| 58 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
2/27/09 11:22:21 AM#41
Originally posted by Gamer1221
That may be, but its not really relevant to what was being discussed. My point was that if you believe anything that a PR person says, you are an idiot. A PR person's job is bullshit people and convince them to buy their product regardless of its quality or necessity. All of these people claiming that Tasos 'promised' this feature and Aventurine 'promised' that feature really need to wake up.
I don't believe PR people, and I already knew the website was bullshit, but the fact remains that there are probably quite a few people who paid money for this game after reading the feature list, and will log in or explore the forums further to find out that they aren't getting what they paid for. It's one thing for a fan site to have inaccurate information, but for the main web site not to be updated on the supposed Release Date... How can they even call that a release?
I agree with you man, their website smacks of amateurism, as does their billing system and the general lack of polish surrounding their product. That said, no one is forced to hand over their money. I paid them with the expectation that it would probably be a waste of fifty bucks, and so far I was right. The difference between me and all the folks whining and complaining that they were lied to is that I expected it, and it was an acceptable risk of a small amount of money for possibly finding some long-term enjoyment. The phrase 'buyer beware' applies here. People need to accept responsibility for their actions (even though I know this isn't currently in vogue, particularly in America). People that bought Darkfall with the expectation that it would be a smooth launch and would feature everything Tasos ever talked about are fricking idiots, end of story. Hopefully they will wise up and learn from their mistake. Don't trust game developers; play a demo and make up your own mind, or suffer the consequences.
|
|
|
2/27/09 11:31:23 AM#42
Originally posted by Gamer1221
I like this format of discussion. Makes things easy to address
*edit for everyone else* I'm white and orange, he's yellow. Official FAQ is green.
And the reason I say it is a fail post is because you keep saying they have lied. Plenty of information is out there stating what has been removed. They have not lied or broken any promise. What they did do was Fail utterly at keeping there main page updated. Thats it, if the other information wasn't available then yes you could say they lied or broke there promise if you wanted because we are simply left with that information as all there is. That isn't the case, so no this does not validate your point that Aventurine has failed to keep there promises since all you have managed to point out is that they Failed to keep there main page updated, which we all agree with.
So Harp on the fact they fail at updating there site. Quit trying to convence people they failed to keep there promises with the above when I can easily show your statement to be false. |
|
|
2/27/09 11:32:50 AM#43
As several other people have said, if they removed these features over a year ago, sometime during that year, they could not remove them from the feature list on the OFFICIAL site? This is, indeed, false advertising. The official feature list on the company website is supposed to be far more reliable than an off-the-top-of-the-head answer on some interview on a fansite. It is a blatant lie to list all these features as being in-game with no intention of launching with them.
Yes, other games have cut features before, but they never advertised those features as still being in-game on their website. What Adventurine did here would be comparable to Turbine still showing the old MEO website yet launching LOTRO. The two games have little in common, just like the game Adventurine launched has little in common with the one on their website. |
|
|
2/27/09 11:41:06 AM#44
Originally posted by Taram
Unless you and others have trouble reading, you will notice I agree they need to update the Faq and there main site in general. It's asinine for it to be so outdated. I will say again since so many have missed this...........
I agree that it's asinine that they haven't updated there Faq or main site.
The problem is the OP's point isn't Valid because he's saying AV has lied and not filled any of there promises and gives examples. While the whole time he himself knows the Faq isn't updated and Aventurine has indeed stated these features would not be in long before now. So he uses the fact that he himself knows that the Faq and main site are not updated to try and prove a point he knows is a lie. Thats what I don't agree with.
The features Aventurine has said would be in, are in fact in. No feature said to be in is not in with the exception of player houses and those are on the back burner with prestiege classes and an Aquatic race. The sad thing is even player housing is in to a degree, they modified it to be part of the clan system lol.
|
|
|
2/27/09 11:48:29 AM#45
This thread brings up a great point. If enough people wanted to do so this sort of false or out-dated advertising could result in a class action suit. This is actually WORSE than what Funcom did. Tecmo Bowl. |
|
Originally posted by GrayGhost79 See, here's where we disagree... When you say "Aventurine has said", I equate that to what's on their official feature list. As a company, and as an entity, that, to me, defines what they "have said". Player housing really isn't in man, we both know that. Apparently, you can't even design your city, it's just a pre-designed plot that you spend money to build on. |
|
|
2/27/09 12:08:51 PM#47
Originally posted by Gamer1221 See, here's where we disagree... When you say "Aventurine has said", I equate that to what's on their official feature list. As a company, and as an entity, that, to me, defines what they "have said". Player housing really isn't in man, we both know that. Apparently, you can't even design your city, it's just a pre-designed plot that you spend money to build on.
See where you lost this whole thing at was when you said you knew about the correct information and knew that these things have been stated to be out already. When I say Aventurine has said I am reffering to the interviews, Dev journals and posts on the official forums by the Devs which you have admitted to reading.
You and I agree the Web site needs to be updated, you have unwittingly admitted to knowing about the other information, which negates your whole Aventurine Lied to me thread. Live with it and be more careful in your debates in the future. You can not admit to reading something officialy posted by Aventurine, then say it doesn't mean antyhing even though it is more recent......................... Point is, you've proved what many of us already knew and agreed on. The Faw needs an update because me and you and many others have seen the information from Aventurine that contradicts it ourselves. Now deny that lol. Good luck though.
If you wish to start a thread about how Aventurines main page and Faq needs an update I won't disagree or bother it. But what you attempted to do here just begged for a response.
Yes, Aventurine needs to update there Faq and main page. No, Aventurine hasn't lied about the features in game, as you yourself have admitted to reading the information they have posted about it being cut.
So good luck with w/e your trying to do here lol. |
|
|
TheHoweller
Novice Member
Joined: 7/16/08
Grinding is the worst idea ever integrated into a game... I would much rather have fun. |
2/27/09 12:09:20 PM#48
Yeah...I'm just so glad I didn't pre-order. Aventurine really dropped the ball on this release, at least from what I've read. I will say I agree with you, Ghost. I feel that if you're going to release a game, and charge for it...The website sponsoring that game "should" be updated with the game's current features. There's just absolutely no excuse for Aventurine doing what they did. I really doubt that many people pre-ordered Darkfall thinking that they'd receive a game with the FAQ's promised features...But it's still ethically wrong. I feel an open beta should have been done before this shoddy release...Hell, ask for donations. The last thing Aventurine should have done was gone back on their word of "no pre-orders, we'll do an open-beta"...But whatever, I've always said it, it's their game...They can fuck it up if they want. I personally think Darkfall will bomb in the end and prove itself to be nothing more than most F2P MMOs...I could be wrong, but I won't stupidly find out by handing them 50 bucks. ------------------------------- |
|
2/27/09 12:20:16 PM#49
It was said once before, but if you don't take pride in your own web-site (which is the face of your company), it says a lot about Aventurine's State of the Game and business practices... and level of compentency!
Not to mention, it is very misleading..!
____________________________ |
|
|
2/27/09 12:21:13 PM#50
The fact is, if they cant update a website, what makes you think they can update code with any reasonable amount of skill? Not being able to delete lines of html to update their website before launch, to coincide with what is currently available, is epic fail. |
|
|
2/27/09 12:30:25 PM#51
Grayghost you really are just making no sense. You are trying to defend these guys anyway you can. Do you really think your crusade is worth it? There isn't anything right about what they are doing. I have just been reading and laughin over your responses to Gamer. You are basically saying that all they really needed to do was release a barren landscape with no depth to it and let us all whack eachother right? And you would willingly hand your money over to someone who did that? Well if thats the case you shuold have spoke up. I could have created something better than this with Oblivion's contrsuction set, and sold it to everyone! Face it these guys screwed up. They left everything out that made this a good game and a true sandbox. While I feel that we should wait it out and see where were at in a month. But there is not point in defending these guys when they said they were going to deliver something, and failed miserably......
|
|
|
2/27/09 12:32:31 PM#52
Originally posted by GrayGhost79 Well, they may not have "lied," per say, but they could be accused of misleading folks by not updating the faq. And yes, I know people should do more investigation on a game than simply reading the faq...but then companies should realy not be trying to mislead folks either. It's a proven historical fact that beer saved humankind. |
|
|
2/27/09 12:44:34 PM#53
"Towers are in game and are safe zones." Towers are in the game, but no...there ARE NO SAFE ZONES. You need to understand what a safe zone is before commenting on it. A safe zone has nothing to do with something that can 3 shot you in a town, or guards that can swarm over you and kill you, or CONCORD in Eve magically appearing you and destroying you. A safe zone means, you can't damage another player no matter how hard you try. A safe zone is when the GAME won't let you damage another player. i.e. a city in Age of Conan. |
|
|
2/27/09 12:53:13 PM#54
I really dont get the arguments from the fans here... If someone heard "Darkfall" mentioned somewhere, and he felt like checking what it is, dont you think he would end up on their homepage? When he would find the homepage he would check the "Features" of the game. After that would he really think: "This is probably mostly false so I gotta dig a bit..." People using gameforums are in a minority compared to the number who plays the game, so a bunch of people wouldnt find out that most things on the featurelist are actually "stretching the truth" a bit. Heres my theories about the homepage: 1) They got someone in temporarily to make the homepage, then they never had any contact with that person again, and noone on Aventurine knows anything about how to handle a homepage. 2) They kept the homepage outdated to lure in more customers. 3) They have been somehow shut off from their own site most of the time, and therefore couldnt change it. 4) They are not really 30 persons in this company, more like 2 persons working like crazy on their game. Thats seriously the only reasons I can come up with... and most of them are dumb in my own opinion. I would really love to hear someone giving their theory on why they have the features so grossly outdated on their site. |
|
|
2/27/09 12:58:33 PM#55
Originally posted by mjones1052
Man someone you either can't read or refuse to.
Unless you really think me saying they need to update there main page and faq is defending them lol. I know, I know, it's the same as always though. Your a fanboi unless you think of anyway possible they have screwed up and blow it out of proportion so much that it goes from, they need to update there Faq to "OMFG, They Lied, they promised Talking Goats would fly out of Rosey O'Donnels arse and create World Peace!"
Sorry, this is a topic about Aventurine not updating there main page and there fact, which has been discussed to death and we all agree fan and troll alike that they need to A.S.A.P.
What this isn't is a list of broken promises lol.
The Faq is about as outdated as it can get at this point, if we all agree about the faq being outdated......... how are you suggesting we came to that agreement? Could it possibly be the fact there are is a ton of info out there explaining why whats missing is missing? No it couldn't be.............. that would make you guys look pretty silly to sit here and QQ like this saying "Oh no Aventurine Lied, look........ where are the pink flamingoes of doom that are on the faq.......... I mean sure, on the forums they said a year ago in a sticky thats still there the flamingoes are gone.......... but there still in the faq so that means they lied"
lol, I am not defending them this time, yes they screwed up by not updating the Faq. They however have not lied lol, this is about them not updating the faq lol. Each missing feature has been posted to be out by the devs a long time ago, some of it even years ago lol. So unless you want to use the information in this thread to QQ about how the faq is out of date, your simply trying your hardest to twist things to suit your cause, which isn't very effective since just about anyone reading either forums already knows whats been removed lol. Good luck though, you really will try to do anything to bash AV or discredit anyone that proves these conspiracy theories wrong huh lol.
In any case, I still agree with you all. The Faq is severly out dated, they screwed the pooch. They failed at updating there website, Its asinine. If thats not enough, you'll simply have to deal with it, cause I have no milk and cookies for you. |
|
|
2/27/09 1:02:57 PM#56
Originally posted by Remains
Since I am the resident fanboi I'll take this one..................
I have no theory behind why they haven't updated there Faq, I agree it's stupid they haven't done so yet. We are in agreement with this lol. The Faq being out of date is asinine. There Developers, it should be extremely simple for them. Hell my 13 year old daughter could do it. We've all been over this many many times in many threads, they haven't updated there faq and it's stupid. Now with that said, since we all admit and understand the Faq is out of date, how exactly does that validate it's use in an atempt to show what features are missing? Considering for it to be out of date we need to have information from the Devs stating so, or information from the devs thats more recent that contradicts the Faq? |
|
Originally posted by GrayGhost79
Since I am the resident fanboi I'll take this one..................
I have no theory behind why they haven't updated there Faq, I agree it's stupid they haven't done so yet. We are in agreement with this lol. The Faq being out of date is asinine. There Developers, it should be extremely simple for them. Hell my 13 year old daughter could do it. We've all been over this many many times in many threads, they haven't updated there faq and it's stupid. Now with that said, since we all admit and understand the Faq is out of date, how exactly does that validate it's use in an atempt to show what features are missing? Considering for it to be out of date we need to have information from the Devs stating so, or information from the devs thats more recent that contradicts the Faq? The fact is, anything that isn't in game like it is on the FAQ is not accurate. |
|
|
2/27/09 2:00:07 PM#58
To the fanboi answering in gold: How can you pull off caravans w/out an ingame system, just curios. A player owned shops are NOT IN, if you go in a town and spam "WTS BLAH BLAH" ITS NOT A SHOP, its called WTS spam, and its a feature that was present since the dawn of mmo's. But yeah, other than that, we knew what was cut for quite some time before launch. When I'm energetic I'm: When I'm at default I'm:
|
|