:03 AM#16
Originally posted by Genleo You have to realise that there has been years since an MMORPG was released that catered to free world FFA PvP players and those players are desperate to get a game like that instead of the spoon-feeding, themepark, WoW-clone nonsense. I personally believe this to be the last hope we get for a FFA PvP MMORPG because of Darkfalls failure. So that is why I paid that money for a game that does not exist yet and which state I know very little about. But I have faith that the game will turn out to be, if not great, atleast a playable FFA PvP game. That being said I don't agree with the way Starvault is handling this. Charging that much money for a game that is in pre-alpha is not a way to attract future customers so either they must be desperate for money or really greedy. However, seeing as they use the UT 3 engine, which cost upwards of $500.000, I doubt it is greed. So, if you are into FFA PvP MMORPGs, have faith. :) |
|
7/23/09 3:23:03 AM#17
Originally posted by Genleo Well, the people that did Everquest hadn't done a MMO before, but they made it well. MO is a spawn based on all failures the last years and based on what made UO and Everquest soo fun to play. I see it as an advantage beeing independent. Othervise we will just get WoW, WAR, AoC alike games. |
|
|
7/23/09 3:26:01 AM#18
Originally posted by steamtank Exactly ... people need to read what Star Vault themself have said before the beta ... " Beta testing and gameplay The Beta is starting July 20 with the features from Combat Beta active, as well as a few new ones. The very first steps have to do with architecture, back-end and network-performance. To begin with, we are aiming to test: /the MO Dev Team "
|
|
|
7/23/09 3:26:13 AM#19
well the 'why would we trust company with no reputation' argument is kinda flawed. loads of times weve been disappointed by our favorite devs... so the whole 'we never heard of them, they suck' is really unneccesary. we might get a good game and then again we might not.
|
|
|
7/23/09 3:46:46 AM#20
Originally posted by sazabi
People like the OP have no clue what they are talking about. With Aventurine, and especially their clown Tasos, you knew upfront it would be a scam. You could smell it 1000 miles away it would be. Same with Dark&Light. And the other scams. -------------- The difference here is that this company is able to license one of the best and most licensed game engines of the world. That alone means they had the funding to back it up. As license fees are paid up front. No delays and excuses. Especially when it comes to EPIC. And EPIC is too proud on it's carefully build up reputation to let their name being slandered by some scam artists. Meaning StarVault has been able to convince EPIC to be a solid company. Next to that, there are movies/Swedish TV program episodes all over the internet about real Dev interviews and tours at StarVaults headquarters, their local city government backing them up... and they also seem to have quite some enthousiastic fans supporting them through thick and thin in their home town in Sweden. Next to that it seems that the Devs have always been totally honest and upfront with their fans. No lies, no deceit, no vague crap and bullshit ala Tasos. Not to mention all the vague crap and license scams and thefts that were going on with Dark&Light back then. In all honesty. I see StarVault more like how CCP started out years ago with EVE Online. And sure it's a risk giving them money and having a chance they get into financial trouble and the game will end up never see the light of day. Well my friends, I paid 50 bucks for Matrix Online. I paid 50 bucks for Vanguard. I paid 50 bucks for Tabula Rasa. I paid 50 bucks for Age of Conan. I paid 2 times 90 bucks for WAR!!! (CE editions for both me and my gf). Need to say more about how much money I flushed through the toilet the last years on MMO's of so called respected Dev companies in the industry?? Rest my case. (And oh. No I didn't buy MO and won't be buying it at all, as I don't like FFA PVP in MMO setting attracting all the Epeen kiddies of the internetz. Just wanted to jump in and have my say on it) |
|