| 89 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
9/26/08 11:43:10 PM#41
Originally posted by IronMan66
I agree in principle that taking a keep or defending one is pretty fun stuff. But the inevitability of the outcome is going to discourage players. People dont play to lose time after time. Victory is what people are after. Again, when the battle is over before it starts, and if people already know this (and they will become wise to the fact), then it becomes pretty much an effort in futility.
Given a well balanced or not, as the population starts increasing for Destruction, which it will, then re-rollers will start migrating to more and more servers. Thus creating a population problem on even the more balanced servers. It is predictable at this even early state of the game.
And I agree in principle to your agreement in principle. :) |
|
|
9/26/08 11:49:14 PM#42
Originally posted by Mcpoopypants Fanboy? Yeah, I do not think so. I think most people who read my posts here know that I am not a fanboy. I have the game that I like and I do not like. I am anything but a fanboy - a blind follower of a company that can do no wrong. Come with a valid argument, one that adds to the discussion and you might just get a better response to your arguments.
Your post has no originality either, why do you need me to be original when your not? same old fanboy cry. Valid argument? Whose trying to argue, just saying, War is in the same vein as Wow, easy mode made for lowest common denominator, anyone can play. That's cool too, my 6 year old nephew plays and owns in it, I think its a really good game for kids and beginners. I just hate that since it's the "Any-mans" game, that also means it gets the highest sales, which means other companies copy the formula. It's making mmo's that require player-skill and thought to become more rare. Try not to get your fanboy panties in a twist and talk like your not a foaming at the mouth fanboy Fine, reduce your arguments to fanboy this and fanboy that. It simply shows that you have nothing more to talk about or add and again nothing original. You are only quoting and adding to the same old, tired and ignorant arguments that have sunken many of these forums to the cesspool of ignorance that they are. |
|
|
9/26/08 11:49:16 PM#43
I hope you are correct, but that Chicken Little inside of me is squaking up a storm. I do like the game, and wish for it to succeed, but it is getting harder and harder to play as Order on a totally dominated server. |
|
|
9/26/08 11:49:47 PM#44
Haha the WoW fanbois are scared. Otherwise why would they be so vocal? **Returned SWG Player** |
|
|
9/26/08 11:52:33 PM#45
Originally posted by IronMan66
Try Ulthuan. :) I cannot say that Order does dominate or that Destruction doesn't but I can tell you that on our server, we have some darn good battles. Order is outnumbered but is better organized and strategic. Destruction has numbers but so far its been tactics that have won their battles. We have a couple closed beta guilds on there (as well as the Penny Arcade guild) that are fun to fight because they know HOW to play -- beyond the zerg that you find on most other servers. :) |
|
|
9/27/08 12:00:35 AM#46
Order on ostermark basicly kicks butt when ever my guild forms up a warband and we meet one of the other big WBs in a RvR zone. Even on weekdays during the day our server runs med/med with our guild running 30-40 people on a night. Pretty dam fun on our server. Also its never med/high or high/full. Server pop is almost always even. Hold on Snow Leopard, imma let you finish, but Windows had one of the best operating systems of all time. If the Powerball lottery was like Lotro, nobody would win for 2 years, and then everyone in Nebraska would win on the same day. AMD 4800 2.4ghz-3GB RAM 533mhz-EVGA 9500GT 512mb-320gb HD |
|
|
9/27/08 12:12:40 AM#47
Originally posted by templarga Fanboy? Yeah, I do not think so. I think most people who read my posts here know that I am not a fanboy. I have the game that I like and I do not like. I am anything but a fanboy - a blind follower of a company that can do no wrong. Come with a valid argument, one that adds to the discussion and you might just get a better response to your arguments.
Your post has no originality either, why do you need me to be original when your not? same old fanboy cry. Valid argument? Whose trying to argue, just saying, War is in the same vein as Wow, easy mode made for lowest common denominator, anyone can play. That's cool too, my 6 year old nephew plays and owns in it, I think its a really good game for kids and beginners. I just hate that since it's the "Any-mans" game, that also means it gets the highest sales, which means other companies copy the formula. It's making mmo's that require player-skill and thought to become more rare. Try not to get your fanboy panties in a twist and talk like your not a foaming at the mouth fanboy Fine, reduce your arguments to fanboy this and fanboy that. It simply shows that you have nothing more to talk about or add and again nothing original. You are only quoting and adding to the same old, tired and ignorant arguments that have sunken many of these forums to the cesspool of ignorance that they are. You reduced your argument to troll this troll that, I nearly sunk to your level so you could comprehend me. If WAR requires you to think, then that says much about you, not the game, I wont say it because I do not wish to insult you. Name calling, is troll a name? yes, you call me names then whine that I called you names? Dont be a hypocrite. You stooped, so dotn mock it. Have a nice day sir and enjoy your intense battles that when you win do you win the land and the resources, no, they get reset, HAHAHA. Silly theme park kids |
|
|
9/27/08 2:56:48 AM#48
If WAR is not considered to be a an MMORPG game, then Guild Wars, City of Heroes, Age of Conan, Sword of the NEw World, Auto Assault, Hellgate London, Maple Story, Phantasy Star Online, Phantsy Star Universe, and even WoW are all not MMORPGs either. All of these games have the same world setups as WAR. they all have quick and easy to grab quest. They all have perfectly laid out little worlds that players will travel through in a linear path. They all don't play like EQ. I've noticed that the only people making this BS flawed arguement are the old geezers with their "remeber the good ol days" attitudes, trying to find ever the slightest reason to hate anything that diviates from the old flawd and boring EQ world, with it's vast open plains of empty space. |
|
|
9/27/08 8:41:50 AM#49
Originally posted by Jenneroflok
I do not think it will happen with WoTLK, I know alot of PvPers that are not happy about the idea of PVP armor or weapontry tied to both Regular PvP and the Arena. Now this might now happen before launch, but the idea of it happening have friends of mine going back to Starwars Galaxies and Sony (Faint). I for one will not go back to wow now, I have experienced the WAR pvp set and their is no going back.
Its, funny. I'm browsing this and other War forums right now over that decision by Blizzard. I detest their duel in a box PVP and the desicion to make any and all PVP gear tied to it made me decide to cancel 2 accounts and start looking elsewhere. |
|
|
Sixfeetunder
Novice Member
Joined: 2/19/07
----------------------Game: EQ 1&2 - SWG - WoW - DnL - DDO - Vanguard - AoC - WAR -Aion - Rift |
9/27/08 9:00:29 AM#50
first month is free but i don't think re-sub the next month... |
|
9/27/08 9:15:34 AM#51
I know TONS and TONS of people that are going to be dropping WHO like its hot as soon as Darkfall Online comes out. Untill then WHO will get my money. |
|
|
Azrile
Advanced Member
Joined: 7/29/08
Any new or returning player to WOW, send me a PM for some help getting started. |
9/27/08 9:24:10 AM#52
Originally posted by QuinColds
Its, funny. I'm browsing this and other War forums right now over that decision by Blizzard. I detest their duel in a box PVP and the desicion to make any and all PVP gear tied to it made me decide to cancel 2 accounts and start looking elsewhere.
Actually WOW has three ways to get PVP gear.. you get it from Arena, you get it from Battlegrounds and now you get it from Lake Wintergrasp (open world RvR) Some of the best gear will require Arena ratings, some will require battleground tokens, and some will require you to win Lake Wintergrasp. And to put in Warhammer's terms. Yes, in WOW there are a few pieces that you can only get by winning in the Arena. But isn' that the same as Warhammer.. Isn't Order going to be 'locked out' of the best pvp gear because they are losing on that server? WOW, just like War, gives the best gear to players who win, but they give the losing side gear that is good enough to be competitive. I can't wait for another month when not only is destruction steamrollong on most servers because of population imbalance, but they will also have better gear. There is already a lot of QQ now, wait til then. If you are an ex-wow player and want to come back. Scroll of Rez gives 7 free days, boost a character to 80 a realm and faction change. Send me PM for an invite. Only 1 per day available |
|
9/27/08 9:31:18 AM#53
Originally posted by Azrile
Its, funny. I'm browsing this and other War forums right now over that decision by Blizzard. I detest their duel in a box PVP and the desicion to make any and all PVP gear tied to it made me decide to cancel 2 accounts and start looking elsewhere.
Actually WOW has three ways to get PVP gear.. you get it from Arena, you get it from Battlegrounds and now you get it from Lake Wintergrasp (open world RvR) Some of the best gear will require Arena ratings, some will require battleground tokens, and some will require you to win Lake Wintergrasp. And to put in Warhammer's terms. Yes, in WOW there are a few pieces that you can only get by winning in the Arena. But isn' that the same as Warhammer.. Isn't Order going to be 'locked out' of the best pvp gear because they are losing on that server? WOW, just like War, gives the best gear to players who win, but they give the losing side gear that is good enough to be competitive. I can't wait for another month when not only is destruction steamrollong on most servers because of population imbalance, but they will also have better gear. There is already a lot of QQ now, wait til then.
Perhaps you haven't been following recent developments in Beta of Wrath. But ALL PVP gear, even the blue starter sets now require a combination of arena points and honor. In fact, the number of points needed would have an avg play on an avg team 2-4 months to get a starter PVP set. |
|
|
9/27/08 9:46:33 AM#54
I'm not convinced that WAR will be pulling in all that flak though. I'm seeing more and more people already moving on to the next line of MMO's again. It's like an endless chairdance. Newest MMO comes around, they play it a while, get sick of it and move to the next.
|
|
|
9/27/08 10:13:38 AM#55
Originally posted by Pheace It's because no gaming companies are willing to push the envelopes. Every MMO is about elves, dwarves, ogres, and fantasy that has been coming out (a little bit of sci-fi can come again once in a while as well). I'm so sick of the damn fantasy genre. Nobody really gets that if you make a good MMORPG that is hyped enough and has at least some slight difference to WoW, it will be successful. AoC failed with this because their game wasn't finished. WAR will do alright, but not amazing because they're playing it on the safe route. Trust me, I've been having some great fun with this game but I don't see how people can go about and say that this isn't just another MMO trying to take a free ride off of WoW. It isn't a bad thing, if others did it like WAR has been doing then all WoW copies with extra sprinkles would do semi-successful. These gaming companies need to realize that some of us are freakin' sick of WoW. And we don't want another WoW.
|
|
|
9/27/08 10:14:10 AM#56
I see WAR growing in numbers actually. It's a game that just keeps getting better as you level. I quit WoW for 3 months after hitting level 59 with my first character. It was just burning me out with all the instances, and gear grind, and Tarren Mill zergfests.
People are just now starting to run the instances inside Altdorf, and the RvR lakes are ramping up in their intensity. It's also not hard to get a second character to Rank 40 to help out, but you'll have to pick and choose which ones you want to get to RR80 and whatever benefits that brings. I dunno, I've never seen an MMO quite like this one. So far it just seems to be getting better. |
|
|
9/27/08 10:26:58 AM#57
Obviously as stated many times this is only registered accounts not actual subs. I see the game suffereing the same fate as DAOC did. The first year they reached 500k subs which was actually pretty good but after that it was a steady decline downward. I see the game doing no better than DAOC did which would mean just another subpar mmo to choose from. |
|
|
9/27/08 10:32:31 AM#58
Originally posted by SaintViktor
I second what Saint has to say here.....And numbers huh...AoC realeased with huge numbers and I don't see you talking about it? I would be shocked if they have 100k by Christmas considering the way they go about fixing issues.. Hell they move faster on gold spammers and to hide the true numbers of players faster then they fix major issues...I mean them changing the way you /who people and guild numbers is ridiculous and the only reason is, is because people started figuring out how many numbers were on servers...Unreal |
|
|
9/27/08 12:22:52 PM#59
Originally posted by IronMan66
In the Scenarios, when with an organized order side, I've never had a problem fighting destruction on equal groups or beating them pretty solidly.
When you get out into the open world, their 1.5:1 ratio (guild wise on Chaos Wastes) becomes a huge factor, as does when people come down a tier and you find yourself facing greater numbers, and those numbers are 5+ levels higher. You know you have a problem when you have a warparty in a keep, and the other side can just zerg right into it and completely wipe out everything without any real losses.
When you're around level 20 as a healer, and a lvl 27-29 DPSer hits you, you've got about 2-3 seconds to live. |
|
|
9/27/08 12:25:04 PM#60
Originally posted by TeranHawkins
AoC didn't sell 900k to players at the start, that is what they sold to retailers (WAR sold around 1.5m to retailers). Also AoC had 400k subs still active (used or not) at the end of Q2. That's June 30th, so it's not 400k still unless the pvp patch was a blessed miracle from God. |
|