Trending Games | Swordsman | ArcheAge | World of Warcraft | WildStar

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,736,820 Users Online:0
Games:714  Posts:6,175,563
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
A-C
2029 Online 2112: Revolution 2Moons 4Story 8BitMMO 9 Dragons A Mystical Land A Tale in the Desert III A3 ACE Online ARGO Online Aberoth Absolute Force Online Absolute Terror Achaea Adellion Aerrevan Aetolia, the Midnight Age Age of Armor Age of Conan Age of Empires Online Age of Mourning Age of Wulin Age of Wushu Aida Arenas Aika Aion Albion Online Alganon All Points Bulletin (APB) Allods Online Altis Gates Amazing World Anarchy Online Ancients of Fasaria Andromeda 5 Angels Online Anime Trumps Anmynor Anno Online Applo Arcane Hearts Arcane Legends ArchLord ArcheAge Archeblade Archlord X Asda 2 Asda Story Ashen Empires Asheron's Call Asheron's Call 2 Astera Online Astonia III Astro Empires Astro Lords: Oort CLoud Asura Force Atlantica Online Atriarch Aura Kingdom Aurora Blade Auto Assault Avatar Star Battle Dawn Battle Dawn Galaxies Battle for Graxia Battle of 3 Kingdoms Battle of the Immortals Battlecruiser Online Battlestar Galactica Online Battlestar Reloaded Beyond Protocol Black Aftermath Black Desert Black Gold Black Prophecy Black Prophecy Tactics: Nexus Conflict Blacklight Retribution Blade & Soul Blade Hunter Blade Wars Blazing Throne Bless Blitz 1941 Blood and Jade Bloodlines Champions Bounty Bay Online Brain Storm Brawl Busters. Brick-Force Bright Shadow Bullet Run Business Tycoon Online CTRacer Cabal Online Caesary Call of Camelot Call of Gods Call of Thrones Camelot Unchained Canaan Online Cardmon Hero Cartoon Universe CasinoRPG Castle Empire Castlot Celtic Heroes Champions Online Champions of Regnum Chaos Online Chrono Tales Citadel of Sorcery CitiesXL Citizen Zero City of Decay City of Heroes City of Steam City of Transformers City of Villains Civilization Online Clan Lord Clash of Clans Cloud Nine Club Penguin Colony of War Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances Company of Heroes Online Conquer Online Conquer Online 3 Continent of the Ninth (C9) Core Blaze Core Exiles Corum Online Craft of Gods Crimecraft Crimelife 2 Cronous Crota II Crusaders of Solaris Cultures Online Cyber Monster 2 Céiron Wars
D-F
D&D Online DC Universe DK Online DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 DV8: Exile Dalethaan Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Relic: Prelude Dark Solstice Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkest Dungeon Darkfall Darkfall: Unholy Wars Darkwind: War on Wheels Das Tal Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide DayZ Dead Earth Dead Frontier Deco Online Deepworld Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Demons at the Horizon Desert Operations Destiny Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Pals Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Call II Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dragons and Titans Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Rampage Dungeon Runners Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online Dynasty of the Magi EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthrise Eclipse War Ecol Tactics Online Eden Eternal Edge of Space Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elder Scrolls Online Eldevin Elf Online Elite: Dangerous Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire Empire & State Empire Craft Empire Universe 3 EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Blue Moon Online Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Eternal Saga Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverEmber Online EverQuest Next EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Evony Exarch Exorace F.E.A.R. Online Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forge Forsaken World Fortnite Fortuna Forum for Discussion of Everlight Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
G-L
GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones: Seven Kingdoms Gameglobe Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gauntlet Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer Gloria Victis Glory of Gods GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Granado Espada Online Grand Chase Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall H1Z1 Habbo Hotel Hailan Rising HaloSphere2 Haven & Hearth Hawken Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero Online Hero Zero Hero's Journey Hero: 108 Online HeroSmash Heroes & Generals Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Heroes of the Storm Hex Holic Online Hostile Space Hunter Blade Huxley Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Imperator Imperian Inferno Legend Infestation: Survivor Stories Infinite Crisis Infinity Infinity Iris Online Iron Grip: Marauders Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kartuga Kicks Online King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom Under Fire II Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kings and Legends Kings of the Realm KingsRoad Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Age Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Landmark Lands of Hope: Phoenix Edition LastChaos League of Angels League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Edda: Vengeance Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 2 Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Lego Minifigures Online Life is Feudal Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia World
M-Q
MU Online Mabinogi Maestia: Rise of Keledus MagiKnights Magic Barrage Magic World Online Manga Fighter MapleStory Martial Heroes Marvel Heroes Marvel Super Hero Squad Online Marvel: Avengers Alliance MechWarrior Online Megaten Meridian 59 : Evolution Merlin MetalMercs Metaplace Metin 2 MicroVolts Midkemia Online Might & Magic Heroes: Kingdoms MilMo Minecraft Mini Fighter Minions of Mirth Ministry of War Monato Esprit Monkey King Online Monkey Quest Monster & Me Monster Madness Online MonsterMMORPG Moonlight Online: Tales of Eternal Blood Mordavia Mortal Online Mourning My Lands Myst Online: URU Live Myth Angels Online Myth War Myth War 2 Mytheon Mythic Saga Mythos N.E.O Online NIDA Online Nadirim Naviage: The Power of Capital Navy Field Need for Speed World Nemexia Neo's Land NeoSteam Neocron Nether Neverwinter Nexus: The Kingdom Of The Winds NinjaTrick NosTale Novus Aeterno Oberin Odin Quest Odyssey RPG Ogre Island Omerta 3 Online Boxing Manager Onverse Order & Chaos Online Order of Magic Original Blood Origins Return Origins of Malu Orion's Belt Otherland Forums OverSoul Overkings Oz Online Oz World Pandora Saga Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Panzar Parabellum Parallel Kingdom Parfait Station Path of Exile Pathfinder Online Perfect World Perpetuum Online Phantasy Star Online 2 Phantasy Star Universe Phoenix Dynasty Online Phylon Pi Story Picaroon Pirate Galaxy Pirate Storm Pirate101 PirateKing Online Pirates of the Burning Sea Pirates of the Caribbean Online Pixie Hollow Planeshift Planet Arkadia Planet Calypso PlanetSide 2 Planetside Planets³ Playboy Manager Pocket Legends Pockie Ninja Pockie Pirates Pockie Saints PoxNora Prime World Prime: Battle for Dominus Priston Tale Priston Tale II Prius Online Project Blackout Project Powder Project Titan Forums Project Wiki Puzzle Pirates Quickhit Football
R-S
R2 Online RAN Online RF Online ROSE Online Rage of 3 Kingdoms Ragnarok Online Ragnarok Online II RaiderZ Rakion Rappelz RappelzSEA Ravenmarch Realm Fighter Realm of the Mad God Realm of the Titans Realms Online Reclamation Red Stone Red War: Edem's Curse Regnum Online Remnant Knights Renaissance Repulse Requiem: Memento Mori Rift RiotZone Rise Rise of Dragonian Era Rise of Empire Rise of the Tycoon Rising of King Risk Your Life Rivality Rockfree Rohan: Blood Feud Role Play Worlds Roll n Rock Roma Victor Romadoria Rosh Online Roto X Rubies of Eventide Ruin Online Rumble Fighter Runes of Magic Runescape Rust Rusty Hearts Ryzom S4 League SAGA SD Gundam Capsule Fighter Online SMITE SUN Sagramore Salem SaySayGirls Scarlet Blade Scions of Fate Seal Online: Evolution Second Life Secret of the Solstice Seed Serenia Fantasy Seven Seas Saga Seven Souls Online Sevencore Shadow of Legend Shadowbane Shadowrun Online Shaiya Shards Online Shattered Galaxy Sho Online Shot Online Shroud of the Avatar SideQuest Siege on Stars Sigonyth: Desert Eternity Silkroad Online Skyblade Skyforge SmashMuck Champions Smoo Online Soldier Front Soul Master Soul Order Online Soul of Guardian Space Heroes Universe Sparta: War of Empires Spellcasters Sphere Spiral Knights Spirit Tales Splash Fighters Squad Wars Star Citizen Star Sonata 2 Star Stable Star Supremacy Star Trek Online Star Trek: Infinite Space Star Wars Galaxies Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Star Wars: The Old Republic StarQuest Online Stargate Worlds Starlight Story Starpires State of Decay SteelWar Online Stone Age 2 Stormfall: Age of War Storybricks Stronghold Kingdoms Sudden Attack Supremacy 1914 Supreme Destiny Sword Girls Sword of Destiny: Rise of Aions SwordX Swords of Heavens Swordsman
T-Z
TERA TS Online Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Tales of Solaris Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris TerraWorld Online Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Aurora World The Black Watchmen The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Crew The Division The Hammers End The Legend of Ares The Lost Titans The Matrix Online The Mighty Quest for Epic Loot The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems The West Theralon There Therian Saga Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Tiger Knight Titan Siege Titans of Time Toontown Online Top Speed Topia Online Torchlight Total Domination Transformers Universe Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Trove Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War Tynon U.B. Funkeys UFO Online URDEAD Online Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Naruto Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Utopia Valkyrie Sky Vampire Lord Online Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos VoidExpanse Voyage Century Online W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WAR2 Glory WYD Global Wakfu War Thunder War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Mercenaries War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Wargame1942 Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warkeepers Warrior Epic Wartune WebLords Wild West Online WildStar Wind of Luck WindSlayer 2 Wings of Destiny Wish Wizard101 Wizardry Online Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Speed World of Tanks World of Tanks Generals World of Warcraft World of Warplanes World of Warships World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xenocell Xiah Xsyon Xulu YS Online Yitien ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online Zombies Ate My Pizza eRepublik

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

EverQuest Next

EverQuest Next 

General Discussion  » My Plea for EQN

3 Pages 1 2 3 » Search
45 posts found
  Voqar

Novice Member

Joined: 1/28/04
Posts: 469

 
OP  9/04/13 2:27:58 AM#1

The MMORPG genre started out as a somewhat hardcore genre that featured a lot of grouping and a lot of challenge.  It was never a genre everybody could get into, because some people just can't handle it, or don't have the time for it.  And that's ok.

 

The early games like EverQuest itself, DAoC, and FFXI defined this genre and those games are STILL successful today, have always been successful, and have always been sub-based with P2P boxes and xpacs.

 

Since then we've had the fluke of WoW.  And since WoW, for reasons that defy any kind of reason, the genre has shifted away from the thing it does best, and the thing that's unique about the the genre, the grouping, and has shifted towards solo gameplay.  At the same time it has shifted away from challenge and reward towards giving away rewards for every trivial little action.

 

Achievement in the early MMORPGs meant something.  You really had to work at stuff and when you were done you felt good about it.  In MMORPGs now there are grinds - which are miserable - but the overall challenge just isn't there and rewards are handed out like candy for doing nothing. It's so much more hollow and shallow.  Worse yet, in F2P you can just buy your achievements for cash - nice sense of accomplishment there.  Where'd you get that cool XXX?  I bought it from the store.  Oh.  Nice.  You are so uber.

 

And all the clones that have come out with this formula of solo ez-mode?  Failures.  They pay for themselves, but ultimately they are failures because they fail to stay sub-based and fail to retain players.  Whereas the older MMORPGs had/have loyal players for years and years, the newer MMORPGs can't even keep people around for a whole year.  Because solo ez mode isn't worth a sub and there's no reason to stick around games where you exhaust the solo campaign in days and there isn't much else to do.

 

These games have to go F2P, which is an abomination and the worst thing to happen to (real) MMORPGs, but it's a model that works for solo/casual/light games that aren't worthy of a sub.  For real MMORPGs players, F2P games aren't even worth playing.

 

So.

 

I realize the EQN dudes want to do something different.  That can be good.  But how about as part of being different, you take the genre back to where it started WITH EVERQUEST, and return the MASSIVELY MULTIPLAYER to MMORPG.  Massively multiplayer isn't a bunch of soloists sharing a world and generating intelligence insulting public chat.  It's people doing things together.  Not PvE or PvP zergs.  Grouping.  Raids.  Community forged by grouping MOST OF THE TIME.  Developing player reputation.  Seeing the same people.  The stuff that made the original MMORPGs some of the best gaming ever.

 

Solo should be something you do when you have little time and can't group - and should be something that's horribly inefficient.  Grouping should be the way you get things done.  Like in the older MMORPGs.  Don't like it?  Don't play.  It's very simple.  A bazillion single players and every failed F2P MMORPG are there for ya.  Flip it around.  Most newer MMORPGs are like 90% solo and 10% optional grouping.  Lets flip it so that you group 95% of the time with solo barely being there.

 

 

This idiotic trend of making solo heavy MMORPGs boggles my mind.  There was never anything wrong with the early MMORPGs.  Why do MMORPG devs keep making MMORPGs that attempt to cater to everyone EXCPEPT the people who helped create the genre and who love the genre?  So many newer players just complain endlessly about the gameplay you mutilate to suit them - they don't even really like MMORPGs but you keep trying to suck them in.  Why keep chasing casuals and soloists when those types of games do not succeed and those players will not be loyal or stick around?

 

Sadly at this point it would be radical and different to make an MMORPG that is group heavy and anything but stupidly easy mode.  It's so sick and wrong that it's come to this.  But it's a chance for SOME dev...you know...like maybe the company that was part of establishing the genre in the first place, to return the genre to its roots and bring back the magic.

 

The other thing is that for that magic to work, you have to ditch the F2P travesty.  F2P is simply garbage for MMORPGs.  It works if you wanna make a game nobody gives a crap about and for players who flit between games and have no loyalty, or worse, are bottom feeders looking for a free ride.  F2P is good for casual games - and no truly good MMORPG has ever been casual.  Sub-based is the only way to create a truly quality gaming experience - and if you make a game WORTH a sub, people will pay.  They did in the early days and for those games that are actually worth a sub, they still pay.

 

Pay to win is shit.  All MMORPGs with F2P have some element of pay to win.  All players should be paying the same amount.  All cool stuff should be earned by playing, not paying extra.  All players should have equal potential to earn rewards by beating challenges - by playing - and where success is determined by how you play, not how much you're willing to pay.  That is how the genre started.  That is why those games are still the best the genre has produced.  You charge a sub so everyone is on the same footing for amount paid, and let the players forge a path from there BY PLAYING.

 

The solo ez mode games that are F2P cater to scrubs who want no challenge, reward for doing nothing, or to flat out buy their way thru games akin to having console cheat codes in single player games - except they're so much more losers that they'll pay to cheat.

 

So yeah, make a game that's different.  Make a game worth a sub, that is group heavy, and that has nice amounts of challenge.  Put the MM back in MMORPG.  Return the genre to the glory of the early years.

 

The last thing the MMORPG genre needs is yet another steaming pile of F2P solo ez mode crap.

 

 

Premium MMORPGs do not feature built-in cheating via cash for gold pay 2 win. PLAY to win or don't play.

  goozmania

Advanced Member

Joined: 8/18/07
Posts: 117

9/04/13 2:31:05 AM#2
You're a bit late, meng. They've already shown us that it is a predominately single player action game, and it will definitely be F2P... And, not only that, but they are pretty excited about that fact, too.
  Karteli

Apprentice Member

Joined: 7/09/12
Posts: 2704

9/04/13 2:40:34 AM#3

Unfortunately, EQN won't be close to anything that made EQ1 popular.  It will be a watered down MMO, revolving around a cashshop, in which every player can be a hero, or buy their success, all without being P2W (because it's all PVE purchases, right?).

 

EQN is a console game, frankly, best played on consoles.  No bother upgrading your system if you want to play it .. just buy a PS4.  There is enough buttons to do everything you want in an action adventure lobby game :P

 

 

Want a nice understanding of life? Try Spirit Science: "The Human History"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8NNHmV3QPw&feature=plcp
Recognize the voice? Yep sounds like Penny Arcade's Extra Credits.

  shass

Advanced Member

Joined: 3/31/11
Posts: 100

The light at the end of the tunnel... is the headlamp of an oncoming train.

9/04/13 3:01:49 AM#4

Bang on post Vo - It amazes me why all the companies throw bucketloads of money at one failing project after another. Once a game is released they then start dumbing it down - aka Rift - until there is no longer any challenge or a reason to log in. A lot of a games longevity stems from players rolling Alts to try another class. Unfortunately, with today's generic one size fits all, we can do anything, characters - there is no point. One of the beauties of older game mechanics was the fact that some character abilities were unique, and a group needed their skills. This led to problems when that class was not available, but surely a better answer could be found than making everyone the same.

Unfortunately EQnext looks like it follows the same route - bland. But with the added drawback of kiddie graphics. Why the mad rush for stylized graphics that are so childish? Apparently they date slower.... but my son used commonly available mods to make my old copy of Morrowind look amazing, so surely a deep and immersive MMORPG could be good looking and kept updated? I feel no desire to explore a cartoon world.

Maybe one day someone will use the kickstarter system to take a risk and make something similar to what you suggest; no other company appears to understand anything other than a short term money making venture, aka wow clone but simpler, and it does not work.

  Allein

Elite Member

Joined: 6/11/13
Posts: 762

9/04/13 3:28:27 AM#5

While many could obviously care less what SOE has to say (yet they still follow their games), they have said that community and social connection will be very important in EQN.

As there are no levels or vertical progression, P2W doesn't come easy, nor does soloing the entire game. Grouping and roles will be important.

Subs (at least traditional) don't pay the bills anymore. EQ/EQ2 still have subs, just with cash shops tacked on, it's a win/win for SOE.

EQ, DAoC, and Vanilla WoW were great times. I don't believe WoW was a fluke however. As it grew, all other games declined. If players preferred the styles of EQ/DAoC, they wouldn't of stuck around in WoW. Many people like being able to solo for 10 mins or 10 hours or group and do hard content with friends. WoW catered to this. It opened the mmo doors to millions that would most likely not made it past a few levels in EQ or DAoC. Does that make WoW crap, I don't think so.

Many clones have tried to copy the formula and have failed, because they weren't as good, plain and simple. WoW's only downfall was itself and trying to compete with all the clones trying to compete with it. A race towards the bottom.

EQ was a small game in comparison and while it had a lot of pros, it wasn't short of cons either. There were plenty of annoying people in 1999 EQ just as there were in 2007 WoW.

For me, a game is what I make of it. If you try your hardest to not have fun and find all the flaws, you aren't going to enjoy yourself. If you make the best of it and make friends and play the game, you'll be happy.

While I don't believe EQN is trying to rekindle some long forgotten magic, it is trying to break the cycle and go down it's own road. At this point, I think that is the best bet.

Cloning EQ or some special formula from 15 years ago is not the answer. It worked back then do to a long list of factors. Those factors have all drastically changed. It's great to remember the good ole days, but those days are gone. Live in the moment and look forward to the future.

I'm looking forward to EQN and most likely will have a great time in it for years, just as I did in EQ, DAoC, and WoW. All three previous games gave me completely different experiences. I hope EQN can match or even top them.

People can choose to believe SOE or not, but it all boils down to just being another game. Some will love it and some will hate it. I believe SOE (for now) and that EQN will provide a challenge and a lot of long term entertainments without all the grind and hassle that has been the downfall of so many games. While "fun" is a bad word around here, I want to have fun. Be it for 30 minutes or 5 hours. Alone, with a few friends, an entire guild, or a decent chunk of the server. Games that can cater to everyone and do it well, will succeed. Games that continue to focus only on a few play styles (Wildstar, TESO) are doomed to repeat the same pattern that has been going on for years.

  Mattatron

Apprentice Member

Joined: 8/12/13
Posts: 237

9/04/13 3:28:34 AM#6
Originally posted by Voqar

Solo should be something you do when you have little time and can't group - and should be something that's horribly inefficient.  Grouping should be the way you get things done.  Like in the older MMORPGs.  Don't like it?  Don't play.  It's very simple.  A bazillion single players and every failed F2P MMORPG are there for ya.  Flip it around.  Most newer MMORPGs are like 90% solo and 10% optional grouping.  Lets flip it so that you group 95% of the time with solo barely being there.

You answered your own post in this paragraph. Game production is about making money.

 

Let's say I open a restaurant and the house specialty is "garlic and anchovy flavored meatballs". Customers can walk in, sit, and expect immediate delivery of garlic and anchovy flavored meatballs, while other dinners, like a cheeseburger, might take up to an hour to serve, while the delicate wafting scent of garlic and anchovy meatball lingers throughout the place and out the door. This would make huge fans of garlic and anchovy flavored meatballs particularly happy, maybe so much that they'd frequent the restaurant many times per week. People not-so-fond of the meatballs would likely steer clear, maybe even avoiding neighboring businesses if the smell bothers them.

 

Now, add the fact my restaurant costs 50 million to 100 million dollars to open. I have a very specialized customer base, very happy with my product, but it's going to take me 1200 years to start making a profit. I only plan to live 900 years, so unfortunately the burden to run the restaurant will fall on my 700 year old children who, when I pass, might change the menu.

 

It would be great if all production companies did things solely for the love of the genre or medium. It would be great if Publisher's Clearing House showed up at my door right now with a check. World peace would be great. I'd even go for a law stipulating every female 18-24 that resembled Jessica Alba in Sin City spend 1 hour a day in my bedroom half-clad. It's not going to happen. The sooner we accept it's not going to happen, we can move on.

  donpopuki

Novice Member

Joined: 4/06/12
Posts: 594

9/04/13 5:49:56 AM#7
The hardcoreness and massive multi player aspect of EQN is unknown. SOE explicitly stated they want to cater to the hardcore crowd but at the same time cater to casuals as well. IMO it is possible to do both and it makes better business sense.

We don't know what the death penalties are, how hard mobs can be or what sort of progession there will be (there will be vertical progession of some sort but so far they refuse to talk about it).
  Enrif

Hard Core Member

Joined: 8/06/13
Posts: 137

9/04/13 6:29:30 AM#8

"People are very very smart"

"If you want to invade that dragon den, bring better a group"

"If you want to invade the orcs  you don't do it alone or with a friend, but with a small army"

 

satisfied?

  Kyllien

Novice Member

Joined: 3/22/13
Posts: 315

9/04/13 6:45:24 AM#9

Nowhere, anywhere have they said that this game will be only solo easy mode.  In-fact like the previous post what they have said is that there will be a mix of content including stuff for the solo crowd all the way up to the hard core bring an army crowd.  Just because there is something for you to do while you are soloing, maybe you can't commit more then 20 minutes but you want to do something, doesn't mean the game is less rich, less hardcore.  Go find the hard core areas and enjoy them.

We haven't even seen a real combat demo yet so please hold your judgment at least until you have some facts to back up your rant.

  Rusque

Elite Member

Joined: 6/08/10
Posts: 1648

9/04/13 7:15:49 AM#10
Originally posted by Voqar

Since then we've had the fluke of WoW.  And since WoW, for reasons that defy any kind of reason, the genre has shifted away from the thing it does best, and the thing that's unique about the the genre, the grouping, and has shifted towards solo gameplay.  At the same time it has shifted away from challenge and reward towards giving away rewards for every trivial little action.

You can't fathom any kind of reason for the shift?

Selective memories abound on MMORPG.com! WoW wasn't designed with some nefarious plot in mind to ruin all your fun. MMO gamers had been complaining about various issues and Blizzard listened. I know people like to pretend that imaginary gamers just showed up to play WoW, but the initial playerbase was EQ'ers who were fed up with EQ. "Why are there so few QUESTS in everQUEST?" If I had a nickel for every time I heard that I would be able to buy Blizzard.

 

That's how businesses work, they see a demand, they fill that demand. Just because you don't agree with the direction something is taking doesn't mean it defies reason. The changes in the genre make perfect sense. Players asked for stuff, players got stuff, more players got interested. The MMO community was microscopic compared to what it is today.

Games as bad as SWTOR have as many players as EQ did in it's prime. That shows you how many people are floating around the MMO industry looking for games.

 

Whenever someone brings up games that currently could use players, DFUW, EVE, Vanguard, Wurm online . . . there's always  a list of reasons why a person isn't interested.  Then when a game like FFARR comes out, there's a line out the door of people trying to play.

You tell me why developers aren't responding to these cries for a more old school approach. Because those of you who claim to want it aren't putting your money where your mouth is. You scream and whine all day, but heaven forbid you go out and support games that might encourage future development of games you want. You can clearly see that the other side of the MMO community (the non-"old school") are quite ready and willing to spend money - so games keep getting made for them. Shocking, I know.

 

"Well it's not my job to spend money on something that isn't done to my standards, that's why I don't play those games."

Yes, yes it is your job. As a consumer who wants a certain type of product, it falls on your shoulders to show the developers that you're worth developing for.

People love to talk about how great Vanguard is, then they say that it would be great if it had a development team behind it updating it. Why? Why should they do that? There is no proof that any of you would play it, simply because you don't play it. If Vanguard somehow found itself with 400-500k players tomorrow, you can bet SOE would take notice. It's not in a businesses interest to leave money on the table.

But there is no money, because you (general 'you', referring to people who want these types of games)  don't support them.

 

What defies reason, is the misguided belief that these pre-WoW style MMO's should be made. There's no proof that players will support it. You say you will, but what happens when something isn't to your liking? You leave it to gather dust. Don't you guys realize that there's no incentive to pursue people like yourselves?

  solarbear88

Novice Member

Joined: 12/12/10
Posts: 73

9/04/13 8:14:44 AM#11
I have a strong suspicion that the areas around towns will be pretty easy but as you push into the wilderness you will need a small group to continue. That would be my ideal mmo.
  Apraxis

Elite Member

Joined: 9/28/05
Posts: 1416

9/04/13 9:51:21 AM#12
Originally posted by Voqar

...

I realize the EQN dudes want to do something different.  That can be good.  But how about as part of being different, you take the genre back to where it started WITH EVERQUEST, and return the MASSIVELY MULTIPLAYER to MMORPG. 

 ...

Well and that is wrong it started with UO, or even before.. and i really played enough DikuMUDs (from what EQ is based on).

So, no thanks. I want my UO back.. and as funny it sounds EQN looks at the moment a lot more like UO instead of EQ.. and i do think that is a good thing.. Maybe they get some other influences from UO, too.

And apart from influences from earlier games.. exactly that happend the last 15 years.. they very extremely similar to the game before it... and it is really time that we do something different, we do something new.. and i hail EQN for doing exactly that.

Hopefully it turns out as a good and fresh experience, and not like another clone we have played the last 15 years.

  Mendel

Novice Member

Joined: 7/22/11
Posts: 610

9/04/13 10:26:25 AM#13

Before the OP went on a thinly-disguised rant against the micro-transaction business model, there was a very good point about making MMORPGs more group-dependent.  I'll focus on that.

In order for an MMORPG to be more group dependent, it needs to be hostile to solo play.   Combat needs to be difficult unless there are people to help.  It should be very dangerous with a high risk of death, even with a group of 3 or 4 others.  And that death needs to have some significance for the player, an in-game reason to avoid death.

The OP mentions EQ as a group-dependent game.  To some degree, it was.  But even in the very early days, the core group mechanism showed signs of weakness.  EQ1 also had classes that were designed to be more solo-friendly.   Once the druid and necromancers discovered they could safely kite, these classes zoomed to level 40+ while the vast majority of players were hoping to reach the teens.   The xp from a mob was constant, and xp sharing in a group encouraged people to think they could get better experience without the group, because they would get all the xp (discounting the theoretical increase in kill-speed by a group).   The earliest major patches to EQ1 were to address these issues.   Necros were 'nerfed' and group bonuses added to attempt to rectify these problems.   The early game mechanisms simply rewarded the solo player more than the group mechanic, and the player base learned that lesson.

Returning to a group-centric game will require solid game mechanics from the start.   A group should be just as necessary in the level 1 newbie area as in the max-level dungeon.  No character class could exist that is independent in combat, nor allow tactics to make them a stand-alone group, including pets (minions), hirelings, movement altering affects or other means.  The combat functions of absorb damage (tank), apply damage (DPS), and remove damage (heal) must be kept out of a single character, to any degree.  Subordinate roles (buffs in particular) should not unbalance these restrictions.   Class X should not be able to solo just because it has Buff Z from a higher level.

Making a group-centric MMORPG is definitely possible, but the mechanisms must be clearly defined to keep the game controlled.  Maybe grouping is bad for business, or simply out of fashion, but that extra dedication to the group game appears to be lacking in current game developers.

 

Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority.

  solochoowookie

Apprentice Member

Joined: 1/25/13
Posts: 35

9/04/13 10:53:23 AM#14
Originally posted by Enrif

"People are very very smart"

"If you want to invade that dragon den, bring better a group"

"If you want to invade the orcs  you don't do it alone or with a friend, but with a small army"

 

satisfied?

But, will they be able to make big trouble for Moose or Squirrel?   

  flclimax

Advanced Member

Joined: 4/05/12
Posts: 91

9/04/13 11:00:56 AM#15
Originally posted by Rusque
Originally posted by Voqar

Since then we've had the fluke of WoW.  And since WoW, for reasons that defy any kind of reason, the genre has shifted away from the thing it does best, and the thing that's unique about the the genre, the grouping, and has shifted towards solo gameplay.  At the same time it has shifted away from challenge and reward towards giving away rewards for every trivial little action.

You can't fathom any kind of reason for the shift?

Selective memories abound on MMORPG.com! WoW wasn't designed with some nefarious plot in mind to ruin all your fun. MMO gamers had been complaining about various issues and Blizzard listened. I know people like to pretend that imaginary gamers just showed up to play WoW, but the initial playerbase was EQ'ers who were fed up with EQ. "Why are there so few QUESTS in everQUEST?" If I had a nickel for every time I heard that I would be able to buy Blizzard.

 

That's how businesses work, they see a demand, they fill that demand. Just because you don't agree with the direction something is taking doesn't mean it defies reason. The changes in the genre make perfect sense. Players asked for stuff, players got stuff, more players got interested. The MMO community was microscopic compared to what it is today.

Games as bad as SWTOR have as many players as EQ did in it's prime. That shows you how many people are floating around the MMO industry looking for games.

 

Whenever someone brings up games that currently could use players, DFUW, EVE, Vanguard, Wurm online . . . there's always  a list of reasons why a person isn't interested.  Then when a game like FFARR comes out, there's a line out the door of people trying to play.

You tell me why developers aren't responding to these cries for a more old school approach. Because those of you who claim to want it aren't putting your money where your mouth is. You scream and whine all day, but heaven forbid you go out and support games that might encourage future development of games you want. You can clearly see that the other side of the MMO community (the non-"old school") are quite ready and willing to spend money - so games keep getting made for them. Shocking, I know.

 

"Well it's not my job to spend money on something that isn't done to my standards, that's why I don't play those games."

Yes, yes it is your job. As a consumer who wants a certain type of product, it falls on your shoulders to show the developers that you're worth developing for.

People love to talk about how great Vanguard is, then they say that it would be great if it had a development team behind it updating it. Why? Why should they do that? There is no proof that any of you would play it, simply because you don't play it. If Vanguard somehow found itself with 400-500k players tomorrow, you can bet SOE would take notice. It's not in a businesses interest to leave money on the table.

But there is no money, because you (general 'you', referring to people who want these types of games)  don't support them.

 

What defies reason, is the misguided belief that these pre-WoW style MMO's should be made. There's no proof that players will support it. You say you will, but what happens when something isn't to your liking? You leave it to gather dust. Don't you guys realize that there's no incentive to pursue people like yourselves?

 

  Plump

Novice Member

Joined: 7/24/13
Posts: 11

9/04/13 11:09:39 AM#16

I feel like EQN has become the litmus test for success or failure for future MMORPGS. Well traveled, seasoned MMORPG gamers are hanging all of the genre's hopes and aspirations on the success of EQN. This is essentially setting yourselves up for disappointment and failure. The nostalgia you experienced while playing your first serious MMORPG CANNOT be replicated. It was a unique equation that added to such levels of unprecedented stimuli. Some of the major factors include the emergence of massive human social interaction via an exciting new technological breakthrough mechanism...The Internet, a fresh and unsullied genre, new immersion, new gameplay interaction, and a younger, less reality-tainted version of YOURSELF.

 

I feel your pain, I really do. I am also in dire need of a new time-sink. let's just put everything in context , that's all.

 

 

  Wizardry

Elite Member

Joined: 8/27/04
Posts: 6541

Perhaps tomorrow will be better.

9/04/13 11:12:34 AM#17

I agree with most of your post but you missed your own point about the fluke that was Wow.Why do you think so many games copy that simple game and it's cartoon graphics?Other devs believe that is the formula for success even though they see game after game fail doing the exact same thing.

BTW Wow did not increase while other games declined,the population in other games was so low and there were very few games as is.There was no movement,Wow simply cashed in on the new wave of gamer's that got DSL. over the year or two prior.

As to paying the bills,games do more than pay the bills,they make profits,that is why they keep making them.The cash shop is simply greed and abuse of it's loyal patrons.FFXI does not and Square Enix has never had any form of cash shop and it does just fine.

My only plea for EQN would be to lose the cash shop,but i know 100% for fact that is not happening.It would not surprise me one bit ,if SOE tries to implement the cash shop during Landmark to have players fund the game lol.

 

http://www.youtube.com/user/Napolianboo#p/u/15/rCYLLQCNc1w
Samoan Diamond

  Zorgo

Hard Core Member

Joined: 12/05/05
Posts: 2188

Who did wrong? The advertiser hired to sell the game or the consumer who put faith in advertising?

9/04/13 11:17:18 AM#18
@OP: Not that you are wrong necessarily; but what evidence do you have that it will be a solo friendly game on easy mode?
  Theocritus

Hard Core Member

Joined: 7/15/08
Posts: 3605

9/04/13 11:27:18 AM#19

EQN wont be anything like EQ was in its heyday....You dont have to look any further than EQ1 itself to know that is true......SOE is looking to make big bucks on this and you dont do that by making a hardcore game that appeals to a few....You make an entertaining, easy mode game that appeals to the masses.....I think what most people dont understand in 2013 is that most people aren't looking for a challenge: They are looking to be entertained.......It started with WoW in 2004 and has been the norm ever since....ITs kinda like hoping some new formed band turns out to be the next Led Zeppelin or Rolling Stones......It isnt gonna happen...This genre is about one thing and one thing only now: Making money.

  Elikal

Spotlight Poster

Joined: 2/09/06
Posts: 8067

“No path is darker then when your eyes are shut.” -Flemeth

9/04/13 12:17:59 PM#20
Originally posted by shass

Bang on post Vo - It amazes me why all the companies throw bucketloads of money at one failing project after another. Once a game is released they then start dumbing it down - aka Rift - until there is no longer any challenge or a reason to log in. A lot of a games longevity stems from players rolling Alts to try another class. Unfortunately, with today's generic one size fits all, we can do anything, characters - there is no point. One of the beauties of older game mechanics was the fact that some character abilities were unique, and a group needed their skills. This led to problems when that class was not available, but surely a better answer could be found than making everyone the same.

Unfortunately EQnext looks like it follows the same route - bland. But with the added drawback of kiddie graphics. Why the mad rush for stylized graphics that are so childish? Apparently they date slower.... but my son used commonly available mods to make my old copy of Morrowind look amazing, so surely a deep and immersive MMORPG could be good looking and kept updated? I feel no desire to explore a cartoon world.

Maybe one day someone will use the kickstarter system to take a risk and make something similar to what you suggest; no other company appears to understand anything other than a short term money making venture, aka wow clone but simpler, and it does not work.

It is because money can't buy you... (dramatic pause)... wisdom!

A forum is a place where people can discuss about different opinions. So what I don't get is, how people react offended when they come to a forum and then find... well different opinions. If a different opinion offends you, what are you even doing here?

3 Pages 1 2 3 » Search