| 238 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
5/01/09 12:22:57 PM#181
Originally posted by blueturtle13
"There goes the neighhboorhood! Hey! All you darn kids! Go on! Get offa my game! |
|
|
5/01/09 12:25:52 PM#182
R ight as in I agree ;) Lucas is to blame as well, in my opinion moreso after the failure before it. |
|
|
5/01/09 2:41:51 PM#183
Originally posted by blueturtle13
I do not for 1 second dismiss lucas arts from wrong doing. They approved what went on, they bought the cool aid that soe was selling to them. That makes them incompetent and greedy. However if you get a company that has produced hits in the past telling you that this new plan they cooked up will get them millions of subscribers I can't dimiss that as being the catalyst for the whole situation. Soe sold lucas arts on a concept that is the crowning achievement in what not to do to an mmo. It is the single biggest example of how to ruin a game, your reputation and drive away players. None of this would have happened if the soe developers didn't go beyond what was asked of them and then actively campaign to make those changes.
I never said that soe was free to do whatever they want to and I know lucas had final say in whatever they want. That does not mean lucas is in the design room overseeing concepts and and soe cannot create ideas for approval on their own. Soe could create anything they wanted to and then submit it as proven above by the entire concept of the nge. Just because someone has finaly authority to say no, doesn't mean they will have perfect judgement and are immune to being sold on a terrible idea.
What was lucas arts supposed to do after soe continually screwed up? Fire them? Shut the game down? Give SWG to some other company? I'm sure the contract was protective both directions and lucas arts could not get out of it that easily as soe itself had millions invested in the game also. Also why is lucas arts at fault for soes inability to deliver anything they promised? When did the failures of a company become the fault of someone else? Lucas arts failed to pick the right company to produce a hit game and they bought into the greedy idea of screwing over their customers. Shame on them. Had they picked bioware or someone else in the first place odds are none of this would have happened. Remove soe from the picture and its pretty hard to see lucas arts as the big reason for these things happening isn't it?
|
|
|
5/01/09 2:52:35 PM#184
Originally posted by Locklain I like that last part there. Basically shifts the blame off LEC and places it on SOE. The funny thing about a partnership is you both rise together you both fall together. This has nothing to do with trust, it just shows that either LEC didn't care or they have no business sense at all. I think is shows that lucas arts was just as willing to screw over the players when presented with the picture of the nge pulling in warcraft like numbers. Both companies suck for doing this, but soe did dream this up and sold it for approval. The lucas team was just greedy, ignorant and niave enough to go endorse it. |
|
|
5/01/09 3:01:23 PM#185
Originally posted by blueturtle13
i dont think anyone here ever denied of LECs decision making responsibility when it came to the nge. what has been argued is that the idea, planning, development and implementation of the NGE came from SOE. of course LEC was aware they even marketed the game. you have the links already what are you trying to prove here? |
|
|
5/02/09 10:19:59 AM#186
Originally posted by Locklain
Yup, it is well known what happened. SOE mismanaged the game from day one. LEC was not happy, and told them to fix the problem. Dan Rubenfield and his team came up with the NGE, and sold the idea to LEC. LEC trusted SOE (big mistake). SOE then implemented the NGE. The NGE failed, miserably. LEC messed up -- they TRUSTED SOE to know what they were doing, and to be acting in good faith in the best interests in their partnership. Bad move. I like that last part there. Basically shifts the blame off LEC and places it on SOE. The funny thing about a partnership is you both rise together you both fall together. This has nothing to do with trust, it just shows that either LEC didn't care or they have no business sense at all.
No, it places blame where it belongs. Not all partnerships are the same. LEC provided the IP, SOE was supposed to provide a good game. SOE were supposed to be the experts in making MMORPGs, and LEC trusted them to do so. LEC was wrong in trusting them to know their part of the job. LEC definitely failed, by picking a bad group to partner with. |
|
|
5/02/09 10:24:01 AM#187
Originally posted by blueturtle13
So basically you are saying that LEC should have shut the game down pre-CU instead of trusting SOE to make it better, because SOE had been doing a bad job. Okay, I GUESS that's a reasonable argument...sorta. |
|
|
5/02/09 10:26:38 AM#188
Originally posted by Daffid011 I think is shows that lucas arts was just as willing to screw over the players when presented with the picture of the nge pulling in warcraft like numbers. Both companies suck for doing this, but soe did dream this up and sold it for approval. The lucas team was just greedy, ignorant and niave enough to go endorse it.
My thoughts exactly. |
|
|
5/02/09 10:28:26 AM#189
So now we have the next tactic of the apologists: It was LEC that FORCED the NGE. I guess we have come full circle yet again.
|
|
|
5/02/09 11:22:06 AM#190
Who's on first? Gotta love this circle of non-arguments that Arc has drawn out. Good work, Arc! |
|
Originally posted by Fishermage It's kind of funny really lol. I finally decide to challenge the notion that Sony hasn't done anything unethical, provide some evidence to support my point and get all kinds of interesting responses. By simply debating a point (and nothing more), I've now heard that everyone is equally unethical, so it must be o.k., LEC made them do it so it's not really their fault, that I'm trolling, baiting, mentally ill, vengeful, calling people out and picking on nice people. This whole thread is a study in the sociology of MMO forums lol. Sorry to disappoint some folks, but I'm really just debating the point that Sony has never done anything unethical. I think they have. We've heard statements like this for years now, and I finally decided to respond. I've had my eyes opened to something positive through this btw. I didn't really know that the FTC was keeping such close tabs on Sony. Now that I've seen how they've been repeatedly investigated and fined and/or sued successfully, I feel that I don't need to be such a consumer advocate as a hobby. It seems like "real" consumer advocates are doing a very good job, along with the authorities. I found that encouraging. I'm also aware that legislation is in the works to provide even more tools to help protect consumers of online entertainment. I think that's a good thing. I'm a happy gamer ^_^. |
|
|
5/05/09 10:20:59 AM#192
Originally posted by Daffid011 Good to see you as well Ecco. Ive been amazed lately at the Petition to close Warhammer thread and sure enough it finally died out and now they are after SOE again lol and not only SOE but you as well it seems. Well take heart my friend if your upsetting the trolls this badly you must be doing something right. Hang in there.
Good to see grandpagamer come into the thread and post a bunch of insults and conjecture? Wow I am pleased also! Great discussion tactics that the two of you pat yourselves on the back for. Congratulations to both of you for being objective and discussing the people who post and not the issues that are posted. Well done sirs!
Grandpa, read the orange highlighted accusation where you paint the haters as being conspiracy theorists. Now read the pink highlight where you spew the exact same conspiracy nonsense that you are complaining about. Look out everyone! The soe haters are focusing on warhammer! Anyone without a shining opinion must be a soe hater! They will be coming for your game next! run run run!
There used to be discussion filled with examples, facts and occurances in the mmo world with opinions on both sides. Now what I see from the supporters is nothing more than baseless rationalization and personal insults while they dance around highfiving each other and do the exact poor behavior that they accuse everyone else of. It is mind boggling to watch.
When did picking apart the person posting an relevent issue replace discussion of opinions and examples of the actual topic? Woo Hoo . We must have struck a chord Ecco they just wont let this one die lmao |
|
|
5/05/09 11:15:27 AM#193
Originally posted by grandpagamer
Good to see grandpagamer come into the thread and post a bunch of insults and conjecture? Wow I am pleased also! Great discussion tactics that the two of you pat yourselves on the back for. Congratulations to both of you for being objective and discussing the people who post and not the issues that are posted. Well done sirs!
Grandpa, read the orange highlighted accusation where you paint the haters as being conspiracy theorists. Now read the pink highlight where you spew the exact same conspiracy nonsense that you are complaining about. Look out everyone! The soe haters are focusing on warhammer! Anyone without a shining opinion must be a soe hater! They will be coming for your game next! run run run!
There used to be discussion filled with examples, facts and occurances in the mmo world with opinions on both sides. Now what I see from the supporters is nothing more than baseless rationalization and personal insults while they dance around highfiving each other and do the exact poor behavior that they accuse everyone else of. It is mind boggling to watch.
When did picking apart the person posting an relevent issue replace discussion of opinions and examples of the actual topic? Woo Hoo . We must have struck a chord Ecco they just wont let this one die lmao
Actually, that was allowed to die about five days and as many pages ago, until your current attempt to bring it back to life. |
|
|
5/05/09 12:10:24 PM#194
Originally posted by Fishermage
I was thinking the same thing earlier. -------- "SOE has probably united more gamers in hatred than Blizzard has subs"...daelnor |
|
|
5/05/09 12:27:41 PM#195
LOL!
Sony changed THEIR game. You don't like it. MOVE ON WITH YOUR LIFE. It's just a game! |
|
|
5/05/09 1:09:34 PM#196
Originally posted by grandpagamer Woo Hoo . We must have struck a chord Ecco they just wont let this one die lmao
Actually, that was allowed to die about five days and as many pages ago, until your current attempt to bring it back to life. Really? What company are you crusading against now? Please let us know as we are all on pins and needles awaiting your uncovering of the next scandal.
I am not crusading against anyone, and never have been. I am enjoying a conversation, and you are enjoying flaming people and making fun of them. Different strokes for different folks, I guess. |
|
|
5/05/09 1:44:10 PM#197
Originally posted by Fishermage Woo Hoo . We must have struck a chord Ecco they just wont let this one die lmao
Actually, that was allowed to die about five days and as many pages ago, until your current attempt to bring it back to life. Really? What company are you crusading against now? Please let us know as we are all on pins and needles awaiting your uncovering of the next scandal.
I am not crusading against anyone, and never have been. I am enjoying a conversation, and you are enjoying flaming people and making fun of them. Different strokes for different folks, I guess. Some people make it very easy to make fun of them as their opinion of themselves is so high that its just too much fun to pass up. |
|
|
5/05/09 1:51:08 PM#198
Originally posted by grandpagamer
Actually, that was allowed to die about five days and as many pages ago, until your current attempt to bring it back to life. Really? What company are you crusading against now? Please let us know as we are all on pins and needles awaiting your uncovering of the next scandal.
I am not crusading against anyone, and never have been. I am enjoying a conversation, and you are enjoying flaming people and making fun of them. Different strokes for different folks, I guess. Some people make it very easy to make fun of them as their opinion of themselves is so high that its just too much fun to pass up. I guess some people enjoy making fun of what they consider easy targets, while others like a real challenge. Still others find no need to engage in such things, and prefer to talk about subjects and not make fun of people at all. As I said, different strokes. |
|
|
5/05/09 2:21:12 PM#199
Originally posted by Fishermage
Actually, that was allowed to die about five days and as many pages ago, until your current attempt to bring it back to life. Really? What company are you crusading against now? Please let us know as we are all on pins and needles awaiting your uncovering of the next scandal.
I am not crusading against anyone, and never have been. I am enjoying a conversation, and you are enjoying flaming people and making fun of them. Different strokes for different folks, I guess. Some people make it very easy to make fun of them as their opinion of themselves is so high that its just too much fun to pass up. I guess some people enjoy making fun of what they consider easy targets, while others like a real challenge. Still others find no need to engage in such things, and prefer to talk about subjects and not make fun of people at all. As I said, different strokes. Like the challenge of uncovering all the plots in the game industry? |
|
|
5/05/09 2:36:38 PM#200
Originally posted by grandpagamer Really? What company are you crusading against now? Please let us know as we are all on pins and needles awaiting your uncovering of the next scandal.
I am not crusading against anyone, and never have been. I am enjoying a conversation, and you are enjoying flaming people and making fun of them. Different strokes for different folks, I guess. Some people make it very easy to make fun of them as their opinion of themselves is so high that its just too much fun to pass up. I guess some people enjoy making fun of what they consider easy targets, while others like a real challenge. Still others find no need to engage in such things, and prefer to talk about subjects and not make fun of people at all. As I said, different strokes. Like the challenge of uncovering all the plots in the game industry?
No, like the challenge of having a nice friendly discussion on the internet, without immature, insecure people jumping in and hijacking that conversation with flames and childish attacks. Some of us learned from our parents that making fun of people is wrong, whether on the internet or in real life. Some of us learned this over the years ourselves. Others never learn such things. The challenge is navigating through that soup of immaturity. |
|