| 40 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
2/12/13 1:07:09 AM#21
Originally posted by craftseeker
Class roles and Role playing a character are both big parts of RPGs. Your class is one part of what makes you your alter ego. There are other things that you can pick which is your alignment, race, attitude, character, story and what have you. When you're a chaotic wizard in a group, you are a chaotic wizard. That's your role in your group and that's how you role play. Removing class-roles in games is another attempt to detract us from the Role Playing experience.
While you're right, the "Role Playing" part doens't necessary mean "your class role in a group" but that doesn't mean your class is not part of your character which you are role playing. Because it is.
|
|
|
2/12/13 1:09:33 AM#22
DOSbox for the win! i use it too hahaha! i play warcraft:orcs vs humans with it and Dune (Dune 2000) as well :3 There are people who play games and then there are gamers. |
|
|
2/12/13 1:14:33 AM#23
Originally posted by LauraFrost Notice you said "chaotic wizard" there, not "ranged dps". Yes your alignment, character class, deity and race are important parts of your "Role Playing", or should be. Being "ranged dps" is a result of that, and has nothing to do with the RP in MMORPG, however important you see it as part of your game play |
|
|
2/12/13 1:16:10 AM#24
Why can't more games have solo dungeons? why does everything have to have 5 mans? who actually expects to get together 4 of their friends to do anything IRL? really? do you invite four friends over just to watch tv or cut your grass or clean your toilet? because that's what we're led to believe about dungeons is that they are everyday occurances in the lives of the toons we play.
|
|
|
2/12/13 1:27:04 AM#25
FInal Fantasy XI is everything I could ever want in an RPG or MMO. It's challenging, has a great story, job system, and has varied locales. Also dungeons are not instanced, and most require puzzle solving to get through them.
It's an old game sure, but there's aso a reason why it has been so successful for so so long. |
|
|
corpusc
Elite Member
Joined: 7/25/03
CHATTANOOGAN contact me if you are seriously interested in |
2/12/13 2:52:53 AM#26
Originally posted by darkhalf357x
this is not a serious recommendation, because its an action/shooter MMO(ish), and not RPG. but......
Realm of the Mad God has the kind of graphics you are looking for. or even better...EIGHT BIT! 8) The End |
|
2/12/13 4:56:10 AM#27
Turn-based ugh terible gameplay ok thats said. I recconment Asheron's call 2 open world and open dungeons no instance crap some are very hard. No guidance no npcs with! above head and one of BEST CRAFTING SYTEMS in any mmo. Asheron's call 2 -11year old game but still good in 2013 gameplay and graphic wise.
|
|
|
Elsabolts
Advanced Member
Joined: 10/03/06
Life Liberty and the Pursuit of those that would threaten It |
2/12/13 5:08:48 AM#28
|
|
2/12/13 5:17:51 AM#29
Sounds like you are describing what DDO was like for me when I was really into it. I cannot get back into it now tho I tried to download it again. But when it was new to me it was great. I must have rebuilt every class a hundred times. Rogue was the most challenging. I left the game after they added the noisy airship. It ruined the feel of the city and was useless guild crap.
|
|
|
2/12/13 5:24:00 AM#30
if you want turn based mmorpg, try atlantica online, if singleplayer, try wizardry 7,8 if you didnt played those.
|
|
|
2/12/13 5:26:28 AM#31
http://store.steampowered.com/app/220700/ have at it hauss!
|
|
|
2/12/13 5:38:23 AM#32
what happen? they are transformed in to shooters with rpg skins only EVE is real MMO...but I am impressive with TSW |
|
|
2/12/13 5:45:08 AM#33
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
2/12/13 5:50:15 AM#34
Divinity original sin is out sometime this year from Larian studios..its turn based and looks great..not only that they are going to have a toolset with the game for player made content which is free to download when released that is http://www.youtube.com/LarianStudios hope this helps
|
|
|
2/12/13 6:17:11 AM#35
Originally posted by casual187 Don't you mean, "Have at it, Hoss"? As in, Hoss Cartwright from Bonanza, where the phrase originated from? |
|
|
darkhalf357x
Hard Core Member
Joined: 1/25/12
I'm only playing the role chosen for me. Who you supposed to be? |
Originally posted by SuperNick Not entirely true as I still (re)play these games and enjoy them just as much. I recently finished Dragon Quest VI for SNES and enjoyed it as much as I did when I first played it back in the 90s. I wish I had 'newer' features like a detailed map function, but outside of that it was FUN and still is. Yes some of them didnt translate well over time. Lufia comes to mind. Even for a kids game the dialogue made me lurch today but thought it was all the rage when I first played it. The point I'm making is some of those old school mechanics (light/challenging grinding) are STILL fun (to me) today and wish someone would make an MMO around it. I tend to break games down to their cores as if I dont like that I wont like the game. The aesthetics and other 'fluff' on top just changes the look. If I play an MMO today, none of them present a healthy challenge of finding an interesting dungeon, fighting diverse monsters, seeing how far you can go. The closest I have found to this was EQ. The further out in a zone I went the harder it was to kill the mobs. Until I returned to PoP, sold my loot and trained in more skills or bought more tomes for my beserker. Its pretty much exactly what I want. The issue is 'time decay' as I call it. The game is like 100 years old (joking). I'm saying why cant someone put the pretty skin of GW2 over a game mechanic such as EQ? Giving me the best of both worlds. All the themepark-esque MMOs have easy questing to the point I can outlevel the mobs rediculously within the first 10 levels. Nothing to me is worse than outleveling content you still want to do. It turns that ugly grey color which does nothing but remind me I will get no XP for doing what could have been a fun quest. Why cant they up the mobs HP or something? Nothing overly complicated. Another thing I noticed if when I played Final Fantasy I for iPhone/PSP/GBA/etc it had become INFINITELY easier to play then when I re-played it on PSX. For one thing they got rid of magic charges and added in phoenix down. Battles would happen lighting fast and there really was no way of dying without doing something seriously wrong. I cant see the fun in that nor the need to make the original content easier. I guess Im just a dying breed of gamer holding onto the dream of re-imagining what I think still IS fun. Understand others have different opinions, just wish we could have different (types) of games to accomodate. I want my version of GW2! :P |
|
darkhalf357x
Hard Core Member
Joined: 1/25/12
I'm only playing the role chosen for me. Who you supposed to be? |
Originally posted by Wighty Completely agree. At least back in the day we had diversity. You want an easy RPG you played Secret of the Stars or Final Fantasy Adventure. You wanted hardcore? You played Wizardry. Today we get easy only and it doesnt look like its going to change. Lost opporutnity in my eyes. Still looking out for an idie quickstarter. |
|
2/12/13 3:19:22 PM#38
They should resurrect the "Gold Box" series. You know, the games like Pool od Radiance, Champions of Krynn,... Just with updated graphics animations and sound.
Something like they did with Legend of Grimrock, a modern version of "old school" dungeon crawler game called Dungeon Master. Website: http://www.emrendil.com |
|
|
2/12/13 3:41:46 PM#39
Originally posted by Emrendil Yes, that would be cool. My favorite is Curse of the Azure bond (second one, the one after Pool of Radiance). And please don't make it into a MMO. Just make a good SP game, may be with co-op. Turn-base combat, SRPG set up. |
|
|
2/12/13 4:06:21 PM#40
Originally posted by nariusseldon Nah...that'd be too logical. |
|