Originally posted by GoodBadUgly

For one, I don't think its a disaster by any means.   It will be some time before you can really call it that.   The situation was far from optimal that's for sure but it definitely wasn't a disaster.   You can't call no rain for two days straight in Seattle a drought either.

I trust them enough and their game enough to have paid 50 dollars for it.   I also enjoyed playing in beta and on the first day.    I guess that sums up my feelings on it.

When the "limited" amount of players cannot log in it shows they simply were not ready. I don't know what else you want to call a disaster, the leevies in LA weren't ready for the huge amount of water and thus failed causing massive flooding...same thing here, and it was a disaster in both cases. So yes, it was most assuredly a disaster and the only ones denying it are die-hard fans an/or ignorant.

Sad to see people resorting to attacking eachother.

ill be a nice guy and report all of you XD

No seriously there is no need to do personal attacks.

The op didnt even respond to the personal attacks directed to him which makes him more mature than those who resorted on doing so.

you know what?

I actually voted yes in my poll  - cause id like to see the game work too

i posted the poll and mentioned disaster in reference to the launch because be honest everyone - it was a total disaster PR wise.

I reckon they will fix the situation in good time and get the game up and running and itl settle down in the weeks to come.

All this post was intended to be was a poll for the community to express how they felt about the launch and why, its like a radio show where people phone in to give their views.

as for the shitty spelling - i have bought a new keyboard and im still getting used to it

Originally posted by maxnrosy

Sad to see people resorting to attacking eachother.

ill be a nice guy and report all of you XD

No seriously there is no need to do personal attacks.

The op didnt even respond to the personal attacks directed to him which makes him more mature than those who resorted on doing so.

I saw one person doing personal insults in this topic, so I hope you get ALL of them...causing missing one is gonna be kinda hard. I hope these forums ban people for mis-using the mod/report tool like others do.

Originally posted by ShuttleXpC

Originally posted by GoodBadUgly

For one, I don't think its a disaster by any means.   It will be some time before you can really call it that.   The situation was far from optimal that's for sure but it definitely wasn't a disaster.   You can't call no rain for two days straight in Seattle a drought either.

I trust them enough and their game enough to have paid 50 dollars for it.   I also enjoyed playing in beta and on the first day.    I guess that sums up my feelings on it.

 

When the "limited" amount of players cannot log in it shows they simply were not ready. I don't know what else you want to call a disaster, the leevies in LA weren't ready for the huge amount of water and thus failed causing massive flooding...same thing here, and it was a disaster in both cases. So yes, it was most assuredly a disaster and the only ones denying it are die-hard fans an/or ignorant.

Accept for in this case, we lost a few days of gaming. Which they made up for by adding on 3 more free days. So your compairing the loss of 3 days of gaming, which were refunded lol, to a levy breaking and causing massive flooding.

Wow..........................

Ok so lets look at whats happened so far in those 3 days added on

the game is still down apart from a few hours worth of bugged game time

thats what ive heard and read anyway

if im incorrect then i hold my hands up  - but from what i can see they have taken peoples money  - offered a bonus of 3 days to say sorry and then taken the servers back down again after a few hours.

hardly fair is it?

so when the servers do come back up will they calculate the downtime due to bug fixes and add that to the 3 days thats already been depleated by downtime?

i doubt it

Originally posted by celee2222

Ok so lets look at whats happened so far in those 3 days added on

the game is still down apart from a few hours worth of bugged game time

thats what ive heard and read anyway

if im incorrect then i hold my hands up  - but from what i can see they have taken peoples money  - offered a bonus of 3 days to say sorry and then taken the servers back down again after a few hours.

hardly fair is it?

so when the servers do come back up will they calculate the downtime due to bug fixes and add that to the 3 days thats already been depleated by downtime?

i doubt it

Ok, I'll look at whats happend so far. I was able to log in for one day, played 3 hours straight, had a lot of fun. No issue's accept some of our clan mates were experiencing the out of sync issue, which of course no one in our party was. So for the first day I played had fun, which takes me to day two. Day two, I still haven't had my living room flooded or anything, but I did experience the sync issue, and it was unplayable for the most part. Well ....... it's day 2 so waiting on Day three which is tommorow. I said 3 days of game play loss since it was suppose to launch the 25th but pretty much was an official launch the 26th. So I have played 1 day out of those 3 days and got 3 free days. So as long as servers are up tommorow and I can play looks like I got my dime, and a day. Neat huh. 

So since servers went live, I've managed to play for 1 free day. Haven't been able to play the other 2 free days. As long as servers are up tomorrow then looks like I haven't lost a thing and neither has anyone else. Wait till tommorow for the "I got ripped off" type of posts. You know, until it's actually on your dime and not Aventurines.

Then you can start the diseaster spill again, this time you would be able to say you have lost one day of paid gaming and go from there.