Originally posted by Skatty2007

On the flipside, maybe a 48x48 cap would negate the "large guilds pwn everything" problem. If a guild of 48 people is taking on a guild of 1000 people, they in effect have the same chance of winning.

This can be both a positive and a negative...

Positive because it could mean there WILL be battlekeep turnover = more siege battle fun for you and I.

Negative because it kind of defies logic that a group of 48 shouldn't overtake a group of 1000. However, Leonidis did this at Thermopylae a long ago with his band of merry Greeks - so you never know :)

Actually the big guilds would still "pwn" everything. Even if a smaller guild manages to win a battle keep spot from one of the big guilds they would now need the gold and resources to build their own keep. If you have a guild with only 50 members it's going to be a lot harder for them to gather resources than it would be for a guild with 1000 members, which would make it a lot harder to have the battle keep ready before the next attack window time has to be scheduled.

Iijs 6/05/08 11:41:24 PM

#27

Report this post

Explain why you are reporting this post: (750 characters max.)

Novice Member

Joined: 10/27/04
Posts: 430

A guild of 48 might have a hard time fielding all 48 for a siege.... but a guild of 125-150 people, NO PROB. I've seen an average of 50-60 people online most of the day since launch -- it all depends what guild you're in.

Page 2 of 2

2

Search Theme Gamelist

- Page Created in 1.047 seconds -