Trending Games | Pirate101 | Guild Wars 2 | Warhammer 40K: Eternal Crusade | World of Warcraft

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,900,116 Users Online:0
Games:751  Posts:6,269,032
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
A-C
2029 Online 2112: Revolution 2Moons 4Story 8BitMMO 9 Dragons A Mystical Land A Tale in the Desert III A3 ACE Online ARGO Online Aberoth Absolute Force Online Absolute Terror Achaea Adellion Aerrevan Aetolia, the Midnight Age Age of Armor Age of Conan Age of Empires Online Age of Mourning Age of Wulin Age of Wushu Aida Arenas Aika Aion Albion Online Alganon All Points Bulletin (APB) Allods Online Altis Gates Amazing World Anarchy Online Ancients of Fasaria Andromeda 5 Angels Online Angry Birds Epic Anime Trumps Anmynor Anno Online Applo Arcane Hearts Arcane Legends ArchLord ArcheAge Archeblade Archlord X Ascend: Hand of Kul Asda 2 Asda Story Ashen Empires Asheron's Call Asheron's Call 2 Astera Online Astonia III Astro Empires Astro Lords: Oort CLoud Asura Force Atlantica Online Atriarch Aura Kingdom Aurora Blade Auto Assault Avatar Star Battle Dawn Battle Dawn Galaxies Battle for Graxia Battle of 3 Kingdoms Battle of the Immortals Battlecruiser Online Battlestar Galactica Online Battlestar Reloaded Beyond Protocol Black Aftermath Black Desert Black Gold Black Prophecy Black Prophecy Tactics: Nexus Conflict Blacklight Retribution Blade & Soul Blade Hunter Blade Wars Blazing Throne Bless Blitz 1941 Blood and Jade Bloodlines Champions Boot Hill Heroes Borderlands 2 Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel Bound by Flame Bounty Bay Online Brain Storm Bravada Bravely Default Bravely Second Brawl Busters. Brick-Force Bright Shadow Bullet Run Business Tycoon Online CTRacer Cabal Online Caesary Call of Camelot Call of Gods Call of Thrones Camelot Unchained Canaan Online Cardmon Hero Cartoon Universe CasinoRPG Cast & Conquer Castle Empire Castlot Celtic Heroes Champions Online Champions of Regnum Chaos Online Child of Light Chrono Tales Citadel of Sorcery CitiesXL Citizen Zero City of Decay City of Heroes City of Steam City of Transformers City of Villains Civilization Online Clan Lord Clash of Clans Cloud Nine Club Penguin Colony of War Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances Company of Heroes Online Conquer Online Conquer Online 3 Continent of the Ninth (C9) Core Blaze Core Exiles Corum Online Craft of Gods Crimecraft Crimelife 2 Cronous Crota II Crusaders of Solaris Cultures Online Cyber Monster 2 Cyberpunk 2077 Céiron Wars
D-F
D&D Online DC Universe DK Online DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 DV8: Exile Dalethaan Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Relic: Prelude Dark Solstice Dark Souls 2 Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkest Dungeon Darkfall Darkfall: Unholy Wars Darkwind: War on Wheels Das Tal Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide DayZ Dead Earth Dead Frontier Dead Island Dead Island 2 Dead Island: Riptide Deco Online Deep Down Deepworld Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Demons at the Horizon Desert Operations Destiny Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Divinity: Original Sin Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Age: Inquisition Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Fin Soup Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Pals Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Call II Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dragons and Titans Drakengard 3 Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Rampage Dungeon Runners Dungeon of the Endless Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online Dynasty of the Magi EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthrise Eclipse War Ecol Tactics Online Eden Eternal Edge of Space Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elder Scrolls Online Eldevin Elf Online Elite: Dangerous Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire Empire & State Empire Craft Empire Universe 3 EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Blue Moon Online Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Eternal Saga Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverEmber Online EverQuest Next EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Evony Exarch Exorace F.E.A.R. Online Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout 4 Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Fearless Fantasy Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy Type-0 HD Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forge Forsaken Uprising Forsaken World Fortnite Fortuna Forum for Discussion of Everlight Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
G-L
GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones: Seven Kingdoms Gameglobe Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gauntlet Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer Gloria Victis Glory of Gods GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Granado Espada Online Grand Chase Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall H1Z1 Habbo Hotel Hailan Rising HaloSphere2 Haven & Hearth Hawken Heart Forth Alicia Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero Online Hero Zero Hero's Journey Hero: 108 Online HeroSmash Heroes & Generals Heroes & Legends: Conquerors of Kolhar Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Atlan Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Heroes of the Storm Hex Holic Online Hostile Space Hunter Blade Huxley Icewind Dale: Enhanced Edition Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Imperator Imperian Inferno Legend Infestation: Survivor Stories Infinite Crisis Infinity Infinity Iris Online Iron Grip: Marauders Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kartuga Kicks Online King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom Under Fire II Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kings Era Kings and Legends Kings of the Realm KingsRoad Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Age Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online Kyn L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Landmark Lands of Hope: Redemption LastChaos League of Angels League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Edda: Vengeance Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 2 Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Lego Minifigures Online Lichdom: Battlemage Life is Feudal Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lords of the Fallen Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia World
M-Q
MU Online Mabinogi Maestia: Rise of Keledus MagiKnights Magic Barrage Magic World Online Manga Fighter MapleStory Martial Heroes Marvel Heroes Marvel Super Hero Squad Online Marvel: Avengers Alliance Mass Effect 4 MechWarrior Online Megaten Meridian 59 : Evolution Merlin MetalMercs Metaplace Metin 2 MicroVolts Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor Midkemia Online Might & Magic Heroes: Kingdoms Might & Magic X: Legacy MilMo Minecraft Mini Fighter Minions of Mirth Ministry of War Monato Esprit Monkey King Online Monkey Quest Monster & Me Monster Madness Online MonsterMMORPG Moonlight Online: Tales of Eternal Blood Moonrise Mordavia Mortal Online Mourning My Lands Myst Online: URU Live Myth Angels Online Myth War Myth War 2 Mythborne Mytheon Mythic Saga Mythos N.E.O Online NIDA Online Nadirim Naviage: The Power of Capital Navy Field Need for Speed World Nemexia Neo's Land NeoSteam Neocron Nether Neverwinter Nexus: The Kingdom Of The Winds NinjaTrick NosTale Novus Aeterno Oberin Odin Quest Odyssey RPG Ogre Island Omerta 3 Online Boxing Manager Onverse Oort Online Order & Chaos Online Order of Magic Original Blood Origins Return Origins of Malu Orion's Belt Otherland Forums OverSoul Overkings Oz Online Oz World Pandora Saga Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Panzar Parabellum Parallel Kingdom Parfait Station Path of Exile Pathfinder Online Perfect World Perpetuum Online Persona V Phantasy Star Online 2 Phantasy Star Universe Phoenix Dynasty Online Phylon Pi Story Picaroon Pillars of Eternity Pirate Galaxy Pirate Storm Pirate101 PirateKing Online Pirates of the Burning Sea Pirates of the Caribbean Online Pixie Hollow Planeshift Planet Arkadia Planet Calypso PlanetSide 2 Planetside Planets³ Playboy Manager Pocket Legends Pockie Ninja Pockie Pirates Pockie Saints Pokémon X and Y PoxNora Prime World Prime: Battle for Dominus Priston Tale Priston Tale II Prius Online Prodigy Project Blackout Project Gorgon Project Powder Project Titan Forums Project Wiki Project Zomboid Puzzle Pirates Quest for Infamy Quickhit Football
R-S
R2 Online RAN Online RF Online ROSE Online Rage of 3 Kingdoms Ragnarok Online Ragnarok Online II RaiderZ Rail Nation Rakion Rappelz RappelzSEA Ravenmarch Realm Fighter Realm of Sierra Realm of the Mad God Realm of the Titans Realms Online Reclamation Red Stone Red War: Edem's Curse Regnum Online Remnant Knights Renaissance Repulse Requiem: Memento Mori Rift RiotZone Rise Rise of Dragonian Era Rise of Empire Rise of the Tycoon Risen 3: Titan Lords Rising of King Risk Your Life Rivality Rockfree Rohan: Blood Feud Role Play Worlds Roll n Rock Roma Victor Romadoria Rosh Online Roto X Rubies of Eventide Ruin Online Rumble Fighter Runes of Magic Runescape Rust Rusty Hearts Ryzom S4 League SAGA SD Gundam Capsule Fighter Online SMITE SUN Sacred 3 Sagramore Salem SaySayGirls Scarlet Blade Scions of Fate Seal Online: Evolution Second Chance Heroes Second Life Secret of the Solstice Seed Serenia Fantasy Seven Seas Saga Seven Souls Online Sevencore Shadow Realms Shadow of Legend Shadowbane Shadowgate Shadowrun Online Shaiya Shards Online Shattered Galaxy Sho Online Shot Online Shroud of the Avatar SideQuest Siege on Stars Sigonyth: Desert Eternity Silkroad Online Skyblade Skyforge SmashMuck Champions Smoo Online Soldier Front Soul Master Soul Order Online Soul of Guardian South Park: The Stick of Truth Space Heroes Universe Sparta: War of Empires Spellcasters Sphere Spiral Knights Spirit Tales Splash Fighters Squad Wars Star Citizen Star Sonata 2 Star Stable Star Supremacy Star Trek Online Star Trek: Infinite Space Star Wars Galaxies Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Star Wars: The Old Republic StarQuest Online Starbound Stargate Worlds Starlight Story Starpires State of Decay SteelWar Online Stone Age 2 Stormfall: Age of War Stormthrone Storybricks Stronghold Kingdoms Styx: Master of Shadows Sudden Attack Supremacy 1914 Supreme Destiny Sword Girls Sword of Destiny: Rise of Aions SwordX Swords of Heavens Swordsman
T-Z
TERA TS Online TUG Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Tales of Solaris Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris TerraWorld Online Terraria Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Aurora World The Banner Saga The Black Watchmen The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Crew The Division The Epic Might The Hammers End The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing 2 The Legend of Ares The Lost Titans The Matrix Online The Mighty Quest for Epic Loot The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems The West The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Theralon There Therian Saga Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Tiger Knight Titan Siege Titans of Time Toontown Online Top Speed Topia Online Torchlight Torment: Tides of Numenera Total Domination Transformers Universe Transistor Transverse Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Trove Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War Tynon U.B. Funkeys UFO Online URDEAD Online Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Naruto Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Utopia Valkyrie Sky Vampire Lord Online Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos VoidExpanse Voyage Century Online W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WAR2 Glory WYD Global Wakfu War Thunder War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Mercenaries War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Warflare Wargame1942 Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warkeepers Warrior Epic Wartune Wasteland 2 WebLords Wild West Online WildStar Wind of Luck WindSlayer 2 Wings of Destiny Wish Wizard101 Wizardry Online Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Speed World of Tanks World of Tanks Generals World of Warcraft World of Warplanes World of Warships World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xenoblade Chronicles: X Xenocell Xiah Xsyon Xulu YS Online Yitien ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online Zombies Ate My Pizza eRepublik

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

EverQuest Next

EverQuest Next 

General Discussion  » PvP vs. PvE "Compromise"

43 Pages First « 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 » Last Search
848 posts found
  cheyane

Hard Core Member

Joined: 7/17/09
Posts: 2431

7/26/13 6:32:11 PM#521
Originally posted by Ramanadjinn
Originally posted by cheyane
I notice that PvP players want PvE players in their game but the reverse is not always so. What I cannot understand is why should the PvE players be made to play with PvP players .

 

I don't really see anyone saying PvE players should be made to play with PvP players.

I see a lot of us saying we would like for them to play with us though.  If you do not want to do so i'll never hold it against you.

Also, you have to bear in mind, there is a very large portion of the MMORPG gaming community that are PVE/PVP players and not just one type of player.

Large portion is PvE/PvP  you say but is that because they can choose to play it when they want to. How many would be if there was no choice ? Wouldn't only PvP MMORPG games be more popular then like Darkfall ?

 

I just got called silly lol okay nvm I am out of this thread.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

  mos0811

Novice Member

Joined: 10/23/07
Posts: 173

7/26/13 6:38:12 PM#522
Originally posted by cheyane
Originally posted by Ramanadjinn
Originally posted by cheyane
I notice that PvP players want PvE players in their game but the reverse is not always so. What I cannot understand is why should the PvE players be made to play with PvP players .

 

I don't really see anyone saying PvE players should be made to play with PvP players.

I see a lot of us saying we would like for them to play with us though.  If you do not want to do so i'll never hold it against you.

Also, you have to bear in mind, there is a very large portion of the MMORPG gaming community that are PVE/PVP players and not just one type of player.

Large portion is PvE/PvP  you say but is that because they can choose to play it when they want to. How many would be if there was no choice ? Wouldn't only PvP MMORPG games be more popular then like Darkfall ?

Games like Darkfall are more action oriented games with full loot.  Looting rights/drops are a big issue as I've read and talked with players over the years.  A game that can limit what drops, by leaving equipped items alone would do better than full loot games.  Also the combat mechanics in DF are manual aim, where I personally like tab targeting.  For players that like tab-targeting there is no fantasy open world PvP game on the market.  The last one I knew of was Shadowbane.  Actually SB spoiled me to all other games; it had no questing and was based on city conquest.  One of the greatest games I've ever played.  EvE is a close second, only because it's based in space.

PvP games are even more niche that mmoRPG games, so yeah they are a very small part of the market.  It's one of the reasons that so far only indie companies have tried to do an open world PvP game.

  Holophonist

Hard Core Member

Joined: 2/15/09
Posts: 2033

7/26/13 6:45:54 PM#523
Originally posted by mos0811
Originally posted by cheyane
Originally posted by Ramanadjinn
Originally posted by cheyane
I notice that PvP players want PvE players in their game but the reverse is not always so. What I cannot understand is why should the PvE players be made to play with PvP players .

 

I don't really see anyone saying PvE players should be made to play with PvP players.

I see a lot of us saying we would like for them to play with us though.  If you do not want to do so i'll never hold it against you.

Also, you have to bear in mind, there is a very large portion of the MMORPG gaming community that are PVE/PVP players and not just one type of player.

Large portion is PvE/PvP  you say but is that because they can choose to play it when they want to. How many would be if there was no choice ? Wouldn't only PvP MMORPG games be more popular then like Darkfall ?

Games like Darkfall are more action oriented games with full loot.  Looting rights/drops are a big issue as I've read and talked with players over the years.  A game that can limit what drops, by leaving equipped items alone would do better than full loot games.  Also the combat mechanics in DF are manual aim, where I personally like tab targeting.  For players that like tab-targeting there is no fantasy open world PvP game on the market.  The last one I knew of was Shadowbane.  Actually SB spoiled me to all other games; it had no questing and was based on city conquest.  One of the greatest games I've ever played.  EvE is a close second, only because it's based in space.

PvP games are even more niche that mmoRPG games, so yeah they are a very small part of the market.  It's one of the reasons that so far only indie companies have tried to do an open world PvP game.

Darkfall isn't sandbox enough to be the game that a lot of us want. Don't get me wrong, I play and enjoy darkfall, but that's because it happens to be the closest thing to what I want, not 100% what i want.

 

There are also technical problems involved with the game. But mainly my only real problem with the game is lack of options. Everybody is either a crafter, or some kind of fighter. There aren't any interesting pve professions like there were in UO. No tamers, bards, etc. Not enough variety in professions/roles and the crafting leaves a little to be desired.

  DavisFlight

Apprentice Member

Joined: 9/25/12
Posts: 2592

7/26/13 6:47:39 PM#524
Originally posted by mos0811
Originally posted by cheyane
Originally posted by Ramanadjinn
Originally posted by cheyane
I notice that PvP players want PvE players in their game but the reverse is not always so. What I cannot understand is why should the PvE players be made to play with PvP players .

 

I don't really see anyone saying PvE players should be made to play with PvP players.

I see a lot of us saying we would like for them to play with us though.  If you do not want to do so i'll never hold it against you.

Also, you have to bear in mind, there is a very large portion of the MMORPG gaming community that are PVE/PVP players and not just one type of player.

Large portion is PvE/PvP  you say but is that because they can choose to play it when they want to. How many would be if there was no choice ? Wouldn't only PvP MMORPG games be more popular then like Darkfall ?

Games like Darkfall are more action oriented games with full loot.  Looting rights/drops are a big issue as I've read and talked with players over the years.  A game that can limit what drops, by leaving equipped items alone would do better than full loot games.  Also the combat mechanics in DF are manual aim, where I personally like tab targeting.  For players that like tab-targeting there is no fantasy open world PvP game on the market.  The last one I knew of was Shadowbane.  Actually SB spoiled me to all other games; it had no questing and was based on city conquest.  One of the greatest games I've ever played.  EvE is a close second, only because it's based in space.

PvP games are even more niche that mmoRPG games, so yeah they are a very small part of the market.  It's one of the reasons that so far only indie companies have tried to do an open world PvP game.

Not necessarily. DAoC, a PvP MMO, was the second most popular MMO of its time. Eve, FFA PVP MMO, is the second most popular western MMO of today.

There's a huge market for PvP, else LoL wouldn't be the most played game in the world.

 

Problem is, making a good MMO is hard, making a good MMO with PvE and PvP is even harder. It takes talent and good design, something most studios lack, and just clone WoW instead.

  Allein

Elite Member

Joined: 6/11/13
Posts: 980

7/26/13 6:53:10 PM#525

"This is not going to be Grieferquest, and every system will be designed around not allowing that. It's one of those things where you have to make it so that griefers can't ruin the experience for everyone else."

http://massively.joystiq.com/2012/10/20/soe-live-2012-john-smedley-on-eq-next-and-soes-future/

Hopefully they know what they are doing. While I didn't read the million and one pages of "discussion," I feel a compromise is fairly easy to implement where almost everyone is happy or pretty dang close.

While I'm all for a FFA PVP system that strongly encourages and rewards PVP and has harsh punishments for those that grief/gank, I don't see how it fits into EQ.

Unless they force us to join a side (Faction, Deity, Race, Alignment, etc) and fight against people that I have to hate because they selected a different side, I don't feel PVP fully works in Norrath.

Sure we can fight over land, resources, cities, dungeons, but why would a halfling kill another halfling for a field of crops?

Most PVP games have some eternal struggle, where is it in EQN? It's easy to just "sandbox" but sandbox is a very very loose term and doesn't mean we have to kill each other.

I think PVP works well in PVP games. If they don't make PVP the central theme of the game, but include it, I think they will have problems down the road.

I'm hoping for one server with a SWG type flag system that rewards those that take risks, yet leaves those that don't want to play along, to still have a good time.

Going along with the sandbox idea, I would love to see some sort of realistic system in place where PVE types can gather resources, build cities, craft and do what they do and PVP types can go attack said resources/cities. Get people to band together and not be PVE or PVP players, but EQN players enjoying the game.

  azarhal

Hard Core Member

Joined: 7/06/09
Posts: 579

7/26/13 7:00:29 PM#526
Originally posted by Holophonist
Originally posted by cheyane
I notice that PvP players want PvE players in their game but the reverse is not always so. What I cannot understand is why should the PvE players be made to play with PvP players .

They shouldn't. I actively don't WANT the "nonpvp" crowd in any game I play. 

BTW, don't lump everybody into either pvp or pve. I enjoy pvp, and I also enjoy pve. It's very silly to say "pvp players want pve players in their game."

PvP and PvE are used with two different meaning in this thread. They are used as both content and game types.

Content wise PvP mean player-vs-player be it duel, FFA, battlegrounds, RvR, etc. While PvE mean player vs environment like raids, quests, etc. 

Game wise, PvP game type is where the player has limited to no control on where, who and when the PvP activities happens. While PvE game type has no or really few PvP activities and when they exist the player control where, who and when they happen.

A PvP game can have PvE content, but the players are still PvP players because that activity cannot be avoided.

A PvE game can have PvP content, the majority of players are PvE-only, some will be PvP-only (and on the wrong server/game) and some will do both content.

A FFA PvP game will never have PvE player (as in game type), but they can have people who like PvE content., but these people are still PvP players, because that content is "always on".

  Holophonist

Hard Core Member

Joined: 2/15/09
Posts: 2033

7/26/13 7:07:13 PM#527
Originally posted by azarhal
Originally posted by Holophonist
Originally posted by cheyane
I notice that PvP players want PvE players in their game but the reverse is not always so. What I cannot understand is why should the PvE players be made to play with PvP players .

They shouldn't. I actively don't WANT the "nonpvp" crowd in any game I play. 

BTW, don't lump everybody into either pvp or pve. I enjoy pvp, and I also enjoy pve. It's very silly to say "pvp players want pve players in their game."

PvP and PvE are used with two different meaning in this thread. They are used as both content and game types.

Content wise PvP mean player-vs-player be it duel, FFA, battlegrounds, RvR, etc. While PvE mean player vs environment like raids, quests, etc. 

Game wise, PvP game type is where the player has limited to no control on where, who and when the PvP activities happens. While PvE game type has no or really few PvP activities and when they exist the player control where, who and when they happen.

A PvP game can have PvE content, but the players are still PvP players because that activity cannot be avoided.

A PvE game can have PvP content, the majority of players are PvE-only, some will be PvP-only (and on the wrong server/game) and some will do both content.

A FFA PvP game will never have PvE player (as in game type), but they can have people who like PvE content., but these people are still PvP players, because that content is "always on".

If that's how the person I was responding to meant it, then they're just wrong. Pvp players don't necessarily want pve players to play their games.

  Allein

Elite Member

Joined: 6/11/13
Posts: 980

7/26/13 7:10:17 PM#528
Originally posted by DavisFlight
Originally posted by mos0811
Originally posted by cheyane
Originally posted by Ramanadjinn
Originally posted by cheyane
I notice that PvP players want PvE players in their game but the reverse is not always so. What I cannot understand is why should the PvE players be made to play with PvP players .

 

I don't really see anyone saying PvE players should be made to play with PvP players.

I see a lot of us saying we would like for them to play with us though.  If you do not want to do so i'll never hold it against you.

Also, you have to bear in mind, there is a very large portion of the MMORPG gaming community that are PVE/PVP players and not just one type of player.

Large portion is PvE/PvP  you say but is that because they can choose to play it when they want to. How many would be if there was no choice ? Wouldn't only PvP MMORPG games be more popular then like Darkfall ?

Games like Darkfall are more action oriented games with full loot.  Looting rights/drops are a big issue as I've read and talked with players over the years.  A game that can limit what drops, by leaving equipped items alone would do better than full loot games.  Also the combat mechanics in DF are manual aim, where I personally like tab targeting.  For players that like tab-targeting there is no fantasy open world PvP game on the market.  The last one I knew of was Shadowbane.  Actually SB spoiled me to all other games; it had no questing and was based on city conquest.  One of the greatest games I've ever played.  EvE is a close second, only because it's based in space.

PvP games are even more niche that mmoRPG games, so yeah they are a very small part of the market.  It's one of the reasons that so far only indie companies have tried to do an open world PvP game.

Not necessarily. DAoC, a PvP MMO, was the second most popular MMO of its time. Eve, FFA PVP MMO, is the second most popular western MMO of today.

There's a huge market for PvP, else LoL wouldn't be the most played game in the world.

 

Problem is, making a good MMO is hard, making a good MMO with PvE and PvP is even harder. It takes talent and good design, something most studios lack, and just clone WoW instead.

FFA PVP failed sadly in DAoC. It became obvious that people couldn't handle PVE and PVP at the same time. While the end game was RvR/PVP, getting there was a different story. Very similar to WoW or any other game, just instead of 2v2, 40vs40 battlegrounds, we had a huge map to fight over when we made it there.

EVE works due to the game/world design. Norrath isn't exactly the same thing and would be harder to mirror, but would be interesting.

There is a huge market for PVP (I know I love it), but when given the chance/choice, most people don't want FFA PVP or PVP not on their terms.

I agree making an MMO with a good balance of PVE and PVP is one of the hardest things a dev can do and is why so many have failed or went with the PVE/PVP server route. A real open world, sandbox type game that is also successful has to have a lot of great foundation and systems in place to keep the world moving. Much like real life. Laws can suck, but without them, life would suck even more. Laws are also a slippery slope when it comes to this whole "sandbox" ideal as well.

Aug 2nd....come quicker!

 

  DavisFlight

Apprentice Member

Joined: 9/25/12
Posts: 2592

7/26/13 7:31:31 PM#529
Originally posted by Allein
Originally posted by DavisFlight
Originally posted by mos0811
Originally posted by cheyane
Originally posted by Ramanadjinn
Originally posted by cheyane
I notice that PvP players want PvE players in their game but the reverse is not always so. What I cannot understand is why should the PvE players be made to play with PvP players .

 

I don't really see anyone saying PvE players should be made to play with PvP players.

I see a lot of us saying we would like for them to play with us though.  If you do not want to do so i'll never hold it against you.

Also, you have to bear in mind, there is a very large portion of the MMORPG gaming community that are PVE/PVP players and not just one type of player.

Large portion is PvE/PvP  you say but is that because they can choose to play it when they want to. How many would be if there was no choice ? Wouldn't only PvP MMORPG games be more popular then like Darkfall ?

Games like Darkfall are more action oriented games with full loot.  Looting rights/drops are a big issue as I've read and talked with players over the years.  A game that can limit what drops, by leaving equipped items alone would do better than full loot games.  Also the combat mechanics in DF are manual aim, where I personally like tab targeting.  For players that like tab-targeting there is no fantasy open world PvP game on the market.  The last one I knew of was Shadowbane.  Actually SB spoiled me to all other games; it had no questing and was based on city conquest.  One of the greatest games I've ever played.  EvE is a close second, only because it's based in space.

PvP games are even more niche that mmoRPG games, so yeah they are a very small part of the market.  It's one of the reasons that so far only indie companies have tried to do an open world PvP game.

Not necessarily. DAoC, a PvP MMO, was the second most popular MMO of its time. Eve, FFA PVP MMO, is the second most popular western MMO of today.

There's a huge market for PvP, else LoL wouldn't be the most played game in the world.

 

Problem is, making a good MMO is hard, making a good MMO with PvE and PvP is even harder. It takes talent and good design, something most studios lack, and just clone WoW instead.

FFA PVP failed sadly in DAoC. It became obvious that people couldn't handle PVE and PVP at the same time. While the end game was RvR/PVP, getting there was a different story. Very similar to WoW or any other game, just instead of 2v2, 40vs40 battlegrounds, we had a huge map to fight over when we made it there.

 

Okay, first thing

No one was talking about FFA in DAoC.

Second, DAoC was not built around FFA PvP, hence why it was just an ignored subset.

Third, DAoC's PvP was almost nothing like WoW's. DAoC's PvP was built into the core of the game and had many aspects of the game revolve around it and be influenced by it. WoW's PvP is a side show that if it suddenly went away, it would make no difference to the game.

Fourth, you missed the point of what I said. That PvP is popular.

  Bidwood

Novice Member

Joined: 2/26/13
Posts: 555

7/26/13 9:57:57 PM#530
Originally posted by fyerwall
Originally posted by Holophonist
Originally posted by Mendel
Originally posted by Holophonist
Originally posted by Mendel
Originally posted by Holophonist

My concern isn't really with how harsh the anti-griefing system is, but just how it's executed. If it's like the PS2 anti-griefing system, that'll be a huge turn off for me. As far as I know, in PS2 if you shoot teammates too often, your gun gets locked down.... not very interesting.

Something else that's not been tried, a cash shop-type approach.

If one player kills another player without consent (a flag), the game automatically charges the killer's credit card for $50 and credits the victim for $45.   If you want to kill someone, go right ahead.  The consequences are resolved between the killer and Mr. Visa.   There's no other consequence in-game that will work as consistently or as effectively.  If that somehow doesn't stop Mr. Gates from slaughtering PvE players, simply have an escalating cost.

Novel, unique, and no one's going to kill someone without a consent flag.  (Just because it hasn't been tried doesn't mean it would be acceptable to the players).

That's a horrible idea. As you said, nobody's ever going to kill anybody without a "consent flag." How is that a good system? If you wanted a system that dropped PKing down to 0, then you'd just make it so nobody could attack anybody else unless they were flagged. The point of bounty hunting (and similar) systems is that it mitigates crimes, but doesn't outright get rid of them. That's the point of having risk/reward.

Dropping PKing to 0 is exactly what the PvE player wants.   When they want to be safe, they are safe from other players.  Anywhere.   They still have to deal with the environment (factions, mobs, etc).   If I'm willing to indulge in PvP, I simply turn the PvP flag on.   Otherwise, you will pay the consequences.

It isn't a horrible system, especially if the PvP flag can be toggled only very infrequently.   An hour since the last PvP action could keep the killer from escaping to 'safety', and you can still enact bounties.   (Bounty hunting, like all other in-game consequences, doesn't work -- every PvP player is busy doing their own thing when there's a criminal to punish).

And note, I never said anything about not being able to kill a player who isn't currently PvP flagged; doing so just has a consequence that you find objectionable.   This system does not prohibit the bad behavior or put any kind of restrictions on it.

Please note:  This system requires a subscription, or at least a valid credit card to create / operate an account.   To me, that's the worst part of this mechanism.

Yes... I know that's what the pve player wants. I'm saying it's dumb because it's not different than just turning off non-consensual pvp.

 

What does this ridiculous system accomplish that simply turning off non-consensual pvp wouldn't? It's another one of these "compromises" that simply gives you what you want and not what we want. There's 0 reason to have it, so it's a bad idea.

So why is it a bad idea to give those who want to be able to flag pvp off the ability to do so?

How does it impact those who will have pvp flagged on?

Point of fact is it does NOTHING to impact pvp playstyle aside from the fact pvpers cannot kill those who do not wish to pvp. It removes the option for people to gank others, simple as that. I have not heard one reason why its a bad idea other than "Because it ruins my fun" and its somehow a valid reason for pvpers. Yet when some states they want the flag because pvp ruins their fun, the reason is no longer valid.

Basically most of the pro-pvper seem to be of the 'hooray for me and the hell with you" mind set. The reason for this is because PvPers know, that when given the option, a lot of people will choose to play pvp flagged off, limiting their potential pool of targets. And pvpers do not like this idea.

As for your last statement, there is a reason to have the flag system - some people just don't like to pvp when they don't want to.

That would destroy the economy in the game I'm hoping for. A game built around risk v.s. reward where people who don't want the risk can just turn it off and get all the rewards anyway.

 

Originally posted by cheyane
I notice that PvP players want PvE players in their game but the reverse is not always so. What I cannot understand is why should the PvE players be made to play with PvP players .

You misunderstand. I don't care if they play. I just want a triple-A MMO built from the ground up with PVP and PVE as integral parts of the game. I don't need people who don't want that to play. I just need the game to exist so I can have fun playing it.

 

Before someone throws the "so let's have separate servers" argument at me again, re-read the bold yellow text above. Rinse and repeat until you get it.

 

Originally posted by DavisFlight
Originally posted by MoonBeans

just add pvp and pve servers and problem solved, everyone wins.

 

People who have never ever played a proper PvP game need to stop chiming in with their uneducated "fixes".

Good PvP needs to be baked in from the start, as a core part of the game. If its just a toggle you can turn on and off with no other changes, it's not PvP worth playing. This is probably the 90th time someone in this thread has said this so please, stop parading around this moronic "solution".

 

And the "PvE crowd" needs to stop acting holier than thou, you just come across as closed minded, incomprehensive elitists who don't understand game design or the wants of others.

 

Seriously people, do some MMO homework if you don't think the two can exist in the same game. And if done right, the two greatly benefit one another.

 

And when people ask for PvP, we're NOT ALL ASKING FOR AN OPEN RANGE TO GANK WHOEVER! So STOP USING IT AS A STRAW MAN.

Bravo! This is a nice summary of how I feel.

  MoonBeans

Novice Member

Joined: 4/23/12
Posts: 175

7/27/13 2:15:49 AM#531
Originally posted by Ramanadjinn
Originally posted by MoonBeans

just add pvp and pve servers and problem solved, everyone wins.

 

i find it funny how so many, pvpers get upset when pvers  state that they rather have their own server .  no matter how hard and how loud or vocal you get.   people that don't care about forced pvp, won't share your playing style.   so is very unlikely they will buy the game wich such system.

some of the pvpers envision this perfect sandbox world,  filled with easy pray pvers victims,  (crafters or cookie makers) that they can gank at ease every 4 steps.  that's why they get frustrated when they see , pvers rather play something else.  it is hard to adknowledge that the world isen't about what we want only.

 

a pver isen't only the typical squeeshy fearful crafter or the traditional barkeeper that hides behind the desk,  that's a stereotype some people seem to have when they think of pvers,  or carebears as some others like to use.   you have a whole lot of different playing styles when you say pve, the sameway pvp isen't only about grief and pking.

 

casual players , raiders, explorers, crafters, socialisers, roleplayers. people who enjoys pvp and pve whenever they want, and not when little bob wants them to.

 

if a mmo wants to be financially very succesful  and not just do ok, devs should consider them all.  instead of going the ,  Eve online niche path only.

 

You really should read the thread.

There is a lot of good discussion on these topics you seem to have missed.

As for the pvpers getting upset that you want your own server, or wanting a sandbox world filled with PVE people just so they can gank them.   Those people, if they exist, aren't really active within this thread.

Mostly though, I see you throwing some stereotypes at PVP enthusiasts (saying we look down on you or think you somehow inferior) and accusing us of stereotyping you.  I do not think you are in any way inferior to me because of how you like to play your games and I really wish you would try to be more undestanding of us.  We aren't here to try to ruin gaming for you or anyone who likes the things you like.  

Most of us want you to be happy and have games that you enjoy.  We just want you to understand that we also want that and we don't think this can be achieved with a game that has separate PVE and PVP servers any more than some of our friends here think they can have fun on a PVP server when they disdain all PVP.

been playing MMO since ultima online days .  EQ1 played on the  pvp servers.  then, daoc, then lineage 2  etc, etc.    been there already done that to death.   

nowadays if i want to truly pvp, i rather buy me a shooter.   PVP in MMO don't work too well at least is a Daoc 2.

 

i think it is time for devs to come up with something different. we are now in 2013 and so far all we keep gettingt  are the very samething since Ultima online days.

 

  Holophonist

Hard Core Member

Joined: 2/15/09
Posts: 2033

7/27/13 7:53:33 AM#532
Originally posted by MoonBeans
Originally posted by Ramanadjinn
Originally posted by MoonBeans

just add pvp and pve servers and problem solved, everyone wins.

 

i find it funny how so many, pvpers get upset when pvers  state that they rather have their own server .  no matter how hard and how loud or vocal you get.   people that don't care about forced pvp, won't share your playing style.   so is very unlikely they will buy the game wich such system.

some of the pvpers envision this perfect sandbox world,  filled with easy pray pvers victims,  (crafters or cookie makers) that they can gank at ease every 4 steps.  that's why they get frustrated when they see , pvers rather play something else.  it is hard to adknowledge that the world isen't about what we want only.

 

a pver isen't only the typical squeeshy fearful crafter or the traditional barkeeper that hides behind the desk,  that's a stereotype some people seem to have when they think of pvers,  or carebears as some others like to use.   you have a whole lot of different playing styles when you say pve, the sameway pvp isen't only about grief and pking.

 

casual players , raiders, explorers, crafters, socialisers, roleplayers. people who enjoys pvp and pve whenever they want, and not when little bob wants them to.

 

if a mmo wants to be financially very succesful  and not just do ok, devs should consider them all.  instead of going the ,  Eve online niche path only.

 

You really should read the thread.

There is a lot of good discussion on these topics you seem to have missed.

As for the pvpers getting upset that you want your own server, or wanting a sandbox world filled with PVE people just so they can gank them.   Those people, if they exist, aren't really active within this thread.

Mostly though, I see you throwing some stereotypes at PVP enthusiasts (saying we look down on you or think you somehow inferior) and accusing us of stereotyping you.  I do not think you are in any way inferior to me because of how you like to play your games and I really wish you would try to be more undestanding of us.  We aren't here to try to ruin gaming for you or anyone who likes the things you like.  

Most of us want you to be happy and have games that you enjoy.  We just want you to understand that we also want that and we don't think this can be achieved with a game that has separate PVE and PVP servers any more than some of our friends here think they can have fun on a PVP server when they disdain all PVP.

been playing MMO since ultima online days .  EQ1 played on the  pvp servers.  then, daoc, then lineage 2  etc, etc.    been there already done that to death.   

nowadays if i want to truly pvp, i rather buy me a shooter.   PVP in MMO don't work too well at least is a Daoc 2.

 

i think it is time for devs to come up with something different. we are now in 2013 and so far all we keep gettingt  are the very samething since Ultima online days.

 

You talk about pvp sandboxes being tried over and over (which isn't true), yet you advocate separate pvp/pve servers. This silly idea has already been debunked more than a few times in this very thread.

  Lord.Bachus

Elite Member

Joined: 5/14/07
Posts: 8630

I believe in life before death... So dont forget to enjoy it while you still can.

7/27/13 8:05:37 AM#533
Originally posted by craftseeker
Originally posted by Bidwood
EVE style with hi sec for the people who don't like PVP. You're welcome.

or perhaps the usual way, PvP servers and PvE servers and no confining the 70% PvE player base into 30% or less of the world.

You got those numbers out of your head somewhere?

 

Most typical PvE players also love to PvP from time to time, for the majorrity of PvE players having split PvE and PvP only servers is a really bad idea...

 

there is only one solution, having PvE and PvP seperated on the same server... make the PvP areas huge enough, and make it worthwile for everyone to travel there from time to time...

 

think about a central PvP hub connecting the PvE areas.. much like EvE i suppose,  so to get to another main part of the world, you would allways have to cross the PvP part..  Afraid of traveling alone trough the evil wicked PvP world, join a caravan...

Best MMO experiences : EQ(PvE), DAoC(PvP), WoW(total package) LOTRO (worldfeel) GW2 (Artstyle and animations and worlddesign) SWTOR (Story immersion) TSW (story) ESO (character advancement)

  Nitan66

Novice Member

Joined: 7/19/13
Posts: 14

 
OP  7/27/13 8:47:20 AM#534
Originally posted by Lord.Bachus
Originally posted by craftseeker
Originally posted by Bidwood
EVE style with hi sec for the people who don't like PVP. You're welcome.

or perhaps the usual way, PvP servers and PvE servers and no confining the 70% PvE player base into 30% or less of the world.

You got those numbers out of your head somewhere?

 

Most typical PvE players also love to PvP from time to time, for the majorrity of PvE players having split PvE and PvP only servers is a really bad idea...

 

there is only one solution, having PvE and PvP seperated on the same server... make the PvP areas huge enough, and make it worthwile for everyone to travel there from time to time...

 

think about a central PvP hub connecting the PvE areas.. much like EvE i suppose,  so to get to another main part of the world, you would allways have to cross the PvP part..  Afraid of traveling alone trough the evil wicked PvP world, join a caravan...

Basically what I was trying to suggest in the OP. But added on that the PvP areas should be mobile, giving even the pure PvE enthusiast a chance to explore unhindered at some point.

  NagelRitter

Apprentice Member

Joined: 7/18/13
Posts: 613

7/27/13 9:43:36 AM#535
Originally posted by Holophonist

You talk about pvp sandboxes being tried over and over (which isn't true), yet you advocate separate pvp/pve servers. This silly idea has already been debunked more than a few times in this very thread.

I don't know how you can debunk something that generally works OK. It may not be great for PvPers but they shouldn't be playing MMORPG's anyway.

Favorite MMO: Vanilla WoW
Currently playing: GW2, EVE
Excited for: Wildstar, maybe?

  Holophonist

Hard Core Member

Joined: 2/15/09
Posts: 2033

7/27/13 11:17:01 AM#536
Originally posted by NagelRitter
Originally posted by Holophonist

You talk about pvp sandboxes being tried over and over (which isn't true), yet you advocate separate pvp/pve servers. This silly idea has already been debunked more than a few times in this very thread.

I don't know how you can debunk something that generally works OK. It may not be great for PvPers but they shouldn't be playing MMORPG's anyway.

 

What's been debunked over and over is that a pvp and nonpvp server setup is an acceptable "compromise." It's been explained time and time again how a game that can separate out pvp and still be a functioning game isn't a game that had pvp built into it naturally. If you can just turn it off, then it's clearly not that important to the game as a whole.

You say it's been working pretty well so far.... YEAH FOR YOU.

Also, what exactly do you mean pvpers shouldn't be playing mmorpgs??
  Allein

Elite Member

Joined: 6/11/13
Posts: 980

7/27/13 12:08:56 PM#537
Originally posted by DavisFlight
Originally posted by Allein
Originally posted by DavisFlight
Originally posted by mos0811
Originally posted by cheyane
Originally posted by Ramanadjinn
Originally posted by cheyane
I notice that PvP players want PvE players in their game but the reverse is not always so. What I cannot understand is why should the PvE players be made to play with PvP players .

 

I don't really see anyone saying PvE players should be made to play with PvP players.

I see a lot of us saying we would like for them to play with us though.  If you do not want to do so i'll never hold it against you.

Also, you have to bear in mind, there is a very large portion of the MMORPG gaming community that are PVE/PVP players and not just one type of player.

Large portion is PvE/PvP  you say but is that because they can choose to play it when they want to. How many would be if there was no choice ? Wouldn't only PvP MMORPG games be more popular then like Darkfall ?

Games like Darkfall are more action oriented games with full loot.  Looting rights/drops are a big issue as I've read and talked with players over the years.  A game that can limit what drops, by leaving equipped items alone would do better than full loot games.  Also the combat mechanics in DF are manual aim, where I personally like tab targeting.  For players that like tab-targeting there is no fantasy open world PvP game on the market.  The last one I knew of was Shadowbane.  Actually SB spoiled me to all other games; it had no questing and was based on city conquest.  One of the greatest games I've ever played.  EvE is a close second, only because it's based in space.

PvP games are even more niche that mmoRPG games, so yeah they are a very small part of the market.  It's one of the reasons that so far only indie companies have tried to do an open world PvP game.

Not necessarily. DAoC, a PvP MMO, was the second most popular MMO of its time. Eve, FFA PVP MMO, is the second most popular western MMO of today.

There's a huge market for PvP, else LoL wouldn't be the most played game in the world.

 

Problem is, making a good MMO is hard, making a good MMO with PvE and PvP is even harder. It takes talent and good design, something most studios lack, and just clone WoW instead.

FFA PVP failed sadly in DAoC. It became obvious that people couldn't handle PVE and PVP at the same time. While the end game was RvR/PVP, getting there was a different story. Very similar to WoW or any other game, just instead of 2v2, 40vs40 battlegrounds, we had a huge map to fight over when we made it there.

 

Okay, first thing

No one was talking about FFA in DAoC.

Second, DAoC was not built around FFA PvP, hence why it was just an ignored subset.

Third, DAoC's PvP was almost nothing like WoW's. DAoC's PvP was built into the core of the game and had many aspects of the game revolve around it and be influenced by it. WoW's PvP is a side show that if it suddenly went away, it would make no difference to the game.

Fourth, you missed the point of what I said. That PvP is popular.

You weren't talking about DAoC FFA in particular, but regular servers were pretty much PVE servers. So I was trying to relate the game to this thread.

At release, they had to open a 2nd FFA server because you couldn't get on the 1st. Both had a waitlist for a while. So they weren't ignored. They were very popular and had many of the player run systems that people want in a sandbox. Alliances, politics, backstabbing, good/bad guilds, player policing etc. If actually worked well and was some of the best online gaming I've ever had.

DAoC PVP was very much like WoW's. Beyond Darkness Falls (how I miss it!) and Relics effect on PVE, you could level and gear up all the way to the end in safety. Then build a house, craft, and loot grind in TOA (which killed the game btw).

The year leading up to WoW, many had left RvR to focus on the mindless grind for gear in TOA, very much like WoW.

I agree you could take PVP out of WoW and nothing would happen, but same goes for DAoC. Yes, RVR/PVP was the point of the end game, but you could easily avoid it and weren't forced into it at all. Why you would play a PVP game and not PVP, is beyond me, but people did.

PVP is popular, no doubt at all. But people want to PVP on their time. Games that take that control from players don't do so well. LoL, Dota, FPS's aren't mmorpgs and can't be compared.

EVE is unique and took a long time to get where it is (10 years) and even in EVE you can avoid PVP (in a FFA game no less), it just takes a lot of effort and defeats the purpose of the game in my eyes. The same rules wouldn't copy well into a fantasy based mmo, but I can see a lot of it working as well.

This thread is about compromise and many are listing their want of a game built with PVP as the central focus with PVE supporting it or whatever this back and forth is about.

I hope PVP is a part of the main design and not an afterthought. At the same time, I don't want to fight players that don't want to fight back. They should be able to enjoy their experience.

Hopefully, SOE has thought long and hard into this and will find that magical compromise that will engage all players and be a long lasting gaming experience. Doing so without forcing PVE or PVP players to spend time on segregated parts of the map or servers.

I think the idea of what a sandbox can/should be and what will actually work in the long run are far apart. I know some don't mind a niche or smaller game population, but I'd assume SOE isn't shooting for that and will make the game accessible to are larger audience in some way. Or they may go the EVE route and go for the long game, who knows. I just want in.

  Theocritus

Apprentice Member

Joined: 7/15/08
Posts: 3616

7/27/13 1:17:56 PM#538
I never liked having PVP as a part of EQ.....IMO they should just concentrate on PVE only.....Factions that hate each other with a hard AI is good enough for me....I dont need to kill or be killed by other players.
  DavisFlight

Apprentice Member

Joined: 9/25/12
Posts: 2592

7/27/13 1:28:58 PM#539
Originally posted by Allein
Originally posted by DavisFlight
Originally posted by Allein
Originally posted by DavisFlight
Originally posted by mos0811
Originally posted by cheyane
Originally posted by Ramanadjinn
Originally posted by cheyane
I notice that PvP players want PvE players in their game but the reverse is not always so. What I cannot understand is why should the PvE players be made to play with PvP players .

 

I don't really see anyone saying PvE players should be made to play with PvP players.

I see a lot of us saying we would like for them to play with us though.  If you do not want to do so i'll never hold it against you.

Also, you have to bear in mind, there is a very large portion of the MMORPG gaming community that are PVE/PVP players and not just one type of player.

Large portion is PvE/PvP  you say but is that because they can choose to play it when they want to. How many would be if there was no choice ? Wouldn't only PvP MMORPG games be more popular then like Darkfall ?

Games like Darkfall are more action oriented games with full loot.  Looting rights/drops are a big issue as I've read and talked with players over the years.  A game that can limit what drops, by leaving equipped items alone would do better than full loot games.  Also the combat mechanics in DF are manual aim, where I personally like tab targeting.  For players that like tab-targeting there is no fantasy open world PvP game on the market.  The last one I knew of was Shadowbane.  Actually SB spoiled me to all other games; it had no questing and was based on city conquest.  One of the greatest games I've ever played.  EvE is a close second, only because it's based in space.

PvP games are even more niche that mmoRPG games, so yeah they are a very small part of the market.  It's one of the reasons that so far only indie companies have tried to do an open world PvP game.

Not necessarily. DAoC, a PvP MMO, was the second most popular MMO of its time. Eve, FFA PVP MMO, is the second most popular western MMO of today.

There's a huge market for PvP, else LoL wouldn't be the most played game in the world.

 

Problem is, making a good MMO is hard, making a good MMO with PvE and PvP is even harder. It takes talent and good design, something most studios lack, and just clone WoW instead.

FFA PVP failed sadly in DAoC. It became obvious that people couldn't handle PVE and PVP at the same time. While the end game was RvR/PVP, getting there was a different story. Very similar to WoW or any other game, just instead of 2v2, 40vs40 battlegrounds, we had a huge map to fight over when we made it there.

 

Okay, first thing

No one was talking about FFA in DAoC.

Second, DAoC was not built around FFA PvP, hence why it was just an ignored subset.

Third, DAoC's PvP was almost nothing like WoW's. DAoC's PvP was built into the core of the game and had many aspects of the game revolve around it and be influenced by it. WoW's PvP is a side show that if it suddenly went away, it would make no difference to the game.

Fourth, you missed the point of what I said. That PvP is popular.

You weren't talking about DAoC FFA in particular, but regular servers were pretty much PVE servers. So I was trying to relate the game to this thread. No... they weren't. The PvE servers were pretty much the PvE servers. The RVR servers were focused on PvP.

DAoC PVP was very much like WoW's. Beyond Darkness Falls (how I miss it!) and Relics effect on PVE, you could level and gear up all the way to the end in safety. Then build a house, craft, and loot grind in TOA (which killed the game btw). Being able to level in safety does not make a game's PvP like WoW's PvP. You're implying something you don't mean.

The year leading up to WoW, many had left RvR to focus on the mindless grind for gear in TOA, very much like WoW. Except unlike WoW, they didn't like it, and it's what caused the game to die. And unlike WoW, the grind wasn't exactly mindless (except for scrolls) artifacts and MLs took a TON of thought and coordination to do.

I agree you could take PVP out of WoW and nothing would happen, but same goes for DAoC. Yes, RVR/PVP was the point of the end game, but you could easily avoid it and weren't forced into it at all. Why you would play a PVP game and not PVP, is beyond me, but people did. The market would collapse as there would be no demand for specialized crafted armor. Certain bosses would become near impossible without realm abilities. Darkness Falls wouldn't exist. And development would become stagnant in the same way it does in themepark games. A lot of "whats the point". PvP did have an impact on the game.

PVP is popular, no doubt at all. But people want to PVP on their time. Games that take that control from players don't do so well. If that was true, then DAoC wouldn't have done well. How many times were people forced to run out into RvR to defend their own frontier? That's not on their time.

EVE is unique and took a long time to get where it is (10 years) and even in EVE you can avoid PVP (in a FFA game no less), it just takes a lot of effort and defeats the purpose of the game in my eyes. The same rules wouldn't copy well into a fantasy based mmo, but I can see a lot of it working as well.

This thread is about compromise and many are listing their want of a game built with PVP as the central focus with PVE supporting it or whatever this back and forth is about. Well, it's much easier to have PvE tacked on than have PvP tacked on. MUCH easier.

I hope PVP is a part of the main design and not an afterthought. At the same time, I don't want to fight players that don't want to fight back. They should be able to enjoy their experience.

I mostly agree with what you said, just not all of it.

  Gholos

Novice Member

Joined: 6/29/13
Posts: 209

7/27/13 1:30:28 PM#540
Originally posted by Theocritus
I never liked having PVP as a part of EQ.....IMO they should just concentrate on PVE only.....Factions that hate each other with a hard AI is good enough for me....I dont need to kill or be killed by other players.

I agree with you, when i play a MMORPG (EQ in particular) i prefer to group together with people than to KOS them.


"Brute force not work? It because you not use enought of it"
-Karg, Ogryn Bone'ead.

43 Pages First « 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 » Last Search