Trending Games | Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn | Star Wars: The Old Republic | EverQuest | World of Warcraft

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,901,110 Users Online:0
Games:753  Posts:6,271,475
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
A-C
2029 Online 2112: Revolution 2Moons 4Story 8BitMMO 9 Dragons A Mystical Land A Tale in the Desert III A3 ACE Online ARGO Online Aberoth Absolute Force Online Absolute Terror Achaea Adellion Aerrevan Aetolia, the Midnight Age Age of Armor Age of Conan Age of Empires Online Age of Mourning Age of Wulin Age of Wushu Aida Arenas Aika Aion Albion Online Alganon All Points Bulletin (APB) Allods Online Altis Gates Amazing World Anarchy Online Ancients of Fasaria Andromeda 5 Angels Online Angry Birds Epic Anime Trumps Anmynor Anno Online Applo Arcane Hearts Arcane Legends ArchLord ArcheAge Archeblade Archlord X Ascend: Hand of Kul Asda 2 Asda Story Ashen Empires Asheron's Call Asheron's Call 2 Astera Online Astonia III Astro Empires Astro Lords: Oort CLoud Asura Force Atlantica Online Atriarch Aura Kingdom Aurora Blade Auto Assault Avatar Star Battle Dawn Battle Dawn Galaxies Battle for Graxia Battle of 3 Kingdoms Battle of the Immortals Battlecruiser Online Battlestar Galactica Online Battlestar Reloaded Beyond Protocol Black Aftermath Black Desert Black Gold Black Prophecy Black Prophecy Tactics: Nexus Conflict Blacklight Retribution Blade & Soul Blade Hunter Blade Wars Blazing Throne Bless Blitz 1941 Blood and Jade Bloodlines Champions Boot Hill Heroes Borderlands 2 Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel Bound by Flame Bounty Bay Online Brain Storm Bravada Bravely Default Bravely Second Brawl Busters. Brick-Force Bright Shadow Bullet Run Business Tycoon Online CTRacer Cabal Online Caesary Call of Camelot Call of Gods Call of Thrones Camelot Unchained Canaan Online Cardmon Hero Cartoon Universe CasinoRPG Cast & Conquer Castle Empire Castlot Celtic Heroes Champions Online Champions of Regnum Chaos Online Child of Light Chrono Tales Citadel of Sorcery CitiesXL Citizen Zero City of Decay City of Heroes City of Steam City of Transformers City of Villains Civilization Online Clan Lord Clash of Clans Cloud Nine Club Penguin Colony of War Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances Company of Heroes Online Conquer Online Conquer Online 3 Continent of the Ninth (C9) Core Blaze Core Exiles Corum Online Craft of Gods Crimecraft Crimelife 2 Cronous Crota II Crusaders of Solaris Cultures Online Cyber Monster 2 Cyberpunk 2077 Céiron Wars
D-F
D&D Online DC Universe DK Online DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 DV8: Exile Dalethaan Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Relic: Prelude Dark Solstice Dark Souls 2 Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkest Dungeon Darkfall Darkfall: Unholy Wars Darkwind: War on Wheels Das Tal Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide DayZ Dead Earth Dead Frontier Dead Island Dead Island 2 Dead Island: Riptide Deco Online Deep Down Deepworld Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Demons at the Horizon Desert Operations Destiny Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Divinity: Original Sin Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Age: Inquisition Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Fin Soup Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Pals Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Call II Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dragons and Titans Drakengard 3 Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Rampage Dungeon Runners Dungeon of the Endless Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online Dynasty of the Magi EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthrise Eclipse War Ecol Tactics Online Eden Eternal Edge of Space Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elder Scrolls Online Eldevin Elf Online Elite: Dangerous Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire Empire & State Empire Craft Empire Universe 3 EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Blue Moon Online Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Eternal Saga Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverEmber Online EverQuest Next EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Evony Exarch Exorace F.E.A.R. Online Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout 4 Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Fearless Fantasy Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy Type-0 HD Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forge Forsaken Uprising Forsaken World Fortnite Fortuna Forum for Discussion of Everlight Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
G-L
GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones: Seven Kingdoms Gameglobe Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gauntlet Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer Gloria Victis Glory of Gods GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Granado Espada Online Grand Chase Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall H1Z1 Habbo Hotel Hailan Rising HaloSphere2 Haven & Hearth Hawken Heart Forth Alicia Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero Online Hero Zero Hero's Journey Hero: 108 Online HeroSmash Heroes & Generals Heroes & Legends: Conquerors of Kolhar Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Atlan Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Heroes of the Storm Hex Holic Online Hostile Space Hunter Blade Huxley Icewind Dale: Enhanced Edition Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Imperator Imperian Inferno Legend Infestation: Survivor Stories Infinite Crisis Infinity Infinity Iris Online Iron Grip: Marauders Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kartuga Kicks Online King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom Under Fire II Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kings Era Kings and Legends Kings of the Realm KingsRoad Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Age Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online Kyn L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Landmark Lands of Hope: Redemption LastChaos League of Angels League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Edda: Vengeance Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 2 Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Lego Minifigures Online Lichdom: Battlemage Life is Feudal Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lords of the Fallen Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia World
M-Q
MU Online Mabinogi Maestia: Rise of Keledus MagiKnights Magic Barrage Magic World Online Manga Fighter MapleStory Martial Heroes Marvel Heroes Marvel Super Hero Squad Online Marvel: Avengers Alliance Mass Effect 4 MechWarrior Online Megaten Meridian 59 : Evolution Merlin MetalMercs Metaplace Metin 2 MicroVolts Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor Midkemia Online Might & Magic Heroes: Kingdoms Might & Magic X: Legacy MilMo Minecraft Mini Fighter Minions of Mirth Ministry of War Monato Esprit Monkey King Online Monkey Quest Monster & Me Monster Madness Online MonsterMMORPG Moonlight Online: Tales of Eternal Blood Moonrise Mordavia Mortal Online Mourning My Lands Myst Online: URU Live Myth Angels Online Myth War Myth War 2 Mythborne Mytheon Mythic Saga Mythos N.E.O Online NIDA Online Nadirim Naviage: The Power of Capital Navy Field Need for Speed World Nemexia Neo's Land NeoSteam Neocron Nether Neverwinter Nexus: The Kingdom Of The Winds NinjaTrick NosTale Novus Aeterno Oberin Odin Quest Odyssey RPG Ogre Island Omerta 3 Online Boxing Manager Onverse Oort Online Order & Chaos Online Order of Magic Original Blood Origins Return Origins of Malu Orion's Belt Otherland Forums OverSoul Overkings Oz Online Oz World Pandora Saga Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Panzar Parabellum Parallel Kingdom Parfait Station Path of Exile Pathfinder Online Perfect World Perpetuum Online Persona V Phantasy Star Online 2 Phantasy Star Universe Phoenix Dynasty Online Phylon Pi Story Picaroon Pillars of Eternity Pirate Galaxy Pirate Storm Pirate101 PirateKing Online Pirates of the Burning Sea Pirates of the Caribbean Online Pixie Hollow Planeshift Planet Arkadia Planet Calypso PlanetSide 2 Planetside Planets³ Playboy Manager Pocket Legends Pockie Ninja Pockie Pirates Pockie Saints Pokémon X and Y PoxNora Prime World Prime: Battle for Dominus Priston Tale Priston Tale II Prius Online Prodigy Project Blackout Project Gorgon Project Powder Project Titan Forums Project Wiki Project Zomboid Puzzle Pirates Quest for Infamy Quickhit Football
R-S
R2 Online RAN Online RF Online ROSE Online Rage of 3 Kingdoms Ragnarok Online Ragnarok Online II RaiderZ Rail Nation Rakion Rappelz RappelzSEA Ravenmarch Realm Fighter Realm of Sierra Realm of the Mad God Realm of the Titans Realms Online Reclamation Red Stone Red War: Edem's Curse Regnum Online Remnant Knights Renaissance Repulse Requiem: Memento Mori Rift RiotZone Rise Rise of Dragonian Era Rise of Empire Rise of the Tycoon Risen 3: Titan Lords Rising of King Risk Your Life Rivality Rockfree Rohan: Blood Feud Role Play Worlds Roll n Rock Roma Victor Romadoria Rosh Online Roto X Rubies of Eventide Ruin Online Rumble Fighter Runes of Magic Runescape Rust Rusty Hearts Ryzom S4 League SAGA SD Gundam Capsule Fighter Online SMITE SUN Sacred 3 Sagramore Salem SaySayGirls Scarlet Blade Scions of Fate Seal Online: Evolution Second Chance Heroes Second Life Secret of the Solstice Seed Serenia Fantasy Seven Seas Saga Seven Souls Online Sevencore Shadow Realms Shadow of Legend Shadowbane Shadowgate Shadowrun Online Shaiya Shards Online Shattered Galaxy Sho Online Shot Online Shroud of the Avatar SideQuest Siege on Stars Sigonyth: Desert Eternity Silkroad Online Skyblade Skyforge SmashMuck Champions Smoo Online Soldier Front Soul Master Soul Order Online Soul of Guardian South Park: The Stick of Truth Space Heroes Universe Sparta: War of Empires Spellcasters Sphere Spiral Knights Spirit Tales Splash Fighters Squad Wars Star Citizen Star Sonata 2 Star Stable Star Supremacy Star Trek Online Star Trek: Infinite Space Star Wars Galaxies Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Star Wars: The Old Republic StarQuest Online Starbound Stargate Worlds Starlight Story Starpires State of Decay SteelWar Online Stone Age 2 Stormfall: Age of War Stormthrone Storybricks Stronghold Kingdoms Styx: Master of Shadows Sudden Attack Supremacy 1914 Supreme Destiny Sword Girls Sword of Destiny: Rise of Aions SwordX Swords of Heavens Swordsman
T-Z
TERA TS Online TUG Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Tales of Solaris Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris TerraWorld Online Terraria Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Aurora World The Banner Saga The Black Watchmen The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Crew The Division The Epic Might The Hammers End The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing 2 The Legend of Ares The Lost Titans The Matrix Online The Mighty Quest for Epic Loot The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems The West The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Theralon There Therian Saga Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Tiger Knight Titan Siege Titans of Time Toontown Online Top Speed Topia Online Torchlight Torment: Tides of Numenera Total Domination Transformers Universe Transistor Transverse Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Trove Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War Tynon U.B. Funkeys UFO Online URDEAD Online Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Naruto Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Utopia Valkyrie Sky Vampire Lord Online Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos VoidExpanse Voyage Century Online W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WAR2 Glory WYD Global Wakfu War Thunder War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Mercenaries War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Warflare Wargame1942 Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warkeepers Warrior Epic Wartune Wasteland 2 WebLords Wild West Online WildStar Wind of Luck WindSlayer 2 Wings of Destiny Wish Wizard101 Wizardry Online Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Speed World of Tanks World of Tanks Generals World of Warcraft World of Warplanes World of Warships World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xenoblade Chronicles: X Xenocell Xiah Xsyon Xulu YS Online Yitien ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online Zombies Ate My Pizza eRepublik

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

Camelot Unchained

Camelot Unchained 

General Discussion  » ONLY 4 or 5 classes on release! Say it isn't so........

6 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 » Search
107 posts found
  Ncrediblebulk

Novice Member

Joined: 1/09/08
Posts: 137

"Bulk Smash, Baby! Bulk Smash!"

3/28/13 12:11:24 PM#61
Originally posted by naezgul
Originally posted by Ncrediblebulk
4 or 5 classes could work given the right system was implemented. From what I've read you will gain skill by doing things (I.E. swinging a sword or casting spells). Thus you could have 4 base classes (+1 crafter class) and allow the player to choose what they want to do within that class making the abilities and methods of attack define what exactly class the player becomes.

If you think of Daoc's system at launch you have 4 base classes. I was a Hib thus I'll use their classes for example. You had Guardian, Naturalist, Stalker, and Magician. Thus when a player chose Guardian they were limited to specific item set  to use until they chose their path of specialization. A hero took a beefy defensive/tank ability set (although could DPS) at the cost of range (not that any tank's ranged attacks were worth worrying about except the Armsman RR5 oh noes!), Blademasters (even though most considered meat shields) specialized in pure face melting melee DPS, and Champions attuned themselves to magic but were still granted access to melee weapons for being on a lower hip point table and being easier to crowd control.

Thus a system similar to this could be used. You pick your class, Guardian/Naturalist/Stalker/Magician, then you are given a large choice of paths to follow. The paths you use define what kind of specific class your character becomes. So if a player chooses guardian they would most likely have access to any and all physical attack paths. This isn't to say they wouldn't have the ability to attuned themselves to magic in some way although it would be bad design if they were as powerful as a specialized Magician due to the amount of armor they might be wearing.

Thus let's say the player chooses Guardian but wants to have the ability to use magic also. Naturally as a Guardian they are going have physical damage weapons equipped but because of their magical attunement they gain access to a path which offers abilities similar to that of the Champion Class in Daoc. The ability to do some magical direct damage along with debuffing targets or buffing themselves becomes paired with the ability to use a sword/shield or even a two handed weapon. Players aren't going to all go the same path thus you might have dual wielding Guardians who debuff their targets to make killing easier. Some players hate magic and would focus solely on stabbing the target's face. It works just as well for the other base classes. If there is CC or Speed paths make them available to at least 2 paths on different base classes. So groups aren't forced to have at least one X and one Y to be competitive. Maybe you want a Naturalist attuned to Nature magic which grants healing and buffs. Perhaps a Magician attuned to Nature magic which can summon FoF shrooms and also give the caster Lifetaps (cough cough!). Stalkers would be the same. Stealth path or trickery for wall climbing, safe fall, and such paired with a choice of Bows/Xbows/Throwing or stab you in the face or back daggers/swords/maces/axes/etc. You could even offer a way for stalkers who don't want to focus on stealth alternative paths such as music maybe and create a bard class.

4 base classes paired with a system such as this would allow for players to basically create their own class. I'm sure there would be specific paths which would be more powerful than others but that falls on the Devs to balance correctly. MJ stated choice is going to matter thus good design would want to restrict certain combinations of Paths. Similar to how mages worked in Baldur's Gate. If you chose to specialize in Evocation spells you lost the ability to cast Enchantment spells. Classes aren't going to be mirrored but will abilities like they were in Daoc? IMO figure out the abilities you want then assign them to paths which belong to classes. Players will figure out the rest.

 

 

Camelot had 10 or 11 classes per realm on start, don't confuse the base classes with actual classes. They got rid of them as they were pointless.

You are right the base classes in Daoc weren't important and thus were done away with. I'm not confusing them with the actual classes merely stating you remained a guardian, even though your class name changed, when you chose to become a champion but because of this choice you gained the ability to use magic and lost the abilitiy to use spears and DW. You also were put onto a different HP and CC immunity table. There's no reason CU couldn't launch like this from what MJ has said in the foundation principles. Have 4 base combat classes and 1 crafter class. Players who pick a combat class then choose what set of skills they want to use. Some skills would be general guardian skills with others would restrict access to others so you don't end up with over powered combinations. It's a give and take system which takes 4 base classes and allows for choice to matter (which MJ also talked about in a foundation principle). This allows you to design basic base classes and put more focus on the abilities which each specialization path within that base class has access to. This is what made the classes different in Daoc. A pally had a bunch of chants (endo, helath, power regens, armor buff, etc.) making him a more defesne class while a champion's ability set was way more offensive with a self buff, DD, debuffs, and a snare.

 

I wasn't suggesting every realm start with the same base classes. You would end up having different base classes like you did in Daoc. They would be different due to a specific sets of abilities they had access too (2h in alb, LW/Spear in Hib, ability to use 1h and 2h weapon type by specing a path in mid) paired with perhaps some general ones (named differently for each realm but with less variation like mending/nuture/rejuvenation).  Maybe the TDD's guardian magic path was all about debuffs with some light damage while the Viking's guardian magic path showcased the ability to buff yourself and your ally's. This makes the classes unmirrored by what abilities they have access to which is how it was in Daoc. Champions, Valewalkers, Skalds, Thanes, Reavers, and Pallys were all branches of the tank class that chose magic attunement as a specific set of skills but even in that choice there was vast difference in the abilities choosing this magic attunement granted them. This lead to different playstyle of classes as illustrated by the Pally/Champion example above.

"Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth."

  naezgul

Novice Member

Joined: 3/15/13
Posts: 389

 
OP  3/28/13 12:21:31 PM#62
Originally posted by Ncrediblebulk
Originally posted by naezgul
Originally posted by Ncrediblebulk
4 or 5 classes could work given the right system was implemented. From what I've read you will gain skill by doing things (I.E. swinging a sword or casting spells). Thus you could have 4 base classes (+1 crafter class) and allow the player to choose what they want to do within that class making the abilities and methods of attack define what exactly class the player becomes.

If you think of Daoc's system at launch you have 4 base classes. I was a Hib thus I'll use their classes for example. You had Guardian, Naturalist, Stalker, and Magician. Thus when a player chose Guardian they were limited to specific item set  to use until they chose their path of specialization. A hero took a beefy defensive/tank ability set (although could DPS) at the cost of range (not that any tank's ranged attacks were worth worrying about except the Armsman RR5 oh noes!), Blademasters (even though most considered meat shields) specialized in pure face melting melee DPS, and Champions attuned themselves to magic but were still granted access to melee weapons for being on a lower hip point table and being easier to crowd control.

Thus a system similar to this could be used. You pick your class, Guardian/Naturalist/Stalker/Magician, then you are given a large choice of paths to follow. The paths you use define what kind of specific class your character becomes. So if a player chooses guardian they would most likely have access to any and all physical attack paths. This isn't to say they wouldn't have the ability to attuned themselves to magic in some way although it would be bad design if they were as powerful as a specialized Magician due to the amount of armor they might be wearing.

Thus let's say the player chooses Guardian but wants to have the ability to use magic also. Naturally as a Guardian they are going have physical damage weapons equipped but because of their magical attunement they gain access to a path which offers abilities similar to that of the Champion Class in Daoc. The ability to do some magical direct damage along with debuffing targets or buffing themselves becomes paired with the ability to use a sword/shield or even a two handed weapon. Players aren't going to all go the same path thus you might have dual wielding Guardians who debuff their targets to make killing easier. Some players hate magic and would focus solely on stabbing the target's face. It works just as well for the other base classes. If there is CC or Speed paths make them available to at least 2 paths on different base classes. So groups aren't forced to have at least one X and one Y to be competitive. Maybe you want a Naturalist attuned to Nature magic which grants healing and buffs. Perhaps a Magician attuned to Nature magic which can summon FoF shrooms and also give the caster Lifetaps (cough cough!). Stalkers would be the same. Stealth path or trickery for wall climbing, safe fall, and such paired with a choice of Bows/Xbows/Throwing or stab you in the face or back daggers/swords/maces/axes/etc. You could even offer a way for stalkers who don't want to focus on stealth alternative paths such as music maybe and create a bard class.

4 base classes paired with a system such as this would allow for players to basically create their own class. I'm sure there would be specific paths which would be more powerful than others but that falls on the Devs to balance correctly. MJ stated choice is going to matter thus good design would want to restrict certain combinations of Paths. Similar to how mages worked in Baldur's Gate. If you chose to specialize in Evocation spells you lost the ability to cast Enchantment spells. Classes aren't going to be mirrored but will abilities like they were in Daoc? IMO figure out the abilities you want then assign them to paths which belong to classes. Players will figure out the rest.

 

 

Camelot had 10 or 11 classes per realm on start, don't confuse the base classes with actual classes. They got rid of them as they were pointless.

You are right the base classes in Daoc weren't important and thus were done away with. I'm not confusing them with the actual classes merely stating you remained a guardian, even though your class name changed, when you chose to become a champion but because of this choice you gained the ability to use magic and lost the abilitiy to use spears and DW. You also were put onto a different HP and CC immunity table. There's no reason CU couldn't launch like this from what MJ has said in the foundation principles. Have 4 base combat classes and 1 crafter class. Players who pick a combat class then choose what set of skills they want to use. Some skills would be general guardian skills with others would restrict access to others so you don't end up with over powered combinations. It's a give and take system which takes 4 base classes and allows for choice to matter (which MJ also talked about in a foundation principle). This allows you to design basic base classes and put more focus on the abilities which each specialization path within that base class has access to. This is what made the classes different in Daoc. A pally had a bunch of chants (endo, helath, power regens, armor buff, etc.) making him a more defesne class while a champion's ability set was way more offensive with a self buff, DD, debuffs, and a snare.

 

I wasn't suggesting every realm start with the same base classes. You would end up having different base classes like you did in Daoc. They would be different due to a specific sets of abilities they had access too (2h in alb, LW/Spear in Hib, ability to use 1h and 2h weapon type by specing a path in mid) paired with perhaps some general ones (named differently for each realm but with less variation like mending/nuture/rejuvenation).  Maybe the TDD's guardian magic path was all about debuffs with some light damage while the Viking's guardian magic path showcased the ability to buff yourself and your ally's. This makes the classes unmirrored by what abilities they have access to which is how it was in Daoc. Champions, Valewalkers, Skalds, Thanes, Reavers, and Pallys were all branches of the tank class that chose magic attunement as a specific set of skills but even in that choice there was vast difference in the abilities choosing this magic attunement granted them. This lead to different playstyle of classes as illustrated by the Pally/Champion example above.

The base classes are pointless. You knew what you were going to create on startup. It's just time wasted coding that isn't needed.

the base class was used for what? Ten or fifteen minutes of play? Before  you go on to your actual class?

it would be a different story if you had a base class for twenty levels and that path actually influenced your final class choice

  Cernan

Novice Member

Joined: 10/13/06
Posts: 353

3/28/13 12:23:30 PM#63
Originally posted by naezgul
 

Ok by that token daoc had 100 classes on launch.

i understand what you are saying....I still believe 3 or 4, even 5 classes are not enough to bring back the DYNAMICS and feeling we had with daoc

in theory one class is enough with enough lines/branches to choose from. To me it's symantics

It's still 4 or 5 per realm,  not in total.  So they are having to come up with 12-15 unique classes to balance.  That is why they are trying to keep the numbers low per realm at start.  Some games launch with only 5 classes total these days.  You are still getting 12-15 total classes, it's just split between factions.  Roll a different server and choose another realm for variety.

A Scout, Ranger, and Hunter have entirely different mechanics.  Not that they will have those classes, just giving a DAoC example.  It's still  just one Archer class.  However, realm flavor gives each class different specializtion paths to pick from.  Only the hunter can tame pets, only the ranger can dual wield, and only the scout can stun for 9 seconds with his shield.  That may seem like 1 class, but in balance terms they 3 to deal with in this scenario.  Same with the bolt casters.  Only runemasters had  group bladeturn.  Only wizards could cast 3 bolts.

  Ncrediblebulk

Novice Member

Joined: 1/09/08
Posts: 137

"Bulk Smash, Baby! Bulk Smash!"

3/28/13 12:24:33 PM#64
Originally posted by naezgul
Originally posted by Cernan
Originally posted by naezgul
Multiple paths?   A class was a class. They started with 30+ classes.  Don't confuse weapon/spell lines with classes?

 

Who said I was confusing the two?  You said 4/5 classes wouldn't cut it.  I'm saying 4/5 classes doesn't mean 4/5 styles of play.  One class can have multiple styles of play depending on spec paths available.  Guess you didn't understand the point of my post.  I tried to give examples of how ONE class can be played in entirely different ways.  So just because you have one class, doesn't mean it's only one style of play.  Someone else previously asked if tanks could be viable DPS.  2handed Heroes in Hibernia were viable dps, especially on Mordred with polearms.  I gave specific examples.

 

Also lets look at your scenario you just gave with 30+ classes at launch.  So you are considering  each realm's class as individuals.  If you are going to do that then you can't say 4/5 classes won't cut it.  You are contradicting yourself.  Gotta multiply that number by 3.  I'm just using your own logic. Then we have 12-15 classes for CU, not 4/5.  

Ok by that token daoc had 100 classes on launch.

i understand what you are saying....I still believe 3 or 4, even 5 classes are not enough to bring back the DYNAMICS and feeling we had with daoc

in theory one class is enough with enough lines/branches to choose from. To me it's symantics

I think it is merely being stated there were 4 basic classes and based on the set of abilities you chose to specialize in you were granted different playstyles.. Based on what set of abilities you chose to have access to your playstyles were often narrowed down to 3 or sometimes 2 depending on the class. To me it seems he realizes there were a bunch of classes at launch all with different names, however they still were grouped into 4 base classes. The sets of abilites is what gave them the different playstyles and what set them apart from not only other classes within your realm but across the other two. A Wizard and a Sorc were both Magician base class at the base of the design, just the set of abilities and playstyles each specific class had was different. CU can launch with 4 base combat classes (Guardian, Naturalist, Magician, Stalker) for each realm named differently and end up actually having 12-15 classes per realm based on what set of abilities the player has access to depending on what realm and base class they chose.

 

Edit: To me it seems you are merely arguing the naming of 4 base classes isnt' enough. It's basically the same system as Daoc with only removing the fact that when you chose Sorc abilities as a Magician your class named changed to Sorc, even though at the base of the design you were merely a Magician who has chosen Sorc abilities.

"Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth."

  naezgul

Novice Member

Joined: 3/15/13
Posts: 389

 
OP  3/28/13 12:33:29 PM#65
Originally posted by Ncrediblebulk
Originally posted by naezgul
Originally posted by Cernan
Originally posted by naezgul
Multiple paths?   A class was a class. They started with 30+ classes.  Don't confuse weapon/spell lines with classes?

 

Who said I was confusing the two?  You said 4/5 classes wouldn't cut it.  I'm saying 4/5 classes doesn't mean 4/5 styles of play.  One class can have multiple styles of play depending on spec paths available.  Guess you didn't understand the point of my post.  I tried to give examples of how ONE class can be played in entirely different ways.  So just because you have one class, doesn't mean it's only one style of play.  Someone else previously asked if tanks could be viable DPS.  2handed Heroes in Hibernia were viable dps, especially on Mordred with polearms.  I gave specific examples.

 

Also lets look at your scenario you just gave with 30+ classes at launch.  So you are considering  each realm's class as individuals.  If you are going to do that then you can't say 4/5 classes won't cut it.  You are contradicting yourself.  Gotta multiply that number by 3.  I'm just using your own logic. Then we have 12-15 classes for CU, not 4/5.  

Ok by that token daoc had 100 classes on launch.

i understand what you are saying....I still believe 3 or 4, even 5 classes are not enough to bring back the DYNAMICS and feeling we had with daoc

in theory one class is enough with enough lines/branches to choose from. To me it's symantics

I think it is merely being stated there were 4 basic classes and based on the set of abilities you chose to specialize in you were granted different playstyles.. Based on what set of abilities you chose to have access to your playstyles were often narrowed down to 3 or sometimes 2 depending on the class. To me it seems he realizes there were a bunch of classes at launch all with different names, however they still were grouped into 4 base classes. The sets of abilites is what gave them the different playstyles and what set them apart from not only other classes within your realm but across the other two. A Wizard and a Sorc were both Magician base class at the base of the design, just the set of abilities and playstyles each specific class had was different. CU can launch with 4 base combat classes (Guardian, Naturalist, Magician, Stalker) for each realm named differently and end up actually having 12-15 classes per realm based on what set of abilities the player has access to depending on what realm and base class they chose.

 

Edit: To me it seems you are merely arguing the naming of 4 base classes isnt' enough. It's basically the same system as Daoc with only removing the fact that when you chose Sorc abilities as a Magician your class named changed to Sorc, even though at the base of the design you were merely a Magician who has chosen Sorc abilities.

A wizard and a sorcerer were COMPLETELY Different  

you cannot even come close to saying they filled the same niche, or playstyle

my point is 4 or 5 classes will not give the same DYNAMICS OR SYNERGY working together than you can have with the plethora of designs available with what daoc has

Q: would you rather have two wizards running together or a wizard and a sorcerer?

 

  Ncrediblebulk

Novice Member

Joined: 1/09/08
Posts: 137

"Bulk Smash, Baby! Bulk Smash!"

3/28/13 12:59:38 PM#66
Originally posted by naezgul
Originally posted by Ncrediblebulk
Originally posted by naezgul
Originally posted by Cernan
Originally posted by naezgul
Multiple paths?   A class was a class. They started with 30+ classes.  Don't confuse weapon/spell lines with classes?

 

Who said I was confusing the two?  You said 4/5 classes wouldn't cut it.  I'm saying 4/5 classes doesn't mean 4/5 styles of play.  One class can have multiple styles of play depending on spec paths available.  Guess you didn't understand the point of my post.  I tried to give examples of how ONE class can be played in entirely different ways.  So just because you have one class, doesn't mean it's only one style of play.  Someone else previously asked if tanks could be viable DPS.  2handed Heroes in Hibernia were viable dps, especially on Mordred with polearms.  I gave specific examples.

 

Also lets look at your scenario you just gave with 30+ classes at launch.  So you are considering  each realm's class as individuals.  If you are going to do that then you can't say 4/5 classes won't cut it.  You are contradicting yourself.  Gotta multiply that number by 3.  I'm just using your own logic. Then we have 12-15 classes for CU, not 4/5.  

Ok by that token daoc had 100 classes on launch.

i understand what you are saying....I still believe 3 or 4, even 5 classes are not enough to bring back the DYNAMICS and feeling we had with daoc

in theory one class is enough with enough lines/branches to choose from. To me it's symantics

I think it is merely being stated there were 4 basic classes and based on the set of abilities you chose to specialize in you were granted different playstyles.. Based on what set of abilities you chose to have access to your playstyles were often narrowed down to 3 or sometimes 2 depending on the class. To me it seems he realizes there were a bunch of classes at launch all with different names, however they still were grouped into 4 base classes. The sets of abilites is what gave them the different playstyles and what set them apart from not only other classes within your realm but across the other two. A Wizard and a Sorc were both Magician base class at the base of the design, just the set of abilities and playstyles each specific class had was different. CU can launch with 4 base combat classes (Guardian, Naturalist, Magician, Stalker) for each realm named differently and end up actually having 12-15 classes per realm based on what set of abilities the player has access to depending on what realm and base class they chose.

 

Edit: To me it seems you are merely arguing the naming of 4 base classes isnt' enough. It's basically the same system as Daoc with only removing the fact that when you chose Sorc abilities as a Magician your class named changed to Sorc, even though at the base of the design you were merely a Magician who has chosen Sorc abilities.

A wizard and a sorcerer were COMPLETELY Different  

you cannot even come close to saying they filled the same niche, or playstyle

my point is 4 or 5 classes will not give the same DYNAMICS OR SYNERGY working together than you can have with the plethora of designs available with what daoc has

Q: would you rather have two wizards running together or a wizard and a sorcerer?

 

I said they were different. I was only comparing them on the same base level because they both wore cloth, had to stand still while casting, and had zero physical ability but focused on magic. This made them both mages which is a general base class. Choosing the Sorc class or Wizard class wasn't what made the classes different it was the vastly different ability sets (Mez/LT/etc. for the sorc and Pbaoe/DDsnare/DD for the wizard) the devs assigned to them. These differenet grouping of abilities across all three realms is what made the classes unmirrored. You can still have 4 base classes at launch with generic names and not worry about coming up with sub class names as long as you differentiate what ability sets each base class has access to. Basically you stay your base class but still choose what specific group of abilities you want access to thus giving a deep class system like Daoc's without specific sub class names tied to the group of abilities you chose. Thus negating your argument that having only 4 or 5 classes wouldn't offer the chance for Dynamics or Synergy if the 4 or 5 classes all have abilities which are grouped together differently but spread across the entire realm class wise so there remains some balance.

 

As far as a Wiz/Sorc or Wiz/Wiz: What are we doing? 2 man roaming team? Wiz/Sorc would be easier with speed and mez but Wiz/Wiz wouldn't be horrible because of DD/snare.

"Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth."

  naezgul

Novice Member

Joined: 3/15/13
Posts: 389

 
OP  3/28/13 1:09:06 PM#67
Originally posted by Ncrediblebulk
Originally posted by naezgul
Originally posted by Ncrediblebulk
Originally posted by naezgul
Originally posted by Cernan
Originally posted by naezgul
Multiple paths?   A class was a class. They started with 30+ classes.  Don't confuse weapon/spell lines with classes?

 

Who said I was confusing the two?  You said 4/5 classes wouldn't cut it.  I'm saying 4/5 classes doesn't mean 4/5 styles of play.  One class can have multiple styles of play depending on spec paths available.  Guess you didn't understand the point of my post.  I tried to give examples of how ONE class can be played in entirely different ways.  So just because you have one class, doesn't mean it's only one style of play.  Someone else previously asked if tanks could be viable DPS.  2handed Heroes in Hibernia were viable dps, especially on Mordred with polearms.  I gave specific examples.

 

Also lets look at your scenario you just gave with 30+ classes at launch.  So you are considering  each realm's class as individuals.  If you are going to do that then you can't say 4/5 classes won't cut it.  You are contradicting yourself.  Gotta multiply that number by 3.  I'm just using your own logic. Then we have 12-15 classes for CU, not 4/5.  

Ok by that token daoc had 100 classes on launch.

i understand what you are saying....I still believe 3 or 4, even 5 classes are not enough to bring back the DYNAMICS and feeling we had with daoc

in theory one class is enough with enough lines/branches to choose from. To me it's symantics

I think it is merely being stated there were 4 basic classes and based on the set of abilities you chose to specialize in you were granted different playstyles.. Based on what set of abilities you chose to have access to your playstyles were often narrowed down to 3 or sometimes 2 depending on the class. To me it seems he realizes there were a bunch of classes at launch all with different names, however they still were grouped into 4 base classes. The sets of abilites is what gave them the different playstyles and what set them apart from not only other classes within your realm but across the other two. A Wizard and a Sorc were both Magician base class at the base of the design, just the set of abilities and playstyles each specific class had was different. CU can launch with 4 base combat classes (Guardian, Naturalist, Magician, Stalker) for each realm named differently and end up actually having 12-15 classes per realm based on what set of abilities the player has access to depending on what realm and base class they chose.

 

Edit: To me it seems you are merely arguing the naming of 4 base classes isnt' enough. It's basically the same system as Daoc with only removing the fact that when you chose Sorc abilities as a Magician your class named changed to Sorc, even though at the base of the design you were merely a Magician who has chosen Sorc abilities.

A wizard and a sorcerer were COMPLETELY Different  

you cannot even come close to saying they filled the same niche, or playstyle

my point is 4 or 5 classes will not give the same DYNAMICS OR SYNERGY working together than you can have with the plethora of designs available with what daoc has

Q: would you rather have two wizards running together or a wizard and a sorcerer?

 

I said they were different. I was only comparing them on the same base level because they both wore cloth, had to stand still while casting, and had zero physical ability but focused on magic. This made them both mages which is a general base class. Choosing the Sorc class or Wizard class wasn't what made the classes different it was the vastly different ability sets (Mez/LT/etc. for the sorc and Pbaoe/DDsnare/DD for the wizard) the devs assigned to them. These differenet grouping of abilities across all three realms is what made the classes unmirrored. You can still have 4 base classes at launch with generic names and not worry about coming up with sub class names as long as you differentiate what ability sets each base class has access to. Basically you stay your base class but still choose what specific group of abilities you want access to thus giving a deep class system like Daoc's without specific sub class names tied to the group of abilities you chose. Thus negating your argument that having only 4 or 5 classes wouldn't offer the chance for Dynamics or Synergy if the 4 or 5 classes all have abilities which are grouped together differently but spread across the entire realm class wise so there remains some balance.

 

As far as a Wiz/Sorc or Wiz/Wiz: What are we doing? 2 man roaming team? Wiz/Sorc would be easier with speed and mez but Wiz/Wiz wouldn't be horrible because of DD/snare.

Let me get this straight, you actually think MJ is talking about 4 or 5 base classes that could be "specced" to be the equivalent of 12 or 15 daoc type classes?

because thats not what I took it for at all, hence my worries that their will not be enough choices for good play......or worse the classes are all so jackofalltrades that we have the garbage we see in GW2.

  Ncrediblebulk

Novice Member

Joined: 1/09/08
Posts: 137

"Bulk Smash, Baby! Bulk Smash!"

3/28/13 6:45:15 PM#68
Originally posted by naezgul
Originally posted by Ncrediblebulk
Originally posted by naezgul
Originally posted by Ncrediblebulk
Originally posted by naezgul
Originally posted by Cernan
Originally posted by naezgul

Let me get this straight, you actually think MJ is talking about 4 or 5 base classes that could be "specced" to be the equivalent of 12 or 15 daoc type classes?

because thats not what I took it for at all, hence my worries that their will not be enough choices for good play......or worse the classes are all so jackofalltrades that we have the garbage we see in GW2.

I have no idea what he is thinking because we have so little information thus far. I am merely trying to illustrate you can launch with 4 base combat classes per realm all with access to their own different set of abilities to create diversity between the realm base classes. Figure out the larger group of all abilities you want to spread across all the classes together (I.E. every realm needs access to X endo regens, X mezzes, X  etc.) and create different groupings of those abilities that syngerize with each other based on what base class they will be applied to.

We know from Foundation Principle #4 "we also want to give the player a lot of freedom to choose skills, armor, etc. for their character without worrying about a never-ending list of absolute restrictions regarding who can wear what armor, use what weapon, etc." This makes me think of a Skyrim like system where you spend points into what you want and basically make your own class. This may be the system they use but what I've proposed is some what of a middle ground between Skyrim and Daoc.

You pick a base class. Then pick your what path/spec you want to focus on granting you a group of abilities to use based on how much you invent in that path/spec just like in Daoc. It's Daoc because you have paths/specs to place points into granting you your abilities but the Skyrim part comes in with allowing for a more general combination of abilities. Using TDD as my realm (i'll bring it the other realm equivalents later in the post):

I choose to be a guardian (or what ever name they choose) base class. This class is meant to use mostly melee during battle. Thus when I choose guardian paths/spec healing or deep ranged damage casting become unavailable because we wouldn't want someone in plate standing and tossing fireballs doing top DPS (or would we?). Thus I'm presented with possible path/spec choices. Lets say I have the choice of a main physical attack method and then a secondary support path/spec. So using Daoc as a reference I would be able to pick my preferred attack weapon (Blades, Blunt, Piercing, Spear, Large Weapons, Dual Wielding, and Shield). I have 2 hands so I feel it goes without saying if I were to pick just a 1 handed weapon I'd pair it with another 1 handed weapon or a shield. I pick Large weapons so I can lead the DPS train.

Now that I have my main form of attack I can choose my secondary path/spec. Maybe another preferred weapon? Maybe because I'm TDD I can attune myself to magic and pick from a few different magic paths? Maybe I can excel in physical expertise and gain abilities like Daoc's Charge or Stoicism? Let's say my choices for secondary paths/specs are limited to just a secondary attack method and there's actually a third path/spec choice which deals with magic and physical prowess. I choose Dual wielding Blades as my secondary attack method. I want to always be able to melt faces using what ever I can find.

So finally I get to my third path/spec choice. Maybe my choices are Nature magic, Dark Magic, Physical Feats, and Light magic. Nature magic may be designed around buffing one's allys along with themselves via chants while dark magic might be scattered with DDs and debuffs. Physical feats would cover those who have little interest in magic and want to excel at battle giving them CC reduction, Charge, Climb walls, etc. Light magic can be similar to a Warden perhaps. Light heals and buffs. I want to return to the greatness that was the Champion class so I pick Dark Magic.

Now from these three paths I would be granted abilities which relate to the chosen paths. Large weapons my have physical attacks which stun and stagger targets while DW might be more focused on keeping the target bleeding to maximize DPS. Dark Magic abilities would be focused towards debuffing and damaging my target. I remain a guardian but have basically created my own custon class based on the paths/specs I chose. Not everyone is going to make the same choice and if designed right (they are big on Rock Paper Scissors) you could have it on a path/spec level also. Maybe DW halves the chance to block with a shield while the shield blocks Large weapons effectively but DW can't defend themselves as well against Large weapons because of the weight. Thus you have DW being more effective against shield, shield being more effective against Large Weapons, and Large Weapons being more effective against DW. This doesn't even cover armor preferences and other systems we often overlook but I'm trying to keep it simple so it's understandable.

The other realms equivalent base classes would work the same way just have different paths/specs which would offer totally different ability sets and playstyles. So maybe a Aurthrian fighter can choose from Two handed weapons, Swords, Maces, Hatches, etc. for physical but have different options for magic attunement. Maybe Fire, Cold, Air magic along with a physical feat path named differently with a different ability set. They would choose 3 or what ever number the Devs decide The same system for a Viking viking base class.

You can even name the physical attack paths the same you just have to have the actually attack abilities act differently. Best example of this is the style differences in the lines of a Warrior and Thane. They both have access to Sword/Hammer/Axe ability paths but then Thanes abilities and styles are different because some have DDs or debuffs attached to them.

The main difference between this system is in place of being a base class then choosing a more specific class with the paths/specs already grouped you discard the choice of a specialized class and just choose the paths/specs yourself. This allows for their to be a deep system where players make choices to differ their classes but you end up only having to have 4 base classes. You develop a set of abilities you want to have in the game. Then group them differently making sure every realm has access to every ability. The abilities just come in different paths much like main CC in Daoc did (Sorc/Alb, Healer/Mid, Bard/Hib). When you start granting realms abilities the other one or two don't have you can get major balance issues. However it allows for a set amount of path/spec pairings which basically create specialized classes without having to actually create the specialized classes.

I can see how this would be GW 2 like but I think the biggest difference is going to be the amount of abilities offered. GW 2 classes to me seemed watered down because you only had 5 weapon attacks (10 if you switched weapons) paired with 5 support skills. I like having a plethora of abilities at my disposal and not a finite amount especially when it's that small.

"Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth."

  redcapp

Novice Member

Joined: 5/13/11
Posts: 733

3/28/13 6:47:57 PM#69
4 or 5 classes = not playing
  binskki

Novice Member

Joined: 3/23/13
Posts: 154

"I just die so fast it's hard to position myself. :)"

3/28/13 6:50:10 PM#70

I believe that all MJ has said so far is that :

1. there will be a fairly small number of classes on release, that he hopes will be added to if the game continues

2. he believes good balance to be a key component of the game

3. he wants classes to be different in each realm; he feels that class mirroring across realms makes for a much less interesting game.

However, I have been reading so many things on so many threads I would have to go back through the Founding Principles and some of the interviews I have bookmarked to remember where the heck I heard what.  Please correct me if I am wrong, someone. :)

  bcbully

Elite Member

Joined: 3/03/12
Posts: 7329

3/28/13 6:51:10 PM#71

When I eat chocolate chip pie it just doesn't feel like chocolate chip cookies. The texture, the consistency, it's just not the same and this is disappointing.

  Tierless

Novice Member

Joined: 7/01/08
Posts: 2114

joie de vivre

3/28/13 7:26:20 PM#72

We all know mj loves lots of classes, we all know he loves alting, we all know his other games had many classes, and we all know cu can always add more, soooooooo chill.

mmorpg.com/blogs/Xobdnas

  skyexile

Novice Member

Joined: 8/14/07
Posts: 701

3/28/13 7:34:12 PM#73

Given that there could be a great range of ways to spec and gear them, i dont think having only 5 is a problem.

SKYeXile
TRF - GM - GW2, PS2, WAR, AION, Rift, WoW, WOT....etc...
Future Crew - High Council. Planetside 1 & 2.

  Ujirik

Novice Member

Joined: 3/27/07
Posts: 457

3/28/13 7:39:18 PM#74
What's bad about 4 or 5 classes? That just sounds like the standard Warrior/Archer/Rogue/Mage/Cleric combination to me.

  Ncrediblebulk

Novice Member

Joined: 1/09/08
Posts: 137

"Bulk Smash, Baby! Bulk Smash!"

3/28/13 7:43:30 PM#75
Originally posted by Ujirik
What's bad about 4 or 5 classes? That just sounds like the standard Warrior/Archer/Rogue/Mage/Cleric combination to me.

We know they won't be mirrored so it turns into 12-15 different classes given each realm has the same amount of classes to choose from and that number can increase even more based on the different ability sets each class has access to with the understanding the ability sets themselves won't be mirrored either.

"Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth."

  Niix_Ozek

Novice Member

Joined: 2/26/13
Posts: 404

3/28/13 11:40:22 PM#76
If they are going to make 4-5 that you can spec to 12-14
Why the hell not make the classes like daoc an make 12 classes?
People enjoy having a different class not just two warriors specced different ways
Look at most classes in daoc, even though you had three spec lines there was little difference between classes, usually just damage type ( for most part )

Ozek - DAOC
Niix - Other games that sucked

  fanglo

Novice Member

Joined: 5/26/04
Posts: 280

3/28/13 11:56:39 PM#77

You guys forgot about the crafting class(es).

 

I healed Mistwraith and all I got was this stupid tee-shirt!

  naezgul

Novice Member

Joined: 3/15/13
Posts: 389

 
OP  3/29/13 12:13:35 AM#78
Originally posted by Niix_Ozek
If they are going to make 4-5 that you can spec to 12-14
Why the hell not make the classes like daoc an make 12 classes?
People enjoy having a different class not just two warriors specced different ways
Look at most classes in daoc, even though you had three spec lines there was little difference between classes, usually just damage type ( for most part )

This!,

people give the argument that or five classes are fine, IF....NOW THIS IS A BIG IF, they actually have 3-5 sub classes per class.

I think people are justifying having so few classes with what they really want.....A DOZEN CLASSES!

If you believe this is Marks plan, what are the new classes he is going to add?

everything falls under caster, melee, healer, stealth, crafter

  RealLifeGobbo

Novice Member

Joined: 3/20/13
Posts: 218

3/29/13 12:25:15 AM#79


Originally posted by naezgul

Originally posted by Niix_Ozek If they are going to make 4-5 that you can spec to 12-14 Why the hell not make the classes like daoc an make 12 classes? People enjoy having a different class not just two warriors specced different ways Look at most classes in daoc, even though you had three spec lines there was little difference between classes, usually just damage type ( for most part )
This!,

people give the argument for or five classes ar fine, IF....NOW THIS IS A BIG IF, they actually have 3-5 sub classes per class.

I think people are justifying having so few lasses with what they really want.....A DOZEN CLASSES!

If you believe this is Marks plan, what are the new lasses he is going to add?

everything falls under castr, melee, healer, stealth, crafter


I agree with both of you. With DAoC, most of the spells and abilities were similar across the 3 realms, but a little different. e.g. Alb Clerics had Healing, Buffs, and Smites while Mid Healers had Healing, Buffs, and CCs. Not to mention as Nixx_Ozek pointed out, most of the other classes were same spec lines and I personally like having 2 different classes instead of being able to spec it 2 different ways like SW:TOR.

Aspiring Game Musician <<>> Inquiring ears, feel free to visit: http://www.youtube.com/user/vagarylabs

  Ncrediblebulk

Novice Member

Joined: 1/09/08
Posts: 137

"Bulk Smash, Baby! Bulk Smash!"

3/29/13 2:58:13 AM#80
Originally posted by Niix_Ozek
If they are going to make 4-5 that you can spec to 12-14
Why the hell not make the classes like daoc an make 12 classes?
People enjoy having a different class not just two warriors specced different ways
Look at most classes in daoc, even though you had three spec lines there was little difference between classes, usually just damage type ( for most part )

A better question to ask may be where did OP get the information of 4-5 classes from? It seems he/she lacks source and is merely bring it up for discussion which is what we have been doing. Conspiracy Keanu would say "What if this is a Mark Jacobs alt account, and he's really just trying to get our views on having only a few classes?"

 

Edit: most of the time the three spec lines ended up drastically changing the way you played the class. Healers being a good example. Clearics had Smith, Rejuv, Enchance. You'd be hard pressed to find a group looking for a healer as a Smite cleric. Yes you had some base abilties players of the same class had but because you chose to put points into the Smite path you blew people up with holy magic and didn't really focus on healing unless it was an emergency. Same for Druid and Healer. Druids who went Nurture sheared, Healers who went Pac CCed. Yes they had other things to do because of secondary specs but in most cases you did what your highest spec was. Maybe look at Mages like a Eldritch or Wizard. Elds could choose Mana which was PBaoe and Snare/DDs, Light which was debuffs and DDs, or Void which offered superior range via bolts, snare/dds, and gtaoes. Wizards weren't any different. Ice was roots, snare/dd, pbaoe, while Fire was high DD with a bolt, and finally earth was snare/dds, gtaoe, and bolts. Yes there were some crossovers within the class and even across the realms (Wizard and Eld both had DD, PBaoe, and Bolt paths) but in most cases you either chose range (bolts), high single target damage (DDs), or high group damage (pbaoe) but based on what other abilites you were granted in a spec line you had other options. I.E. a mana eld didn't always have to pbaoe, snare/dd and snare/aoe dd were useful especially when paired with disease.

Regardless of who is asking, I feel when you look at Foundation Principle #4 it is painted clearly enough to at least theorize. Now are these FPs just general guidelines for development? Maybe, and if so thank you Mark Jacobs for adding to my reference documents. If they are a foundation for what CU is to become it seems very clear to me the foreshadowing of what system is going to be developed.

Using quotes from FP #4 as reference:

"Further, while we want CU to be a class-based RPG, we also want to give the player a lot of freedom to choose skills, armor, etc. for their character without worrying about a never-ending list of absolute restrictions regarding who can wear what armor, use what weapon, etc."

This to me screams of having base classes that outline a general style of play (Melee, Heals, Sneak, Ranged) or set of abilities one might gain when choosing a specific class. The second further explains that choices such as armor and weapon use may be dictated by class choice. Although maybe not, maybe there will be unlimited choice when it comes to choices of armor and weapon sets. In the next quote we find:

"Now, what happens to the magic-user who wears too much metal (or the wrong kind), or spends too much time wielding that sword or “crossing the streams” is another matter entirely but the choice is yours.  While there are some restrictions, they will be few in number, as we want players to be able to have fun with the system.  This is one of the reasons why I am not calling CU a “Sandbox MMORPG” (IMO, a true sandbox MMORPG has almost no restrictions whatsoever) but rather an MMORPG with some strong sandbox elements"

To me this reinforces taking away minimal choices like armor and weapon sets while leaving the choice of picking which designed grouping (different per realm of course to unmirror the classes) of abilities you want to use. Now I can't negate it also sounds like you are going to be able to wear metal armor and pair it with magic, or have a magic user who also uses swords but that leads me to think they want to design a system where you can have hybrid classes or spec setups maybe with some trade off (I.E. magic perhaps backfiring like the Brightwizard/Sorc mechanic in Warhammer). He notes there will be some restrictions. Perhaps armor and weapon sets? An example of this would be if a player chose the Mage class they might be restricted to wearing cloth if they want to use the hardest hitting damage spells but they might on the other hand choose to have a caster that wears heavier armor and/or uses melee weapons (Please grant me another Valewalker Class MJ!!!) but because of increased survivability looses some potency of damage.

This FP is the only thing I've found thus far in my research of the game that explains or even sheds some light on what may become the class system. Obviously with more information we will get a better picture. Regardless you raise valid points, but as a Kickstarter funded project perhaps they don't apply because of how small the scope of the game may have to be based on the amount of money they receive.

"Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth."

6 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 » Search