| 56 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Latronus
Elite Member
Joined: 1/10/08
PC is not political correctness, it means Political Cowardice! |
2/11/13 10:43:51 PM#41
Originally posted by SuperNick So let me get this right. EQ had no problem doing this back in 1999 or so, but newer games can't seem to make mob animations good enough so that the players can learn and figure out when to to the hell otta the way? So, did the devs forget how to code and choreograph fights? Let's be honest, the circles are put there so that players no longer have to learn when to move. It makes easier and faster to complete dungeons and raids. Players are more concerned about the loot these days than they are about feel the satisfaction of figuring the fight out AND getting the loot. It's just a matter of time before the single button replaces all the skill bars. It'll simply say "I Win". |
|
2/11/13 11:02:56 PM#42
EQ didn't use animations, they used text. Replacing text, or an animation, with a red circle does not remove the requirement that the player has to learn to move (or associate that with some other function) - it just makes the stimulus larger. Stop signs mean your supposed to stop your car. And I do, probably 99.7% of the time. Sometimes I miss it - I'm distracted on the phone, or listening to the radio. Sometimes it takes the other guy honking his horn to keep me from wrecking. It happens... it's not good but it happens. The other guy can't hit my brake pedal, no matter how much he/she may like to - they can just increase the stimulus and hope I take the correct action. |
|
|
2/11/13 11:38:27 PM#43
Another way to look at it, and realize why so many guilds require tools like this (Boss Mods, etc): Let's say you have a raid of 25 people - the standard WoW raid nowadays. Let's say there's a boss tell - if someone misses the tell, the boss enrages and wipes the raid. Not a totally uncommon scenario. Sure, most of the times the punishment is less severe, and it takes several people failing, but to make the math easy (I'm hardly a math major), we'll say 1 failure = wipe. Most people can get this tell right 95% of the time. In fact, we'll assume that everyone gets this right 95% of the time. To calculate the odds of success, it's (P)^n, where P is the probability of a single occurance happening, and n is the number of occurances. So, our P is 0.95, our n is 25. 0.95^25 = 0.277 So we have a <28% chance of winning this raid... even though there's only a 1 in 20 chance of any one person screwing up. Once you take that out 25 times, odds are someone is going to screw up. And that means a wasted run for 25 people - one hour wasted, buffs and consumables wasted, and most importantly, morale wasted. Now let's say there's an addon, that puts a huge red circle on the ground. Just by installing and using it, it increases the chances of success. Now, each person has a 98% chance of succeeding against the boss tell. P = 0.98, n= 25, 0.98^25 = 0.603 Sure, these are arbitrary numbers, but I'd say they are within the realm of plausibility. So now, just by increasing the awareness of the raiders, we increased the odds of success to more than 60%. We didn't change the action they had to perform, we just increased the stimulus, and in doing so, more than doubled our chances of success. If you think "uber top guilds" don't use tools like this ... "uber top guilds" are the ones writing tools like this, and use of tools such as these give them the edge they have to get on top in the first place. |
|
|
2/12/13 12:28:58 AM#44
Well, telegraphing has been in video games as far back as I can remember. Mike Tyson's Punchout is a good example of an early game that was all about telegraphed boxers. I normally don't want it in my MMO... I guess it doesn't matter though with all those raid boss mods pretty much taking the risk right out of the games anyways. Enter a whole new realm of challenge and adventure. |
|
|
2/12/13 1:02:19 AM#45
Originally posted by Ridelynn Funny I have used the same math to come up with an entirely different conclusion. 25 people, Each with a 5% chance of failing the mechanic = 72% chance of raid wiping = bad mechanic. In fact nearly all mechanics are bad. Instead of playing the game we are reduced to min-maxing the mechanic. Not fun, not fun at all. We need to convince ourselves and then the developers that the "boss fight" and the "boss fight mechanics" are a stale dead end and move on to some other paradigm. |
|
|
2/12/13 1:13:19 AM#46
I can understand the occasional telegraph because not every game has deadly boss mods but seriously, what that new game showed in their video was EVERYthing was telegraphed, it's a tad boring that way.
|
|
|
2/12/13 1:54:19 AM#47
Originally posted by Sijjistoryus I've yet to see a MMO that requires more skill in PVE than *any* Nintendo game, ever. http://lyrics.iztok.org/verse/Lynyrd_Skynyrd/Simple_Man/80615 |
|
|
2/12/13 10:44:01 AM#48
Originally posted by Wraithone Yeah. Some of them think that MMOs are actually second lives, and achievements in a game means anything. Sad!
|
|
|
2/12/13 10:46:45 AM#49
I like this method simply becauses it reduces the need for Raiders and Raid Leaders from having to 'exit' the game to look up strategies on the web. -Blitz |
|
|
2/12/13 10:46:52 AM#50
Originally posted by aesperus Actually is quite easy. Have difficulty settings like D3. D3 is a very popular game and yet it has perma death. |
|
|
2/12/13 10:54:26 AM#51
This has been around ever since Vanilla WoW, hellllo Deadly Boss Mods? And this was probobly done before that but that's the oldest MMO I played. If your gonna introduce huge spikey damage then there needs to be telegraphing. |
|
|
2/12/13 11:47:43 AM#52
Originally posted by BlitzVF Can they just alt-tab out and run the game in window mode? Or better yet, have a tablet handy for looking up strategies. |
|
|
Don-Quixote
Apprentice Member
Joined: 3/30/12
If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes should fall like a house of cards. Checkmate. |
2/12/13 4:22:17 PM#53
Originally posted by Ridelynn What we learn might not change, but the meaning of it and the process of learning might be completely different. In the case of an enemy that telegraphs a non-red circle attack (stimulus A) I have to learn first what the action means, what the boss will do. i.e. the context of the stimulus A, in order for me to apply a counter: mechanism B (not stand on the fire). So, mechanism B is tied to that specific boss's stimulus A. A different boss might apply the exact same stimulus A (the same animation) but instead of creating an area of fire, the outcome could be totally different (e.g. an earthquake) and so mechanism B would not be the appropiate solution to counter it. Another boss could use stimulus F (a totally different animation) and the outcome could be “an area of fire” which then would lead the player to use Mechanism B again. In this case each stimulus is contextualized and so the player's process of learning and reaction is also contextualized in a specific encounter. In the case of a red circle, my defense mechanism B is not tied to a specific boss in a specific way, it does not tell me anything about the enviroment I am in. Stimulus A here is “a big red circle” and mechanism B is “move out of the red circle”. So I am basically not playing against THIS or THAT specific boss, I am playing a meta-game which just happens to coincide with THIS boss but that can be applied to ANY boss whatsoever. Stimulus A = get out of the red circle. You don't even have to know what will appear on the red circle, it doesn't matter cause it's not part of the meta-game. For me this is not "dumbing down" a game, it just make all the effort, money, imagination put to create a boss encounter pointless. Which sometimes leads me to ask myself: why do they spend millions creating this game when they could have basically just made a game where I controlled a pixel and the whole purpose of the game was to move said pixel out of red circles that randomly appear on the screen? I guess it comes down to the purpose that each player places on the game. Could we say that players whose purpose is “to beat the game” prefer red circles and players that “enjoy the journey” prefer not to have them? Maybe.
|
|
2/12/13 4:24:57 PM#54
Originally posted by Quizzical I am going to blame Magic the Gathering. Tap>INTERRUPT haha |
|
|
2/12/13 4:27:54 PM#55
Except... changing the stimulus is just a matter of eyecandy - to have a red circle, or a boss animation, or emote text - that's just a matter of presentation. An Addon that telegraphs an alarm siren and huge flashing alerts - again, just a matter of presentation. The game itself stays the same. If you are arguing about the mechanics that necessitate paying attention to the game, then it's a whole different ball of wax - your arguing that games should be written different, and probably such that they do not require reflexive action. If this is the crux of your case, the answer is simply "pick a different game" - because no matter what the tell may be, it won't change the underlaying basics of the game, which is that of responding to various situations appropriately and within some realtime constraint. There are times when I enjoy something that is strategic without the additional stress of timing: Chess, for example, where you can sit and plan your moves carefully. Turn-based strategy games, for a video game example. And there are times when I like a bit more chaos - something real time, visceral, and action-oriented. I admit I'm a bit tired of EQ and WoW - that doesn't make the mechanic bad, just not fun for me at the moment after playing it for years and years, but GW2 is fun for that, and Vindictus is a blast for action-oriented combat and animation-based tells (and yes, even a few red circles from time to time). |
|
|
Purutzil
Elite Member
Joined: 10/02/11
If you see no good or you see no bad in a game, chances are you are bias. |
2/12/13 4:32:30 PM#56
If you got the ability to telepathically read someones mind (or in this case read the script) then I can see maybe it not being needed but you NEED some clue what is going on. Can some of it be 'lessened' to be less visually showing? Possibly, but its hard to really balance stuff out as depending where the person is it can make it very difficult to see things and adjust.
Honestly though, I have no problem with things being telegraphed in detail, its more to me about how long the telegraphing lasts before the ability is actually used I feel should play more of a part. Being visible though very quick isn't a bad thing to me, giving you a chance to react using quick decision making based off where its going to hit and move very quickly in response. |