Originally posted by CeTheGreat
Good start for us so far. Must be CRS helping us * rolls eyes*

 If the map start to roll west and Antwerp in threatened with being capped....."unexpected" maintenance will pop up again.

Originally posted by Rigamortis

Originally posted by CeTheGreat
Good start for us so far. Must be CRS helping us * rolls eyes*

 If the map start to roll west and Antwerp in threatened with being capped....."unexpected" maintenance will pop up again

Antwerp is far behind us. What's the next town on the blame list?

Originally posted by CeTheGreat

Originally posted by Rigamortis

Originally posted by CeTheGreat
Good start for us so far. Must be CRS helping us * rolls eyes*

 If the map start to roll west and Antwerp in threatened with being capped....."unexpected" maintenance will pop up again

Antwerp is far behind us. What's the next town on the blame list?

 

 

None I guees.. most of us unsubbed anyway.

Chris, whats good for "us" isn't good for us 

The Antwerp debacle caused many good players to unsub.

No use crying over spilled milk but it really was just another bad decision made by a company with a history of bad decisions.

I'm pro game before being pro Axis or Allied as we all should be right now.

Well, a lot of them  that unsubbed probably still love the game and it hurts them to leave.

They probably feel there is no way to let CRS know how angry/upset they are, but hit them in the wallet.

While it hurts them it also hurts us, meaning the playerbase.

Hopefully everyone who unsubbed over the incident comes back some day soon.

It's not like they can vent on the forums because the posts will be deleted and they were.

The forum moderation on the CRS forums is overdone which is evident by the lack of posts there and the numerous influx here.

Players should come here before unsubbing because they can vent and get their points across because they know these forums are being read by CRS daily w/o the heavy modding.

Originally posted by CeTheGreat
I get ya Pete , but most seem to be milking a dry cow. Are some of these guys that miserable where they just want to complain 24/7? I just don't get it, honestly

Aren't you on here on the pretense to support the game? All you do is trash the playerbase with a allies=good, axis=bad attitude. I remember you admitting that if an Antwerp situation happened to allies you'd be frustrated. Hypocrite much?

83 posts in 9 days, real casual poster (and you supposely post from your phone as well lol)...

Ce just asking, were you ever privy to some of the demands by the CRS staff toward the GHC?  I was and if you are in the actual know you will understand we followed what we were told but event after event has driven good players out of the game.   When players like Blood quit, the nicest fairest guy in the game, then CRS is making bad game decisions.  You coming on here defending CRS by saying everyone who disagrees is a whiner makes your point less effective. 

What about AHC?

This is a river that runs both ways - a lot of people here seem to feel the flow only affects them - well there wrong - it affects everyone and coming in here and trying to push the crap in one direction is in complete ignorance of the fact that they are making posts based upon years of "experience" of how diverse and the multitude of twists and turns that this game has experienced. All have ahd there effect, all eddy out into the lea's eventually.

In fact, to claim primacy or conspiracy here is the cloth that covers the table of "grudge".

So much complete and utter bs in this thread.

1) yeah a server reset happened when you were lowpop zerging twerp with your 220 Spawn delay. Why did you have such a delay? 4:1 anyone?

Boohoo unsub we didn't get it all our own way!!

2) The allies have recapped twerp 4 times in my memory. It hasn't been a massively important town in 5 years,

3) During 2008 and the summer where the allies smacked the axis so hard, so repeatedly we were told as HC "just because you can, do you thnk you should?" otherwise the axis would have won none. GHC could barely work out how to move a flag let alone put together a strategy. No one allied unsubbed, made of sterner stuff maybe?

4) Liege down to 1 AB and a server reset happened. Yes we were p'd after a 5 hour attack, we went back again and yep... no one unsubbed.

5) Every time any AHC gets p'd off enough, they go axis. Must be hard being led by such a bunch of whiney nerds.

6) bronco was banned not for being vocal. He was banned for repeatedly driving S76s in town upon town to fall off cliffs or drown. He was a grade A loser. There's your 'ban'.

I could go on but really, why bother? The axis with balls still play and fight. The ones wearing dresses left to whine on other forums, oh... like this one!

---

Originally posted by ianstein29
Ce just asking, were you ever privy to some of the demands by the CRS staff toward the GHC?  I was and if you are in the actual know you will understand we followed what we were told but event after event has driven good players out of the game.   When players like Blood quit, the nicest fairest guy in the game, then CRS is making bad game decisions.  You coming on here defending CRS by saying everyone who disagrees is a whiner makes your point less effective. 

---

Oh come on now, unless you're still subscribed to the game, or in the high command still there's no reason to keep everyone else out of the loop.

A few weeks in to the game I was on teamspeak with some windhund members, I can't remember who it was but they said that being in the high command was about as fun as a "virtual PTA meeting" so I always stayed clear.

Originally posted by david06

 

---

Originally posted by ianstein29
Ce just asking, were you ever privy to some of the demands by the CRS staff toward the GHC?  I was and if you are in the actual know you will understand we followed what we were told but event after event has driven good players out of the game.   When players like Blood quit, the nicest fairest guy in the game, then CRS is making bad game decisions.  You coming on here defending CRS by saying everyone who disagrees is a whiner makes your point less effective. 

---

 

Oh come on now, unless you're still subscribed to the game, or in the high command still there's no reason to keep everyone else out of the loop.

A few weeks in to the game I was on teamspeak with some windhund members, I can't remember who it was but they said that being in the high command was about as fun as a "virtual PTA meeting" so I always stayed clear.

HC is a tiring job in its current form and CRS want to further increase the responsibility that HC has which will only cause bad things.

a) Players will dislike a few players having even more power to dictate their gameplay

b) HC will be expected to do more than they already do (even though there isn't enough).

It's a downward spiral as if you make them do even more things then more players will leave HC meaning that those remaining will have to do even more so they will leave. In the end you'll have a few left. Likewise normally in HC the ones of less quality typically are pushed to the back with the more able ones doing things. If there is an exodus of both good and bad HC then you'll have more periods in game run by poor HC dictating to the remaining playerbase.

---

Originally posted by JanJansen

A big thank you to the owners of this forum...We are cratefull that we get a fair chance of telling our side of the story,somthing that is not possible on crs their forums which is ren like a south american bannana republic..

---

The good thing about a public forum related to this game is that it's much easier to keep in touch with players and the community.

It may sound a bit lame but right now I've found a group of ArmA2 players that get together once a week for a larger operation, about 50-60 guys usually. Sometimes we split in to teams and play against each other but most of the time we play a co-op scenario, like an air assault or something. It's a lot more fun than it sounds and great if you only have 1-3 hours to play on a weekend.

So while I was goofing off in the assembly area with these guys the other day I realized that I didn't really enjoy WW2online that much, and it was really the people that I was playing with that made it worthwhile. If/when the game goes belly up I'd like to figure out where everyone else migrates to and a place like this makes things much easier.

Of course if there's new content, some major rule changes or a bunch of old players are legitimately saying "hey, the game is awesome again" then this forum is great for communicating that kind of stuff as well, but unfortunately I don't think that is going to happen.

Originally posted by david06

 

---

Originally posted by JanJansen

 

A big thank you to the owners of this forum...We are cratefull that we get a fair chance of telling our side of the story,somthing that is not possible on crs their forums which is ren like a south american bannana republic..

---

 

The good thing about a public forum related to this game is that it's much easier to keep in touch with players and the community.

It may sound a bit lame but right now I've found a group of ArmA2 players that get together once a week for a larger operation, about 50-60 guys usually. Sometimes we split in to teams and play against each other but most of the time we play a co-op scenario, like an air assault or something. It's a lot more fun than it sounds and great if you only have 1-3 hours to play on a weekend.

So while I was goofing off in the assembly area with these guys the other day I realized that I didn't really enjoy WW2online that much, and it was really the people that I was playing with that made it worthwhile. If/when the game goes belly up I'd like to figure out where everyone else migrates to and a place like this makes things much easier.

Of course if there's new content, some major rule changes or a bunch of old players are legitimately saying "hey, the game is awesome again" then this forum is great for communicating that kind of stuff as well, but unfortunately I don't think that is going to happen.

 

I played ArmA2 with a bunch of guys from Tactical Gamer,  and I realized about the samething.   I honestly didnt like WWIIOfflines gameplay or mechanics, I loved the squadmembers.

It was much the same for Roma Victor, bad buggy, clunky game, but the community was what made the game great. 

---

Originally posted by mline
where'd JanJansen's thread go?

---

I'm not sure, I guess it was modded.

Originally posted by david06

 

---

Originally posted by mline
where'd JanJansen's thread go?

---

 

I'm not sure, I guess it was modded.

Must be some kind of cross board moderator cabal cruelly restricting our God given right to free speech