The following are a set of personal beliefs this person holds dear. Guess what this person does for a living.

1. Protecting Prostitution. This person had opined that several federal laws against prostitution “are subject to several constitutional and policy objections. Prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” In support of this proposition, this person cited only two cases involving contraception (Griswold and Eisenstadt) and one involving abortion (Roe). She further recommended that the federal laws against prostitution be repealed.

2. Protecting Bigamy: This person had opined that a law restricting the rights of bigamists “is of questionable constitutionality since it appears to encroach impermissibly upon private relationships.” This person offered only a weak “Cf.” cite to Griswold and Eisenstadt in support of this proposition. But the marital relationship that Griswold celebrates is plainly the traditional one-husband, one-wife version: marriage is “an intimate relation of husband and wife” and a “bilateral loyalty.” And Eisenstadt speaks of the “right of the individual, married or single,” not of the bigamist.

3.  Replace Mother's Day and Father's Day with a ‘Parent’s Day’ should be considered, as an observance more consistent with a policy of minimizing traditional sex-based differences in parental roles.”

4. Criticizing the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts. According to this person: “The Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, while ostensibly providing ‘separate but equal’ benefits to both sexes, perpetuate stereotyped sex roles to the extent that they carry out congressionally-mandated purposes.”

5. Urging Co-Ed Prisons. This one may be my favorite, as it starkly illustrates how far removed this person was from the real world: “Sex-segregated adult or juvenile institutions are obviously separate and in a variety of ways, unequal.… If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.”

6. Reducing the Age of Consent to 12. this person had recommended legislative changes that would reduce the age of consent for statutory rape under federal law from 16 to 12.

7. Requiring Taxpayer Funding of Abortion. This person strongly criticized the Court’s ruling that taxpayers are not constitutionally required to subsidize non-therapeutic abortions.
 

He is the president of the United States.

Originally posted by Samuraisword

He is the president of the United States.

God help us.........

I know. Astute,sagacious,clever.....

No...not the President of the United States. Close though. This person works in the same city and probably has more power than him.

Give you a hint. It's a woman and she got this position during the Clinton Administration (I probably said too much)

we know it ain't the prez ......I new before the hint....I will say Hospital for a hint.. ???? not to give it away.

Originally posted by Enigma

No...not the President of the United States. Close though. This person works in the same city and probably has more power than him.

Give you a hint. It's a woman and she got this position during the Clinton Administration (I probably said too much)

Justice Ruth?

 
Yes Edward Whelan...is a most clever writer.

Originally posted by Enigma

No...not the President of the United States. Close though. This person works in the same city and probably has more power than him.

Give you a hint. It's a woman and she got this position during the Clinton Administration (I probably said too much)

A dead giveaway.

Nancy Pelosi .

Originally posted by frodus

we know it ain't the prez ......I new before the hint....I will say Hospital for a hint.. ???? not to give it away.

it does have to do with a hospital. yes. She's there right now.

Originally posted by Enigma

Originally posted by frodus

we know it ain't the prez ......I new before the hint....I will say Hospital for a hint.. ???? not to give it away.

 

it does have to do with a hospital. yes. She's there right now.

is heard going " ooo ooo ooo" as his hand is raised and pointing to his other post in here!

Originally posted by Enigma

No...not the President of the United States. Close though. This person works in the same city and probably has more power than him.

Give you a hint. It's a woman and she got this position during the Clinton Administration (I probably said too much)

I have only read this far sooo, I was going to say Ron Paul but now Ruth Ginsberg.

Now I'll see if I am right.

Originally posted by Vemoi

Originally posted by Enigma

No...not the President of the United States. Close though. This person works in the same city and probably has more power than him.

Give you a hint. It's a woman and she got this position during the Clinton Administration (I probably said too much)

 

I have only read this far sooo, I was going to say Ron Paul but now Ruth Ginsberg.

Now I'll see if I am right.

 

Yup.
 

Ruth Ginsberg. A Supreme Court Judge appointed by William Jefferson Clinton.

ahh in her freetime she also knits pro abortion sweaters, with pictures of dead fetuses on them.

Im judges i the 9th circuit, and higher up judges like her try to make life unreasonable difficult.

I have to dissagree she is the most powerful. She is solid on the left for judges. The one who swings back and forth would be the most powerful.

The one that struck me the most there was co-ed prisons... wow...

Originally posted by Bigdavo

The one that struck me the most there was co-ed prisons... wow...

fun as hell for the guys. A living torment of hell for the women. And a nightmare for the guards lol

Originally posted by Enigma

Originally posted by Bigdavo

The one that struck me the most there was co-ed prisons... wow...

 

fun as hell for the guys. A living torment of hell for the women. And a nightmare for the guards lol

Not to mention a massive relief for the guys who just want to serve their time? Not that the tradeoff is necessarily worth it of course.

What really struck me wrong was the comment about the BSA/GSA. Both of them are private organizations, heavily based upon Christian principles, as private organizations they have every right to play out the roles and rules they currently embody without government interferance. I would on the other hand absolutely love to see a more modern, and more neutral organization come to take a similar place and function in the world. I see way too many people these days without even a minor hint when it comes to survival, first aid, teamwork, or leadership, all of which are just a part of what those groups teach, principles which quite literally save lives.

I have to say, co-ed prisons are a terrible idea.  The others make sense though.  Not entirely sure about bigamy, but then, why would it matter?  Marriage as a legal document is kind of silly because it has no legal basis in the first place anyways....sometimes I wonder why it even entered the legal field.