Trending Games | Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn | Star Wars: The Old Republic | EverQuest | World of Warcraft

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,901,122 Users Online:0
Games:753  Posts:6,271,492
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
A-C
2029 Online 2112: Revolution 2Moons 4Story 8BitMMO 9 Dragons A Mystical Land A Tale in the Desert III A3 ACE Online ARGO Online Aberoth Absolute Force Online Absolute Terror Achaea Adellion Aerrevan Aetolia, the Midnight Age Age of Armor Age of Conan Age of Empires Online Age of Mourning Age of Wulin Age of Wushu Aida Arenas Aika Aion Albion Online Alganon All Points Bulletin (APB) Allods Online Altis Gates Amazing World Anarchy Online Ancients of Fasaria Andromeda 5 Angels Online Angry Birds Epic Anime Trumps Anmynor Anno Online Applo Arcane Hearts Arcane Legends ArchLord ArcheAge Archeblade Archlord X Ascend: Hand of Kul Asda 2 Asda Story Ashen Empires Asheron's Call Asheron's Call 2 Astera Online Astonia III Astro Empires Astro Lords: Oort CLoud Asura Force Atlantica Online Atriarch Aura Kingdom Aurora Blade Auto Assault Avatar Star Battle Dawn Battle Dawn Galaxies Battle for Graxia Battle of 3 Kingdoms Battle of the Immortals Battlecruiser Online Battlestar Galactica Online Battlestar Reloaded Beyond Protocol Black Aftermath Black Desert Black Gold Black Prophecy Black Prophecy Tactics: Nexus Conflict Blacklight Retribution Blade & Soul Blade Hunter Blade Wars Blazing Throne Bless Blitz 1941 Blood and Jade Bloodlines Champions Boot Hill Heroes Borderlands 2 Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel Bound by Flame Bounty Bay Online Brain Storm Bravada Bravely Default Bravely Second Brawl Busters. Brick-Force Bright Shadow Bullet Run Business Tycoon Online CTRacer Cabal Online Caesary Call of Camelot Call of Gods Call of Thrones Camelot Unchained Canaan Online Cardmon Hero Cartoon Universe CasinoRPG Cast & Conquer Castle Empire Castlot Celtic Heroes Champions Online Champions of Regnum Chaos Online Child of Light Chrono Tales Citadel of Sorcery CitiesXL Citizen Zero City of Decay City of Heroes City of Steam City of Transformers City of Villains Civilization Online Clan Lord Clash of Clans Cloud Nine Club Penguin Colony of War Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances Company of Heroes Online Conquer Online Conquer Online 3 Continent of the Ninth (C9) Core Blaze Core Exiles Corum Online Craft of Gods Crimecraft Crimelife 2 Cronous Crota II Crusaders of Solaris Cultures Online Cyber Monster 2 Cyberpunk 2077 Céiron Wars
D-F
D&D Online DC Universe DK Online DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 DV8: Exile Dalethaan Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Relic: Prelude Dark Solstice Dark Souls 2 Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkest Dungeon Darkfall Darkfall: Unholy Wars Darkwind: War on Wheels Das Tal Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide DayZ Dead Earth Dead Frontier Dead Island Dead Island 2 Dead Island: Riptide Deco Online Deep Down Deepworld Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Demons at the Horizon Desert Operations Destiny Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Divinity: Original Sin Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Age: Inquisition Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Fin Soup Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Pals Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Call II Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dragons and Titans Drakengard 3 Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Rampage Dungeon Runners Dungeon of the Endless Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online Dynasty of the Magi EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthrise Eclipse War Ecol Tactics Online Eden Eternal Edge of Space Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elder Scrolls Online Eldevin Elf Online Elite: Dangerous Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire Empire & State Empire Craft Empire Universe 3 EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Blue Moon Online Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Eternal Saga Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverEmber Online EverQuest Next EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Evony Exarch Exorace F.E.A.R. Online Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout 4 Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Fearless Fantasy Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy Type-0 HD Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forge Forsaken Uprising Forsaken World Fortnite Fortuna Forum for Discussion of Everlight Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
G-L
GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones: Seven Kingdoms Gameglobe Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gauntlet Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer Gloria Victis Glory of Gods GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Granado Espada Online Grand Chase Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall H1Z1 Habbo Hotel Hailan Rising HaloSphere2 Haven & Hearth Hawken Heart Forth Alicia Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero Online Hero Zero Hero's Journey Hero: 108 Online HeroSmash Heroes & Generals Heroes & Legends: Conquerors of Kolhar Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Atlan Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Heroes of the Storm Hex Holic Online Hostile Space Hunter Blade Huxley Icewind Dale: Enhanced Edition Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Imperator Imperian Inferno Legend Infestation: Survivor Stories Infinite Crisis Infinity Infinity Iris Online Iron Grip: Marauders Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kartuga Kicks Online King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom Under Fire II Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kings Era Kings and Legends Kings of the Realm KingsRoad Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Age Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online Kyn L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Landmark Lands of Hope: Redemption LastChaos League of Angels League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Edda: Vengeance Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 2 Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Lego Minifigures Online Lichdom: Battlemage Life is Feudal Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lords of the Fallen Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia World
M-Q
MU Online Mabinogi Maestia: Rise of Keledus MagiKnights Magic Barrage Magic World Online Manga Fighter MapleStory Martial Heroes Marvel Heroes Marvel Super Hero Squad Online Marvel: Avengers Alliance Mass Effect 4 MechWarrior Online Megaten Meridian 59 : Evolution Merlin MetalMercs Metaplace Metin 2 MicroVolts Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor Midkemia Online Might & Magic Heroes: Kingdoms Might & Magic X: Legacy MilMo Minecraft Mini Fighter Minions of Mirth Ministry of War Monato Esprit Monkey King Online Monkey Quest Monster & Me Monster Madness Online MonsterMMORPG Moonlight Online: Tales of Eternal Blood Moonrise Mordavia Mortal Online Mourning My Lands Myst Online: URU Live Myth Angels Online Myth War Myth War 2 Mythborne Mytheon Mythic Saga Mythos N.E.O Online NIDA Online Nadirim Naviage: The Power of Capital Navy Field Need for Speed World Nemexia Neo's Land NeoSteam Neocron Nether Neverwinter Nexus: The Kingdom Of The Winds NinjaTrick NosTale Novus Aeterno Oberin Odin Quest Odyssey RPG Ogre Island Omerta 3 Online Boxing Manager Onverse Oort Online Order & Chaos Online Order of Magic Original Blood Origins Return Origins of Malu Orion's Belt Otherland Forums OverSoul Overkings Oz Online Oz World Pandora Saga Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Panzar Parabellum Parallel Kingdom Parfait Station Path of Exile Pathfinder Online Perfect World Perpetuum Online Persona V Phantasy Star Online 2 Phantasy Star Universe Phoenix Dynasty Online Phylon Pi Story Picaroon Pillars of Eternity Pirate Galaxy Pirate Storm Pirate101 PirateKing Online Pirates of the Burning Sea Pirates of the Caribbean Online Pixie Hollow Planeshift Planet Arkadia Planet Calypso PlanetSide 2 Planetside Planets³ Playboy Manager Pocket Legends Pockie Ninja Pockie Pirates Pockie Saints Pokémon X and Y PoxNora Prime World Prime: Battle for Dominus Priston Tale Priston Tale II Prius Online Prodigy Project Blackout Project Gorgon Project Powder Project Titan Forums Project Wiki Project Zomboid Puzzle Pirates Quest for Infamy Quickhit Football
R-S
R2 Online RAN Online RF Online ROSE Online Rage of 3 Kingdoms Ragnarok Online Ragnarok Online II RaiderZ Rail Nation Rakion Rappelz RappelzSEA Ravenmarch Realm Fighter Realm of Sierra Realm of the Mad God Realm of the Titans Realms Online Reclamation Red Stone Red War: Edem's Curse Regnum Online Remnant Knights Renaissance Repulse Requiem: Memento Mori Rift RiotZone Rise Rise of Dragonian Era Rise of Empire Rise of the Tycoon Risen 3: Titan Lords Rising of King Risk Your Life Rivality Rockfree Rohan: Blood Feud Role Play Worlds Roll n Rock Roma Victor Romadoria Rosh Online Roto X Rubies of Eventide Ruin Online Rumble Fighter Runes of Magic Runescape Rust Rusty Hearts Ryzom S4 League SAGA SD Gundam Capsule Fighter Online SMITE SUN Sacred 3 Sagramore Salem SaySayGirls Scarlet Blade Scions of Fate Seal Online: Evolution Second Chance Heroes Second Life Secret of the Solstice Seed Serenia Fantasy Seven Seas Saga Seven Souls Online Sevencore Shadow Realms Shadow of Legend Shadowbane Shadowgate Shadowrun Online Shaiya Shards Online Shattered Galaxy Sho Online Shot Online Shroud of the Avatar SideQuest Siege on Stars Sigonyth: Desert Eternity Silkroad Online Skyblade Skyforge SmashMuck Champions Smoo Online Soldier Front Soul Master Soul Order Online Soul of Guardian South Park: The Stick of Truth Space Heroes Universe Sparta: War of Empires Spellcasters Sphere Spiral Knights Spirit Tales Splash Fighters Squad Wars Star Citizen Star Sonata 2 Star Stable Star Supremacy Star Trek Online Star Trek: Infinite Space Star Wars Galaxies Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Star Wars: The Old Republic StarQuest Online Starbound Stargate Worlds Starlight Story Starpires State of Decay SteelWar Online Stone Age 2 Stormfall: Age of War Stormthrone Storybricks Stronghold Kingdoms Styx: Master of Shadows Sudden Attack Supremacy 1914 Supreme Destiny Sword Girls Sword of Destiny: Rise of Aions SwordX Swords of Heavens Swordsman
T-Z
TERA TS Online TUG Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Tales of Solaris Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris TerraWorld Online Terraria Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Aurora World The Banner Saga The Black Watchmen The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Crew The Division The Epic Might The Hammers End The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing 2 The Legend of Ares The Lost Titans The Matrix Online The Mighty Quest for Epic Loot The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems The West The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Theralon There Therian Saga Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Tiger Knight Titan Siege Titans of Time Toontown Online Top Speed Topia Online Torchlight Torment: Tides of Numenera Total Domination Transformers Universe Transistor Transverse Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Trove Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War Tynon U.B. Funkeys UFO Online URDEAD Online Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Naruto Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Utopia Valkyrie Sky Vampire Lord Online Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos VoidExpanse Voyage Century Online W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WAR2 Glory WYD Global Wakfu War Thunder War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Mercenaries War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Warflare Wargame1942 Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warkeepers Warrior Epic Wartune Wasteland 2 WebLords Wild West Online WildStar Wind of Luck WindSlayer 2 Wings of Destiny Wish Wizard101 Wizardry Online Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Speed World of Tanks World of Tanks Generals World of Warcraft World of Warplanes World of Warships World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xenoblade Chronicles: X Xenocell Xiah Xsyon Xulu YS Online Yitien ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online Zombies Ate My Pizza eRepublik

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

General Discussion

General Discussion 

The Pub at MMORPG.COM  » Poll: How much pricing model is hurting MMORPG's?

7 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Search
135 posts found
  Axehilt

Novice Member

Joined: 5/09/09
Posts: 7213

9/07/13 10:38:26 PM#101
Originally posted by Velocinox

If cost is always the primary factor in sales...

I am sure Microsoft will skyrocket sales of the XBOX 360 by lowering its price to $199.99

If you had some perfectly preserved beef from the time of mad cow disease, you would make a bundle selling it for $1.99 a pound instead of $6.99 a pound even if it is both fresh and healthy.

Why is the Galaxy S4 still the best selling smartphone when Samsung slashed the price of the S3 to 20% of retail?

Do some research and look up Salton Sea resort prices from the late 1950s. 

Price drops do not universally increase sales. You are completely wrong in this. In the MMO industry game quality trumps price. You cannot sell a terrible game for $5 faster than a great game will sell for $50 plus $15 a month. 

Luxury Good:

Investopedia: "An item that is not necessary for living, but is deemed as highly-desired within a culture or society. The ability to purchase or finance a luxury item is directly proportionate to ones' income or assets. In other words, as people move into higher income brackets they are more able and more likely to purchase more expensive luxury goods.

Luxury items are also known as "positional goods" because they signal that the owner has achieved a certain position or status within society to be able to afford them."

Wikipedia: "Luxury goods are products and services that are not considered essential and are associated with affluence."

BusinessDictionary.com: "Products which are not necessary but which tend to make life more pleasant for the consumer. In contrast with necessity goods, luxury goods are typically more costly and are often bought by individuals that have a higher disposable income or greater accumulated wealth than the average." 

All of them include the fact that they are typically reserved for those with greater income than average. There is nothing affluent about MMO prices, which means they are optional expenses but not luxury goods (services). You are wrong on this as well. 

You keep trying to prove what has already been established and incorrect, and instead of helping your argument, you add more things you are incorrect about. 

A lot of what you're saying indicates you haven't been paying attention at all.  Please read what's being said.

For example, I don't know where you got this "primary factor" nonsense.  It's a factor, period.  Sometimes it's the primary factor, sometimes not.  But it's always a factor.  It always matters to some degree, because nobody has infinite money to be able to afford the good at every price.
 
Another example, you somehow thought someone in this thread was saying a lower price is always the best price.  Price always changes the number of people willing or able to make purchases, but lowering a price isn't universally the right choice.  Nobody claimed that.  Quite the opposite, I clearly stated my hunch is $7 wouldn't be worth it!  (But that we don't have enough information to know for sure either way.)
 
 
Lastly, are you trying to imply that for the millions of people in the world living on or near the bread line MMORPG subscriptions are something they can  easily afford?  For many, possibly even most, it's a luxury good.  It's something where the price prevents the product from getting into the hands of people who -- were they able to play -- would be interested in playing.
 
  Phelcher

Advanced Member

Joined: 6/01/09
Posts: 1133

9/08/13 7:15:05 AM#102
We don't want a better deal, we want better games...

"No they are not charity. That is where the whales come in. (I play for free. Whales pays.) Devs get a business. That is how it works."


-Nariusseldon

  Phelcher

Advanced Member

Joined: 6/01/09
Posts: 1133

9/08/13 7:23:44 AM#103
Originally posted by jpnz
Originally posted by Phelcher
Originally posted by jpnz
If something cost less, more people will buy it. This isn't exactly rocket science. ROFL!

No.. then more people CAN afford it.

If a nice moist turd cost $600 bucks... would you buy it? OK, what if that was reduced to $6 bucks..?

  

Only children and adolescent youth spend habitually on $7 turds...    (convincing themselves it isn't a turd)

 

This is a pretty illogical ad hominem attack but lets see how far down the rabbit hole we can go. :)

If a Ferrari cost $6, would people buy more Ferrari's? Yes? So... logic?

 

 

Sorry, there is no constant in your argument. As a Ferrari cost more to make, so your rebuttal is illogical.

 

Secondly, everyone wants a Ferrari for free... and it's not a sustainable business.  So why would anyone want to drive a turd.. just because they can't afford a Ferrari..?    Let-alone pay $5 for the turd ..? 

(Why pay for anything in a free game... )

"No they are not charity. That is where the whales come in. (I play for free. Whales pays.) Devs get a business. That is how it works."


-Nariusseldon

  Velocinox

Hard Core Member

Joined: 3/15/06
Posts: 663

9/08/13 3:31:29 PM#104
Originally posted by Axehilt
Originally posted by Velocinox

If cost is always the primary factor in sales...

I am sure Microsoft will skyrocket sales of the XBOX 360 by lowering its price to $199.99

If you had some perfectly preserved beef from the time of mad cow disease, you would make a bundle selling it for $1.99 a pound instead of $6.99 a pound even if it is both fresh and healthy.

Why is the Galaxy S4 still the best selling smartphone when Samsung slashed the price of the S3 to 20% of retail?

Do some research and look up Salton Sea resort prices from the late 1950s. 

Price drops do not universally increase sales. You are completely wrong in this. In the MMO industry game quality trumps price. You cannot sell a terrible game for $5 faster than a great game will sell for $50 plus $15 a month. 

Luxury Good:

Investopedia: "An item that is not necessary for living, but is deemed as highly-desired within a culture or society. The ability to purchase or finance a luxury item is directly proportionate to ones' income or assets. In other words, as people move into higher income brackets they are more able and more likely to purchase more expensive luxury goods.

Luxury items are also known as "positional goods" because they signal that the owner has achieved a certain position or status within society to be able to afford them."

Wikipedia: "Luxury goods are products and services that are not considered essential and are associated with affluence."

BusinessDictionary.com: "Products which are not necessary but which tend to make life more pleasant for the consumer. In contrast with necessity goods, luxury goods are typically more costly and are often bought by individuals that have a higher disposable income or greater accumulated wealth than the average." 

All of them include the fact that they are typically reserved for those with greater income than average. There is nothing affluent about MMO prices, which means they are optional expenses but not luxury goods (services). You are wrong on this as well. 

You keep trying to prove what has already been established and incorrect, and instead of helping your argument, you add more things you are incorrect about. 

A lot of what you're saying indicates you haven't been paying attention at all.  Please read what's being said.

No, I have read every word of every post you have made in this discussion... EVERY. I have made counterpoints to everything you have said. I even broke your posts down into paragraphs and addressed each in detail. To make the claim that I haven't read your posts in the face of the plain evidence is commentary on the fact that YOU are the one that hasn't read this discussion and have just been making blind, uninformed, and in the end we discovered, incorrect assertions.

To wit, here is my first post in reply to the OP...

Originally posted by Velocinox

Pricing doesn't make a difference. The game makes the difference. If it is fun and appeals to a wide audience it will succeed.

 

Unfortunately, cash stores are here to stay. No matter the business model, Subs, F2P, or B2P it no longer matters. The industry will not pass up the revenues it has observed coming from the successful in-game cash stores.

It simply comes down to how much of your life you are willing to hand over to publishers for a game, and how much it is worth to you.

My point is clear from the start and I have never deviated. Game quality trumps price.

And here is your reply...

Originally posted by Axehilt
Originally posted by Velocinox

Pricing doesn't make a difference. The game makes the difference. If it is fun and appeals to a wide audience it will succeed. 

Unfortunately, cash stores are here to stay. No matter the business model, Subs, F2P, or B2P it no longer matters. The industry will not pass up the revenues it has observed coming from the successful in-game cash stores.

It simply comes down to how much of your life you are willing to hand over to publishers for a game, and how much it is worth to you.

Pretending elasticity doesn't exist, forgetting it exists, or being ignorant of its effects, doesn't mean it isn't a factor.

Price obviously has the potential to make a huge difference in MMORPG revenue.  The problem being that they can't easily test different price points with the exact same product, to find where the local maxima is for maximizing revenue.  So we can't say for sure that the increase in sale (count) from a lower price point would actually generate more total revenue, or that a higher price point would or wouldn't make more revenue despite fewer sales.  Not without actual experiment results on exactly the same product.

Where you go on condescendingly about price elasticity, when as I have proven over the last dozen pages doesn't affect the sales more than game quality does. And you have made the attempt in the last half-dozen pages to weasel your point around to make it right, when you know your original post was wrong in reply to my point.... bottom line.

 

For example, I don't know where you got this "primary factor" nonsense.  It's a factor, period.  Sometimes it's the primary factor, sometimes not.  But it's always a factor.  It always matters to some degree, because nobody has infinite money to be able to afford the good at every price.
 
I addressed the 'some degree' aspect as well. when I mentioned the pebble in orbit affecting Earth's tides. everything affects everything else to some degree but we don't bring that up as a refute to an obvious point. Neutrinos from the sun affect the Earth's mass, but we don't spend hours figuring out their implications when we go to dig a ditch.
 
 
Another example, you somehow thought someone in this thread was saying a lower price is always the best price.  Price always changes the number of people willing or able to make purchases, but lowering a price isn't universally the right choice.  Nobody claimed that.  Quite the opposite, I clearly stated my hunch is $7 wouldn't be worth it!  (But that we don't have enough information to know for sure either way.)
 
YOU have made this point, over and over in this thread, not me. As in this post you are now saying you never made...
 
Originally posted by Axehilt

Do you think every player is plunking down $300 for a lifetime subscription?  Then obviously price matters.   Not everyone was interested in that product at that price.

And that product (lifetime sub) is much different from a single month of subscription, so it doesn't represent sufficient price experimentation to figure out what the right price of a single month's subscription is.

$15 vs. $1 subscription price would have a huge impact on subscription sales.  That's like the most basic of economics, man.  It matters, and it matters a lot!

By the way it's rather ironic that the type of high-income consumer you're describing (who would be willing to pay very high sub fees) is a perfect example of price elasticity.

 

But now you are saying you agree that the price wouldn't be a major aspect? What is your point? I don't think you have one other than winning an internet argument. The truth is, the audience is so starved for a fun MMO that pricing is the LAST of the publisher's concerns in the long run.

 
 
 
Lastly, are you trying to imply that for the millions of people in the world living on or near the bread line MMORPG subscriptions are something they can  easily afford?  For many, possibly even most, it's a luxury good.  It's something where the price prevents the product from getting into the hands of people who -- were they able to play -- would be interested in playing.
 

Nobody was talking about 'bread line' income. I stated early on that we're considering developed nation economies, as written in this post on the third page....

Originally posted by Velocinox

You're missing the point. More people would buy a $130,000 Maserati for $35,000 than both of your examples combined.

The perceived value trumps minor (and MMO subscriptions are minor to most developed-world consumers) increases in price.

A fun game will sell at any price point within current industry range. The deciding factor when the price difference is so minimal is quality of the game expressed in perceived value.

This is just another in a long line of attempts by you to stretch the discussion into inconsequential hyperbole to try and help your already sunk point have merit.

 

Now, obviously I HAVE read your posts. I know what this topic is about and I know when you are just making things up as you have in this latest post. Show some dignity and walk away with the lesson learned.

'Sandbox MMO' is a PTSD trigger word for anyone who has the experience to know that anonymous players invariably use a 'sandbox' in the same manner a housecat does.


No game is more fun than the one you can't play, and no game is more boring than the one you've become familiar with.


How to become a millionaire:
Start with a billion dollars and make an MMO.

  Shadanwolf

Apprentice Member

Joined: 6/13/10
Posts: 1880

9/08/13 3:38:27 PM#105

I'm playing a mmo atm that is nickle and dimeing me to death

Small packs(unless you want to pay cash for some more slots) is making me crazy aas I have to discard items because I'm not near a shop to sell them.Sooo i'm stopping playing that game(which is currently in beta). I've posted my "concerns". We'll see what changes come at 9/18 launch.

So..yes.There's pricing and then there's poor pricing decisions.

  Axehilt

Novice Member

Joined: 5/09/09
Posts: 7213

9/08/13 7:57:48 PM#106
Originally posted by Velocinox

Now, obviously I HAVE read your posts. I know what this topic is about and I know when you are just making things up as you have in this latest post. Show some dignity and walk away with the lesson learned.

No, you're not reading because you're either drawing completely incorrect conclusions (the two examples I listed last post) or you're missing the very basic core concept I've been trying to convey: that pricing matters.

You: "Pricing doesn't make a difference."

That's just a flat-out incorrect statement, as I've hammered on time and again.  At least now with your recent posts you've backslid into it not mattering "more than game quality", so at least I've been able to get you to concede that pricing matters.  Instead of trying to pridefully disagree with my first response to you, you should've simply agreed with it, "Oh yeah, you're right. Pricing does make a difference, but I feel like game quality is a bigger factor."  That would've been logical and been a pretty solid opinion to hold.

Your "pebble in orbit" comments might be appropriate if we were talking about a 5% change in price (from 14.99 to 14.24) but we're not.  We're discussing pricing in general, and most commonly a change from $15 to $7!  That's 54% off!  Such a huge change in price will obviously have far more than a "pebble in orbit" affect on sales, and is very likely to also have a big affect on total revenue.

Your "pebble in orbit" is also the only thing we're talking about.  We're not talking about multiple games.  We're talking about picking one game, and will it do better at $7 or $15?  So the other factors you think are so huge aren't even part of the discussion.

My "the lower price isn't always the best price" is really clear, but you don't seem to be able to split out two separate concepts:

  • Sales.  The raw number of transactions.  At a lower price, more sales will happen.
  • "The best price."  The number which optimizes total revenue (which is sales * price)
    • Basically by definition the lowest price isn't the best price, because the lowest price is $0 and you'd make $0 revenue.
    • Price has a massive influence on total revenue (clearly, if it can make a game earn $0!) but finding the best price requires experimentation at different price points with the same exact product.
Your "nobody was talking about 'bread line' income" is part of why your posts feel so short-sighted.  It's a discussion about price!  Different price points will enable new potential payers to pay.  So while people specifically on the bread line may not ever be a market for MMORPGs, the people just above it are.  And right now those people aren't willing and able to add another $15 to their monthly budget.  But there are undeniably some people where $7 to their monthly budget is possible.  It's those people who are potential new customers which would increase the subscription sales of a MMORPG which lowered its price.
 
Again: is it worth it?  Would that be the best price?  We don't know. (Probably not.)  But it would increase sales, because these people are out there teetering on the edge and refusing to pay because the price is too high for them.
 
Your Maserati example is meaningless because it's talking about a separate product.  This is a discussion about price.  Take the same Maserati and sell it for $75,000 or $130,000 or $200,000, and which price ends up being best for total revenue.  The discussion has always been about whether changes to pricing alone will improve MMORPGs revenue.
  Phelcher

Advanced Member

Joined: 6/01/09
Posts: 1133

9/08/13 11:29:11 PM#107
Originally posted by Axehilt
Originally posted by Velocinox

Now, obviously I HAVE read your posts. I know what this topic is about and I know when you are just making things up as you have in this latest post. Show some dignity and walk away with the lesson learned.

No, you're not reading because you're either drawing completely incorrect conclusions (the two examples I listed last post) or you're missing the very basic core concept I've been trying to convey: that pricing matters.

You: "Pricing doesn't make a difference."

That's just a flat-out incorrect statement, as I've hammered on time and again.  At least now with your recent posts you've backslid into it not mattering "more than game quality", so at least I've been able to get you to concede that pricing matters.  Instead of trying to pridefully disagree with my first response to you, you should've simply agreed with it, "Oh yeah, you're right. Pricing does make a difference, but I feel like game quality is a bigger factor."  That would've been logical and been a pretty solid opinion to hold.

Your "pebble in orbit" comments might be appropriate if we were talking about a 5% change in price (from 14.99 to 14.24) but we're not.  We're discussing pricing in general, and most commonly a change from $15 to $7!  That's 54% off!  Such a huge change in price will obviously have far more than a "pebble in orbit" affect on sales, and is very likely to also have a big affect on total revenue.

Your "pebble in orbit" is also the only thing we're talking about.  We're not talking about multiple games.  We're talking about picking one game, and will it do better at $7 or $15?  So the other factors you think are so huge aren't even part of the discussion.

My "the lower price isn't always the best price" is really clear, but you don't seem to be able to split out two separate concepts:

  • Sales.  The raw number of transactions.  At a lower price, more sales will happen.
  • "The best price."  The number which optimizes total revenue (which is sales * price)
    • Basically by definition the lowest price isn't the best price, because the lowest price is $0 and you'd make $0 revenue.
    • Price has a massive influence on total revenue (clearly, if it can make a game earn $0!) but finding the best price requires experimentation at different price points with the same exact product.
Your "nobody was talking about 'bread line' income" is part of why your posts feel so short-sighted.  It's a discussion about price!  Different price points will enable new potential payers to pay.  So while people specifically on the bread line may not ever be a market for MMORPGs, the people just above it are.  And right now those people aren't willing and able to add another $15 to their monthly budget.  But there are undeniably some people where $7 to their monthly budget is possible.  It's those people who are potential new customers which would increase the subscription sales of a MMORPG which lowered its price.
 
Again: is it worth it?  Would that be the best price?  We don't know. (Probably not.)  But it would increase sales, because these people are out there teetering on the edge and refusing to pay because the price is too high for them.
 
Your Maserati example is meaningless because it's talking about a separate product.  This is a discussion about price.  Take the same Maserati and sell it for $75,000 or $130,000 or $200,000, and which price ends up being best for total revenue.  The discussion has always been about whether changes to pricing alone will improve MMORPGs revenue.

 

LOL^

 

We are not talking about anyone, we are talking about people whom have a hobby. Same type of people who spend thousands on their other hobbies...  like drag racing, boating, camping, backpacking, paintball, etc..

 

 

Secondly, you have no clue what Velocinox is saying, do you..?  Quality establishes price..

 

 

Cheap game.. cheap price.

No amount of making it cheaper will bring more customers in. It is called the cost of diminishing returns. Free games pull in tons of free gamers. All of them put a load & stress on your servers, only a few whales buy. Eventually the pyramid scheme topples and your left with closed doors.

"No they are not charity. That is where the whales come in. (I play for free. Whales pays.) Devs get a business. That is how it works."


-Nariusseldon

  Axehilt

Novice Member

Joined: 5/09/09
Posts: 7213

9/09/13 2:52:03 AM#108
Originally posted by Phelcher

We are not talking about anyone, we are talking about people whom have a hobby. Same type of people who spend thousands on their other hobbies...  like drag racing, boating, camping, backpacking, paintball, etc.. 

Secondly, you have no clue what Velocinox is saying, do you..?  Quality establishes price.. 

Cheap game.. cheap price.

No amount of making it cheaper will bring more customers in. It is called the cost of diminishing returns. Free games pull in tons of free gamers. All of them put a load & stress on your servers, only a few whales buy. Eventually the pyramid scheme topples and your left with closed doors.

This isn't complicated.

The thread is about whether MMORPGs would do better at $7 or $15.

  • To even discuss the topic, we have to assume additional potential customers are going to start paying for a $7 subscription compared with a $15 one.  So obviously we're discussing more than just existing $15 subscriber base hobbyists.  And yes, it would bring more customers in because that's how economics works.
  • It's a no-brainer MMORPGs should strive for better quality, but that's not what this thread is asking.  This thread is about whether MMORPGs would do better at $7 or $15, which implies "Does price-changing matter...with the same game?"
  simmihi

Hard Core Member

Joined: 6/11/10
Posts: 525

9/09/13 3:09:21 AM#109

I'd like to see a system with 3 different prices for subscribers.

$5  -    Sub1 = access to game and the basic features, 2 active character slots, 20 AH slots, full death penalty

$10 -   Sub2 = Sub1 + convenience stuff like instant travel instead of fast travel,  50% death penalty, 10% XP boost, 3 active character slots, 30 AH slots

$15 -   Sub3 = Sub2 + additional 10% XP boost, 5 active character slots, unlimited AH slots, no death penalty

Something like this, features not set in stone obviously, you get the idea. In these days, a lot of people like to play more games at a time. If i spend 2-3 hours per day, i find a $15 price justified. If i end up logging in only for a raid two times per week, because that's the only thing I enjoy in that game, then $15 is a bit much.

  Loktofeit

Elite Member

Joined: 1/13/10
Posts: 12401

Currently playing EVE, SMITE, ArcheAge, and Combat Arms

9/09/13 6:37:19 AM#110
Axehilt, you're a trooper, man.

"And wikipedia is as accurate as Britannica. Wikipedia is very reliable. You would be hard pressed to find a more reliable source for these kinds of things." -fivoroth

  SpottyGekko

Hard Core Member

Joined: 9/26/04
Posts: 2956

9/09/13 7:28:47 AM#111
Originally posted by Axehilt
Originally posted by Phelcher

We are not talking about anyone, we are talking about people whom have a hobby. Same type of people who spend thousands on their other hobbies...  like drag racing, boating, camping, backpacking, paintball, etc.. 

Secondly, you have no clue what Velocinox is saying, do you..?  Quality establishes price.. 

Cheap game.. cheap price.

No amount of making it cheaper will bring more customers in. It is called the cost of diminishing returns. Free games pull in tons of free gamers. All of them put a load & stress on your servers, only a few whales buy. Eventually the pyramid scheme topples and your left with closed doors.

This isn't complicated.

The thread is about whether MMORPGs would do better at $7 or $15.

  • To even discuss the topic, we have to assume additional potential customers are going to start paying for a $7 subscription compared with a $15 one.  So obviously we're discussing more than just existing $15 subscriber base hobbyists.  And yes, it would bring more customers in because that's how economics works.
  • It's a no-brainer MMORPGs should strive for better quality, but that's not what this thread is asking.  This thread is about whether MMORPGs would do better at $7 or $15, which implies "Does price-changing matter...with the same game?"

Axe, you seem to be single-mindedly pursuing this point, regardless of it's meaning.

 

What do you mean by "the game will do better" ? More players or more revenue ?

 

Because if you define it as purely "more players", then there's no doubt you're correct in saying $7 will be "better" than $15.

But if you're implying a 50% drop in sub fee will generate MORE than 100% extra subs, then you're dead wrong. It has to be more than double the player number, otherwise there's no change in total revenue (whilst most definitely an increase in overheads).

 

I don't believe that there's a significant amount of people who feel so strongly about $8 that they will not play a game they would have enjoyed playing if they were prepared to pay $15. The amount is trivial, unless you want access to multiple MMO's simultaneously.

  Phelcher

Advanced Member

Joined: 6/01/09
Posts: 1133

9/09/13 9:09:24 AM#112
Originally posted by Axehilt
Originally posted by Phelcher

We are not talking about anyone, we are talking about people whom have a hobby. Same type of people who spend thousands on their other hobbies...  like drag racing, boating, camping, backpacking, paintball, etc.. 

Secondly, you have no clue what Velocinox is saying, do you..?  Quality establishes price.. 

Cheap game.. cheap price.

No amount of making it cheaper will bring more customers in. It is called the cost of diminishing returns. Free games pull in tons of free gamers. All of them put a load & stress on your servers, only a few whales buy. Eventually the pyramid scheme topples and your left with closed doors.

This isn't complicated.

The thread is about whether MMORPGs would do better at $7 or $15.

  • To even discuss the topic, we have to assume additional potential customers are going to start paying for a $7 subscription compared with a $15 one.  So obviously we're discussing more than just existing $15 subscriber base hobbyists.  And yes, it would bring more customers in because that's how economics works.
  • It's a no-brainer MMORPGs should strive for better quality, but that's not what this thread is asking.  This thread is about whether MMORPGs would do better at $7 or $15, which implies "Does price-changing matter...with the same game?"

 

Bro, you are getting rather embarrassing at this point. You know just enough about Micro/macro economics to discuss, but have no understanding of their inner workings.

So, what MMORPG are you talking about @ $7  vs  $15.  Any arbitrary game, or an exact one?

 

 

 

Your question alone implies you do not understand economics.  Don't even mention a game then, mention a widget and take up some classes and learn. 

Tic-tac-toe wouldn't bring in anyone at $7, so asking $14 would be stupid.  People playing in a premier Tic-Tac-Toe league will most certainly pay $15/month, to be amonst their friends and the elite players. 

If you make it $7.. it doesn't mean 50% moAr people will pick up the game, it just means it cost less and those who were already thinking about TRYING, might now.  Those elite players might stop playing in that Tic-Tac-Toe league because now a bunch of mingers are playing and messing up the community...  so subscription drop.

 

That is also plausible^  

 

 

(& what happened to late EQ & WoW, as more children pushed the paying adults out of the game.)

"No they are not charity. That is where the whales come in. (I play for free. Whales pays.) Devs get a business. That is how it works."


-Nariusseldon

  Loktofeit

Elite Member

Joined: 1/13/10
Posts: 12401

Currently playing EVE, SMITE, ArcheAge, and Combat Arms

9/09/13 9:10:08 AM#113
Originally posted by Axehilt

This isn't complicated.

The thread is about whether MMORPGs would do better at $7 or $15.

  • To even discuss the topic, we have to assume additional potential customers are going to start paying for a $7 subscription compared with a $15 one.  So obviously we're discussing more than just existing $15 subscriber base hobbyists.  And yes, it would bring more customers in because that's how economics works.
  • It's a no-brainer MMORPGs should strive for better quality, but that's not what this thread is asking.  This thread is about whether MMORPGs would do better at $7 or $15, which implies "Does price-changing matter...with the same game?"

I'm not so sure about your assessment. While many might be inclined to point to things like Steam to support the theory that more would buy at a lower price, we aren't talking about the purchase price for a new product. We're talking about the subscription price for an existing service.

There are a lot of other factors involved here. While there are plenty that avoid buying a new game because of the sixty dollar box price, there isn't anything to support that people are avoiding subscribing to MMOs because of the fifteen dollar subscription price. There's also the fact that MMOs are at such a universally consistent price that a half price MMO would be perceived as a lower quality MMO when looked at by those customers one would be looking to bring in, especially because there's no manner by which they can tell how the MMOs are different. They look the same and have the same feature set, so the perception is the higher priced one must be of a higher quality. Another thing at play is the natural disposition people have toward avoiding difficult comparisons, further pushing the consumer away from the seven dollar MMO.

 

All that aside, the OP takes a rather short-sighted view when he presents the question:

"If for example FFXIV:ARR came free with $7 monthly sub, 100% I would've took that deal. What is better to sell something to 3 people for $7 or to sell the same thing to 1 person for $15?"

As mentioned above, the price of an MMO is rarely a factor, so whether a person starts playing at seven dollars or starts playing at fifteen dollars, the impact of price on the decision to continue or cancel remains relatively the same.

Acquisition is important, but conversion and retention is key. Even if a lower price did introduce a spike in people trying the game, funneling in more people at the low end doesn't really pay off when you're now investing far more in combating churn and raising your cost per acquisition.

"And wikipedia is as accurate as Britannica. Wikipedia is very reliable. You would be hard pressed to find a more reliable source for these kinds of things." -fivoroth

  Torvaldr

Elite Member

Joined: 6/10/09
Posts: 5939

9/09/13 9:55:09 AM#114
Originally posted by Loktofeit

As mentioned above, the price of an MMO is rarely a factor, so whether a person starts playing at seven dollars or starts playing at fifteen dollars, the impact of price on the decision to continue or cancel remains relatively the same.

Acquisition is important, but conversion and retention is key. Even if a lower price did introduce a spike in people trying the game, funneling in more people at the low end doesn't really pay off when you're now investing far more in combating churn and raising your cost per acquisition.

I wouldn't say the price isn't or rarely is a factor, but when accepting how the product is packaged, the exact price point becomes secondary.

For example paying a monthly bill for a game is more than I want to be required to spend, but if I were to spend that then $7 or $15 doesn't really matter, but I might think twice if it went up to $20 or $25 per month.

If a game has a cash shop and I'm going to spend money I will buy however much I feel like spending so $10, $20, or $50, but I'm going to think twice before buying larger packages.  I might spend the equivalent of $5 - $15 on a mount (or some similar such thing), but I'll balk at spending $45 on that mount.  That is how PWE/Cryptic outpriced themselves for me.  I'm just not going to spend $45 on one companion for one character.

So price, for me, is rarely the sole or primary factor unless it's completely out of my financial sensibilities, but it is a factor. Price could even be a factor in your last scenario.  People might buy a game for $60 and spend some cash shop money now and then (or not), but they might not buy it at all if they only way they can play is to constantly pay, even if the price of the one off payment is well within budget.

Curse you AquaScum!

  Morrok

Novice Member

Joined: 12/26/08
Posts: 132

9/09/13 10:03:25 AM#115


Originally posted by Loktofeit
I'm not so sure about your assessment.


Actually, i think Axehilt is making the point in this dicussion.

To *me*, what counts (after a trial time) is the the total cost of an MMO.
This includes the box/download price (if any) plus the sub price, say for a year.
Of course, the trial time is crucial for my decision to buy or not in the first place.

Now, after that trial period there's the case when i say to myself "hmm... this game has some potential but isn't where i'd like it to be yet".
In this case, sub price *does* matter if i support it by subbing anyways or not.

If, on the other hand, the game offers "everything i want", then the sub price is not irrelevant but less important.
Not irrelevant because there's still the total cost to consider and the "difficult comparisons" you were mentioning and that i talked about in the "would you pay more" thread.
As long as the total cost would fall within my personal limit, i'd buy+sub.


But since there's no MMO in existance that offers "everything i want", and *my* wants are different from the next player's, and MMOs kind of not only tend to but need to cater "the masses" (at least a crucial mass) to be successful, Axehilt's point of "best price" matters.

You are correct, retention is what matters in the end.
But acquisition is the key to retention.
If you make the "hurdle" to try the game in the first place too high you're excluding some (or a lot, depending on how high that hurdle actually is) players.
And by "try" in the meaning of the last sentence i mean *beyond* the usually free trial period, which might be enough to judge things like graphics or UI but is not really enough to see if for example the economy is "stable" or what you want it to be or class balancing etc.


So my facit:
Sub prices *do* matter.
Make them too low, and you might convey the impression of a sub-par game.
Make them too high, and you might loose entire (target) audiences.
As Axehilt tried - from how i understood him - to say:
The right price between "too high" and "too low" can only be determined through market research and adjustments.
But since the ~15USD/EUR mark is established, it's difficult to deviate from that; after all people have (price) expectations.
And if the 15USD/EUR mark will be enough to cover the cost for a company, you're unlikely to see 14EUR or 16EUR instead, we're more likely to see 10EUR if the expected account:sub ratio is too low.
While we're unlikely to see raises of a sub-price AFTER the launch, simply because many players would rage-quit, making proper market research prior to setting the price *the* most important factor in setting the price.

  GrumpyMel2

Advanced Member

Joined: 3/24/09
Posts: 1824

9/09/13 12:51:02 PM#116

At this point, I do feel compelled to be a little pedantic and point out that what you guys are discussing here is the "price point" rather then the "pricing model", still a valid topic but an important distinction. Sub based games that charge $7 or $15 per month, may well have the same "pricing model". 

"Pricing Model" would indicate how you go about coming up with the "price point" and/or how you monetize the service.

 

  Axehilt

Novice Member

Joined: 5/09/09
Posts: 7213

9/09/13 1:28:20 PM#117
Originally posted by SpottyGekko

Axe, you seem to be single-mindedly pursuing this point, regardless of it's meaning. 

What do you mean by "the game will do better" ? More players or more revenue ? 

Because if you define it as purely "more players", then there's no doubt you're correct in saying $7 will be "better" than $15.

But if you're implying a 50% drop in sub fee will generate MORE than 100% extra subs, then you're dead wrong. It has to be more than double the player number, otherwise there's no change in total revenue (whilst most definitely an increase in overheads). 

I don't believe that there's a significant amount of people who feel so strongly about $8 that they will not play a game they would have enjoyed playing if they were prepared to pay $15. The amount is trivial, unless you want access to multiple MMO's simultaneously.

I've already covered most of this in prior posts:

  • We're talking about revenue.
  • I'm not implying it will generate enough new subs to be worth it.  I've repeatedly stated I think it won't.
  • We don't know for sure.  Even developers don't.  Because there is very little (if any) price experimentation going on.
Your last paragraph makes the "fixated on existing users" mistake that several posters are making.  When talking about a price change, if you're only looking at the existing playerbase (who were prepared to pay $15) then almost any price drop is a terrible idea because those players aren't going to subscribe more than the one time they already do.  But this is economics, man.  When you drop the price you attract new players.  The ones who weren't prepared to pay $15 are the bulk of the new payers!
 
With other products a lower price also generates more repeat payments, but in the case of MMO subscriptions that value is by its nature extremely small (it's extremely rare for a single player to maintain multiple subscriptions to the same game.)
 
However like the OP has mentioned a few times, it would increase the number of subscriptions spread across multiple games for players (subscribing to 2 separate games instead of just 1.)  But I think that's still a pretty small factor next to the significant (but probably not +100%) increase due to new payers.
  Axehilt

Novice Member

Joined: 5/09/09
Posts: 7213

9/09/13 1:33:17 PM#118
Originally posted by Morrok

To *me*, what counts (after a trial time) is the the total cost of an MMO.
This includes the box/download price (if any) plus the sub price, say for a year.

Right, exactly.

Loktofeit isn't wrong to bring up the fact that compared with the box price the subscription is going to be a less important factor, but it's still a factor.  It's still part of the total cost of the game.

How many additional people bought GW2, because the subscription was "free" instead of $15/mo?  I'm guessing it's a pretty significant number!  That's a direct example of the affect of subscription pricing.

  GrumpyMel2

Advanced Member

Joined: 3/24/09
Posts: 1824

9/09/13 1:56:02 PM#119
Originally posted by Axehilt
Originally posted by SpottyGekko

Axe, you seem to be single-mindedly pursuing this point, regardless of it's meaning. 

What do you mean by "the game will do better" ? More players or more revenue ? 

Because if you define it as purely "more players", then there's no doubt you're correct in saying $7 will be "better" than $15.

But if you're implying a 50% drop in sub fee will generate MORE than 100% extra subs, then you're dead wrong. It has to be more than double the player number, otherwise there's no change in total revenue (whilst most definitely an increase in overheads). 

I don't believe that there's a significant amount of people who feel so strongly about $8 that they will not play a game they would have enjoyed playing if they were prepared to pay $15. The amount is trivial, unless you want access to multiple MMO's simultaneously.

I've already covered most of this in prior posts:

  • We're talking about revenue.
  • I'm not implying it will generate enough new subs to be worth it.  I've repeatedly stated I think it won't.
  • We don't know for sure.  Even developers don't.  Because there is very little (if any) price experimentation going on.
Your last paragraph makes the "fixated on existing users" mistake that several posters are making.  When talking about a price change, if you're only looking at the existing playerbase (who were prepared to pay $15) then almost any price drop is a terrible idea because those players aren't going to subscribe more than the one time they already do.  But this is economics, man.  When you drop the price you attract new players.  The ones who weren't prepared to pay $15 are the bulk of the new payers!
 
With other products a lower price also generates more repeat payments, but in the case of MMO subscriptions that value is by its nature extremely small (it's extremely rare for a single player to maintain multiple subscriptions to the same game.)
 
However like the OP has mentioned a few times, it would increase the number of subscriptions spread across multiple games for players (subscribing to 2 separate games instead of just 1.)  But I think that's still a pretty small factor next to the significant (but probably not +100%) increase due to new payers.

Of course, there is another factor involved as well that's not being considered. Namely how a more then 50 percent drop in gross revenue per user effects the nature of the services the company delivers. An MMO type service is going to have both elastic and inelastic operating costs. There are plenty of economies of scale that can be gained, but even still at $7 per user, the company is going to be operating alot closer to margin on each user supported.... that certainly can have a pretty drastic effect on the nature of the services provided and the company that's trying to provide them.

  Loktofeit

Elite Member

Joined: 1/13/10
Posts: 12401

Currently playing EVE, SMITE, ArcheAge, and Combat Arms

9/09/13 2:21:34 PM#120
Originally posted by Torvaldr
Originally posted by Loktofeit

As mentioned above, the price of an MMO is rarely a factor, so whether a person starts playing at seven dollars or starts playing at fifteen dollars, the impact of price on the decision to continue or cancel remains relatively the same.

Acquisition is important, but conversion and retention is key. Even if a lower price did introduce a spike in people trying the game, funneling in more people at the low end doesn't really pay off when you're now investing far more in combating churn and raising your cost per acquisition.

I wouldn't say the price isn't or rarely is a factor, but when accepting how the product is packaged, the exact price point becomes secondary.

For example paying a monthly bill for a game is more than I want to be required to spend, but if I were to spend that then $7 or $15 doesn't really matter, but I might think twice if it went up to $20 or $25 per month.

 

Reading that first line out of context, I would agree with you.

When putting it back in the context of just the 7 and 15 dollar prices, it seems you agree with the statement, as well.

"And wikipedia is as accurate as Britannica. Wikipedia is very reliable. You would be hard pressed to find a more reliable source for these kinds of things." -fivoroth

7 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Search