| Thread (9 posts) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
CactusmanX 4/19/08 6:21:43 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 5/05/04
Don''t mock me my friend. It''s a condition of mental divergence. |
I have no techinal knowledge on servers but I was wondering, If a MMOG had a server size of say 200, would that allow the game to do more? Like more twitchy combat, destructable enviroments, player housing etc. And if it could do you think anyone would want to play it. Not saying I am making a game, just wondering. |
|
| ~ |
||
|
fischsemmel 4/19/08 6:23:23 PM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 11/21/06 |
Eh? Server size of 200? |
|
| |
||
|
Illius 4/19/08 6:30:59 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 4/12/06
I intend to live forever -- So far so good! |
Originally posted by fischsemmel He means people. He's asking if limiting the number of people per server to perhaps 200 people would allow for better game mechanics. |
|
| |
||
|
paulscott 4/19/08 6:54:45 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 12/04/05
why do humans build, because it isn''t there |
WurmOnline is based around the player limit of 500 people actively playing on a server(logged in), 1,500 active on the server(call it home and have stuff placed down that's theirs), and a grid of 28,000 servers(if you quote me on the last figure I'll choke you). While a lot of that is indy scope, I'm sure that at the same time a lot of it isn't. That's just a game covering everything except the twitch combat. |
|
| My definition of an expert in any field is a person who knows enough about what's really going on to be scared. |
||
|
Czzarre 4/19/08 7:28:45 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 9/10/07
MMORPG Character Monuments ...When its time for your character to take a well deserved rest... |
I dont believe there is a perfect server size number. The perfect server size is there is enough players to make it seem your not alone, yet not too crowded that you hunt where you want without too much competition Torrential |
|
| AoC PvP guide, Gathering Guide, Leveling Guides! Looking for a new game? The MMORPG FINDER |
||
|
CaesarsGhost 4/19/08 7:35:10 PM
|
||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 4/03/04
The only difference between a Troll and a Fanboi is which side of the fence they stand on. |
My experience on the Development side (2 MMOFPS that were published... one shortlived) is that there's definately a "players per area" sort of limit that you can hit... but it doesn't effect any other systems. Endless Ages worked for years, the pop-cap was fairly high (thousands). So no, I don't believe pop-cap has as much to do with game mechanic. I think the effort the programmers put into the different sections is what is the "trade-off" you're thinking off. You have finite resources and decide if you want to support however many players or however many features. 1 programmer can only program so much in a certain amount of time... it's not his/her fault, it's just the truth. So I guess it's both "Yes." and "No." depending on how you look at it. |
|
| - CaesarsGhost Currently Subscribed to: |
||
|
CactusmanX 4/19/08 9:07:46 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 5/05/04
Don''t mock me my friend. It''s a condition of mental divergence. |
Ah, the reason I ask is because I figure for certain features, like housing, it would be more practical to do if there were fewer players per server. And other things like twitch combat, the reason most people say it couldn't be done in an MMOG is because having a lot of people + collision detection + the internet = a lot of lag. So I figured that maybe having not so many people + collision detection + the internet = not so much lag, simplistic but you get my point. |
|
| ~ |
||
|
Xiaoki 4/19/08 11:20:32 PM
|
||
|
Hard Core Member
Joined: 3/07/04 |
I think Planetside had a max of 200 people. Huxley will have a max of around 200 people per map as well. |
|
| |
||
|
resonate6 4/20/08 5:25:17 AM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 4/10/08
I feel safer on a racetrack than I do on Houston''s freeways. |
Originally posted by fischsemmel
hehehehe |
|
| |
||