Trending Games | Elder Scrolls Online | WildStar | Star Wars: The Old Republic | ArcheAge

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,644,328 Users Online:0
Games:681  Posts:6,078,017
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
A-C
2029 Online 2112: Revolution 2Moons 4Story 8BitMMO 9 Dragons A Mystical Land A Tale in the Desert III A3 ACE Online ARGO Online Aberoth Absolute Force Online Absolute Terror Achaea Adellion Aerrevan Aetolia, the Midnight Age Age of Armor Age of Conan Age of Empires Online Age of Mourning Age of Wulin Age of Wushu Aida Arenas Aika Aion Albion Online Alganon All Points Bulletin (APB) Allods Online Altis Gates Amazing World Anarchy Online Ancients of Fasaria Andromeda 5 Angels Online Anime Trumps Anmynor Anno Online Applo Arcane Hearts Arcane Legends ArchLord ArcheAge Archeblade Archlord X Asda 2 Asda Story Ashen Empires Asheron's Call Asheron's Call 2 Astera Online Astonia III Astro Empires Astro Lords: Oort CLoud Asura Force Atlantica Online Atriarch Aura Kingdom Aurora Blade Auto Assault Avatar Star Battle Dawn Battle Dawn Galaxies Battle for Graxia Battle of 3 Kingdoms Battle of the Immortals Battlecruiser Online Battlestar Galactica Online Battlestar Reloaded Beyond Protocol Black Aftermath Black Desert Black Gold Black Prophecy Black Prophecy Tactics: Nexus Conflict Blacklight Retribution Blade & Soul Blade Hunter Blade Wars Blazing Throne Bless Blitz 1941 Blood and Jade Bloodlines Champions Bounty Bay Online Brain Storm Brawl Busters. Brick-Force Bright Shadow Bullet Run Business Tycoon Online CTRacer Cabal Online Caesary Call of Camelot Call of Gods Call of Thrones Camelot Unchained Canaan Online Cardmon Hero Cartoon Universe CasinoRPG Castle Empire Castlot Celtic Heroes Champions Online Champions of Regnum Chaos Online Chrono Tales Citadel of Sorcery CitiesXL Citizen Zero City of Decay City of Heroes City of Steam City of Transformers City of Villains Civilization Online Clan Lord Clash of Clans Cloud Nine Club Penguin Colony of War Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances Company of Heroes Online Conquer Online Conquer Online 3 Continent of the Ninth (C9) Core Blaze Core Exiles Corum Online Craft of Gods Crimecraft Crimelife 2 Cronous Crota II Cultures Online Cyber Monster 2 Céiron Wars
D-F
D&D Online DC Universe DK Online DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 DV8: Exile Dalethaan Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Relic: Prelude Dark Solstice Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkest Dungeon Darkfall Darkfall: Unholy Wars Darkwind: War on Wheels Das Tal Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide DayZ Dead Earth Dead Frontier Deco Online Deepworld Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Demons at the Horizon Desert Operations Destiny Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Pals Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Call II Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dragons and Titans Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Rampage Dungeon Runners Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online Dynasty of the Magi EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthrise Eclipse War Ecol Tactics Online Eden Eternal Edge of Space Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elder Scrolls Online Eldevin Elf Online Elite: Dangerous Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire Empire & State Empire Craft Empire Universe 3 EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Blue Moon Online Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Eternal Saga Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverEmber Online EverQuest Next EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Everquest Next: Landmark Evony Exarch Exorace F.E.A.R. Online Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forge Forsaken World Fortnite Fortuna Forum for Discussion of Everlight Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
G-L
GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones: Seven Kingdoms Gameglobe Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gauntlet Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer Gloria Victis Glory of Gods GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Granado Espada Online Grand Chase Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall H1Z1 Habbo Hotel Hailan Rising HaloSphere2 Haven & Hearth Hawken Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero Online Hero Zero Hero's Journey Hero: 108 Online HeroSmash Heroes & Generals Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Heroes of the Storm Hex Holic Online Hostile Space Hunter Blade Huxley Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Imperator Imperian Inferno Legend Infestation: Survivor Stories Infinite Crisis Infinity Infinity Iris Online Iron Grip: Marauders Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kartuga Kicks Online King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom Under Fire II Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kings and Legends KingsRoad Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Age Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Lands of Hope: Phoenix Edition LastChaos League of Angels League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Edda: Vengeance Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 2 Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Lego Minifigures Online Life is Feudal Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia World
M-Q
MU Online Mabinogi Maestia: Rise of Keledus MagiKnights Magic Barrage Magic World Online Manga Fighter MapleStory Martial Heroes Marvel Heroes Marvel Super Hero Squad Online Marvel: Avengers Alliance MechWarrior Online Megaten Meridian 59 : Evolution Merlin MetalMercs Metaplace Metin 2 MicroVolts Midkemia Online Might & Magic Heroes: Kingdoms MilMo Minecraft Mini Fighter Minions of Mirth Ministry of War Monato Esprit Monkey King Online Monkey Quest Monster & Me Monster Madness Online MonsterMMORPG Moonlight Online: Tales of Eternal Blood Mordavia Mortal Online Mourning My Lands Myst Online: URU Live Myth Angels Online Myth War Myth War 2 Mytheon Mythic Saga Mythos N.E.O Online NIDA Online Nadirim Naviage: The Power of Capital Navy Field Need for Speed World Nemexia Neo's Land NeoSteam Neocron Nether Neverwinter Nexus: The Kingdom Of The Winds NinjaTrick NosTale Novus Aeterno Oberin Odin Quest Odyssey RPG Ogre Island Omerta 3 Online Boxing Manager Onverse Order & Chaos Online Order of Magic Original Blood Origins Return Origins of Malu Orion's Belt Otherland Forums OverSoul Overkings Oz Online Oz World Pandora Saga Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Panzar Parabellum Parallel Kingdom Parfait Station Path of Exile Pathfinder Online Perfect World Perpetuum Online Phantasy Star Online 2 Phantasy Star Universe Phoenix Dynasty Online Phylon Pi Story Picaroon Pirate Galaxy Pirate Storm Pirate101 PirateKing Online Pirates of the Burning Sea Pirates of the Caribbean Online Pixie Hollow Planeshift Planet Arkadia Planet Calypso PlanetSide 2 Planetside Planets³ Playboy Manager Pocket Legends Pockie Ninja Pockie Pirates Pockie Saints PoxNora Prime World Prime: Battle for Dominus Priston Tale Priston Tale II Prius Online Project Blackout Project Powder Project Titan Forums Project Wiki Puzzle Pirates Quickhit Football
R-S
R2 Online RAN Online RF Online ROSE Online Rage of 3 Kingdoms Ragnarok Online Ragnarok Online II RaiderZ Rakion Rappelz RappelzSEA Realm Fighter Realm of the Mad God Realm of the Titans Realms Online Reclamation Red Stone Red War: Edem's Curse Regnum Online Remnant Knights Renaissance Repulse Requiem: Memento Mori Rift RiotZone Rise Rise of Dragonian Era Rise of Empire Rise of the Tycoon Rising of King Risk Your Life Rivality Rockfree Rohan: Blood Feud Role Play Worlds Roll n Rock Roma Victor Romadoria Rosh Online Roto X Rubies of Eventide Ruin Online Rumble Fighter Runes of Magic Runescape Rust Rusty Hearts Ryzom S4 League SAGA SD Gundam Capsule Fighter Online SMITE SUN Sagramore Salem SaySayGirls Scarlet Blade Scions of Fate Seal Online: Evolution Second Life Secret of the Solstice Seed Serenia Fantasy Seven Seas Saga Seven Souls Online Sevencore Shadow of Legend Shadowbane Shadowrun Online Shaiya Shattered Galaxy Sho Online Shot Online Shroud of the Avatar SideQuest Siege on Stars Sigonyth: Desert Eternity Silkroad Online Skyblade Skyforge SmashMuck Champions Smoo Online Soldier Front Soul Master Soul Order Online Soul of Guardian Space Heroes Universe Spellcasters Sphere Spiral Knights Spirit Tales Splash Fighters Squad Wars Star Citizen Star Sonata 2 Star Stable Star Supremacy Star Trek Online Star Trek: Infinite Space Star Wars Galaxies Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Star Wars: The Old Republic StarQuest Online Stargate Worlds Starlight Story Starpires State of Decay SteelWar Online Stone Age 2 Stormfall: Age of War Storybricks Stronghold Kingdoms Sudden Attack Supremacy 1914 Supreme Destiny Sword Girls Sword of Destiny: Rise of Aions SwordX Swords of Heavens Swordsman
T-Z
TERA TS Online Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Tales of Solaris Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris TerraWorld Online Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Aurora World The Black Watchmen The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Crew The Division The Hammers End The Legend of Ares The Lost Titans The Matrix Online The Mighty Quest for Epic Loot The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems The West Theralon There Therian Saga Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Tiger Knight Titan Siege Titans of Time Toontown Online Top Speed Topia Online Torchlight Total Domination Transformers Universe Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Trove Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War Tynon U.B. Funkeys UFO Online URDEAD Online Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Naruto Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Utopia Valkyrie Sky Vampire Lord Online Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos VoidExpanse Voyage Century Online W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WAR2 Glory WYD Global Wakfu War Thunder War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Mercenaries War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Wargame1942 Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warkeepers Warrior Epic Wartune WebLords Wild West Online WildStar Wind of Luck WindSlayer 2 Wings of Destiny Wish Wizard101 Wizardry Online Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Speed World of Tanks World of Tanks Generals World of Warcraft World of Warplanes World of Warships World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xenocell Xiah Xsyon Xulu YS Online Yitien ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online Zombies Ate My Pizza eRepublik

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

General Discussion

General Discussion 

The Pub at MMORPG.COM  » Filters

2 Pages 1 2 » Search
24 posts found
  Helleri

Spotlight Poster

Joined: 5/26/08
Posts: 649

“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”- Henry Ford

 
OP  10/19/13 5:53:57 PM#1

I am curious to know what your thoughts are on In-Game Chat Filters.Primarily this is in regards to Profanity filters And weather or not you think they are necessary or even all that useful. Secondarily, it is extensible to things like website spamming and scamming attempts.

 

So, here are some starter questions to get it going:

 

  • Do most of the filters you have seen or are familiar with accomplish what they set out to do; And, if so how well (e.i. Sufficient/too well/not nearly well enough)?
 
  • Can you think of an example of a really good/bad chat filter, that you have experienced, and what the strong/weak point(s) of it were?
 
  • What would you do to improve chat filters?

"Quality is not an act, it is a habit."
- Aristotle.

  5Luck

Advanced Member

Joined: 1/23/10
Posts: 170

10/19/13 8:55:24 PM#2

Ok Ill bite,

 

1st and fore most chat boxes should be sizable and detachable. Usually we have a few layers all in one box in a fixed location and they should be moveable -on the fly- and detachable so I can view all the layers at the same time if i wish to. That means each detachable "pane" should have its own customizable filtering.

 

Now the filters them selves, Here I will say most games have a decent filter system. Meaning you can filter the usually suspects guild, gen, local, trade, ally, race/faction and, help. These are all very important and sometimes game specific. The main thing I see games fail at here is the block player ignore and temp/perm chat ban features the game implements.

 

Seeing there are so many options for each player, the block/ban options should be implemented in a way that blocks a player from a certain pane/filter only -per instance- of block/ban. This way games can have the rowdy unruly chatters -have their own- permanet chat rooms and not have them clog up and push out the "other" chatters in the normal gen/world chats but not push them completly out of chattng.

 

This option alows like minded players to congregate with other like minded players without the typical finite lines of comunication breaks. Also this will allow a mod to iimplement a chat ban in a real and perminate way but still not leave that player with a game that is lacking one of the most important features. Chat

As far as parental blocks profanity filters and the like, I have never been "let down" with a game in this manner. When it comes to these filters though you need to realize that most players who frequent chat rooms are well versed in "beating the filter" and you might consider adding anyone who has had or is curently banned from -any- chatting options to simply be added to the profanity filter upon it being toggeled on. That I am sure isnt the easiest solution for the coder as most filters are cut/copy/paste with a liecancing agreement attach but from my point of veiw that kind of dedicated work can create a new liecencing for its producer.

 

 

  Helleri

Spotlight Poster

Joined: 5/26/08
Posts: 649

“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”- Henry Ford

 
OP  10/19/13 10:16:04 PM#3
Originally posted by 5Luck

Seeing there are so many options for each player, the block/ban options should be implemented in a way that blocks a player from a certain pane/filter only -per instance- of block/ban. This way games can have the rowdy unruly chatters -have their own- permanet chat rooms and not have them clog up and push out the "other" chatters in the normal gen/world chats but not push them completly out of chattng.

 That one part i didn't quite understand, could you rephrase?

In general I think I see what your getting at. Players having a high level of control over filter options. Which I can Agree is very important.

 

While you can't think of a game off hand where there is a pretty bad filter in place. I definitely can. World of tanks...Their general chat and in-match filter is a good example to me of an overprotective filter. It sensors far too many innocent words because of partial spellings containing aspects of what could be considered a profanity. And there is no toggle for this filter that i have been able to find. Additionally when the devs do make exceptions to either unblock certain words or add a new block, they tend to make really bad choices on that game.

 

But, I have also seen some that are simply extremely limited (largely due to age and neglect) like Active Worlds. Which these days should change it's name to Inactive Worlds. Some of the most basic features of any other MMO simply do not exist there. Like the closest thing they have to private messaging is telegrams (they actually call them telegrams and I am surprised they don't call them telegraphs).

 

Now as a really good example I can think of. Runescape...All the things you talk about they have. Every channel has a chatter filter. And, you can split/merge, dock/float resize, and snap to borders just about every aspect of the interface. The toggles go deep filter wise. All the stuff you were talking about pretty much, plus the ability to change text colors for the different channels and alter the deep interface.

 

I think the MMO with the most control over communication on the user end though is Second Life. Depending on the viewer you use it goes astonishingly deep. There is also a dark side to this as certain sl tools and viewers allow one user to give near absolute control to another user.

 

"Quality is not an act, it is a habit."
- Aristotle.

  5Luck

Advanced Member

Joined: 1/23/10
Posts: 170

10/19/13 11:25:46 PM#4

When a player gets a temp chat ban most times that time only acts as a build up and vent cycle and to manage that aspect I am suggesting a "per filter" and/or "per pane" block/ban option for both players and moderators.

 

A player who finds a certain chatter is unwanted they can choose to block them from a particular filter where as they will still be able to chat with them in a different filter or block them on all. Trade chat being one of the larger issues with certain games. A player might want to prevent general chat from a certain player but also may want to still leave the option to trade with them as their gold is still well ...gold!

 

And the same for moderation. If a player gets a few (or even a single) complaints by moderators and a temp or perm chat ban is being implemented it can be done in the -filter- the infraction happened in alone leaving the option for one or more heavily moderated filters while others are less so allowing the players to choose where they will communicate.

 

One such example(I think) would be uncharted waters where players can be banned from certain filters though the system is lacking in most other areas including a limited block list an a non intuitive management system.

  SaintGraye

Novice Member

Joined: 4/18/12
Posts: 109

10/19/13 11:29:27 PM#5


Originally posted by Helleri
I am curious to know what your thoughts are on In-Game Chat Filters. Primarily this is in regards to Profanity filters And weather or not you think they are necessary or even all that useful. Secondarily, it is extensible to things like website spamming and scamming attempts.

An intriguing topic, mate, may I inquire why you opted to pursue it? Curiosity? Theory-crafting? Or are you, perhaps, considering solutions for something more tangible?


Originally posted by Helleri
Do most of the filters you have seen or are familiar with accomplish what they set out to do; And, if so how well (e.i. Sufficient/too well/not nearly well enough)?

Honestly, I would suggest that few to none accomplish their goals. For the most part, in my experience, they act more often as an impediment to free speech than a deterrent to vulgar, crude or hate-filled language.

The primary issues are as follows:
* language barriers
* euphemisms
* evolution of speech

To elaborate, quite a few of the chat-filters you'll run into, particularly among the Free-to-Play genre, were designed for a singular language (Chinese, Korean and Japanese being the major contenders). This presents something of a localization issue when it must be converted for use with a foreign tongue; I would cite Ragnarok Online 2 as the most recent example I encountered, wherein the symbol "0" (zero) and "O" (oh) were both prohibited by the filter as their Korean equivalent may be used for some manner of profanity. Consequently, chat was filled with "l**king f*r s*me*ne t* help..." and so forth, which was a marked improvement over an earlier state wherein merely including either in a word caused it to be entirely censored, as in "******* for ******* ** help....". Furthermore, foreign languages are rarely prohibited within a chat filter, thus while common English vulgarisms, such as "b****" may be filtered, using Russian or Chinese to insult a fellow player is unlikely to be censored.

As for euphemisms, well, I've yet to encounter a single person who can grasp them all, much less an automated script. For instance, if I were to write that (pardon the crudity of my example) "last night i was with this chick, she was wetter than a waterslide and panting like a dog but it was like throwing a hotdog down a hallway" well, you can likely infer my meaning, but would a chat filter? I can distinctly recall a number of instances in FreeRealms, a child-friendly MMO, where several players conversed euphemistically at length concerning subjects that few, if any, parents would care to have their children privy to... and my example, in compare, was quite tame.

Finally, the evolution of the English language is such that new terms are constantly being created or tweaked for derogatory purposes. For instance, I can recall a now-defunct online shooter that, in an attempt to mitigate players tea-bagging on another, prohibited the word "tea" from being written in chat (along with "tb" and the like). It sounds harmless enough, right? After all, how many gamers discuss a nice Earl Grey or Darjeeling? Yet, that selfsame filter lacked context, thus you'd end up with "***r them a new one" and "s***dy now" or "can you ***ch me how to do that?" Even assuming context-filters are in place, you are still denying your players access to a typically innocuous term for no more reason than that it may be used for one express purpose. By way of further example, "fag" is commonly among the terms entered into a chat-filter (and may well be in this site's) and was with one high-profile MMORPG I played wherein my guild, comprised of quite a few Scots, Brits, some Aussies and other folk for whom it is merely another name for cigarette, came to laugh at our little inside joke of pausing a raid for "homo time" as one of our leaders was in the habit of asking to stop "for a quick fag." No harm was intended, nor offense, yet the filter rendered his otherwise sterile response abruptly lude and thus unpublishable.


Originally posted by Helleri
Can you think of an example of a really good/bad chat filter, that you have experienced, and what the strong/weak point(s) of it were?

See above.


Originally posted by Helleri
What would you do to improve chat filters?

Ideally? Employ an artificial intelligence to monitor the chat in realtime... yet if you requested a less facetious response I'd likely have to settle for something along the lines of community monitoring. Mind, I am not referring to "community volunteer GMs" or the like, nothing that entails any semblance of power being vested in a singular community member, but rather a system akin to that proposed for the forthcoming XBOX One: players who consistently utilize the chat in a manner that is deemed inappropriate enough to be flagged by others are eventually prohibited from using such or restricted solely to contact with those who behave in a similar manner. You may argue that it is little better than discrimination, yet what it genuinely boils down to is a self-imposed caste system: those who use profanity without regard and those abhor it, wherein never the twain shall they meet.

  5Luck

Advanced Member

Joined: 1/23/10
Posts: 170

10/19/13 11:39:13 PM#6
@santgrey

 

Some of this seems completely nonsensical to me in that when you add in the *** portion you not only enable a player to use their imagination but you bring even more attention to the hidden meaning and make it even more profane/obvious.

No IMO it must be done on the per chatter and not the per character(symbol)

 

  SaintGraye

Novice Member

Joined: 4/18/12
Posts: 109

10/19/13 11:48:31 PM#7

Did you even bother to read what I wrote or just assume the context out of hand?

Had you read it, you would have gathered that those italicized sections containing asterisks are examples of my personal experience with chat filters, which I firmly denote as ludicrous. They are not suggestions and, should you have continued reading into my final paragraph, you would have noticed that I agree with you: censoring ought to take place on an individual player basis, not per comment.

...also, why on Earth did you quote the entire bloody reply for the sake of leaving a few sentences? A simple @SaintGraye would have accomplished the trick without resorting to essentially double-posting my response.

 

EDIT: It occurs to me that I may have misconstrued your reply. If so, I apologize for jumping down your throat, though I'm not overly optimistic that's the case.

  5Luck

Advanced Member

Joined: 1/23/10
Posts: 170

10/19/13 11:54:19 PM#8
Originally posted by SaintGraye

Did you even bother to read what I wrote or just assume the context out of hand?

Had you read it, you would have gathered that those italicized sections containing asterisks are examples of my personal experience with chat filters, which I firmly denote as ludicrous. They are not suggestions and, should you have continued reading into my final paragraph, you would have noticed that I agree with you: censoring ought to take place on an individual player basis, not per comment.

...also, why on Earth did you quote the entire bloody reply for the sake of leaving a few sentences? A simple @SaintGraye would have accomplished the trick without resorting to essentially double-posting my response.

 

EDIT: It occurs to me that I may have misconstrued your reply. If so, I apologize for jumping down your throat, though I'm not overly optimistic that's the case.

Fixed as well I am suggesting the same PoV as you so calling me out on it only is a deterant from the point we both share..

 

Odd you wouldnt like that...

  SaintGraye

Novice Member

Joined: 4/18/12
Posts: 109

10/20/13 12:10:27 AM#9
Originally posted by 5Luck
Fixed as well I am suggesting the same PoV as you so calling me out on it only is a deterant from the point we both share..

 

Odd you wouldnt like that...

As noted, the possibility did occur to me that I may have misconstrued your response, for which I did and do apologize. In the interest of allowing you to respond without appearing to react to... well, nothing, I opted to leave my initial comment.

Still, as we obviously agree, no harm, no foul, aye?

  monochrome19

Novice Member

Joined: 1/09/13
Posts: 309

10/20/13 12:15:32 AM#10
I always turn my chat filter off. There's no such thing as a filter in real life so there shouldn't be one online. Its good because it lets me know who the assholes are, so I can ban them or never party with them.
  5Luck

Advanced Member

Joined: 1/23/10
Posts: 170

10/20/13 12:46:18 AM#11
Originally posted by monochrome19
I always turn my chat filter off. There's no such thing as a filter in real life so there shouldn't be one online. Its good because it lets me know who the assholes are, so I can ban them or never party with them.

Honestly this is mee too but all the same I do understand there is a need and the curent systems out there are not doing the job. I tend to chat in non-moderated rooms for the most part though I do block spammers occasionaly.

  AIMonster

Elite Member

Joined: 12/31/08
Posts: 1981

10/20/13 12:55:40 AM#12

Profanity filters are generally ineffective since they are easy to circumvent and filtering profanity won't necessarily stop some of the most hurtful things being said.  Despite all this I don't necessarily see it as a bad thing to have, considering it doesn't take a lot of effort to implement.  I do think good moderation (GMs for example) works far better at keeping trolls and spammers out.

Filters will occasionally filter out words they shouldn't because they contain profanity within them even if the word itself is not profanity.  Some examples are words like circumstance, cockatrice, and titillate.  Sometimes words that are used by the game itself in a context that won't be considered profanity get filtered: for example bastard sword.

As far as a bad example of filtering goes, I believe in Neverwinter if enough players report you, you receive a temporary ban on chatting.  This system is easily abused as a guild or group of players can harass other players by shutting down their chat with a few reports and continue this harassment.  Leaving moderation in the hands of other players is almost always going to be a bad thing.

Improving chat filters would be tricky, because the more sensitive you make them the more you risk filtering too many words.  People will always find ways to circumvent the filters anyway, so really I wouldn't improve the filters and just leave them the way they are.  Focus more on moderation and tools to improve that instead.

Raptr link because it's the cool new trend:

  Helleri

Spotlight Poster

Joined: 5/26/08
Posts: 649

“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”- Henry Ford

 
OP  10/20/13 12:56:33 AM#13

@5luck

I get your meaning now with you having put it another way, thanks...I think that much filter control might be a tad excessive though.

@SaintGraye

Given the bulk of what you said about the limitations of the software used and the limitation of filtration in general. I tend to think that what it really boils down to is an instance of dev and community diligence. And, yet another instance where devs should elect to write their own code and not use prepackaged products.

 

But also in regards to what you said about a sort of segregation of worst offenders...I like Runescape's method for this. That being, Quick Chat. When a player insults people constantly and uses an excess of profanity in normal conversation (a single slip now and then of a profane word is usually not a punished), They are temp muted. And, until their mute is lifted they can only use emotes and the Quick Chat (for some things it's a 24 hour offense, for others it requires going through the account action appeal process). The quick chat is a menu entered into by double tapping enter. It has some first pane short answers like yes, no etc. as well as numbered categories, under which are lettered subcategories, and then things to say.

 

The quick chat is pretty easy to navigate and can let a player do things like state their level, ask levels, ask about location, and state suggested activities. But besides being muted many players find it useful. Because for instance with stating a level, well...quick chat doesn't lie. also learning a few quick chat codes makes communicating while bossing easier.

 

@AIMonster

I think players being able to flag only works well if their flags do not have an immediate effect. I would like to see a system where flags alert an actual moderator to take a closer look and make a final decision on it. But agreed that players alone with the power soley in their hands tend to go mad with it.

 

In Runescape we have player moderators. Their only ability really is that they can report like any other player...but the reports they make go to the top of the pile and stay there until addressed (I think they can also temp mute for like an hour or something in case it is something that needs to be addressed quickly, and disputes against them are handled very seriously. So they must be certain they are in the right). There are problems with this system of course. Primarily that there are not many player moderators. Also that there is no clear path to becoming one. And, that they are not motivated to due a great job by any kind of pay or compensation. Also they have a silver crown in front of their name. Which as you can probably guess can become a burden.

[also i am aware of how often I reference runescape but it is the game i am most familiar with having played it for 12 years.]

"Quality is not an act, it is a habit."
- Aristotle.

  5Luck

Advanced Member

Joined: 1/23/10
Posts: 170

10/20/13 8:46:20 AM#14

Well.. Hrmm.

 

I can see where that many options might be cumbersome but there is a few upcoming devices that may be of some use.

 

I read somewhere the new XBOX Kinect system is providing facial expresion recognition and if it can read higher heart rate and expressions of fun.. it should also have the ability to read expressions of mischif and anger and either put comments up for reveiw to a more stringent filter or outright prevent the comment from being submitted

  Helleri

Spotlight Poster

Joined: 5/26/08
Posts: 649

“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”- Henry Ford

 
OP  10/20/13 12:46:09 PM#15

@5luck

Well what I really should have said regarding too many options. Is something about practicality.

 

Like...If you are able to block someone in chat and have them remain unblocked in trade. While a feature like that is much appreciated the one time out of ten it is applicable. the rest of the time you will get people complaining about how, in order to fully block someone they have to go to each channel and block each aspect of that players ability to interact with them in a meaningful way (as apposed to having an omni button for the action). Also how often will the feature be used even if it is non-intrusive when not used? Most of the time is it just taking up contextual menu space, code space, and game screen space unused? And could development have better gone to a more immediately useful feature?

 

Additionally people may complain that this one aspect of the game seems unusually deep in comparison to many other aspects of the game. They might feel to much focus was put into a single facet of play. And while not technically imbalanced the game might feel imbalanced because of it. If you put a ton of attention into one small aspect like this. It is only fair to put at least that much attention into every other aspect.

 

So it isn't that it's not a good idea if done well. Just that it might not be the most practical approach if we can think of something that may be more effective and take less time and resources to implement. But, kicking around ideas is key.

 

@SaintGraye

I neglected to address your question earlier about my exact interest in this in general (had to give how to put it some thought). To put it best. It simply doesn't hurt to talk about these things. In doing so we figure out our own preferences better. And, who knows who will see it and take something useful from it. There are a good 2k guests browsing this site at any one time. And, of the frequently posting members. I know of at least one who is (or at least had been) seriously involved in building a game. Think tank topics on these forums don't have to have a specific aim because of their wide audience. An arrow will sometimes find it's mark independent of the bow mans aim if there are enough targets on the field. Besides...would you rather I post up a crystal ball thread with a troll bait title?

"Quality is not an act, it is a habit."
- Aristotle.

  Halandir

Apprentice Member

Joined: 8/02/08
Posts: 741

10/20/13 1:20:21 PM#16

Sometimes it feels like our culture is on an accelerating spiral leading to the end goal of automated filters and responses being able to remove the burden of actual human thought/decisions.

Personally I do not need a "filter" on chat. Filter or not, annoying people will be annoying. I much prefer an inexhaustible ignore-list with easy addition of annoying elements.

Add the possibility to share ignore-lists, perhaps even within guilds and I will be happy.

Filters always feel counterproductive: Abusive people always find a way around them, often spamming global repeatedly in the process and filters often become annoying because they filter things they should'nt have. Example: In Guild Wars some monsters dropped a "Cockatrice staff". Saying that in chat (or even linking the item from inventory) got you filtered - Leading to annoying: "I'm wielding a ****atrice staff".  And yes, even assassins had their share of problems :-)

Save the money on useless filter development and add better ignore options, thank you!

 

We dont need casuals in our games!!! Errm... Well we DO need casuals to fund and populate our games - But the games should be all about "hardcore" because: We dont need casuals in our games!!!
(repeat ad infinitum)

  Helleri

Spotlight Poster

Joined: 5/26/08
Posts: 649

“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”- Henry Ford

 
OP  10/20/13 8:31:27 PM#17
Originally posted by Halandir

Sometimes it feels like our culture is on an accelerating spiral leading to the end goal of automated filters and responses being able to remove the burden of actual human thought/decisions.

Personally I do not need a "filter" on chat. Filter or not, annoying people will be annoying. I much prefer an inexhaustible ignore-list with easy addition of annoying elements.

Add the possibility to share ignore-lists, perhaps even within guilds and I will be happy.

Filters always feel counterproductive: Abusive people always find a way around them, often spamming global repeatedly in the process and filters often become annoying because they filter things they should'nt have. Example: In Guild Wars some monsters dropped a "Cockatrice staff". Saying that in chat (or even linking the item from inventory) got you filtered - Leading to annoying: "I'm wielding a ****atrice staff".  And yes, even assassins had their share of problems :-)

Save the money on useless filter development and add better ignore options, thank you!

 

lol "Assassin" is one of those classic ones that the filter grabs hold of seemingly regardless of the specific game one is playing.

 

I really like the idea of a shared ignore list amongst a guild (or even friends). Wondering though, do you have an idea of how that might look and work?

 

The thing with an unlimited ignore list though...I feel that it would be good if it color coded names on it. There may come a point when you want to drop someone from an ignore list. And if it is too bogged down with past names added you may not be able to find the name your looking for easily. If they are color coded to reflect roughly how long ago the name was added it makes it easier to clear out (like wise a shift and ctrl + click, multi selection option would be nice).

 

Over all though. I view an ignore list to be a type of filter. So, maybe the issue is not so much with filters in general. But simply lack of player control over them on the whole (as it seems that many like ignore lists but don't like the standard censor).

"Quality is not an act, it is a habit."
- Aristotle.

  Halandir

Apprentice Member

Joined: 8/02/08
Posts: 741

10/22/13 6:08:08 PM#18
Originally posted by Helleri
Originally posted by Halandir

...

Personally I do not need a "filter" on chat. Filter or not, annoying people will be annoying. I much prefer an inexhaustible ignore-list with easy addition of annoying elements.

Add the possibility to share ignore-lists, perhaps even within guilds and I will be happy.

...

Save the money on useless filter development and add better ignore options, thank you! 

...

I really like the idea of a shared ignore list amongst a guild (or even friends). Wondering though, do you have an idea of how that might look and work?

 

The thing with an unlimited ignore list though...I feel that it would be good if it color coded names on it. There may come a point when you want to drop someone from an ignore list. And if it is too bogged down with past names added you may not be able to find the name your looking for easily. If they are color coded to reflect roughly how long ago the name was added it makes it easier to clear out (like wise a shift and ctrl + click, multi selection option would be nice).

 

Over all though. I view an ignore list to be a type of filter. So, maybe the issue is not so much with filters in general. But simply lack of player control over them on the whole (as it seems that many like ignore lists but don't like the standard censor).

 

I agree, unlimited ignore list would be hard to calculate cycles on. With shared lists amongst friends and guild it could end up as an outright recursion bomb.

I would be happy with something like:

Personal ignore list: 50 entries. With the possibility to mark 20 entries as "never delete". Once 50 entries have been reached the list is a FIFO buffer for unmarked entries.

Friends ignore list: 150 latest entries from up to 5 friends. This would leave room for friends 20 favorite "stalkers" + their combined latest 50 ignored annoyances. (Some processing power required for handling duplicates, determining aged/stale entries and such. A 1-5 minute delay/scheduling of updating/flushing would be ok.)

Guild ignore list: 200 entries. Almost like "friends ignore list", but without taking "never delete" flags into account. Guild leader/officers should be able to determine which guild members/ranks should have their personal lists included in the list generation.

I hope this gives you a rough idea of what I meant, and no: I haven't even chalked up pseudocode, let alone calculated on the cyclecost for a system like that :-)

 

We dont need casuals in our games!!! Errm... Well we DO need casuals to fund and populate our games - But the games should be all about "hardcore" because: We dont need casuals in our games!!!
(repeat ad infinitum)

  Helleri

Spotlight Poster

Joined: 5/26/08
Posts: 649

“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”- Henry Ford

 
OP  10/24/13 9:51:15 PM#19
Originally posted by Halandir
Originally posted by Helleri
Originally posted by Halandir

...

Personally I do not need a "filter" on chat. Filter or not, annoying people will be annoying. I much prefer an inexhaustible ignore-list with easy addition of annoying elements.

Add the possibility to share ignore-lists, perhaps even within guilds and I will be happy.

...

Save the money on useless filter development and add better ignore options, thank you! 

...

I really like the idea of a shared ignore list amongst a guild (or even friends). Wondering though, do you have an idea of how that might look and work?

 

The thing with an unlimited ignore list though...I feel that it would be good if it color coded names on it. There may come a point when you want to drop someone from an ignore list. And if it is too bogged down with past names added you may not be able to find the name your looking for easily. If they are color coded to reflect roughly how long ago the name was added it makes it easier to clear out (like wise a shift and ctrl + click, multi selection option would be nice).

 

Over all though. I view an ignore list to be a type of filter. So, maybe the issue is not so much with filters in general. But simply lack of player control over them on the whole (as it seems that many like ignore lists but don't like the standard censor).

 

I agree, unlimited ignore list would be hard to calculate cycles on. With shared lists amongst friends and guild it could end up as an outright recursion bomb.

I would be happy with something like:

Personal ignore list: 50 entries. With the possibility to mark 20 entries as "never delete". Once 50 entries have been reached the list is a FIFO buffer for unmarked entries.

Friends ignore list: 150 latest entries from up to 5 friends. This would leave room for friends 20 favorite "stalkers" + their combined latest 50 ignored annoyances. (Some processing power required for handling duplicates, determining aged/stale entries and such. A 1-5 minute delay/scheduling of updating/flushing would be ok.)

Guild ignore list: 200 entries. Almost like "friends ignore list", but without taking "never delete" flags into account. Guild leader/officers should be able to determine which guild members/ranks should have their personal lists included in the list generation.

I hope this gives you a rough idea of what I meant, and no: I haven't even chalked up pseudocode, let alone calculated on the cyclecost for a system like that :-)

 

With the guild and friends ignore list it would be cool if you didn't have to make any personal exemptions to it (could but didn't have to). Like an auto bump off when it reaches a max. Old entries getting removed as the newest entries are added. To make sure no one gets bumped off eventually that should always remain on it a guild leader can set ignores/bans from chat to 1 hour/8 hour/12 hour/24 hour/indefinite/permanent...none would get bumped off that have not served a fixed amount of time. and no permanents would get bumped off over an indefinite.

"Quality is not an act, it is a habit."
- Aristotle.

  Halandir

Apprentice Member

Joined: 8/02/08
Posts: 741

10/25/13 1:37:37 PM#20
Originally posted by Helleri
Originally posted by Halandir
...

With the guild and friends ignore list it would be cool if you didn't have to make any personal exemptions to it (could but didn't have to). Like an auto bump off when it reaches a max. Old entries getting removed as the newest entries are added. To make sure no one gets bumped off eventually that should always remain on it a guild leader can set ignores/bans from chat to 1 hour/8 hour/12 hour/24 hour/indefinite/permanent...none would get bumped off that have not served a fixed amount of time. and no permanents would get bumped off over an indefinite.

 

Maybe not quite as intricate as what I imagined. Simpler but cleaner... Would also be a better choice for "whatever chat-daemon" load... And - It would definately work for me. Overall a better design :-)

Someone should consider and expand on this "deluxe ignore functionality" - Heck publishers could save a lot of "chat-police" manhours! 

 

We dont need casuals in our games!!! Errm... Well we DO need casuals to fund and populate our games - But the games should be all about "hardcore" because: We dont need casuals in our games!!!
(repeat ad infinitum)

2 Pages 1 2 » Search