<
>
 Thread (3 posts)
Kairarr  5/14/08 1:23:18 PM
#1

Rank: 31/100 Rank: 31/100 Rank: 31/100 Rank: 31/100 Rank: 31/100

Apprentice Member

Joined: 4/03/08
Posts: 116

Well so much for their promises, graphics are ruining the game.

Can you believe it , 48 vs 48 for their biggest pvp battle. World of Warcraft Alterac Valley is 40 vs 40 with no lag at all, and it is a damn PvE game. Now you have Age of Conan who focus mainly on PvP with worse pvp than WoW.

 
 
ProfRed  5/14/08 1:29:37 PM
#2

Rank: 13/100 Rank: 13/100 Rank: 13/100 Rank: 13/100 Rank: 13/100

Novice Member

Joined: 10/29/03
Posts: 1474

Uhh do you realize that there are at least 5 other posts about this before you with tons of discussion on the topic? 

Here's one just in case you aren't a troll:

www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/178898

... and if you say anything is worse pvp than WoW then you are instantly discrediting yourself. 
 
asdasdasdd  5/14/08 1:36:10 PM
#3

Rank: 37/100 Rank: 37/100 Rank: 37/100 Rank: 37/100 Rank: 37/100

Apprentice Member

Joined: 4/30/06
Posts: 37

Originally posted by Kairarr

Well so much for their promises, graphics are ruining the game.

Can you believe it , 48 vs 48 for their biggest pvp battle. World of Warcraft Alterac Valley is 40 vs 40 with no lag at all, and it is a damn PvE game. Now you have Age of Conan who focus mainly on PvP with worse pvp than WoW.

 

Cept WoW graphics are cartoony and it's hard to find a comp bad enough to not be able to run the game. Good thing WoW's 40v40 were always in the same place, not running around doing other objectives, right?

Sieging is NOTHING like AV, and your just ignorant if you think so. Sieging reqs ALL people on each side to fight CONSTANTLY in order for a win, AV is a huge PvE BG, seriously. You use to win by killing the bosses, you still win by killing NPCs