| 96 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
5/13/06 12:08:29 PM#26
Sigh. When are you going to give up? is your ONLY intention to drag the game into the mud, under false pretenses? |
|
|
5/13/06 12:13:04 PM#27
Think "it" might be retarded :)
Fish of tommorow |
|
|
5/15/06 11:03:36 AM#28
This is FunCom's game to ruin. A great analogy would be the US Democrats having the 2004 election in their hands, with nobody but themselves to ruin it.
I really wish some other developer had taken on this title. I really do. IF there was ANY other name attached to it BUT FunCom...I'm sorry, but I hate to see something with this great a promise shot before it gets out of the gate. And don't even try and defend FC yet, watch and let them prove what they do best. Foul a great thing. If you never played AO, do a search for "optiflex shoulderpads". That's your boy FC hard at work. Just somebody find another company! Please! |
|
|
Xpheyel
Apprentice Member
Joined: 2/28/05
He that breaks a thing to find what it is has left the path of wisdom. |
5/15/06 11:55:43 AM#29
You're indicting FC because the AO graphics screw up visual shoulderpads on Opifex..? I think Anarchy Online is a lot of fun though its kind of an old-style game with a fair bit of grinding and lewt hunting.
|
|
5/15/06 8:53:10 PM#30
No, no, only using that simple example of one of many, many small mistakes. Attention to detail sort of things. If they are anywhere near as callous and indifferent to even the minor bugs/glitches, let alone the many other more major ones..that's all I was trying to illustrate. |
|
|
5/16/06 2:52:36 PM#31
Are we talking about the same company who released 2 expansions that got awards? Then again i hope the ney sayers actually check the state of the game pre beta before saying to mutch.
|
|
|
5/16/06 6:53:06 PM#32
I'm here to hype this game, too. It and GW are the only things I like oiut there right now. I did hear a rumour that Conan would be rated M tho? because the violence would be graphic. I love Conan, always have but I have small children. I don't know if I want them to see Mommy tearing some guys head off, or ripping his spine out.
Back to official forums to see |
|
|
5/16/06 9:06:44 PM#33
Yeah, the M rating is a double edged sword. For those with youngsters around, this one may be a bit iffy. I know I would't want my kids playing it(or watching me play it); their innocence is stripped quick enough without parents contributing to the issue. On the other hand, it may do allot to keep the WoW crowd from infesting it. I know there are going to be many who find their way over, that's a given. If the M rating keeps 1 leet away, I'd call it a brilliant game plan.(Not bashing WoW, just the ones who enjoy "Pwning n00bs!"...<pointing my finger at akewlguy>). For this reason alone I'm gonna give it a shot. Even if I can only play weekends, it should be fun. To get back on topic...HH, please come back! You were right, this game is going to be terrible! Oh why, why didn't we listen to you?! The horror...the horror...the horror.... |
|
|
5/17/06 4:16:06 PM#34
I don't play MMO's with my kids there. When they're awake, I'm spending time with them ;)
I don't think I need to prop up AoC anymore than anyone else has here. The proof will be in the pudding when the various games get released and the Cheers and Jeers are heard world wide ;) I think AoC definately has the potential to draw a lot of people to it's fold, and hopefully the M rating will keep some (if not most) of the kiddies from playing. The community over on their boards is amazing! |
|
|
5/18/06 8:47:32 AM#35
Im all for anything based on Robert E. Howard's work.
|
|
|
5/18/06 9:33:26 AM#36
Careful what you ask for, maybe HH will be back! I also agree that for those with children this game might be a bit too violent. Maybe they will have a way to turn off blod/gore? -Chegg |
|
|
5/18/06 9:23:28 PM#37
But all in all, AO to me still rocks and will always be one of my favorite sci-fi mmo's to date and still has alot of people involved in the game. With FC picking up the AoC title, I think alot of people out there are going to be thrilled when this game releases. |
|
|
5/22/06 3:05:57 AM#38
based on the title of this thread, I just wanted to point out AoC's three "best mmo" awards from E3 this year :D
http://opinionator.net/aoc/e3-awards Opinionator Games' AoC : http://opinionator.net/aoc |
|
|
5/22/06 4:10:28 AM#39
Fish of tommorow |
|
|
5/22/06 8:53:38 AM#40
AO is not just popular with the Norwegians, unless I and a few thousand others were moved in our sleep:P And I have great faith in Funcom to make a huge success out of AoC. Am I a Funcom fanboi? No. I realize they have their shortcomings, as do all devs. Am I an AO fan? Absolutely. Funcom turned what started to be the biggest disaster in mmo histoery and completely turned it around into the game it is today and my home away from home. I expect nothing less of AoC, but I will wait until it is out and playable before I fully support it or declare it a failure. Wish everyone could do that instead of formulating unfounded opinions about games that aren't even out yet. When it's out and if it turns out to be garbage, then please feel free to bash it as such. I will probably join you. But until then, any and all opinions of AoC's imminent failure are just that. Opinions.
|
|
|
5/22/06 10:10:49 AM#41
Well said Zovan. Contructive criticism is great, unfounded bashing is not. -Chegg |
|
|
5/22/06 10:17:39 AM#42
Point & Click MMORPG Movement/Combat Interface = Loser Funcom - Change it or Fail Nuff Said |
|
|
De_Valos
Novice Member
Joined: 9/23/05
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity; I'm uncertain of the former." ~Einstein |
5/22/06 1:41:15 PM#43
Shoal,
Where is it that you've drawn your assumption that Age of Conan: Hyborian Adventures uses a point and click movement/combat interface? You can use your keyboard, WASD or arrow keys to move your avatar, to attack you press 4-9 on the numeric keypad. Each press causes your avatar to swing their equipped weapon in a specific direction. You do not have to click on a MOB in order to strike it. If the Mob is within range and capable of intersecting the weapons arc you will strike it and thus do damage. No need to target/click a mob at all. With this system if you have 50 mobs standing in front of you (not likely) and you press 9 you will swing your blade from the upper right, diagonally down to the lower left, just as a human would swing the weapon striking all mobs within the path of the weapon. |
|
5/23/06 6:18:43 AM#44
this is the only game worth waiting for. blizzard fanboys will be served whine and cheese at the entrance to wow forums , now shush back to cartoon world of childplay |
|
|
5/23/06 7:20:19 AM#45
I don't see your point. You are obviously some sort of Conan fan judging from you avatar and name, so whats the problem? You are trying to rip the game up before it even releases. Have you played it? If you have, you do realize that Betas are not the true game. They are TEST. What you may believe the game is today may not be the case the next....BECAUSE THEY ARE TESTING IT. |
|
|
5/23/06 11:08:26 AM#46
Torak, I think HyborianHero is a lost cause. At this point I feel a bit like feeding the troll, oh well ;) Also, I am so sick of all the WoW fanbois that come here and proclaim that 'point-and-click' combat/movement will ruin the game. Please READ UP on a game before you criticize it. Thanks for setting that straight De Valos! -Cheggelund |
|
|
5/23/06 11:21:50 AM#47
Yeah I see some of his post........I didn't realise he was just a troll. I wasted a big long post on him lol I have nothing against point and click, I play L2. Its actually easier then w.a.s.d. You just "point and click" lol. (what I do not like is how in some point and clicks the camera needs to be rotated manually, I think FFIX did that) All in all, its simply a matter of taste. if it is good game it will do well. |
|
|
5/23/06 2:47:10 PM#48
For what it's worth, I dont think HH is a troll in a traditional sense. I think he really does believe what he says.... He just can't say what he thinks without being annoying, emotional, or petty. Too bad really, maybe he could have found at least some sympathy othewise. Not from me though
|
|
|
5/27/06 12:03:33 AM#49
Wow..How stupid does this poster look now that AoC has taken home 3 major Best of Show awards from E3, beating out some stiff competition. Dude you're a moron. AoC is bringing many innovative features to an MMO title, not to mention some spiff ass graphics along with the incredible gameplay elements....Go watch all the Trailers and gameplay footage from E3 2006, and tell me if you saw a better MMO presentation... I'll save you the trouble - there wasnt one, and thats coming from a Vanguard Fanboy. |
|
|
5/28/06 2:02:24 PM#50
King carebear? How is there "nothing new" in this title? How is it falling behind others? As a quick look over almost every single title being hyped on this site can tell, then 90% of All upcoming MMOs are clones of World of Warcraft (Vanguard being hyped highly as one, for whatever reason; more pulpy cheese for the masses to revel in I guess) or Lineage 2 clones from NCsoft... Here we have a title that takes it's creative inspiration from a more "mature", if one can call Conan litterature mature in any other sense of the concept than having explicit sex and violence, source, rather than the usual fairies and elves vs. green men with tusks garbage "we" are all so happy to revel in. That alone is new. On top of that, we have the inclusion of an RTS element, a realtime combat system that in current previews appear to be lightyears ahead of what anyone else has dared do. Ultima Online style combat as breaking edge uberness in WoW and all it's clones is an absurd anakronism that should be done away with. DDO tried, but failed. Note how above I said creative inspiration? That's right, making a complete copy of a world set down by a depressed and suicidal writer close to 100 years ago, published solely in pulp magazine untill rather recently, and thinking that would be a wonderful and balanced game is an absurdity. Even with more modern and well documented make-believe worlds that would cause no end of problems. Why? It's this thing called balanced gameplay. While not something anyone has, as of yet anyway, managed to create that on a larger scale than quick-bout FPS games, at least attempting to make a balanced game where you have a relatively varried number of different ways to interact with the game, like fighting or using magic or tradeskilling. If you want a game more closely built to the material it is based upon, you'll have a catastrophy as the world is not ready for anything like that. We want more or less predictable gameplay with everything set in safe frames so we know everything. Having a more open game world will not happen for many many years. The very idea of more innovative game design for MMOs has been more or less completely abolished by the enourmous (in relation to it's media) success that World of Warcraft is enjoying. Instead of whining about the straying from a few things in the original litterature, that most players will never have read anyway, who knows some might actually pick it up now, and the fact that the game will involve PvP and not only be a chat interface with pretty graphics, you should be applauding Funcom for actually bothering to try with another MMO game that dares to be different. |
|